en User talk:Joe p15

Welcome!

Hello, Joe p15, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Pupster21 Talk To Me 16:42, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Headingley.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Headingley.JPG. The copy called Image:Headingley.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 02:02, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. BlueValour 02:15, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted

Hi! Just a short message to let you know I have reverted your last edit to the Meltham article. The external links only needed to be corrected, the Textron page location had changed and the David Brown Tractor Club has a new Website.

Additionally I have deleted the sports person John Stead from the notables list. There was consensus some time back that the list was to large. BlueValour created the category Category:People from Huddersfield to use instead, which allows far more names to be added. Richard Harvey 23:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, no problem, theres a couple of dead links in the body text as well that you might want to change, one about the Brown family and one about Coats Viyella. Thanks. Joe p15 10:57, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted! I assume you meant the Brook Family not Brown. The weblink for them was an Irish Archive retrieval system, which has changed, I have therefore replaced the link to one for St James church in Meltham where the Brook family is buried and the website mentions some historical info on them. Richard Harvey 10:06, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meltham

Hi! I've moved the images on the page back into gallery format. When I originally uploaded them I spread them around the page within the various sections they related to as normally seen in a hard copy encyclopaedia. However over time this proves to be a problem with the page layout. Often with image frames overlapping text, depending on the readers monitor resolution and varying text edits. Thus the images end up being constantly resized, or moved around the page, depending on individual editors preferences. Consensus has shown that one large image near the top of the page, often in the infobox unless it makes it to long, with the others lower down the page in gallery format allows text to flow, without the constant need to keep re-editing the individual images. I used to get frustrated trying to keep redoing the page formats to let the images be seen easily, until a senior editor advised: "This isn't a hard copy book, so the page format is not the same". Richard Harvey 09:05, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sheffield Tigers

Hello. I have seen the table you are in the middle of placing on the Sheffield speedway page. Looks good. Can I make one suggestion though. Instead of putting the rider biographies on that page, can you make the wiki artciles for each of the riders and link to those instead. The bios really aren't relevant to the Sheffield team page and there is a template about for rider pages. Will probably be quicker for you in the long run. I will eventually get round to doing them but its slow going.

This may interest you too .. {{User:Radzinski/SpeedwayFan}}

Hammer1980 14:14, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I like the squad template. I have been working out how to do that myself but I dont understand all that techie stuff !! I have showed you good work to another editor who made the speedway templates and asked him if he could make a dedicated speedway template based on yours. Hope you don't mind. I would then add to all the riders so far.

Maybe each team should have its own year template ? What do you think? Hammer1980 22:17, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. Thats what I based the speedway one on, football, then Foxhill made it a generic speedway one. You a Tigers fan I take it ? Hammer1980 22:22, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added sources on your new articles so they don't get tagged for speedy deletion ! Hammer1980 22:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Speedway squad

Squad template made by Foxhill. I have edited the Sheffield template to the new code. It works really well. He has made your good design easuer for idiots like me to use ! Hammer1980 13:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You think its worth putting the squad templates on the relevant club pages too ? Hammer1980 22:16, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Siblings

I have to say I'm not convinced the Sporting Siblings category is an encyclopedic way to organize articles on Wikipedia. Could you outline your reasons for creating the category? I've already removed several individuals who do not have a sibling verified as notable, and this could be a recurring problem. Deiz talk 11:08, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Autrey

Sorry didn't realise !! Didn't notice it was alphabetical either !! I have put some of the refernce links in your latest rider posts so they are not deleted but have nothing for Charlie Venegas. Have you got a ref we can add ? Hammer1980 23:46, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cat

Good work on adding siblinbgs and removing single articles.. maybe it has a future. FYI your page on Charle Venegas looks fine, simple details, establishes notability, appropriate external link. Deiz talk 00:52, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Younis / Younus

Hi Joe, the reason I changed the spelling is purely down to the name of the WP article, spelt Younis. Cricinfo and CricketArchive (the two main resources used by WP:CRIC) also have him listed as Younis.

