|
User talk:J.delanoy/Archive 19
My User PageWould you mind semi-protecting my user page? Targeting it seems to be popular amongst IP vandals I revert on Huggle. Many thanks. Vicenarian (T · C) 02:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
ok.but the guy was blocked anyways. See here. AndrewrpTally-ho! 16:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
A favour to askHey J, I hate to bother you, but would you mind dialing down the protection on my user page from full to semi? I think that the furor has passed and full protection should no longer be necessary. Thanks again, t'shaelchat 19:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
This page needs semi-protection immediately... it's reported at RPP, but the vandalism is massive and ongoing. Thanks! Vicenarian (T · C) 19:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Shameless questionspamIt recently occurred to me to get the local timezones of various administrators that I've dealt with and know I can work with in the future, and to concentrate that information in one page instead of my memory. Because the relevant page is linked from my userpage, anyone will be able to find a list of the most useful admins. It so happens that you're the latest victim. If you feel like revealing your timezone (not exactly the most dangerous secret in the world), you can reply here, here or here (the latter by actually adding yourself to the table). If you object, simply reply here or here (be sure to specify if you're objecting to the concept itself, or just the timezone). Because this is shameless questionspam, thanks in advance for whatever option you choose. —LedgendGamer 20:42, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Question re:vandalismHi - I know this is an inappropriate edit, but does it really classify as vandalism? Would it be appropriate to use Huggle to remove it? Shiva (Visnu) 02:04, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
A Little Help?User:Delicious carbuncle has started a post on ANI about User:Allstarecho. I boldly closed the post and told both users to back away from each other and find their corners of Wiki. Something that User:Tanthalas39 (an involved admin) said as well, but couldn't enforce. Delicious carbuncle, instead of following the unenforceable advice of myself and Tanthalas39, he wants an "uninvolved admin" to tell him to back away from the dead horse and the ANI post and leave Allstarecho alone. Would you mind doing that? If you wish not to get in the middle, I will completely understand. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 02:18, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Knock-knock joke vandalismGood move protecting Knock-knock joke. I note that the last 3 acts of vandalism were all performed by similar IP addresses: And now on my user page: Can some sort of range block be applied? -- Scjessey (talk) 03:05, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
This whole thing is a little absurd, but given that a handful of places that refer to it from this Metafilter piece say that the concept is only being promoted by Attack Attack!, the deleted Crabcore article might actually be a decent merge candidate. Would you mind restoring it to User:Mrzaius/sandbox/crabcore so that I can see if there's anything to be salvaged? 113.199.140.113 (talk) 07:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC) (User:Mrzaius - Just don't have time to log in.) OTRS permissionYou were the first name I recognized on the list. Could you confirm that I sent three forwarded permissions for three images? I don't really know what I'm doing, to be honest, but I suppose it can't hurt to ask broadly? Anyways, thanks. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 08:07, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
whywhy vandalism? 206.240.25.254 (talk) 15:24, 2 July 2009 (UTC) Ransom My HeartHello, I was in the process of editing this article to contest the PROD when you deleted it. Can you please either undelete or userify it for me? Thanks, ThaddeusB (talk) 00:16, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Your new-page patrol scriptIs it still working for you? I've had problems with it not showing up lately and just wondered if this is my error or if it wasn't working for you either. Thanks, t'shaelchat 01:49, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Deletion requestHi, At the Village Pump, it has been agreed by consensus that this image should be deleted. Could you please help me delete that image? Thanks in Advance. --George Thompson (talk) 04:24, 3 July 2009 (UTC) Unlisted RFC-UserThis RFC for user conduct, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Viriditas, appears to have not been listed under candidate pages. Currently 3 users have listed difs and according to my opinion appears to be otherwise correctly filed. Note that the person the RFC-User is being filed on brought up the issue of whether this RFCU is appropriate at ANI here. I would add it to the candidate pages myself, but since I became involved by replying at the ANI discussion, I thought it would be better if someone completely unrelated listed it instead. (In case you are wondering why I picked you, it's because you replied to the section above the thread at the ANI which meant you were the first person I saw. Lucky you. :P ) 05:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC) (later Edit:) You may need to do something about the clock on the page since the RFCU was created but not listed over two days ago... Sifaka talk 05:22, 3 July 2009 (UTC) Your recent sockpuppet blockCould you comment on this? The user is emailing me about it and I need to give him an answer. