|
User talk:J.delanoy/Archive 23
Greetings!Greetings J.delanoy! Sorry to generate even more work for you, but a user you blocked recently, User talk:208.68.153.242, has started vandal editing again now that the block is up. His/her/their edits have been reverted by other editors without any warnings and as I'm not the reverting editor, not sure if I can jump in there to add further warnings prior to further future blocks. Either way, in case these edits had slipped your notice, maybe you can check it out. Cheers - and thanks for being out there! --Technopat (talk) 01:39, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
User:64.130.72.179hello, J.delanoy. i just saw the vandalism that this IP user was perpetrating on the Carol Browner article. i think you are way too forgiving. i would have blocked the creep permanently after the third incident. (i'm no fan of Carol Browner). no need to respond. just my 2 cents worth. Kenatipo (talk) 02:54, 1 November 2009 (UTC) The RazziesHi. I noticed your removals and then reverts on actor articles that added the Razzie award template. I am going to remove them, mostly because when WP:ACTOR debated and finally concluded to remove the parameters from the Template:Infobox actor, at no point in the debate did anyone support retaining the Razzie award parameter. The decision was basically that Razzies are bad faith parody awards, not legitimate industry or critical awards, are subject to voting by anyone who cares to pay the $25 fee to be a voter and ultimately wouldn't be listed on article filmographies or otherwise. My view is that WP:ACTOR has already made a conclusion about adding the template. If this is disupted, I will gladly open an WP:RfC at WT:ACTOR and I am absolutely positive of the outcome. Although these templates have been around for a while, they haven't been added to the articles until today by a new editor. Just wanted to let you know my reasoning. Wildhartlivie (talk) 02:45, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
WikitableHello there J.delanoy. Are you any good with Wikitables? If you are, please look at User:Razorflame#Current editing statistics I would like that to be in a table with headers that say the following: Header 1 (first column header) says Namespace :::: Header 2 (second column header) says Edit count :::: Header 3 (third column header) says Percentage of edits. Do you think you could do that for me, seeing as I suck at that kind of thing? Please let me know on my talk page whether or not you can help me. Thanks, Razorflame 19:56, 1 November 2009 (UTC) Additional questions for you. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. --Jayron32 00:36, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 Note: You could also recieve the "Wikipedian of the Week award for this week!
I can think of no other user right now who deserves this more than you! Good job!--Coldplay Expert 03:09, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Cool, well this is off topic but what part of the state, I myself reside in the little town of Culpeper, VA anyway good job again Jdelanoy!--Coldplay Expert 03:35, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
You're invited!
In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, review the recent Wikipedia Takes Manhattan, plan for the next stages of projects like Wikipedia at the Library and Wikipedia Loves Landmarks, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects, for example particular problems posed by Wikipedia articles about racist and anti-semitic people and movements (see the September meeting's minutes). In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and generally enjoy ourselves and kick back. You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list. Thanks...... for getting rid of this guy. I was about to report him. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 20:00, 3 November 2009 (UTC) CSD?Hi J, I came across this article: Naked Pumpkin Run and am wondering if it falls under the "No context" criteria for speedy deletion? Thanks. A8UDI 20:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
VandalThanks for dealing with the problems of vandalism on my talk page - appreciated.--SabreBD (talk) 20:52, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
HelloDo you have any informations on the WP:AN/I at id.wikipedia? If not, can I ask idwiki issues on the enwiki AN/I?----Boeing7107isdelicious|Sprich mit meine Piloten 07:32, 5 November 2009 (UTC) Requesting checkuser...Hi J. I have strong reason to believe that IP User:98.26.40.33 is now blocked user:BillNyeIsaG. Both were vandalizing Bill Nye. Thanks, Tom A8UDI 00:02, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of List of simple dichotomiesHi, I noticed you speedied that article. I am unsure C5 applied, since me and another editor had indeed contributed to the article (mostly trimming it) after its creation. I wonder if it is possible to have it userfied under User:Cyclopia/List of dichotomies (without "simple") or if there are issues I am not aware of that prevent recreation. I would like to bring it to a meaningful shape. Thanks! --Cyclopiatalk 17:28, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Grawp IPsI reblocked those IPs--some of them anyway--for five years since it's obvious our little friend is proxying. Blueboy96 02:48, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
QuestionHi I stoped by to look at your user page and i noticed that at the top of you page that you have listed at the top that you hold the sul for your username I would like to do the same can you tell me how to do it or were to find it.--Dcheagle (talk) 04:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC) Rollback rightsHi! Could you please tell me how I get rollback rights on Wikipedia? I noticed that your name was on the list of people who consider this --5 albert square (talk) 00:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
