I wanted to let you know that I just tagged H2O Innovation for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: a unique know-how... active and important player... active and important player... a sound development strategy... gains expertise in seawater desalination... attracts the attention of European sustainable development funds... strengthens its offer to the oil & gas and mining industries... gains expertise in process water treatment... brings increased efficiency... its recognized expertise and advanced technologies to deliver a solution that meets the municipalities needs... consider every aspect of requirements, giving communities an edge... reliable, durable, compact, automated and powerful permanent and mobile solutions... make its clients more competitive... ensure employees safety... The Company provides peace of mind every day and ensures full compliance with environmental standards.—and much, much more in the same vein. It's a sales leaflet, not an encyclopaedia article. All those TM icons are a sure sign that what will follow is company spam.
it's all about what the company does and sells, little about the company itself other than locations and employees. Turnover? Profits? Has the company ever received negative publicity? Who are its competitors?
You have an obvious conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your company is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
Your addition to H2O Innovation has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 14:33, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:H2O Innovation.jpg
⚠
Thanks for uploading File:H2O Innovation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
