User talk:JNorman704

Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen article visibility

Recently I created a new Wikipedia article on Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen. However, I've noticed that whenever I do a Google search on her name, her husband Marc Andreessen's Wikipedia article shows up among her top results, but her own Wiki article is nowhere to be seen. I'm wondering what might be causing this and if there is a solution? Thank you for any help you can offer. JNorman704 (talk)

Unfortunately, we do not control Google's searches on Wikipedia pages. Often times, Google's search engines may take longer than usual to list your page in their databases. Also, it may already be indexed but may appeal lower down in the search results. Try requesting that your page be added using Google's Webmaster Tool. --JustBerry (talk) 21:10, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zynga

Thanks for your contributions to Zynga. I saw on your userpage that you have some expertise on Silicon Valley, so your contributions are very welcome. Also, I realize that it may have been too blunt for me to revert your entire addition to the treatment of employees section. I have moved the criticisms back into the article for this and other subjects to enhance NPOV, and although I understand that there is significant coverage of alleged abusive practices, your balancing contributions look helpful and I will try to integrate them into the Corporate Culture section (a task with which you are welcome to assist). Thanks, RJaguar3 | u | t 22:08, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi RJaguar3, and thank you very much for your note. I was going to reach out to see about striking a balance with this section. Certainly Zynga has received some criticisms, but I believe there is a lot more to the story about working at Zynga than what has been depicted in the Zynga Wiki article so far. Also, the entire 'Controversies' section of this article had been flagged for lacking a neutral POV, and I was attempting to adjust the tone a bit with my edits. In any event, as an outsider at Zynga, I feel there are a number of positive things about the company culture that deserve mention as well as the criticisms, to help give the story balance. I'm looking forward to collaborating with you to make this section even better. JNorman704 (talk) 23:25, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Montopia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ResearchGate

If you add this to the dispute resolution board or anywhere else, please add a notice the page. But I don't really understand your position. Do you personally doubt that ResearchGate is actually sending spam (despite a lot of scientists complaining in public on the net using their real name and their spam even being archived in public email archives)? Or do you just think this should not be reported on Wikipedia because there are only primary sources? Martin.uecker (talk) 23:26, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Clay Jam

Gatoclass 00:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Party Place

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bump (application), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fast Company (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Acumatica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red Herring (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yuja Wang

Hello,

Can you provide the context of the picture you set on wk.fr, date and place, so that I can upload the caption ? Thanks, Zandr4[Kupopo ?] 08:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jerry Yang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Plagarism

The first site, Gawker who has an affiliation with Lifehacker would be more or less biased but there rae clear examples such as the use of muffin covers. The other site I posted also pointed out with links to sites that holds no affiliation. You can dispute the neutrality but don't delete items that you simply disagree with. Deletion should be the last thing done and only after there is a consensus. Silver163 (talk) 22:18, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To further clarify, plagiarism is a serious charge to make, and the site Brit Morin founded, Brit + Co., is up front about being a 'content curator,' something Mashable says everyone on the Web is in the Pinterest era. See http://mashable.com/2013/05/09/curator/. So the Plagiarism charge seems to me to be unfairly targeting Morin. I felt that deleting it was justified based on this from WP:BLP: "Contentious material about living persons (or in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion." JNorman704 (talk) 18:59, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ShoeDazzle logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ShoeDazzle logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Armbrust The Homunculus 06:07, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 2 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Scanadu may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Voice</ref><ref>http://news.cnet.com/KPN,-Qwest-team-on-European-network/2100-1033_3-218186.html) http://www.v3.co.uk/v3-uk/news/1948688/qwest-snaps-eunet</ref> He also founded electronic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:17, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 12 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zoosk logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zoosk logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:36, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Control4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sub-Zero. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brit + Co. company logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brit + Co. company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JNorman704. I work on conflict of interest issues in Wikipedia - I also work a lot on article related to health, which is how we overlapped at Cerner. this edit is mighty promotional, and I saw on your user page that you edit for pay sometimes. I reckon you know that per the Terms of Use you need to disclose edits that you make for pay. I looked through your last bunch of edits and didn't see any disclosures. Maybe you haven't edited for pay recently, or maybe I missed them.

But generally, our practice since the Terms of Use were amended about a year ago, has been to ask paid editors, and other editors with a Conflict of Interst, to make a COI disclosure on their userpage listing articles they have edited for pay or for which they otherwise have a COi, as well as disclosing the conflict on the relevant article talk page.

