Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.
The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft does not establish biographical notability, which is based on what others have written about the subject.
Fix reference errors.
This draft has inconsistent formatting.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Patricia Reif and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Patricia Reif, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
Hello, Janicelp!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please help me with...speedy deletion. I did not want this page deleted, I only wanted to create a new edited page with better references for notability. Also, Wikipedia says that my user page does not exist? I did not want to delete my account either. I am very confused by all this, please help me.
No, you just need to create a user page (one option) or redirect your userpage to your user talk page (this page) if you don't wish to bother saying some things about yourself on your user page.
Some people get very involved in setting up their userpage just so. Try not to spend a lot of time futzing with your userpage until you have more to say.
Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.
Congratulations, Janicelp, on creating your first article. You have put together an interesting biography on someone who obviously deserves to be included in the encyclopedia. After some minor copy editing and adding a few links to other articles, I moved it to the mainspace. I hope this success will encourage you to write more articles about women in religion. If ever you need assistance, please let me know. You might also find it useful to join WikiProject Women in Red. You can do so by clicking on "Join WikiProject" in the box at the top of the page. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:20, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
Hi Dan, Thank you for your quick reply on this. I was hoping to get this up as it is important for this subject to have an English page.
It has been quite awhile since I have written something for Wikipedia. The learning curve is huge and I see that there are many changes as to how things work--I think for the better.
Today, I worked several hours only to be told that YouTube is on the WikiBlacklist and I had to remove those references as well as the one that got flagged for copyright (I did not know). Can you watch this page for me and let me know if there are any other changes I need to address to get it accepted, please> I most appreciate it.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ulrike E. Auga and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Dear Greenman, Thank you for your commentary. I will work on sourcing, but I want to bring to your attention that this person already has a German Wikipedia page https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulrike_Auga
and also a Wikidata entry: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2477207. Would this page not be enough as a reliable source? Also I see that Wikipedia is now requesting tertiary sources whereas they used want secondary ones, how is that possible?
In addition, I have been editing on Wikipedia in 2015 and began the 1000 Women in Religion project, (now Women in Religion focus group) with my colleagues and my handle is janicelp, why does it say my page does not exist?
I hope this helps you as well so we can get her page up. She is a very accomplished academic and deserves to have a page. Perhaps there are cultural differences between Germany and the USA, but those ought to be taken into consideration.
Hi Jim, See my latest reply--yeah, I'm getting that de-Wikipedia is much looser (culturally, I have to say, I think because people can't "embellish" their backgrounds as in the USA (i.e. George Santos!!) because the career hoops they have to jump through are much more strict to begin with, especially after WWII!) Thanks again, Greenman, too, for your help!! Janicelp Janice Leah Poss (talk) 14:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Greenman, Yes, I am receiving help from Figureskatingfan. We are both part of the Women In Religion Project on Wikipedia. if you can find some "reliable" sources to helps us get Ulrike's page up in English, this would be a huge help to her and to us. Thanks, Janicelp (talk) 18:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Janicelp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ulrike E. Auga, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thanks Fireflybot, Please do not delete this page, I am getting help from several Women in Religion editors on this. Thanks for reminding me. Janicelp (talk) 17:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)janicelp[reply]