re: your messageHi J.delanoy, I've left a reply to your message on my talk page -- Marek.69 talk 05:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC) NewtonSthlmtjej (talk) 17:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Hello, My article newtonsales.com was deleted, i am the owner of the site and trying to chronical the history of the site and the purpose of the site in supporting the apple newton. can you let me know why you marked it for deletion and what i can do to fix it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sthlmtjej (talk • contribs) 17:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC) Sthlmtjej (talk) 17:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
WarningUm...you may want to check out this, this, this this and this. it appears that PW got remaned to some really long name that I can't spell. However, PW has remained a seperate account, and Is now being used for vandilism by (wongly) stating that CE is a sock of NoR. regards (I really need to get started on my wikibrake.)--Orangesodakid 19:10, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
If you think I vandalize, it is your right, but banning this ip would just prove that you do not care for unregistered users, I have a contributed this encyclopedia for a long time and many times my edits were automatically reverted by some RETARDS or bots just because I wasn't registered going as far as being banned for adding information (and sources) to articles which now have the information kept on them because I was persistent and kept putting my changes until no bot or RETARD would automatically revert it.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.179.177.244 (talk • contribs)
Request for ip exemptionI have heard that due to conflicts from my ip address, which is linked to my school, that wikipedia will block my ip address. I would like for my account to be exempt from this block. Please reply on my talk page re:request for ip exemption. Thank you --Lord of the Pit (talk) 14:53, 10 November 2009 (UTC) You've been vandal caughtYou may not this vandal catch with railizardz12 or another administrator. --Railizardz 12 (talk) 16:46, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you!It will be a pleasure to take a six-month break from Bambifan101. Thank you for blocking that range. Would it be possible to do the same with that 74.249 range as well? If not, I understand. It's just nice to know we'll have some relief. Bless you. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:17, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
No sweat, J. Thanks for all you do. Gonna run, but thanks yet again. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:31, 11 November 2009 (UTC) You have a minute?Could you check the sites referenced here and here? The pages wouldn't load for me and I have reverted the IP's edits based on that. I have messaged the IP with no response. If you can get the pages to load I will go back and undo my reverts. Oh...thanks for the revert on my talk :) Tiderolls 07:01, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Can you take a look?At the WP:AIV report for Coercorash (talk · contribs). Despite many warnings, and two editors reverting, he's continuing at his absurd stuff. Page move vandalism, redirecting a long standing article to a POV fork he created and so on. cheers. -SpacemanSpiff 07:06, 11 November 2009 (UTC) Full agreement with your thoughts on the cult-ish fundraising banner......but isn't this just a bit of an overreaction? Steve Smith (talk) 06:08, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Speedy-Deletion of "The MadHatters"Hello, Early today the article named "The MadHatters" was speedy-deleted citing G12 as well as G7 and G11. This stated that some of the material under the 'History' section of this article was copied from http://www.casa.org/node/2058. In fact, the information on http://www.casa.org/node/2058 was provided to the Contemporary A Cappella Society by The UW MadHatters as profile/biographical information. It was created by the MadHatters and can also be seen on their website http://www.uwmadhatters.com/content/view/madhatters_in_history/. This fact was posted on the Talk:The MadHatters page after CorenSearchBot notified me (the page's creator) of the possible copyright infringement. Because this information was created by The MadHatters and provided to http://www.casa.org/node/2058, it should not be considered copyright infringement. I would greatly appreciate your time and consideration in the matter of hopefully undeleting this article. Thank you Bernecker (talk) 22:55, 11 November 2009 (UTC) Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshopAs you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome. WOTDNote: You could also recieve the "Wikipedian of the Week award for this week! December21st2012Freak 00:01, 12 November 2009 (UTC) CHU thanksThanks for this. I knew the last one was related, but was trying to AGF on the obsessive ramblings he's been posting on my page. Ugh. tedder (talk) 18:32, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanksfor the IP exemption :)--Coldplay Expert 18:46, 12 November 2009 (UTC) dito. thank you so much. :D regards--Orangesodakid 18:47, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
QuestionHow would I go about acquiring tools for reverting vandalism? Regards - 4twenty42o (talk) 20:01, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
David Sellsi just want to confirm i didnt recrete the article by accident if i did im really sorry i didnt mean to i meant to put a speedy deletion template instead Saturn star (talk) 20:15, 12 November 2009 (UTC) Purging edit summaries of deleted revisionsHello J. I've recently picked up the mop and am still learning the toops and procedures. I'm presently looking at possibly cleaning up recent attacks in User talk:NJGW through a delete and selective restore operation, as you did several months back. I understand the delete and restore steps. However, when I look at the deleted revisions, I see that most of the prior edit summaries have been replaced with "