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 13:27, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the page protectionSeem's I'm getting some backlash from /b/ on 4chan. I upset their little game earlier when several IPs were adding rubbish to Template:Michael Jackson. -=# Amos E Wolfe talk #=- 02:07, 4 July 2009 (UTC) RE: Apartment Building. I'm bringing attention to the fact that page shows clear bias in the 40% of the page has been taken up by information on apartment living in SCOTLAND, a small country of 6million people not particularly famous for it's apartments. I will continue to edit this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bistro-sidecar (talk • contribs) 02:33, 4 July 2009 (UTC) Semi-protectionI've semi-protected this page for one day due to excessive vandalism. Dougweller (talk) 07:39, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Silly meSorry for reverting your edit (and the last revision was silly). Must have conflicted. Happy independence day! ZooFari 21:08, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
User name changeActually you were clear, I initially went with Spaceman Spiff, but then thought I'd check the SpacemanSpiff too, and I found that the two entries by that user are no longer in an article because the page has since become a redirect, so figured that would qualify in "no significant entries". Maybe I was wrong? -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 21:51, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Copyrighted picture questionHey J., is there anyway that we can use File:RuthieHenshall.jpg as the picture for the Ruthie Henshall article? I've searched all over the place but can't seem to find a photo of her with an acceptable copyright license. Thanks, t'shaelchat 22:02, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism on Several PagesHey J., hope your 4th is going well. There is an IP editor that has vandalized several pages on two different IPs. So far they have used:
Would it be possible, since they are IP jumping, to do a range block? - NeutralHomer • Talk • 22:08, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Not sure what the criteria is for protecting talk pages, but could you protect this one for 12 hours? Thanks, t'shaelchat 23:19, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Advice neededPer User talk:Vianello#As for some advices (permalink), an admin from the Vietnamese Wikipedia could use some advice about dealing with page-move vandals. Since the admin that was asked doesn't know what to do to combat this vandalism, I've contacted you to see if you can give him some advice. If you can help, please reply at User talk:Vinhtantran#Re: Mass vandalism (to keep discussion centralized since I've posted this message at the talk pages of several admins). Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:34, 5 July 2009 (UTC) It appears the Azeri/Turk/Armenian edit war has progressed to this article. Would you be interested in locking down this article so univolved editors could at least read-up on the sources given? If you decide not to become involved, I completely understand. Thanks. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:26, 5 July 2009 (UTC) VandalismHi! I thought you may like a heads up on a new WP:Vandalism-only account created today. See User talk:Scarffy736. Richard Harvey (talk) 21:56, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
NationalistsI call them Serbo-nationalists because that is what they are: Tone, Dab, the lot of them. They are hardly Albanian nationalosts are they and they definately are not neutral. And if the arbitary comittee gets tought with me, let it get tough with them and their propaganda. Metrospex (talk) 14:11, 6 July 2009 (UTC) Move request closeout?Hi, JD. It looks to me as if it's time for an admin to come along and close this requested move, which has been open since 28 June and attracted vigourous discussion (and, N.B., some canvassing) but hasn't been commented on in 3 days now. Whatchya think? —Scheinwerfermann T·C15:15, 6 July 2009 (UTC) A question about requests for commentsCould I still comment on the "User's who did not try to resolve" space even if I just watched?Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents!(Sign here) 15:52, 6 July 2009 (UTC) Unblock Marco747 from EditingCan you Unblock Marco747 from Editing please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Palen647 (talk • contribs) 18:40, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Don't worry. I've already filed a case.Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents!(Sign here) Obvoius sock is indeed obvoius.Could you please have a looksie at Special:Contributions/Hyper Lulz Beam? Seems like our sockmaster is back for another round. -t'shaélchat 20:46, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Very adept new user - can you take a glance?Hello J.Delanoy. I do a lot of new-user patrolling and welcoming, and I've noticed a new user, just created 7/4/09 but who seems very experienced, jumping right to welcome newbies, doing good reverts and posting to User:SuggestBot/Requests. Nothing vandelous, just curiously adept. Would you care to take a glance at contributions to be sure all is well? Hope I'm just paranoid. Regards, Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 03:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC) Rollback right request?Hai, just dropping you a line to see if I could acquire the rollback privilege. I do alot of vandalism reversion with Twinkle, but it would probably make my job easier if I could use Huggle instead; Java is slow. I leave it to your cognizance though :). -Falcon8765 (talk) 09:59, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
