This is an archive of past discussions with User:JayJay. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Articles for Creation is desperately in need of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors and administrators alike, to help us clear a record backlog of pending submissions. There is currently a significant backlog of 1745 submissions waiting to be reviewed. These submissions are generally from new editors who have never edited Wikipedia before. A prompt, constructive review of submissions could significantly editor retention.
We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 1 or 2 reviews, would be extremely beneficial.
Hi JayJay -- the anon is trying to add assertions that the man is a criminal, in addition to a batch of original research. Because it's a BLP I'm taking a harder line. I'll unblock him the moment he acknowledges he's read the policy and won't do it again. (Note -- it may even be true what he says -- but it wasn't sourced.) Thanks, Antandrus (talk)00:05, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks -- (being an admin, even for seven years, doesn't make me special -- I'm not always right so I do appreciate you having an unbiased look though!) To my eye it was over the line; an assertion of criminality without source. Cheers, Antandrus (talk)00:13, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
In response to your nomination for deletion, I was able to establish that this drug was (then at least) currently being manufactured by Pendopharm. I also found the links on the company website describing this drug, although a week later those pages disappeared. However, I did find-out two DIN numbers for the drug, per:
old DIN: 00108316 (Frosst > Merck Canada)
new DIN: 02238646 (Pendopharm)
The license to manufacture this drug was transferred to Pendopharm, Montreal, Quebec 2006-10-20 or 1998-08-14 (discontinued by Merck). While the 282 MEP links on the Pendopharm website have apparently been deleted, this prescription drug is still available, apparently still from Pendopharm.
If it is possible to recover my original contribution, that would be helpful. I can try to find current references, if this is not possible, it would be discouraging to have to repeat an earlier effort. Enquire (talk) 02:07, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
This is the very first newsletter for WikiProject Articles for creation! If you find any errors or have suggestions on what to improve/include in future newsletters, please leave a message here.
v4.1.16b2 is now available in the beta channel! Reviewers can use the beta version of the script by following the instructions here and should report bugs here! Release notes can be found here as well as in the source code.
If you are JavaScript savvy, please contact Nathan2055 (talk·contribs) if you wish to help with development.
Reviewing articles and more since 2005!
Delivered 00:38, 18 December 2012 (UTC) by EdwardsBot. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the spamlist.
Episcopal School of Dallas
JayJay
The Controversy section at the end of the Episcopal School of Dallas is highly biased and misinforms readers about the true nature of the lawsuit. Clearly the original author of that story desires to tarnish the name of the Episcopal School of Dallas. Their writing contracts the sources they themselves used. Ideally, a deletion of that section would be best, to settle this once and for all, or the following corrections must be made in order to improve the accuracy of the section:
1. ESD officials only proposed expelling the student if she failed to withdraw voluntarily, which she did. She was not expelled from ESD. Furthermore, this was AFTER ESD administrators initially decided to allow her to stay at the school, not immediately after hearing about the sexual-relations with the teacher.
2. What changed was that the girl began talking about the incident to other ESD students. Those students reported this to ESD administrators and it was after this that the infamous "haunting the halls" e-mail was written. It is also because of her continuing to discuss the matter that ESD decided it was best for her to leave the school.
3. The teacher did immediately resign after ESD administrators were made aware of the situation and now faces criminal charges.
4. The rape charge is statutory. The girl was "in love" with the teacher and they planned to have a relationship together. He said he "wanted her to raise his children."
All of the above can be verified in the sources already cited in the article.
I am not familiar with Wikipedia procedures for editing controversial content but believe I seek to edit the page to increase the objectivity and accuracy of the entry.
Hey 68.12.228.22, you are consistently blanking the section instead of revising it constructively. If you want to clarify what happened, then please discuss so on the article's talk page. I'm not sure why you decided to contact JayJay about this issue. Thanks, Treeees (talk) 22:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC)\
He contacted me because I was reverting his actions, plus he hasn't made an edit in about a month so I don't know why you are bringing this up now? JayJayWhat did I do?03:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Michael Q. Schmidttalkbackis wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS
1272
Oh come on, have a heart. It's only 1 bloody page that no one ever visits. Anyone can clearly tell it's a joke and not actual information. There are fans which think it's an awesome easter egg. Don't be mean. Leave it up. Out of every Wikipedia page, it can't hurt to have 1 little line just for the lols. --The Official Jason garwood (talk) 02:40, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
I don't care, rules are rules and we have to follow them, now I suggest you stop or you will see yourself getting blocked in the future. JayJayTalk to me02:44, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Are all users on Wikipedia such pretentious, up-them-selves pricks? Must be. You lot are the bane of Wikipedia. Rot in hell. I'm done, do what you like, Someone else will come and change it back anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JasonGarwood (talk • contribs) 02:45, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