Westhill, AberdeenshireHowdy - just a quick query; was wondering why you did this reversion please ? It's not obvious from context. Ta. - TB (talk) 09:14, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Blocked user GA nomThe blocked user Kathyrncelestewright nominated The Nightingale here. I was wondering if I should speedy fail it because the user will not be able to make the necessary changes. Thanks, Airplaneman talk 07:41, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi. Regarding Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pioneercourthouse, looks like sleeper Psyouboo (talk · contribs) snuck through. Maybe another range to check? Thanks. Wknight94 talk 15:05, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Hmm..Was this too rude when I gave this warning to the user you blocked: 'This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Zelda Fitzgerald, you will be blocked from editing. You think we can't tell when you lie? Stop '. I'd like your opinion. Thanks A8UDI 02:42, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
Removal of accessHello J.delanoy. Unfortunately I am no longer as active as I was on vandalism/spam fighting on this wiki and I do not want to hold unused flags I request you to remove my rollback flags here. As you know I'm a global rollbacker and it seems that per policy I am allowed to use it so if some day I found any vandalism or spam I think it should not be a problem to use it and, of course, in the event any admin would require me to have local rollback again I will request it through the normal ways. Thank you, --Dferg (talk) 21:18, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
ResearchEditorHe's running a little faster; I accidentally added a new report to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Subpage - Pending close#ResearchEditor. Sorry about that, but he used to add a new sock farm every 2 weeks, and he's now getting back to once a week. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 08:07, 16 November 2009 (UTC) Used 203.189.83.87 deserves another blockYou blocked this user a week ago for a week and he's back ... the acc't is clearly only used for vandalism (although of a very minor sort) BobKawanaka (talk) 14:33, 16 November 2009 (UTC) You were the last one to block this IPso would you like to do it again? [1] JohnWBarber (talk) 04:11, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
128.8.0.0/16I have unblocked 128.8.0.0/16 which is the range used by the University of Maryland. There seems to be substantial interest in using Wikipedia for editing in classes there. Fred Talk 21:36, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
BlockingA bit ridiculous isn't it, considering I have never edited anything on Wikipedia before, yet I get on the website to find a message saying i've been blocked. I think you need to work on your system a bit more with IP's. 118.208.138.17 (talk) 02:11, 19 November 2009 (UTC) Something urgentPlease check your e-mail. Schfifty3 03:12, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
For reverting vandalism on my user talk page... Pepperpiggle has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching! Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}! Thanks! *Pepperpiggle**Sign!* 00:36, 20 November 2009 (UTC) Please help us stop PiracyPlease don't bring back the torrent, music links We are concerned about PIRACY Thank You for understanding
Thank You for understanding Piracy concerns and efforts produce a great movie —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.61.59 (talk) 01:48, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
MajorMinorMarkYou blocked this guy for sockpuppetry. It's likely that he is someone's sock (judging from the edit history, and his knowledge of policy), but he's not been overtly disruptive, and he's actually been helpful in the ongoing sockfest surrounding "team touchdown". Could you fill us in on what's going on? Thanks. Horologium (talk) 03:12, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
166.137.4.139*cough* HalfShadow 18:04, 20 November 2009 (UTC) VandalismI'm extremely sick and tired of vandalism by this same person. Please refer to this administrator's talk page for more about this. I'd appreciate any help that I can get. - Zarbon (talk) 18:21, 20 November 2009 (UTC) You might want to checkuser 166.137.4.0/24, which is part of the range on which the vandal operates. You'll find something worth looking at, I think. I can handle it if you'd like, but I thought you might want to do it. --Deskana (talk) 19:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
B.E.Hi J.d. I saw that you blocked the anon for block evasion based on the ANI post and I was wondering if it was clear who they were? The post seemed on its face to be well intentioned to me. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:43, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
lolsockpuppets? in my pedia? ÷seresin 05:29, 21 November 2009 (UTC) Question!Hey there J.delanoy, I was wondering if I could use one of your funny vandalisms on my user page. I'm trying to build a list too, and I would love to just use a certain one on your page that made me laugh out loud. Cheers, The Arbiter★★★ 03:08, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
