User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus/Archive 25
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC) Hello. I know I'm the nominator of the said AFD, but it doesn't seem right that the AFD was closed as soft delete just one day after it was relisted. Would it be possible to reopen the nomination for one more week? Deleting the article just one day after relisting doesn't feel right, even if it was as a soft delete. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
DeletionHere [1] the draft was always part of the nom to delete. Do you think the voters want the draft saved? Legacypac (talk) 10:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Crisis of liberalismHello Jo-Jo Eumerus, I'd like to work on the article and improve so that it's approved by Wikipedia. I missed the discussion and didn't know how to participate in it. I am going to recreate the page and make changes to satisfy previous concerns. Please let me know how to improve the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viazomyk (talk • contribs) 10:40, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
QuestionNot being familiar with the WP:AIV process, I don't completely understand your response. As I said, this user has engaged in persistent vandalism and disruptive editing. Should I be making this report on some other page? If so, please can you advise me as to which one? With thanks in advance, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:06, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:01, 4 June 2017 (UTC) DYK for PirgelOn 5 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pirgel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Pirgel is the highest mud volcano in Iran? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pirgel. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Pirgel), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. Mifter (talk) 00:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC) Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Problems
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 19:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC) Hmm...Per this, and the short thread above, may want to take have a gander at Crisis of liberalism... you know... with your magic mop goggles. TimothyJosephWood 19:11, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
File:The-Reason-for-God-book-cover.jpegI got a message saying that there's a better version of this book at Wikimedia Commons. I agree. But I'm not sure how to adjust it - should I just delete this file and will the Infobox in The_Reason_For_God then use the commons version? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidfraser (talk • contribs)
FAC reviewing barnstar
Franzboas master accountSince you participated in the discussion about Dennis Brown's block of Franzboas, I'm pointing you to this, which presents some proposals for additional action. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:05, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
could you please explain...You deleted Russian Intercepts on Michael Flynn. By deleting it, rather than turning it into a redirect, as several people suggested, in the AFD, you have guaranteed that no one, except a fellow administrator, can re-use any references in the article. By deleting it you prevent anyone but a fellow administrator from merging any material it contains into a stronger, related article. Can I ask why you didn't close this AFD as redirect? Geo Swan (talk) 20:41, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 June 2017
AfD ClosureGreetings, Jo-Jo. I You closed this AfD, but I think you neglected to delete the page: I'm still seeing it at [14]. Regards, Vanamonde (talk) 09:06, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Putana (volcano)Hello! Your submission of Putana (volcano) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:38, 12 June 2017 (UTC) Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 15:30, 12 June 2017 (UTC) Aaron Bastani & Novara MediaThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Hi Jo-Jo Did you delete Aaron Bastani's page? Did you Also Close Novara Medias Page? Overturn to Keep This page should be re-opened immediately. Aaron Bastani has appeared on Sky news multiple times during the run up the United Kingdom general election, 2017. Novara Media has recently hosted Jeremy Corbyn , Paul Mason, Yanis Varoufakis,John McDonnell, Lily Allen, Caroline Lucas, Alex Salmond and more on their various video articles. They are one of the few media commentators that correctly predicted the results of the election. They are a vital voice for left wing politics which is otherwise ignored by much of mainstream media. Jeremy Corbyn Interview [1] John McDonell Interview[2] Alex Salmond Interview[3] Paul Mason Interview[4] Caroline Lucas Interview [5] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patrickbettington (talk • contribs) 13:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC) References
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
(Question that was misplaced)why my page has been deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aspirepr2004 (talk • contribs)
Hello again. I nominated the Template:No source, on which you enabled protection, to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 June 14#Template:No source, where I invite you to comment. --George Ho (talk) 15:28, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Problems Changes this week
Meetings
Future changes
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 15:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC) Possible puppet doing Cross-wiki spamHello Jo-Jo Eumerus, I am an administrator of the Lusophone Wikipedia and I would like to alert you that an attempt was made to insert a biography, I checked the case and it seems that it is Cross-wiki spam. It's the user CaliBud420 (talk · contribs), registered on June 21, 2017 and created the same biography on two Wikis, I believe it is a puppet. I do not know if it would be worth asking for a check, so I came to warn you. Le Comte Edmond Dantès msg 20:51, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 June 2017
Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available. Recent changes
Changes this week
Meetings
Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. 15:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC) At ANI hope you don't mind me hatting your comment in with Joobo's. I don't mean anything at all against you or your comment, it just seemed to me that Joobo's comment was likely to cause a small explosion in a thread that should simply be a review of Dennis' close on its own merits. GoldenRing (talk) 15:20, 27 June 2017 (UTC) Nomination for deletion of Template:TimedText talk headerTemplate:TimedText talk header has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:37, 28 June 2017 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotNote: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have. SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:35, 30 June 2017 (UTC) I did not notice that Moglix was nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moglix (2nd nomination). I would have supported retention with the sources I found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moglix. Would you relist the AfD for further discussion because it had little discussion to allow for further discussion of the sources? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:44, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Disneyland Railroad FAC image reviewIn the image review you started here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Disneyland Railroad/archive1, I believe everything is now resolved, but I imagine there needs to be some sort of acknowledgement on your part ("everything's good now", "everything looks good", etc.) on that page to close that portion of the article's FA review. Please do so after reading this message. I would prefer to have this resolved today. Jackdude101 17:05, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
Tristan Prettyman imagesHi Jo-Jo Eumerus. How are you going. Thank you for closing the discussions about File:Tristan Prettyman 5.jpg, 6.jpg and 9.jpg. I just wanted to clarify a little more about the OTRS ticket for these images. The ticket started on 1 June and has involved three OTRS agents including myself. There were 14 files concerned in total with the ticket and some have been approved and others not. With respect to these #5, #6 and #9, there was not enough verifiable information to approve them. In fact, it was necessary for us to request for documents from the user's regional copyright registration authority to prove it. I should have made myself a little clearer at the beginning and written a "Delete" comment but I thought it was important for me to remain neutral and let the info stand for itself, that the licenses "could not be confirmed" by the claims written by the user(s) who started that ticket. Nonetheless, it cannot hurt to have an extra week for them to try and produce those documents to us. I believe the images should be deleted now given the lack of evidence and how long the ticket has lasted, but if you would prefer to stick with what was done and let the di-permission stand for a bit longer then I can accept that. I just thought I would let you know more about this background. Cheers. seb26 (talk) 02:40, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
|