User talk:Johnsv29

Linkage disequilibrium

I've substantially edited this topic, in response to the request to make it more accessible for non-expert readers. I hope that adding a number of new headings hasn't made it even less readable. But I feel that the previous account was basically historical and didn't explain why LD has had such an impact in recent years, more than 30,000 keyword citations in PubMed.

I also added a section on LD and diploid data. The traditional parameters all refer to haploid data, which is never observable, which seemed an omission to me. Johnsv29 (talk) 12:02, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]