RFCU inquiryHello. I was meaning to create an SPI, but it was hard for me to follow, and because I know you here a lot, I was hoping you could help me! Please check the page history on Todd Field, an article I created. By observing the edit summaries of the accounts in red, I believe they are under control of a main user. Perhaps the user forgot their password and is creating new accounts? Plus, most of the users are contributing only to pages related to Field. The period of time when there has been most activity from these possible "socks" was in the spring this year. So, what are your observations? Thanks. Schfifty3 04:39, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Another curiosityHi again! I realized I should have responded to the RFCU post, but I don't think I will right now. I am curious: on Mediawiki.org, I see a lot of reverts in your contribs. Do you use your own bot, or do you manually revert but include the standard edit summary (Reverted edits by User1 to last version by User2)? Link: [2] Thanks, Schfifty3 00:01, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
RE:November 2009I do not know what do you mean. ALL the media are saying the suspect is Ampatuan's family clan. So why put a misleading picture into the infobox? A warlord's personal clan is very different from Guerrilla rebellion forces.--1j1z2 (talk) 06:17, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
regarding PickbothmanlolI know AGF and all, but he was socking as recently as yesterday, see User talk:MajorMinorMark. Not sure if you were aware that he was. If you were, and have chosen to unblock him anyways, that's cool. However, I just thought it'd be useful if you had all the details. --Jayron32 02:48, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
You might be interested in WP:ANI#Five-year-old deletion discussion reopened. Hans Adler 07:44, 26 November 2009 (UTC) Your recent additions to Talk:ItalyI think what you are saying is that a user involved in the issue under discussion has been identified as having sockpuppets who have also been involved. And that they have all been blocked. But I don’t think that’s going to be very clear to everyone reading the page. Perhaps you might clarify there? Ian Spackman (talk) 23:41, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank youThank you for protecting the last page. I can't stand that edit war.--David Beals (talk) 03:43, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
YellowMonkey unprotected the page that you last protected. Reprotect it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by David Beals (talk • contribs) 03:56, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Go-Cod-MW2I am very sorry, but I do not understand why you identified me as a sockpuppet. I can assure you that I am not. Please can you cancel your comment on the Italy discussion page, or at least say that I am not one to solve this misunderstanding Thank you --Go-Cod-MW2 (talk) 08:49, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
PickbothmanlolI've reblocked this user per Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Five-year-old deletion discussion reopened; if you have anything to add to the ANI thread that would be very welcome. EyeSerenetalk 12:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC) Happy Thanksgiving!
December21st2012Freak Happy Thanksgiving! 16:31, 26 November 2009 (UTC) Red Star
Protection of Ngo Dinh Diem presidential visit to AustraliaHi J.delanoy, thanks for protecting Ngo Dinh Diem presidential visit to Australia. I was going to request it, but then I realized it was a front-page article and that was probably why it was getting hit so hard. I had heard in the past that these articles were rarely protected because their increased visibility to vandals should correlate with increased visibility to anti-vandalism users, as well, so I was curious of your decision process here. What made you decide to protect it anyway? I only ask because I would like to try to get a better understanding of when WP:RPP is appropriate and when it's not. Thanks again! And try to take a break every once in a while; I always see you around working too hard ;) --Mpdelbuono (talk) 03:24, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
KNUSTI disagree with your reasoning, and have opened a discussion at WT:CP#Combination of CC-BY + "All Rights reserved". And while I have no issues with different interpretations, I would appreciate feedback when you overturn one of my WP:CP clearances. Among others because if I'm wrong, I'd need to change the way I work, to prevent future occurences. Best, MLauba (talk) 09:13, 27 November 2009 (UTC) Hi there! I have a little bit of work for you - a huge SPI investigation. It involves around a dozen IPs and I thought I'd go to a rather seasoned admin about it. Thanks! --Addihockey10(review me!) 01:04, 28 November 2009 (UTC) Orange Star
Bring a drink and some kind of trailmix.I have reached new heights of "failure to be brief." Sorry. :( --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:13, 29 November 2009 (UTC) You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Scibaby Socks...Hi J! Thanks for handling the latest Scibaby case. As usual, we have a group of new socks. Did you by any chance also check the two questionable accounts (User: Climatedragon and User: Hopkinsrocks) against the other two recent sockmasters on the climate articles, User: Tinpac and User: Flegelpuss? --Stephan Schulz (talk) 08:58, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Your blockThank you for addressing User:212.85.6.26 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Please be aware of actions on other wikis too. See google for 212.85.6.26. I'm not sure if those cases call for any action. LeadSongDog come howl 19:12, 30 November 2009 (UTC) His repeated creation of new disruptive SPAs is getting to be a problem. Do you think we'd be able to block the IP range he's using? I remember the last time he used IPs, they were all inside a fairly small range which was range-blocked by Seraphim. Timmeh 21:24, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
|
.jpg)
