User talk:JimmyButler/Archive 25
Teacher reviewMr. Butler i know it may be a little late for this but if you would teacher review the Royal Tern i would greatly appreciate it. --Captain kirkintosh (talk) 19:55, 26 December 2011 (UTC) Another Teacher Review, I had Davis look it over as well. I put it up for peer review and its been up for almost 2 weeks.... I'm just curious if there is anything I can do to speed up the process. Especially with the Peer Review. Stanfordbound 14 (talk) 13:46, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Let yesterday be forever remembered...We were on the front page yesterday! Wikipedia:Today's_featured_article/January_4,_2012 Vancemiller (talk · contribs · count · email) 00:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Teacher ReviewWill you please review Gambusia affinis? Patvac-chs (talk) 01:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC) Please see User_talk:Dana_boomer#Banker_horse. PumpkinSky talk 01:23, 18 April 2012 (UTC) We're doing itHey Jimmy, remember me from a few years ago? We're finally doing an AP Biology Wikipedia project in Maine! Check out the new projects at: WP:APBAPST. It's far less ambitious than your project, but I've already got some good results - it's image based rather than article based. Good Times, Earthdirt (talk) 12:02, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi There, welcome aboard. Again :) David D. (Talk) 22:40, 31 January 2008 (UTC) And welcome (back) from me too. You did some RReally gRReat woRRk, and I'm looking forward to seeing you in action once again. I'd suggest a more random selection of articles, though, and not getting too stressed replicating all your efforts in just the one place. I find that attending to a batch of articles on English grammar is a great de-stressing strategy! Snalwibma (talk) 08:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC) wb :)--Filll (talk) 20:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC) Good to make contact again. One day I'll revisit IntrotoEvo properly, read the whole thing with fresh eyes, see what it looks like, think about how it might be improved - and probably do nothing! But it's pretty good as it is. Congratulations to you, above all people. I notice that our friend A******** has made zero edits since 31 Jan. I presume it was a one-purpose sock of some sort. Meanwhile, I'm pretty busy IRL and just glancing at WP once in a while. Snalwibma (talk) 07:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Hey, I couldn't find anywhere to put this so I'm just dumping this here. Your initiative is so very cool and I have immense respect for the idea. Not only is it fantastic in giving back contributions and teaching people to share knowledge in a community collaborative environment, but you're teaching the scientific method (fact checking, writing .etc). Good job Genjix (talk) 17:13, 21 August 2010 (UTC) An award for you
Template:APBiology2010FA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 13:20, 15 December 2013 (UTC) Template:APBiology2009FA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 12:35, 18 December 2013 (UTC) Hi, ArbCom 2017 election voter messageHello, JimmyButler. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) Random questionI have been wondering what happened to the effort of wikipedia to get schools involved because it seemed like a great idea at the time and led to some great content but it seems to have died out. I remember you had a lot of success in creating great articles with your high school class, and I was wondering your thoughts on why that effort to get educators, universities, and high schools involved didn't go better. Also, thanks for all your hard work to make this a better encyclopedia and for sharing knowledge. I really appreciate it! Remember (talk) 11:31, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
|