The fact that Khan himself spells it Younus is what's stopped me from changing it again, so thanks for bringing that to my attention. AMBerry (talk | contribs) 23:15, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

Hi. I see you've set up a new infobox for current Test cricketers which includes biographical details. I've raised this at WT:CRIC, where there has been considerable previous discussion about infoboxes and where WP:CRIC members may have views. There are a few thousand past and present Test cricketers, so getting the project's consensus on this is probably wise, because all of the bios should, as far as possible, be similar in layout. It'd be good to hear from you on the project talk page why you think this is a beneficial change and what proposals you have for rolling this out across the other cricket bios.

BTW, I see from your updated Monty Panesar that the info is said to be correct to today's date. I'm unclear whether that means you've included the stats from the current England v India match or not. The past convention has been to wait for the match to be concluded before updating stats of this kind to avoid confusion.

Your infoboxes on the English county cricket clubs are, in my view, very good. This new one looks good too, but let's get a consensus on it. Johnlp 22:05, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

Hi Joe,

Can you take a look at my attempt at expanding the infobox, User:Mdcollins1984/Sandbox3, demo here. Ignoring the flag issue, if you like the International section, and the improved clubnumber function (reducing the space issues) it might be an idea to merge it back to the original template, to ease the discussion at WP:CRIC.

Best, –MDCollins (talk) 12:42, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I like it - see what User:AllynJ thinks, his isn't working properly atm! (Let me know what he says!) I'm trying to sort the current-club issue to make historic players easier. Minor implementing issues can be attacked I think, but as you say, put the other cosmetic issues on hold. –MDCollins (talk) 14:22, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine to me as it is there. :) May still be a bit big when put in to action proper, but it's probably a better way of doing it full stop, even without formatting issues etc. AllynJ 14:41, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you're aware, I've reverted the handful of infobox changes you've made so far, as we keep messing with it so they display badly. Can redo them when (and if) we go live proper. –MDCollins (talk) 15:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the encouragement in your edit summary - as you can read at WT:CRIC, all four columns are optional, so any combination from just one to all four are now read to implement. The code is still seperate from the infobox awaiting checking - god it's a mess...- and I can't get coloured headers yet, but think that's just me.

Unfortunately it will mean editing the columns of the rest of the table, as it will be a darn sight easier to work with them than the new section with variable column settings. Still not sure how to work that yet, but we can have a think. Basically the colspan functions for the debuts/club info etc won't work as it stands, but its a small detail to correct compared to the effort in having optional columns. Works though!! –MDCollins (talk) 00:54, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I can't see a problem with TOF... Yeah the stats aligning on the left is probably fine. I'd still like to get the ODI shirt numbers in there somewhere, but can't find a space for it. Any ideas?–MDCollins (talk) 10:24, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thanks for the death thing - confused me for a minute cos it wasn't working. More examples in your sandbox.

We're getting there, but there is always something else. I've experimented by implementing the First-class debut/final first-class match info for the non-internationals. I quite like the info as it gives an idea to the length of a career. I decided that to include it for internationals as well gets a bit much and a bit long, but have a looked. I've changed your sandbox6, demonstrated in Rasid and Lyttleton (Sandbox2).–MDCollins (talk) 01:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think I left it like that so that it would only be a 'final' test, and omitted for current players. Just trying to stop the semi-editing that goes on after every Test match leading to partially correct, but mostly wrong, infoboxes. (Remember that most people only add to the runs column!)–MDCollins (talk) 11:33, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Having said that, I've added the info for Trescothick in the demos, so who knows. Yeah, go on. Cricinfo includes it. –MDCollins (talk) 11:39, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beware that having implemented a rudimentary choose the column headers yourself sort of arrangement, the field names have had to change I'm afraid. I'm assuming User:Joe p15/Sandbox is the current version...

Go on, you have a go! Have finally managed to figure out how to fix the columns widths, but still some issues. If colspan works with the switch command, I'm still considering a ...wait for it... 13 column table!! Explain later if needs be. The stats columns still seem irregular depending on how many are there, the width is also influenced by those massive debut rows, although they've started wrapping now. Not sure what to do about those.

Have a play. –MDCollins (talk) 15:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, revert to a decent version it if you need to, I'll make a copy. –MDCollins (talk)

Good, but column 1 needs to be wider (5 wickets in a match and the Test cap thing...) Any solutions for the domestic debut such as the Lyttlton one, the only reason that two clubs are mentioned there are that his first first-class game wasn't for one of the two 'main FC clubs' mentioned above. Two lines maybe? Or leave it out completely....