QuestionSorry to trouble you but if I may ask you a question here... if ever an admin tags a user's page with a sock template and then the user blanks it at the later timing, is it wrong for me to tag him with a template warning on blanking the page content? --Dave1185 (talk) 19:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for clearing up all of that. Sorry about my manic tagging, I haven't had the best experiences with AIV admins deleting pages. Thanks again :) - Kingpin13 (talk) 20:05, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm not your buddyNo please keep me blocked. I don't want anything to do with this joke called Wikipedia. I got some conflict of interest when I didn't write anything about my self and how can I vandalize something I wrote and created? Just because in your eyes it's something you're not interested in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Padder (talk • contribs) 20:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks......for the vandalism reversion on my talk :-) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:09, 7 July 2009 (UTC) QuestionIf you have a moment, would you mind removing the account creator flag from my user rights? Thanks, t'shaélchat 03:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
AE requestSince nothing has happened, I assume that you are unable to work on my request. I have deleted it to avoid a blind alley in a search that's already too complicated. Thank you for your time in considering it. Milo 09:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC) The closing of the pollHi, I saw you close the Macedonian poll, but could you enlighten me where the closing time is addressed except the new banner? I think the archival is a bit early, and editors there did not draw their de capo vote to all of pages.--Caspian blue 15:51, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
stop deleting my work before i delete youHey moron stop fucking deleting my comments. What about free speech and the freedom to state the bleeding obvious? --217.203.136.221 (talk) 19:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
FyunckOn what basis did you conclude that this user was not edit warring? There's a difference between violating the three-revert rule (which I did not claim) and edit warring. Did you actually look at the diffs I provided? Chidel (talk) 23:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Upload File ProblemWhen I was uploading some files today, I have noticed under the "other item" link under "Logo" the file upload window is smooshed over the right side. This was normally not the case. You would normally find the upload window centered or to the left. Is there anyway that you could fix that or let someone in Meta know and they could fix it. I am not sure if the right side smoosh problem is effecting all the upload links or just one. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 00:46, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
deleted linksLinks to a new e-anthology of poetry were deleted by you in listings Meuse Press & Les Wicks. This is an entirely non-commercial venture featuring some of australia's top poets. It exists only on line & I believe it is appropriate to include links in this case. Thanks beachsmith —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beachsmith (talk • contribs) 03:41, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
VandalismHello some one with IP address 122.169.214.33 has emptied all sections from the article Chiranjeevi on 19th june. Could you please restore the article to previously valid 18th june version? Thanks in advance. Alexander227 (talk) 14:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
But the problem is there are many changes after that. Would you allow me if I just copy and paste those sections back into the article just for this time? Thanks. Alexander227 (talk) 20:12, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
User Davejshep1984Hi there. I think you have been a bit harsh in blocking this user. What he has done is create an article about his local village football team, Donington on Bain Rovers FC, using a copy of the Derby County FC page as a template. He has then been editing his article, which at first look may appear to be vandalism, but is not. The article should be speedy deleted as being non-notable, but to ban the user for good faith but misguided edits is I think an excessive response. Regards WhaleyTim (talk) 15:58, 9 July 2009 (UTC) your comment User talk:Scorpio95I removed it since it appears to be misguided: the person added a genuine content, only it was an unreferenced opinion. While I agree with your revert, your comment was unhelpful for a novice. - Altenmann >t 16:35, 9 July 2009 (UTC) An award
hehe. Thanks :-) J.delanoygabsadds 19:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC) Lickety-split :)How did you revert this IPs contribs so rapidly? I was going to go cleanup after reporting at AIV and found you had done all of it. Thanks for that, btw.
