User talk:JTZegers/Archives/2024/November

Archives

October 2024

Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Lunchly, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I'm not seeing that the current sources attribute any of the product's criticism as being "due to" Donaldson's other controversies, it's all mold and child diet ethics. Belbury (talk) 19:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I changed it to false advertising and mold since that's what the source says. The controversies were mentioned in a different section. JTZegers (talk) 19:39, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying. Where are you seeing the false advertising? If that's intended as a summary of "selling crap to kids who don't know better than to trust the people who are selling it to them", I think it's overstating it. Wikipedia should be cautious about making specific allegations which aren't exactly in the sources. Belbury (talk) 19:43, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In one of the sources I found. JTZegers (talk) 19:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which one? I couldn't see anything in the two you cited. Belbury (talk) 19:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This one: https://www.thegrocer.co.uk/news/mrbeast-lunchly-kits-for-kids-criticised-by-health-campaigners/695923.article JTZegers (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks, you hadn't included that source. I don't see anything in there that would be termed as false advertising, though. Which part of the story are you referring to? Belbury (talk) 19:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where it mentions the irresponsible food claims, then goes into detail over the questionable marketing. I agree, it's very subtle. JTZegers (talk) 19:55, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wouldn't say either of those was false advertising. Belbury (talk) 19:58, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I changed it to the actual subject of that source. I was just trying to follow the rules here. JTZegers (talk) 20:03, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks! Belbury (talk) 20:20, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]