Would you be willing to make such a disclosure on your user page? Also, are you/will you receive compensation from Cerner (or their agents) for edits to the Cerner article? Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 21:49, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jytdog, Thank you for your message and questions, and my apologies for the slow response. I’ve been out of the office.
I am aware of the Terms of Use amendments that went into effect on June 16, 2014. On June 18, 2014, I disclosed on my user page that I sometimes do paid edits for some clients of the OutCast Agency. I have been of the belief that I am following the terms of use, in that they state disclosure is required in “at least one of the following ways: a statement on your user page, a statement on the talk page accompanying any paid contributions, or a statement in the edit summary accompanying any paid contributions.”
In other words, the terms state I must disclose in one of those three places, which I have done regarding OutCast, and that disclosing more than that is not a requirement.
That said, I totally understand the reason for your request. Going forward, I pledge to disclose all paid edits (a) on my user page and (b) on the talk page of the relevant article.
Regarding Cerner: I had neglected to update my user page with a disclosure of those recent paid edits. But I have now done so, as well as disclosed the paid edit on the Cerner talk page.
As far as the edits I have already made to the Cerner page, I didn’t intend for any of them to be promotional. For example, I had seen Wikipedia company articles with a mention or listing of awards, such as Starbucks and Instagram, so I thought it would be OK to add a few significant awards to the Cerner article. However, if you feel any of my Cerner edits don’t adhere to Wikipedia neutrality or other requirements, I would greatly appreciate the opportunity to collaborate with you to make sure they do meet those requirements.
Thank you again for checking in with me on this. JNorman704 (talk) 17:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your very civil response! Always nice, when this conversation goes professionally. So the spirit and letter of the ToU calls for something like: "I an employee of the [Next_Fifteen_Communications#OutCast|Outcast Agency]], and Cerner is one of Outcast's clients" That is "employer, client, and affiliation". If you could put that on your User page (and list any other clients that you are editing in Wikipedia for) that would be ideal. I added the template:connected contributor tag to Cerner talk page so you don't have to worry about making further COI disclosures there. I also added the template:COI Editnotice template to the talk page header, which will make it easier for you to post "edit requests" formally - the formal way includes a tag that posts a notice to the WP:COIN page where more people see it, and can respond to it. Thanks again! Jytdog (talk) 18:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I appreciate your civil response as well as the helpful guidance. I will make my disclosures clearer on my user page and follow up on the other stuff you suggested ASAP. Thank you again. BTW, I noticed on someone's user page that you are one of their Wiki heroes, and I can see why!JNorman704 (talk) 18:51, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That is kind of you to say. I seem to evoke strong feelings - there are people who wish I would leave and never come back too. But it is always a happy thing to get positive feedback, so thanks again. Jytdog (talk) 19:15, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Scanadu 2015 logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scanadu 2015 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Current Lyft logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Current Lyft logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. SounderBruce 05:59, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ayah Bdeir littleBits.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ayah Bdeir littleBits.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:33, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brit + Co for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brit + Co is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brit + Co until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 04:47, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brit Morin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brit Morin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brit Morin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. North America1000 05:38, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jim Brett (November 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft, especially the second paragraph beginning "Brett became president", reads as if its purpose is to praise Brett rather than to describe him neutrally. (Let the readers decide whether to praise him.)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 23:37, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! JNorman704, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:37, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, JNorman704. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zynga logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zynga logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aaron Hirschhorn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Hirschhorn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Hirschhorn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Brit Morin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Brit Morin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TJH2018talk 16:33, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, JNorman704. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:17, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Brit + Co logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brit + Co logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if you forgot to declare paid editing on Acumatica here? ☆ Bri (talk) 20:11, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dan Morehead for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Morehead is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Morehead until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HighKing++ 13:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pantera Capital for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pantera Capital is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pantera Capital until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HighKing++ 13:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pantera Capital logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pantera Capital logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anki company logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anki company logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Daylen (talk) 22:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brit Morin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brit Morin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brit Morin (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Loksmythe (talk) 23:36, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zocdoc for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zocdoc is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zocdoc until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creepTalk 08:43, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Clay Jam logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Clay Jam logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zynga logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zynga logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bill McGlashan.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bill McGlashan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:30, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]