Question?You keep deleting my revisions on the Pius X High School page when it is not vandalism? I am not sure why you think it is vandalism i am trying to add a sports section and make some revisions in the history section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Red8848 (talk • contribs) 22:42, 9 July 2009 (UTC) Hi I'm not vandalising pages as you have said I have merely updated them with proper information —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scorpio95 (talk • contribs) 23:57, 9 July 2009 (UTC) feefoI am slightly suprised that you have deleted Feefo. It is now a service that has sent emails to 1.6million UK users and has receieved feedback from over 325,000 of them. To me, this gives the people a right to know what it is in a clear and unambiguous way - ie Wikipedia. I am not the writer of it as you will see, but have been a user and feel it does deserve a place on Wikipedia. If your issue was that it was too 'advertising' in its style, fine, then force them to rewrite, but to just delete it seems a little harsh. Would you in your capacity have any suggestions about what they need to do next? Thanks in advance John ps, sorry should have logged in so you could see who I am. Have done now.
No problem Thanks for letting me know. Cheers,. John —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johndesmond (talk • contribs) 14:30, 10 July 2009 (UTC) ArrrghHi, JD. We've got an editor with a long history of ownership and other bad behaviour (ANI #1, very ugly ANI #2) still/again at it. Will you please take a look here and here and please advise? Thanks. —Scheinwerfermann T·C14:24, 10 July 2009 (UTC) Superb dispute resolution
Counter-Vandalism AdviceHi, I am relatively new to Wikipedia, and am starting to get a feel for the way things run. I would like to get more involved in counteracting the high level of vandalism on this website. Currently, I am using Twinkle to help me get that job done. However, there has to be a more efficient way to detect and revert vandalism than staring at the recent changes list for hours on end. Do you have any tips on how to improve the speed and efficiency of my reverts? Saforcer (talk) 22:33, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
User talk:206.53.157.88Thanks — you'll see from the history that I seem to be dealing with a rather persistent IP editor here, rotating through various addresses. It started with a series of reversions that I did earlier today at the Wilson Goode article, where a series of IP edits were inserting a photo of Bozo the Clown, and then moved to this post of mine on User:Zyxw's talk page. Mlaffs (talk) 23:33, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Vote stackingHi J.D., could you do me a quick favor and indef block the following vote stacking accounts? I know they're just throwaway accounts, but I don't like leaving a job unfinished. Thanks! a little insignificant 02:10, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism events of this afternoonThis afternoon, we were supposed to be researching on the internet. It was then that a few of my classmates discovered that you can actually edit Wikipedia (!) To my dismay, some of them embarked upon a vandalism spree. This afternoon, you blocked Iamgoingtobeurfriend after various edits made to Chesterfield, see here for instance, plus one edit to Alien vs. Predator (film). They were actually sat two places away from me, and though I tried to stop them by returning to my place and attempting to revert their edits, I always got caught up in an edit conflict with further vandalism. I warned them that they would get blocked if they continued, but still they carried on and you blocked them. Another rogue editor in the room chose to use the school IP, which has been used to vandalise many times before. You blocked them for one year. Without blocking, these people would still be at large, for they ignored the warnings that were sent to them and ignored the 'you have new messages' bar. Though I did yell at them to stop, they did not. I warn that they may start again. I said that if they were to create other accounts for vandalism, they would just get blocked again and maybe get accused of sockpuppetry. They laughed at the term and went to tell everyone that I am an editor of Wikipedia. I wonder if incidents with editors and vandals in the same room happen often. So, I say thank you for blocking them, for they may have continued vandalising otherwise. Wikiert T S C 18:33, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
[Request to Restore Page] BITOSA BangaloreHi J, Thank you to give me opportunity to request you restore my deleted article [1]. I certainly appreciate you taking pains in maintaining world's largest encyclopedia nonsense free. Unfortunately, my article became a victim of the deletion policy. Kindly consider restoring it. The article is about our Alumni Association (BITOSA Bangalore - Birla Institute of Technology Old Students Association, Bangalore). The association is more than two decades old and it got established formally four years back. Like many existing alumni associations, ours is one such association of ex-students of India's prominent engineering college Birla Institute of Technology. It is neither a company nor an organization for making profits. Its member alumni can be found around the globe. And hence the article, which I wrote about it. The small article is just to introduce it to the world. You can verify by visiting its website [2]. I hope I don't need to give you any example from many alumni associations already existing in Wikipedia. I also hope that this article will get restored soon. Thank you in advance! Thanks Amitabh 122.167.85.44 (talk) 11:15, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Unfair RevertsCan you please slow down? Three times today I've tried to revert vandalism, and hit the "save" button only to find out you've done it already. This is not fair :( Please slow down. --Mpdelbuono (talk) 19:28, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
