User talk:JnpoJuwan

Welcome!

Hello, JnpoJuwan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 15:33, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous


Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

ManyAreasExpert (talk) 23:02, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Information icon Hi, you made a major edit to Moving the goalposts but didn't put an edit summary. Some of the changes seemed unproductive, like removing the {{wikt}} template and moving a section anchor (see Template:Anchor#Rationale for substitution in the header: this placement hides the section title), so I reverted the edit, which is unfortunate since some of the changes were good, like adding citation templates. I might go back and redo some of the changes myself.

In the future, please:

  1. Break up large edits into multiple smaller edits so that they can be reviewed more easily. For example, you might do a section at a time or fix one type of problem at a time. See Wikipedia:Good editing practices § The normal editing process
  2. Always write an edit summary, even for relatively minor edits, but summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Even a short one is better than none at all. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your editing preferences.
    By the way, you can use this tool to see how often you use edit summaries or not.

Thanks!

— W.andrea (talk) 22:57, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@W.andrea sorry! I wasn't aware that Wiktionary templates were used in this way, as I have never seen them before in mid article. I have redid my edits keeping that and included an edit summary, I'll try to include those more in the future. it was a surprise to me that already two-thirds of my edits do have edit summaries, ahah! Juwan (talk) 23:07, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, though your redo was still roughly the same size, which again, makes it hard to review. For example, you removed the reference "Cheating Swedish Goalkeeper Moving Goalposts" without explanation. However, I'm not about to contest it since it could plausibly be a copyright infringing link. For reference see WP:REMOVAL. — W.andrea (talk) 01:34, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
cheers! thanks for your advice. you're a very nice editor. Juwan (talk) 11:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I try :) And thanks to you for being open-minded :) — W.andrea (talk) 18:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page reply notification

Hi @JnpoJuwan, just wanted to reach out and let you know that I've replied to your recent post on Talk:MrBeast. When you can, if possible, do reply.

Thanks!

2601:19E:427E:5BB0:4DA2:6CAA:84D7:64BC (talk) 00:38, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Black-tufted marmoset

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Black-tufted marmoset, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:35, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indic scripts

Information icon - Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Vinesh Phogat, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk sorry, only after adding did I see your message. cheers for alerting me, I will remove it if you haven't already. Juwan (talk) 14:54, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

drafts

Hey! It's no biggie at all, but in general I prefer folks not edit my userspace drafts unless we're specifically collabing on something; i have a particular workflow with them and I usually add things like cats and infoboxes at the very end. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 18:52, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Generalissima so sorry, I didn't know! I added them since this was mostly info missing in both the main and draft versions. thank you for telling me, I won't do it again. cheers and have a nice editing. Juwan (talk) 22:40, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove interlanguage links ({{ill}} or {{Interlanguage link}}). It's perfectly valid to have them in articles. I've restored it. BorgQueen (talk) 23:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@BorgQueen is there any excuse for them to be removed as this is a red link on lead? there is another {{ill}} further down, which is why I thought it was okay. otherwise, I'm sorry, I have learnt better! Juwan (talk) 00:13, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miguel Rômulo has been accepted

Miguel Rômulo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 21:17, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello bro, please tell me how do write ipa like English and Hindi language

About Ipa Thesurajsahu (talk) 11:39, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Thesurajsahu that's very vague, could you explain what you mean? Juwan (talk) 12:18, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you teach me how to translate name in ipa. Thesurajsahu (talk) 12:38, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Thesurajsahu I don't think I can teach you well, ahah. but if you want please read up on the articles for Hindi phonology and look at the help pages Help:IPA and Help:IPA/Hindi! Juwan (talk) 13:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks bro but I just want to know that how you edit Atishi Marlena hindi ipa on her wiki page

about ipa Thesurajsahu (talk) 14:21, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

cheers! Juwan (talk) 14:33, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please use incremental edits and edit summaries

Hi. Your [edit] on Yang Chen Ning was very difficult to follow. Please make a series of smaller edits and explain your changes in the edit summaries. Thanks. Johnjbarton (talk) 23:38, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for the reminder, I try to but often fail. Juwan (talk) 00:00, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

charlotte 👸♥ 06:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also threw in file mover, seeing as you already have it on Commons and I can trust you not to do stupid things. Please make sure to follow Wikipedia:File mover and please let me know if you don't want either (or both) of these rights. Cheers, charlotte 👸♥ 06:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changing citation format contrary to Wikipedia policy

Hi, I have reverted your undiscussed change to the citation format at Banana. Policy is quite clear that citation format must not be changed without very good reason and wide consensus. There has been exactly no discussion or even forewarning of this change, which is plainly contrary to policy, and essentially tantamount to disruptive editing. I do hope this is clear. I have chosen to explain this informally rather than issue an immediate formal warning; I hope you will respect this measure of restraint. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:35, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiswick Chap I apologise for my bad editing here. could you post the policy here for me to read more? cheers and have a nice day/night. Juwan (talk) 19:01, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks. It's WP:CITEVAR: "Editors should not attempt to change an article's established citation style, merely on the grounds of personal preference or to make it match other articles, without first seeking consensus for the change." All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:04, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Chiswick Chap genuine question, how exactly did my edits violate CITEVAR? the only change that took place regarding the citations was purely comestic on the code-level, normalisation of the parameter order via ProveIt (this doesn't fall under WP:COSMETICBOT as I also tried copyediting, adding alts and would have continued). I asked experienced editor friends and they couldn't help with what you meant, so I'm simply asking directly. Juwan (talk) 13:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, yeah, maybe it's borderline cosmetic. Love the comestic, btw. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Chiswick Chap may I redo that edit? I don't want to fight over trivial formatting, but just to get my work back on track, ahah. Juwan (talk) 13:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well frankly if it's purely cosmetic, I can't see the point, it's just faffing about; and if it's not purely cosmetic, I object to it. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Illustrative aid" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Illustrative aid has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 24 § Illustrative aid until a consensus is reached. Cremastra ‹ u — c › 15:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Error in Template:Infobox chess biography

There's a duplicate parm error for the "child" parm in Template:Infobox chess biography. Hope you can take care of it. Davemck (talk) 01:11, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Copyeditor's Barnstar
Thank you for your contributions to List of things named after Julius Caesar, I appreciate it very much! The AP (talk) 06:40, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@TheAstorPastor thank you so much for my first barnstar. I will cherish this greatly. Juwan (talk) 06:43, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note on revert

Hi -- I've reverted this edit you made; generally you shouldn't make edits like that to articles that are being actively maintained, per WP:CITEVAR. If you think a change might be appropriate, I'd suggest posting on the article talk page first to see if anyone objects. For a featured article or good article it's almost never a good idea to update the citation style without checking with the editors active on that page. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:14, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]