|
User talk:Joie de Vivre
R E T I R E D The last straw was being accused of lying. I cannot defend against such an accusation. The one thing of which I am most proud about myself is my honesty. If that is not honored here, I have no place here. Thanks to everyone who was kind.
My last: this one. Joie de Vivre° 01:11, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
If you're around the area, shoot me an email back. Joebobsamfrank 21:49, 15 August 2007 (UTC) LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
Delivered on 16:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC). LGBT WikiProject Newsletter
Delivered on 17:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC). Notice of InactivityIn trying to deliver the LGBT Project newsletter, SatyrBot detected a period of three months of inactivity from this account. You have been placed in our "Inactive Members" section. If this has been done in error, please let my bot owner know and change your status in he project. Thanks! SatyrBot 18:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC) Image:Facial.png listed for deletionAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Facial.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 13:00, 23 March 2008 (UTC) Image:Autorecessive_Tay-Sachs.GIF listed for deletionAn image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Autorecessive_Tay-Sachs.GIF, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 14:39, 5 April 2008 (UTC) CfD nomination of Category:Ex-gay peopleI have nominated Category:Ex-gay people (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:People who identify as ex-gay (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. CaveatLector Talk Contrib 04:43, 25 January 2009 (UTC) AfD nomination of Comparison of birth control methods An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Comparison of birth control methods. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comparison of birth control methods. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:58, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is JYNXT. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/JYNXT. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 5 February 2010 (UTC) File source problem with File:400px-Awfulfont.PNG Thank you for uploading File:400px-Awfulfont.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged. If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 14:58, 20 February 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 14:58, 20 February 2011 (UTC) Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Books which discuss the Children of GodCategory:Books which discuss the Children of God, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 23:04, 22 May 2011 (UTC) Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Books which discuss the Children of GodCategory:Books which discuss the Children of God, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Resident Anthropologist (talk)•(contribs) 23:06, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Category:Bisexual dancersCategory:Bisexual dancers, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. KarlB (talk) 17:49, 3 May 2012 (UTC) File:Question mark.PNG listed for deletionA file that you uploaded or altered, File:Question mark.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Arthunter (talk) 05:04, 17 November 2014 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Rough Sex The article Rough Sex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern: While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride!
Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.
Hi, Wiki Loves Pride 2016As a participant of WikiProject LGBT studies, you are invited to participate in the third annual Wiki Loves Pride campaign, which runs through the month of June. The purpose of the campaign is to create and improve content related to LGBT culture and history. How can you help?
Looking for topics? The Tasks page, which you are welcome to update, offers some ideas and wanted articles. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. The group's mission is to develop LGBT-related content across all Wikimedia projects, in all languages. Visit the affiliate's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's talk page. Thanks, and happy editing! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:14, 30 May 2016 (UTC) Big-boob listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Big-boob. Since you had some involvement with the Big-boob redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC) Big-breast listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Big-breast. Since you had some involvement with the Big-breast redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:27, 8 June 2016 (UTC) Big-bust listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Big-bust. Since you had some involvement with the Big-bust redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:28, 8 June 2016 (UTC) Nomination of Noninterference (Buddhism) for deletion A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noninterference (Buddhism) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noninterference (Buddhism) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Farang Rak Tham (Talk) 08:02, 10 May 2019 (UTC) "Ecclesia (Church)" listed at Redirects for discussion
|
||||||||||||||
