User talk:Jrm2007

Hello Jrm2007! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mr Stephen 08:11, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Please do not 'sign' articles, see WP:OWN. Regards, Mr Stephen 08:11, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Dalva Duarte

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dalva Duarte, by UnitedStatesian, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dalva Duarte is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dalva Duarte, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Dalva Duarte itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 06:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Visaria

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Visaria, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Fabrictramp (talk) 00:50, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Visaria

Visaria, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Visaria satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Visaria and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Visaria during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fabrictramp (talk) 22:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Green Felt Jungle

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Green Felt Jungle, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Novel with no assertion of notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 21:55, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Proposed deletion of Stefan E. Warschawski

The article Stefan E. Warschawski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Needs assertion of notability, sources, etc.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 05:55, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Towelie

Please do not use talk pages for general discussion of the topic, as you did with this edit to Talk:Towelie. Talk pages are for discussion related to improving the article, and not as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our [[WP:Reference desk|reference desk] and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 16:02, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your Question on the Talk Page for Virgil Sollozzo

I thought you asked an insightful question on this page, and I have answered it. I have had a keen interest in The Godfather, the novel, for many years now, and I am very knowledgeable concerning it. I have asked your question myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by HistoryBuff14 (talk • contribs) 20:32, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--In case you wouldn't know it, I answered your additional questions regarding The Godfather on my own talk page where you posed them.

By the way, perhaps you can help me with Wiki mechanics. How can I delete an entire section from my talk page, please? I know how to remove the verbiage within the section by editing it out, but not how to delete the entire section, including the heading. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.191.108.18 (talk) 19:02, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

XP "Internet Security" 2010

Please dont write comments in article space; if you have a question about an article, you should write it on the talk page of that article; anyone who's watchlisting the article is automatically going to be watchlisting the talk page as well and will see your comment. This particular article moves pretty slowly, and I dont think many people will be around to answer your question in any case, but there's no harm in asking. —Soap— 11:31, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As long as you can verify the info is true, you should feel free to add to the article. —Soap— 19:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Enrobing

A tag has been placed on Enrobing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Timneu22 · talk 15:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know, I have created the article enrober and redirected enrobing to it. Feel free to make improvements. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:13, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page deletion

Please do not delete threads from talk pages once other editors have replied. We do not normally delete other editors' comments without their permission. If you think a thread has been resolved or was posted in error, you can simply leave a final comment explaining that. Regards. SpinningSpark 21:58, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Age of Adaline

The article The Age of Adaline has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to be a project in pre-production.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stormbay (talk) 18:18, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Boy (book)

Greetings. Do you have any sources for this article? Regards, P. D. Cook Talk to me! 03:26, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ted Manson

The article Ted Manson has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. TexasAndroid (talk) 11:53, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Articles for deletion nomination of Red Wing (actress)

I have nominated Red Wing (actress), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Wing (actress). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. –Grondemar 16:59, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with stubs like that being created, infact the more the better! But this one had hardly any info at all (I'm suprised it wasn't speedily removed by the deletion monkeys on here). Maybe just a few extra bits to establish some essence of notabilty (eg Red Wing was an actress who appeared in 50 films). I think the end-result has been for the good! Lugnuts (talk) 07:22, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ted Manson

The article Ted Manson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Closedmouth (talk) 14:30, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of White Dwarf (film)

The article White Dwarf (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability; very little mention of it on a google search for white dwarf film

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 13:37, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bad Boy (book)

The article Bad Boy (book) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It doesn't say anything except book title and author, and there is already an article about the author.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robkirwan (talk) 15:01, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sterling Lord

The article Sterling Lord has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 00:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jeremy Bernstein concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jeremy Bernstein, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:28, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We almost lost White Dwarf...

...because the initial article was (no offense) very poorly written and unsourced.[1] While it was seen that the prodded version had issues, they were addressable. Point here being that it is always good to begin work on an article over at WP:AFC or a personal sandbox. As multiple sources existed, the the article has been expanded and sourced through regular editing. I encourage you to review a few essays intended for those creating articles: WP:Article wizard, WP:Your first article... and my personal one-stop-shop for new authors... WP:PRIMER. For film articles, you will find MOS:FILM very instructive.Best regards, Schmidt, Michael Q. 04:18, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Jeremy Bernstein

Hello Jrm2007. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Jeremy Bernstein.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jeremy Bernstein}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 20:36, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Visaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Three Rivers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Please do not add content without providing a source to backup you entry Visaria and William Windom. Thank you. Mlpearc (open channel) 01:27, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jrm2007. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uncivil Behavior

Hey there, just came across this during some work I was handling. Wanted to just drop a line and say that the language/tone you used here was neither appropriate nor constructive. Remember the key tenets of Wikipedia's etiquette policy, namely to always assume good faith and to be polite. Try to help out a misguided editor rather than tell them that they "better respond quick" before you are "going to probably report [their] vandalism". It will help them and help promote Wikipedia's positive and open culture. Appreciate your contributions! --Slazenger (Contact Me) 08:06, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Jrm2007. You have new messages at Slazenger's talk page.
Message added 09:53, 22 August 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

--Slazenger (Contact Me) 09:53, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jrm2007. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jrm2007. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vasaria

Notice

The article Vasaria has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this fictional location passes GNG/NFICTION

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:21, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered

Hello, Jrm2007. You have new messages at Talk:Anita Lasker-Wallfisch.
Message added 17:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I am aware that it looks like you no longer edit here, but, just in case, you might want to have a look at this request/proposal regarding an old edit of yours. Thank you. DBaK (talk) 17:09, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification: my proposal would be that you please consider removing the offending names. Sorry if this is unclear when you get there, or circular, or something! Thanks DBaK (talk) 17:15, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

szia én tudok informáciot kérlek keress meg

/* szia én tudok informáciot kérlek keress meg */ Weisel 188.6.193.239 (talk) 11:37, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]