hiall i did is to remove the fake and provocative word indo-european!ancient macedonian language was a greek dialect,so the distinct categorizing is not excused!Greek is also an indoeuropean language,i don t make sense —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.64.200.5 (talk) 20:35, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
hibut ancient Macedonian is a dialect of the ancient Greek language,by putting it under the generally word"indo-european language"shows that it is not Greek,something that is scientifically wrong! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.64.200.5 (talk) 20:42, 11 July 2009 (UTC) hi there - re my edit to ron paulHi there I edited the Jon Paul site. I just wanted to say that what I said was factual. I saw the movie and everything was exact. Please refer to this link for proof: http://www.slate.com/id/2213882/
If you want to protect a homophobic, nasty old man, then congrats. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.217.100.211 (talk) 22:10, 11 July 2009 (UTC) Someone wants attentionI just reverted some "Soviet Russia" joke vandalism by Special:Contributions/202.150.120.123 and was going to post a message at User talk:202.150.120.123. However, I decided not to when I noticed that it has a joke message mentioning your name. You may want to look. If you choose not to rise to the bait and would like me to remove it and post a bland warning, please reply here. Johnuniq (talk) 04:43, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
DeletionYou may want to undelete the article B.B. Lyngdoh. The article subject is clearly notable (Chief Minister of a state), and a google search could produce immediate refs to the claims in the article, such as http://www.hindu.com/2003/10/28/stories/2003102808571200.htm . --Soman (talk) 07:53, 12 July 2009 (UTC) I stumbled across this while working on my latest USMA list and it's in pretty good shape. I've started fixing it up and listed it at Good Article Noms. Any help would be appreciated. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:19, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
semi-protection requestHi - can you please semi-protect my userpage? As I'm an active RC patroller, its been attacked often. Shiva (Visnu) 22:11, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
ThanksThanks for removing the recent vandalism on my talk page. -- Zyxw (talk) 23:10, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Some help,Hello, could you please warn the editor Victor9876 against making edits such as this? He won't heed any warnings otherwise. As far as I have been told, users are not allowed to do what this user was doing.— Dædαlus Contribs 23:42, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
(outdent) Just for the record, Daedalus969 warned Victor9876 about this here, at 01:14 (my time), 12 July 2009. At this time, Victor9876 has made no further edits to User talk:Carrt81, although discussion between Daedalus969 and Victor9876 continued regarding it and escalated. The warning was given. No further edits were made by Victor9876 to that talk page, although WP:AN/I has occurred since then. Daedalus969 then pasted a notice regarding the WP:AN/I thread here, indicating he knew it was being addressed. Regardless, Daedalus969 repeated a warning here, saying "if you do it again, I will report you for vandalism". Again here, "In fact, such acts are that of vandalism, as it falls under the category of section blanking. Do so again and I will report you." Then here, "I am informed of all I need to know. You are not allowed to do the edit noted above, period. I am currently seeking admin assistance regarding this behavior of yours." The back and forth continued and deteriorated. Then Daedalus969 posted a vandalism template warning about the same one instance of removing the talk page posting here, followed by a WP:NPA warning template regarding the intermediate dispute. Victor9876 removed the warnings from his talk page, and Daedalus969 then posted here, saying Victor9876 could remove his warnings from the page, "but just so you know, a warning of a regular user holds just as much power as an admin. If you fail to heed it, you will get blocked." After a couple more posts, Victor9876 removed all the posting from his talk page. Yet again, Daedalus969 came back and made a posting here, saying "Don't blank sections from Cart's talk page anymore, and we should be fine. You've had plenty warning, so if you do it again, I'm reporting you for vandalism." Another editor intervened, noting on Daedalus' talk page that things were on the edge of getting out of control and wanting to stop it before it did. Victor9876 replied on the same page here, saying "Let's move on. Please don't contact me anymore. Thank you!" and made no more posts to User talk:Daedalus969. Daedalus969 came back to User talk:Victor9876 once more, to say "You don't understand policy better than I do. If that were the case, you wouldn't have vandalized that user's talk page by removing that section against policy. Secondly, you have no right to kick me off this page..." No further posts were made on either user talk page, but Daedalus969 then came to this talk page and made the above postings. Essentially, Victor9876 received no less than eight warnings for the one incident, which he did not repeat at all following the first warning, responded to increasingly assertive posts regarding it, was taken to WP:AN/I about it, and then the request by Daedalus969 came here, again requesting intervention, despite the fact that Victor9876 did not repeat the action. This to me is a blatant case of beating a dead horse and borderline contentious WP:POINT violations. I hope this will now stop and everyone go back to business as usual. Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:45, 13 July 2009 (UTC) ThanksThx for the usurp alert, I'm now the original. -SpacemanSpiff { Calvin Hobbes 01:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Sorry for the reversionI am sorry for the quick undetailed(?) reversion at Lisle High School. I'll be the first to admit it looked fishy, but I found a few sources that confirmed the edit. I wish for all of our sakes more editors would include the refs with their edits, but what can you do? Happy editing! LonelyBeacon (talk) 01:25, 13 July 2009 (UTC) It seems that while I was busy figuring out how to warn this person (it was my first time on WP, so it took a while), you went straight ahead with blocking him. If you want to speedy-delete or take other admin action on his talk page, by all means please do so. I'm not sure what's appropriate in this situation on WP. Neat trick with the banner-on-edit, btw. Never seen that before! Wonder if we have that at UESPWiki...I'll have to check. :) --RobinHood70 (talk) 02:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
You around?Can you take a look at Premature ejaculation, before you ask, not a recommendation, just that the same spam link keeps getting added on, I've been reverting it very often, but today there's been too many SPAs adding it back in, and I don't want to cross 3RR and also a page was created for the spam link Promescent. It's one page I could do without on my watchlist! -SpacemanSpiff { Calvin Hobbes 05:56, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
[Request to Restore Page] BITOSA BangaloreHi J, Please consider undelete the page BITOSA_Bangalore. As you asked me to provide some reliable source for the association to be notable, here are some links: [3] , [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] , [8] and [9]. Hope this should be sufficient to mention whay our association is notable. Kindle consider the case. Thanks Amitabh
Regarding the deletion of DD PughDear Delanoy, I cannot understand why you deleted the wikipedia entry of DD Pugh. Late DD Pugh was a politician from Northeastern Indian state of Meghalaya. He belongs to Meghalaya state. He was the second Chief Minister of Meghalaya. For more information on him, you can check in google.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rivatphil (talk • contribs) 11:21, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedian of the Day Note: You could also receive the "Wikipedian of the Week award for this week! Happy editing! Thanks! J.delanoygabsadds 13:47, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I marked Friends_seated (talk · contribs) as a sockpuppet of Beganlocal (talk · contribs) and blocked him for violating 3RR. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:29, 13 July 2009 (UTC) SarandiotiHi! Can you please have an eye on User:Sarandioti, to whom you had previously enforced ARBMAC1. He/she is back and he/she is once again edit-warring all around. Thanks in advance.--Yannismarou (talk) 21:39, 13 July 2009 (UTC) How was I edit warring?? Please elaborate on that, since my edits were 70% accepted. Your problem is that I changed the passage "greek tribe of chaonians" to "greek-speaking tribe of chaonians". The article's source said those exact words "greek-speaking", and curiously you interpreted that as greek-speaking=greek.--Sarandioti (talk) 10:08, 14 July 2009 (UTC) Belated thanks.......for taking care of minor trouble on my talk page. It's been a couple of days since I logged on or I would've been more prompt with my gratitude. See ya 'round Tiderolls 00:33, 14 July 2009 (UTC) oopsHeh. Looks like the user is on a roll and we EC'd on the warnings? tedder (talk) 03:01, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
G---pHas there ever been any conclusive evidence linking G---p to the people who run 4chan? caknuck ° needs to be running more often 04:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Can you take a look at this AfD?It shouldn't be an AfD, the page needs protection/semi-protection to prevent soapboxing and political propoganda, and I think the AfD needs to be speedy closed, as it's a worthy enough subject (it's a notable place!) I've removed most of the junk text from the page, and given that all the absurd contribs are from IPs, a semi-protection should be fine. --SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 20:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC) Wow.OK, so # of WP edits is not a great thing to measure, but still... WOW! 275K!?!?! Yikes. :) I see you doing a lot of vandal-fighting, and I appreciate it. Best Wishes and Thank You. :)- sinneed (talk) 21:48, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Assistance requiredI've made a mess-up and need it undoing. I moved East Runton Windmill to New Mill, East Runton because I got it mixed up with East Ruston. Can you move the page back and delete the "New Mill, East Runton" page. Let me know when you've done and I'll then expand the article. Mjroots (talk) 05:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
BlockingThank you for indefinitely blocking the user I requested You are a tribute to all those Wikipedians out there!
