User talk:Jamiebijania/Archive 1

Archive

Archives

1st 2nd 3rd 4th
5th 6th 7th
8th
Please start a new section at the bottom of the page for new topics and sign your posts using four tildes (~~~~). Thank you.
This user is part of the Welcoming Committee.

deleting talkpages

Hi Jamie, I've declined your deletion request as we don't normally delete user talk pages. Also the vandal in question has now been blocked, which hopefully will solve the problem. WereSpielChequers 16:55, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Serangoon ave 2

A tag has been placed on Serangoon ave 2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jenuk1985 | Talk 11:13, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Serangoon ave 4

A tag has been placed on Serangoon ave 4 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jenuk1985 | Talk 11:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Serangoon ave 3

A tag has been placed on Serangoon ave 3 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jenuk1985 | Talk 11:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Islam in Birmingham

Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. Nevertheless, the article Islam in Birmingham had sufficient context to identify the subject. Moreover, your subsequent 'final' warning to the user[1] was out of place as there are no previous warnings and your personal pages that the pages are irrelevant and their creation is disruptive does not warrant such a warning in any case.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:26, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Serangoon ave 2

A tag has been placed on Serangoon ave 2 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. - Jarry1250 (t, c) 09:09, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with Serangoon ave 2, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jenuk1985 | Talk 10:29, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Please don't call other users racist, even if you are sure they are racists. Review Wikipedia:Civility for more information on our civility policies. Thanks. Hipocrite (talk) 12:51, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks,i will bear that in mind in the future.I shall drop this matter as i am very used to people discriminating me.Jamiebijania (talk) 13:56, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Patrolling pages

Thank you for your message. Whilst I am aware of the New pages patrol, I am unsure what you mean by "please mark the pages as patrolled after you have patrolled them"? I presume you are talking about new articles, if so, how are they marked as patrolled? Thanks,--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 04:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah hah! Well it just goes to show that it doesn't matter how long someone has spent using wikipedia, there is always something new to learn! Thanks, I will look out for the button, have fun!--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 05:43, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Serangoon Ave 2

I have nominated Serangoon Ave 2, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serangoon Ave 2. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jenuk1985 | Talk 17:32, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification needed

Hi,i did reposted the article serangoon ave 2 but i did not delete any speedy deletion tags!Please explain,cheers,Jamiebijania (talk) 11:38, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want this to turn into a "yes you did".. "no I didnt"... "yes you did" argument, so for that reason this will be my only reply on my subject. As the article is now deleted (and as I understand it, protected), the history is not available, but if you didn't remove the speedy tags, you wouldn't have received the warning. Jenuk1985 | Talk 11:49, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That was not a personal attack and i DID NOT delete the deletion templates on serangoon ave 2.And fyi,you cannot put an only warning template if there are no other warnings.Jamiebijania (talk) 12:28, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have taken appropriate action and I will enter into no further correspondence on this matter. Jenuk1985 | Talk 12:36, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Its you AGAIN.Jamiebijania (talk) 14:29, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, do you have an issue? Jenuk1985 | Talk 14:53, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey i do not want to start an argument but you dont try to act as if you forgot about them. Before you randomly put a warning for personal attacks,this is not one. Just a reminder.Jamiebijania (talk) 15:18, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do you actually have a reason for posting here again? You haven't made any comments about anything apart from "It's you AGAIN". Don't bother posting here unless you have something relevant to say. Jenuk1985 | Talk 15:20, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Do you actually have a reason for replying?This will be the last time i write here.Jamiebijania (talk) 01:48, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]