User talk:Jazzeur/Old stuff 2



November 2007

Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Tiptoety (talk) 05:52, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for asking, first off you are not able to block a user unless you are an administrator. Second if you wish to warn a user please use one of these. And third if you wish to report a vandal please make sure they have been properly warned and report them at WP:AIV. Cheers! Tiptoety (talk) 06:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
That would simply constitute vandalism, and can be reported here. Also please remember to sign your posts (on talk pages) using ~~~~. Cheers! Tiptoety (talk) 06:34, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
If you have anymore questions please feel free to ask! You may also want to look into the adoption program. Cheers! Tiptoety (talk) 06:41, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
I do, but the vandal must be currently active, and had been warned within the last few mins. That is why your request for a block was turned down. Cheers! Tiptoety (talk) 06:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Danielle_Brisebois.jpg

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Danielle_Brisebois.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 09:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:D Brisebois.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:D Brisebois.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:CSD#G4 and WP:CSD#I7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Image:D Brisebois.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Fritz S. (Talk) 10:28, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:D Brisebois.jpg

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:D Brisebois.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? J Milburn (talk) 10:33, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:D Brisebois.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:D Brisebois.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:06, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

No free image having been found this far does not justify using an unfree image. Please see the non-free content policy, it clearly states that such images should only be used if no free equivalent "could be created" (which is why unfree images of living persons are rarely accepted at Wikipedia). And since Brisebois still makes public appearances, a free image still could be created, even if none can be obtained from her herself or through her management. --Fritz S. (Talk) 14:54, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Again? Really?

So, how often do you plan to upload that same image and have it deleted as it clearly violates policy before you give up? --Fritz S. (Talk) 08:29, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Danielle_Brisebois.JPG

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Danielle_Brisebois.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Fritz S. (Talk) 08:30, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Dear Fritz, or shall I say dear Ayatollah, I quit. You win! If you are so sure that a licensed picture can be obtained for Danielle Brisebois, I say go get one yourself and use it to illustrate that article. --Jazzeur (talk) 21:06, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Polack article

(You wrote)
Congratulation, great research work and text for the Polack article. --Jazzeur (talk) 04:24, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. --Poeticbent talk 15:35, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Danielle_Brisebois_singer.JPG

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Danielle_Brisebois_singer.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 20:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Jean_Stapleton.jpg

Replaceable fair use
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Jean_Stapleton.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 20:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Awards Infobox Issue

Jazzeur, the issue has been raised again about adding awards to the infobox. Some well thought-out ideas got squashed last time and I think there's enough consensus on the issue now to have it added. Would you like to rejoin the conversation? Here --FilmFan69 (talk) 01:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC)