|
User talk:John811jdWelcome!Hello, John811jd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! : Noyster (talk), 16:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Please stop doing disputed edits on controversial articlePlease note that Rajput is controversial article and also member of Category:Wikipedia controversial topics. so please stop doing disputed edits on this article which would always remain a cause of edit war. we have no other choice than to rely on learned Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica. and they of course can not be surpassed by view of some authors. Had those authors been reliable enough, they would have taken them into account. but they did not. so please stop messing. kind regards. Rajput334 (talk) 12:13, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
Sir, a half-truth article is a deceptive article. Why not presenters of the statement so removed present a fact in its favor .The whole article puts history in totally wrong and unverifiable way. Please tell user Rajput334 to provide a secondary source rather than using a tertiary source britannica for whole article. He is trying to surpass other contributors. Moreover, as per Policies of Wikipedia, it should be verifiable, which it is not. Truth should be our priorityJohn811jd (talk) 13:37, 14 November 2014 (UTC) you may remove what is not verifiable but can't overrule Britannica. what is necessary for article is already provided. It is related to Rajputs overall. There are several authors saying that rajput dynasties arose in 7th century but because of the article being controversial, Britannica Rajput article is cited (which provided for 9th century). write all your claims here and don't mess with article, i will provide you contradictory authorities one by one for all your claims. Rajput334 (talk) 14:49, 14 November 2014 (UTC) November 2014 Your recent editing history at Rajput shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sir, iam not reverting other contributors edits,infact user Rajput334 is reverting other editors sourced content repeatedly. John811jd (talk) 09:11, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Rajput talkThere isn't much chance that anyone can work their way through your recent 16,000-character post at Talk:Rajput. Can I collapse it, please, and then we'll look at the issues one point at a time. You've basically inserted formatted text from an old version of the article and it has made a complete mess of the talk page (look, for example, at how it has messed up the "table of contents" at the top of that page). I'm happy to discuss the issues that you raise once you confirm that you have read and understood WP:RS and WP:COPYRIGHT. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 12:50, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
ANI
November 2014 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 17:17, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
== Seasonal Greets! ==
|
