|
User talk:JeanMercier90Welcome to Wikipedia! Welcome JeanMercier90!Hello JeanMercier90. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions!
I'm Ad Orientem, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put Please remember to:
Sincerely, Ad Orientem (talk) (Leave me a message) 20:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC) Ad Orientem (talk) 20:01, 8 September 2024 (UTC) September 2024
 Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 14:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC) Your recent editing history at Edward Scissorhands shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DonIago (talk) 13:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC) Your recent editing history at Superman Returns shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Betty Logan (talk) 14:04, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:46, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 28Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Assasination of Luis Carlos Galán, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gustavo Bolívar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.) It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC) November 2024
I see you've already been warned three times about edit warring, yet continue to do so, here: [1] [2]. I'm putting this notice here not so much in the hope that you will stop, as to give another example for when you eventually end up on some noticeboard. GA-RT-22 (talk) 04:20, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add I have sent you a note about a page you startedHi JeanMercier90. Thank you for your work on Assassination of Luis Carlos Galán. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:25, 1 December 2024 (UTC) December 2024
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – MW(t•c) 23:43, 26 December 2024 (UTC) Take a deep breathThey're only trying to help. 🆃🆁🆂™ 08:05, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Chaim Rumkowski
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:15, 17 December 2024 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for December 17An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaim Rumkowski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radio 5. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC) I have sent you a note about a page you startedHi JeanMercier90. Thank you for your work on Cinematic Development Company (Colombia). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with North8000 (talk) 20:52, 17 December 2024 (UTC) Posada Alemana
which displays inline in the running text of the article as:
and displays under References as:
If you've already added one or more bare URLs to an article, there are tools available to expand them into full citations; try the reFill tool, which can resolve some bare references semi-automatically. Also, please do not remove the article clean-up tag that highlights an article has one or more bare URLs unless you also fix the problem with the citations. The clean-up tags are there to highlight a problem that needs to be fixed for a better quality article. Other editors have already attempted to improve some of the citations in the article using an available tool, and I have already attempted to improve one citation in the article, too. However, the citations in the article appear to be from Spanish language websites, so the language used in the article also needs to be indicated, which doesn't always happen automatically. I am also puzzled by a couple of your citations concerning the statue of John Lennon, which say you accessed the cited pages in 2013, which is inconsistent with you writing the article on 20 December 2024. The surrounding citation code strongly suggests the citations have been copied, or translated, from another Wikipedia article, and if this is so, you need to attribute the source material. See the guideline for Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 20:52, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Civility
January 2025
 JeanMercier90 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Hey ScottishFinnishRadish. What part of the "I'm not a sockpuppet of anyone" thing did you not understand? Of course, it's nice that someone blocks you so lightly. I've already written in several places that I'm not a puppet of anyone and I even proved it. But as we say in my country; justice is for those in ruana. I was blocked by a Finn with stars earned fraudulently by blocking others based on vile slander and mopping the floor with people. But since this petition is not about him but about me, I reiterate: I'M NOT A SOCKPUPPET OF ANYONE. THE EVIDENCE AGAINST ME IS DEFICIENT.--JeanMercier90 (talk) 17:59, 3 January 2025 (UTC) Decline reason: Even if you are not a sockpuppet, which is highly unlikely, 6 reverts on the Lehder article in quick succession is enough to get you blocked anyway. DrKay (talk) 19:05, 3 January 2025 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Diannaa: I need your help. These people accuse me of being a puppet of someone else who has my name. These people have weak evidence against me while I have already proven that I am not that guy.--JeanMercier90 (talk) 18:01, 3 January 2025 (UTC) Dear DrKay: If it's because of an edit war, then my block should be temporary, not permanent or indefinite. Well, it's almost the same thing. Right now I feel offended by the evil that all of those people, including that Finn, did to me. They think they own Wikipedia and thus abuse their power and mistreat people.--JeanMercier90 (talk) 20:22, 3 January 2025 (UTC) PS: PS: I wish that Finn had had the courage to answer me in the same way he blocked me. Hey sir, the fact that I think the edits of a near namesake are good does not make me a puppet user of him or anyone else. You are nobody to go around making accusations lacking reliable evidence. As I explained elsewhere; the surname Martínez has an accent on the i; Lehder is a former drug lord because he already served time in prison and was released in 2020, today he lives in Germany and is no longer involved in the hazardous criminal business of drug trafficking. Casti's edits have their sources. It would be necessary for CitationBot or some other user to cite the sources because, personally, it was too much for me, or rather difficult, to cite them. But if we are going to continue with this streak of unfounded accusations and other non-constructive actions, it is best that the article be deleted. Let neither I nor anyone else edit it anymore. A piece of cake. JeanMercier90 (talk) 18:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC) |
