User talk:Jeromemoreno/Archive 1

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3→Archive 5

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Template:Swedish nationalism and fascism has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 23:59, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Sweden Democrats  : Immigration policy

Afer reading Ojevindlang's recent edits in the rubric « Immigration policy », I removed this sentence : “ However, this reaching out to foreigners from the Middle East has been condemend by party members in other parts of Sweden ” since it seems a vague extrapolation from words that don't exist no longer actually on the SDU Forum. The author of the sentence (Sinner) mentioned in the Aftonbladet's article doesn't exist actually among the 396 members of this Forum. The words in the sentence « ... condemned by party members in other parts of Sweden » are an exaggerated interpretation. Who did condemn what and where, what are the exact references ?

Sweden Democrats : Family Policy

I modified some parts of recent edits since this polemic about Björn Söders's blog on SD-Kuriren occured three years ago (August 2007). Söders's original article on SD-Kuriren on 1st August 2007 doesn't exist actually. Some parts of the previous edits lead to a tendentious interpretation. I removed Expo’s reference since it is a controversial group. I give new references (articles on Söders's blog on August 2007 & Aftonbladet’s article on 5th August 2007).

Hi! I think your editing has improved the article, which does need some tightening up. It's hard to say if the Sweden Democrats will make it into our parliament in the upcoming election; they are just on the verge of getting the 4 % of the votes needed for that. As for the phrase "Muslim hostility to homosexuals", it may seem a bit drastic, but that is the attitude of traditional Muslims (as it used to be among traditional Christians and still is among some of them). Ojevindlang (talk) 18:43, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Sweden Democrats

About various polls concerning the 2010 Swedish general election, I removed some dead links and made some uptades with new links on TNS Sifo & svt.se (svt.se Valet 2010).

Swedish general election, 2010

The Sweden Democrats are classified among the national-conservative parties.

Alright, I've unprotected this per request at WP:RFUP (see here as well); just watch your edits :). That's what the talk page is for! I'm sending this to the three other users who seem to have been involved as well. Best, Airplaneman ✈ 23:15, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. --Jérôme MORENO HERRERO 08:44, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 09:18, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

The 2010 election campaign

I will mention the most significative SD results in the counties and municipalities. The original source is the Swedish electoral authority.

3RR on Sweden Democrats

Be aware that you just violated the WP:3RR rule on Sweden Democrats. Good faith or not, it might get you blocked. Nymf hideliho! 20:50, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

I feel sorry but I didn't know, it was good faith. Now I am aware of my mistake. I removed three times an edit which contained a long quote of pasted text.

Marine Le Pen

After reading the text about minor edits, I realized that I made a mistake since I have selected the minor modification box. I won't do again that and I will be more careful about minor edits.Jérôme MORENO HERRERO 10:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)--Jérôme MORENO HERRERO 10:08, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Sweden Democrats (history)

I removed the special contribution of 109.225.77.105 in the history section. This special contribution about the early SD history was based on partial citations from controversial organisations (Expo trosko-marxist magazine) and person (former trotskyst writer Stieg Larsson). About this early period, there was already a long study based from the The Centre for the Study of European Politics and Society. His author was Jens Rydgren. This long text is quoted 4 times in the article (history, ideology, immigration, controversies). I think more useful to quote more neutral sources and citations.--Jérôme MORENO HERRERO 11:14, 10 November 2010 (UTC)Jérôme MORENO HERRERO 11:15, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Do you have any sources to support your claim of Expo being Trotsky-Marxist? I have not been able to find anything reliable on that. If you do you should push that into the Expo article. -- Dront (talk) 14:50, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
No they are not a Trotsky-Marxist magazine. They are a foundation that works with the anti-racist issues in Sweden (just as the Swedish government agency Forum för levande historia (Living History Forum, or something like that in english)). Expo is considered by the extreme right as a left-wing extremist Web site, but this is only due to that Expo examines the extreme right. On the Swedish Wikipedia project Expo deemed to be a valid, credible source (with few exceptions for Sweden Democrats, and other xenophobic / racist groups who dont like the source). The article, as it looks now, are nothing but POV. 109.225.77.105 (talk) 18:02, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
And may I add, it wasnt the only citation you censored. 109.225.77.105 (talk) 19:48, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Jerome, do you have any comment on the claims made by anonymous? I would be happy to hear your thoughts on this. -- Dront (talk) 06:27, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Still a few more to do, but I guess it will soon be possible to delete the banner about there not being enough citations. Mikeo1938 (talk) 13:03, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your message on my page. OK about the copy editing ... I like to see things right and in the appropriate style.
It's important, of course, to get as many English language citations as possible; but, as you know, one must be careful to select reputable sources, such as respected newspapers.
As I say above, with the large number of citations now in place, it will soon be possible to remove the banner at the head of the article.

Mikeo1938 (talk) 22:59, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Swedish nationalism & fascism listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Swedish nationalism & fascism. Since you had some involvement with the Swedish nationalism & fascism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji (talk) 14:09, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Swedish nationalism and fascism listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Swedish nationalism and fascism. Since you had some involvement with the Swedish nationalism and fascism redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Mhiji (talk) 14:09, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

"ref improved"

Hello Jeromemoreno. As this is English Wikipedia, please stop adding the {{en}} template to English language references. The only reason to use a language parameter is if the reference is non-English. Thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:25, 2 February 2011 (UTC)


Speedy deletion of Template:Swedish national conservatism, right-wing populism, euroscepticism

A tag has been placed on Template:Swedish national conservatism, right-wing populism, euroscepticism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:13, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Marine Le Pen, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.°°Playmobilonhishorse (talk) 11:19, 10 March 2011 (UTC)