User talk:Jkaharper/2022/May

Death of Lawrence Edward Luscombe information

The edit regarding the Rt Rev LE Luscombe to correct the date has been reversed by you. Could you please leave it in place, as the correction is by his family (I’m his grandson, and was actually with him at the time of his death, holding his hand, it was most definitely the 3rd of May). The Church website article is dated the 4th of May because that’s when the story was published. Thank you, Edward Sutherland Edward Sutherland (talk) 17:32, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Edward Sutherland:, go and read WP:RS before you make any more edits on Wikipedia please, then you'll understand why I removed it and why I can't just okay it without a reliable source. Thanks --Jkaharper (talk) 20:42, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You can’t okay the update by the family of the deceased? That is just sick. There is already an article linked that clearly states the 3rd. For the love of god stop butting in on this, it is deeply upsetting for the family to have you changing the details to the wrong date. It’s not your relative, and maliciously changing details is not welcome. Edward Sutherland (talk) 11:36, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Edward Sutherland: I'm not Jkaharper but I've read your conversation here. I understand that it can be upsetting to have incorrect information about a relative on Wikipedia. But please understand that everyone editing Wikipedia needs to play by the same rules. 1. The source which states 3 May, medicotopics.com, does not seem to be what Wikipedia considers a WP:Reliable source (Jkaharper already linked this) so we cannot rely on it for verification. 2. Casting aspersions ("maliciously changing details") is disallowed per the "Assume good faith" principle. Please don't do that, please focus "on content, not on the contributor".
If you can supply a reliable source which supports the exact date, I'm happy to make the change to the article. But, per Wikipedia:Verifiability, we cannot insert information based on "the beliefs or experiences of editors", even if those claim to be relatives. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 16:45, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inge Viett

Hello there, I see a 'neutrality' tag on the main section of the above article – but no Talk at all why this is so. Its been there almost four years, so should it be removed? All the best, Billsmith60 (talk) 22:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Joe Pignatano

On 26 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Joe Pignatano, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 13:02, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]