Started posting on my own page! <quote>Hmm, getting better. What happens if the First stats column was small and bold, just doesn't stand out like the others. I might try forcing a line break in the Lyttleton think just to tidy it up if its going to wrap anyway. I've also made a 'height' conversion update. Will do that now. –MDCollins (talk) 16:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC)</quote>

Anyway, done that, tried to implement female. Only real thing is to have an if command to put 'women' in the country/team link at the top, but I seem incapable of doing that! Same {{{female}}} can be used to link to the appropriate women caps article, although many are still red. A lot of redirects to find, but they can be done as they come up, like I have done for Australia women and Denmark women. Lets get this baby finished. –MDCollins (talk) 19:52, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I've just seen your attempt to stop the wrapping - it hasn't quite worked (some of the dates now look silly). Haven't really got a solution though, other than making the domestic ones two rows by default - don't think the internationals wrap anyway. What do you think?

Yes, done the female thing. Might tackle the /doc. –MDCollins (talk) 10:57, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have updated the documentation. I've also tweaked various bits of code to make it easier to manage, and more intuitive to implement. Watch out for small {{{field}}} changes, such as the removal of the 'domestic' option (it is now coded from the international function, one 'deliveries = balls/overs, removing the need for two separate options, and probably a few others. When you've had a look and checked it through, feel free to take it back to WT:CRIC. Well done. –MDCollins (talk) 13:04, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - just a pointer, when implementing the 'box, you might want a slightly more informative edit summary, such as 'Implement new infobox, see WT:CRIC, incase anyone has missed the discussion and tries to revert. Keep going lad, not too many more to go... </sighs>. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mdcollins1984 (talk • contribs) 23:19:10, August 19, 2007 (UTC).

Well done

I, Johnlp, award User:Joe p15 a cricket barnstar for excellent work on Template:Infobox cricketer biography. Johnlp 21:00, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your change to User:UBX/English Cricket Team

Hi there. Back in August you added the ECB logo to the English Cricket Team userbox. Unfortunately, that image is copyrighted and only used in certain places under our fair use guidelines, which do not allow for usage in userboxes. The template has now been reverted to use the previous image. Please check the licensing conditions on images before using them in this fashion. Thank you. — Hex (❝?!❞) 13:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Somersetcricket.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Somersetcricket.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Titanscricket.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Titanscricket.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:16, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Warwickshirecricket.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Warwickshirecricket.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:34, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gloucestershirecricket.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Gloucestershirecricket.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Northantscricket.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Northantscricket.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nottscricket.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Nottscricket.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:24, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Leicestershire logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Leicestershire logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spogs?

One question: What are "spogs"? WinterSpw (talk) 22:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Warringtonwolves.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Warringtonwolves.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:24, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good work on the Rugby League team infoboxes

They are an improvement on the old ones, the only thing I would carry over is the 2007 league position, seems to be everything has been cleaned up to give a much better infobox.Londo 06 12:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, cheers.Londo 06 15:05, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Finch (cricketer)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article James Finch (cricketer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 15:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Eaglescricket.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eaglescricket.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 01:29, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Meltham AFC 1951-1952.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Meltham AFC 1951-1952.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 19:22, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Derbyshirecricket.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Derbyshirecricket.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Titanscricket.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Titanscricket.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:53, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Derbyshirecricket.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Derbyshirecricket.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Bloonstdfan360 / talk / contribs 21:26, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox Speedway national team

Template:Infobox Speedway national team has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox Speedway national U-19 team. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:33, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gloucestershirecricket.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gloucestershirecricket.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:55, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Warringtonwolves.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Warringtonwolves.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Greg Norton (cricketer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Greg Norton (cricketer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Norton (cricketer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jack | ^{talk page} 14:46, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Leicestershire logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Leicestershire logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kit left arm giantsaway.png

The file File:Kit left arm giantsaway.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kit body giantsaway.png

The file File:Kit body giantsaway.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Kit right arm giantsaway.png

The file File:Kit right arm giantsaway.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tommy Hedden

The article Tommy Hedden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT. Only 1 primary source provided and no evidence of third party coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]