|
User talk:JJNito197/Archive 1
Red HairHi. I've reverted your edits to Red Hair. I've nothing specific against a lot of what you did, but unfortunately you used as a source a "BritainsDNA" document stored under "guff documents" at the University College London. See discussion here regarding what the genetic scientists there think about this company. Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 21:51, 13 January 2019 (UTC) Hello there. Thank you for correcting, have removed false source that you have stated also. My fault for not proof reading, Regards JJNito197 (talk) 10:38, 14 January 2019 (UTC) JJNito197 Hi. Repeatedly removing cited material in an article because you don't care for it, without any discussion, is disruptive and may cause you to be blocked from editing. If you want to discuss your edit, the proper place to do it in on the talk page, not through reverting edit summaries. Please try and reach consensus on things, rather than tit-for-tat edits. Also, please don't take images from other websites, then upload them saying you own them. Wikipedia takes copyright seriously. If you'd care to undo your last revert, or implement the improvement suggested, we can get discuss things. Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 19:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Alert This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. --Shrike (talk) 16:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Lebanese cuisineThe article Lebanese cuisine you nominated as a good article has passed DYK for Lebanese cuisine On 6 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lebanese cuisine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that many dishes in Lebanese cuisine can be traced back thousands of years to eras of Roman, Greek, Persian, Byzantine, Arab, Egyptian, and Phoenician rule? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lebanese cuisine. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lebanese cuisine), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. — Maile (talk) 12:02, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Lebanese Cuisine Effort
Appreciated! Thanks for your helpful input regarding that article. Regards JJNito197 (talk) 17:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you very much Onceinawhile, I appreciate that. JJNito197 (talk) 17:48, 7 September 2020 (UTC) WP:PHO
Hello talkallam, thanks for inviting me I would be glad to join and help out! JJNito197 (talk) 16:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC) ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
baba ghanoush vs mutabbalSo most every cooking website I end up at after searches says baba ganoush has no tahini but does have onions and tomoatoes while it's mutabbal that is roasted eggplant, olive oil, tahini, garlic and salt (maybe other spices but no other veggies). These websites are all in agreement that Wikipdia (and most English dictionaries) have it wrong:
"Both mutabal and baba ganoush are made using grilled eggplants. In fact, they both contain garlic, lemon and salt too. The difference comes down to a specific ingredient. In mutabal, tahini, which is a slightly bitter, earthy, nutty paste made from sesame seeds, is added. This adds a very distinct flavor and texture, which really separates one eggplant dip from the other. Secondly, baba ganoush is often served with onions, tomatoes and other vegetables, while mutabal is normally just served as a dip, although the Lebanese version is sometimes served with pomegranate seeds and walnuts." The only English dictionary I can find that excludes tahini from the prime (non-optional) ingredient list is Cambridge Dictionary (which is excluded from the article) https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/baba-ghanoush. We need one reliable source on the history of baba ganoush/mutabbal that explains the controversy and word usage so we are not using OR to explain this different ingredient usage and naming across regions. The article lead currently says baba ganoush has tahini in it which goes against all the top search engine recipes. It also says that mutabbal has onions and tomatoes in it which is also wrong. 35.129.1.59 (talk) 14:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
March 2021
SabianThanks for spotting my mistake at Anastas Al-Karmali - that one slipped through the cracks while fixing hundreds of links that were meant for the cymbal company. Do you happen to know what Sabian should actually link to? Could it be the Sabaean language? Lennart97 (talk) 09:10, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article. For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done. I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021. Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project. Thanks so much, Sarah Sanbar Sarabnas I'm researching Wikipedia Questions? 16:00, 24 July 2021 (UTC) Your GA nomination of Arab ChristiansHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Arab Christians you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Arab ChristiansThe article Arab Christians you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold Your GA nomination of Arab ChristiansThe article Arab Christians you nominated as a good article has passed A barnstar for you!
First warning for continuous vandalism to the Antiochian Greek Christians Page
Stop the vandalism, last warning
Report for vandalizing the Antiochian Greek Christians page with unjustifiable claims and with no backed up arguments
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
December 2021
This is a disruptive mass-revert of sourced info, and this is an abuse of warning-templates. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 13:18, 7 December 2021 (UTC) Discretionary sanctions notificationThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. --RegentsPark (comment) 16:38, 7 December 2021 (UTC) Bias
Auto-archiveI've taken the liberty to put MiszaBot at top of your talkpage; it archives old threads automatically. Tip: don't remove warnings and the like; just let them be archived, but don't give the impression you want to hide something. Experienced editors, and admins, will simply scroll through your history. regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 15:26, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Sanskrit and neo-AdvaitaRegarding the translation of Sanskrit, at least three English translations of Shankara's Brahma Sutra Bhasya are available. Comparing them is bewildering; it's almost as if three different texts are translated. Two translators even explicitly state that verse four can be translated in two significantly different ways, giving both translations. Regarding neo-Advaita, that is indeed quite different from classical Advaita. Classical Advaita is exegesis, of texts (Brahma Sutra I.1.3: "Brahman is realisable only trough the scriptures"). Neo-Advaita, in line with Vivekananda's neo-Vedanta, takes a quite different approach, and puts 'experience' at front. But these 'neo's' have deeper roots, in the incorporation of Yoga-thought and practice into Advaita textual exegesis (and vice versa). Nicholson, Unifying Hinduism, has a good treatment on this development. And Rambacharan, The Limits of Scripture, is a good study on Vibekananda's (mis)understanding of Shankara. But then, what is 'real' Advaita Vedanta? The texts from one author from 1200 years ago, writing in response to the philosophies of his time; or present-day Advaita-Yoga, which is a living tradition? Regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:10, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Witness-consciousnessMaybe of interest to you:
After all, that's what present-day Advaita (broadly constructed) is about (I think): yogic witness-consciousness cast in an Advaita Vedanta (Upanishadic) framework. PS: see also "tonic alertness." Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC) Levantine Arabic FACHi JJNito, I nominated Levantine Article for FAC. As you contributed to articles related to Lebanese culture, I thought you could be interested in reviewing this nomination. Thanks for any help you can provide. A455bcd9 (talk) 08:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC) ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Wikipedia and copyright
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:39, 16 December 2022 (UTC) February 2023 Your recent editing history at Dabke shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2023 (UTC)  You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Dabke. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:45, 14 February 2023 (UTC)Culture of EuropeHi. Vandalism as a quite specific menaing here on Wikipedia and the section you removed here most definitly was not vandalism. Off-topic? Sure. But a good faith edit by (apparently) a noob. Please don't WP:BITE the noobs. Kleuske (talk) 11:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
GreetingsWhy was my edit on palestinians reverted? Palestinians are descended from arabs that were there millennia ago. Firekong1 (talk) 23:04, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
EC request - WP:3OHi JJNito97, I've asked for a WP:3O regarding my edit request. I feel like it has been circumvented with Okedem's comments and my edit request was lost in the back and forth. I hope to discuss further. Thanks. Chavmen (talk) 08:07, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Your GA nomination of Second Intermediate Period of EgyptHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Second Intermediate Period of Egypt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. Your GA nomination of Second Intermediate Period of EgyptThe article Second Intermediate Period of Egypt you nominated as a good article has failed A barnstar for you!
Vandalism
Disambiguation link notification for July 29An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reporter (Ancient Egypt), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thebes. (Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 29 July 2024 (UTC) ArbCom 2024 Elections voter messageHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