Just a heads up - appears to be requesting an unblock with a pointless reason. Might be best to lock the talk page? Thanks for the swift block by the way! M♠ssing Ace 14:12, 15 July 2009 (UTC) Spam LinksMy apologies J.delanoy. I was unaware what I was doing was spam since there are links to myspaces as well as other user pages for artists. I personally don't see how those are different, but maybe you could clarify? If external links to media sites are not allowed, then shouldn't all of them be deleted? Not trying to be a pain, I just think the rule should be a definite yes or no, instead of some sites being allowed, and others not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrmike110 (talk • contribs) 15:05, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Any hope at all?--Mrmike110 (talk) 16:22, 22 July 2009 (UTC) EpirotesCould you join the discussion[10]?-- Sarandioti (talk) 15:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC) Wow...I didn't even know a block could be set for this long... UntilItSleeps Public PC 15:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Scott RussoPlease explain exactly why you are blanking the Scott Russo talk page. Artw (talk) 18:02, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Sarandioti, Pakapshem, and a suspicious IPHello, I have recently become involved in a dispute with these two users at Epirotes. Because the topic is contentious, I have opened a discussion on the talkpage. I thought the matter settled when I brought a couple of sources to back what I'm saying, but then, an IP editor popped out of nowhere and promptly undid my edit [12]. This IP has popped up just at the right time in the past [13], whenever I happened to be involved in a dispute with I Pakapshem [14], specifically, on June 8 at Sarande, Gjirokaster and Paramythia. Since he has been warned that he is one step away from an indef block because of his disruptive behavior, I wouldn't be at all surprised if it were him. Do you think this is sufficient to request a checkuser? What should I do? Since this article is contentious, I was wondering if you would be willing to semi-protect the article from IP editors until such disputes have been settled. There is nothing more frustrating than starting a discussion only to be swiftly reverted by an IP. Regards, --Athenean (talk) 18:06, 15 July 2009 (UTC) Athenean's sources were totally unreliable. Check for yourself, before intervening. And now as usual whenever he cant prove his claims he is asking help from admins. Use checkuser, but when Athenean's accusations are proved wrong then block him, since this is the 5-6 time he accuses me without any proof.--Sarandioti (talk) 18:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC) This is the sixth section titled Sarandioti opened by Athenean accusing me or someone else , and asking checkuser, so please use checkuser on me, i pakapshem and anyone else --Sarandioti (talk) 18:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Again false accusations by you Athenean. And you still havent managed to prove why should the additions be removed. Just 2 completely unreliable sources, of which 1 was greek while the other started by saying that there are 280,000 greeks in albania. Ironically, in the 2009 elections in Albania, the greek minority party was voted by ~30,000 people. While, the definition of the Epirote clarifies the issue "every native inhabitant of EPirus, is an Epirote", you want to identify Epirote with Greek Epirote. JDelanoy you are welcome to run as many checkuser tests as you want. --Sarandioti (talk) 19:37, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
The discussion is over and you failed to prove ANYTHING athenean, so stop trying to give that impression. If you don't like the current state of the article, start a new one Greek Epirotes, and there you can add only greek epirotes. But in an article regarding all Epirotes:Albanians, Greeks, Vlachs, you have no right to add only greek epirotes.--Sarandioti (talk) 20:37, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
I would, but Athenean here cant stop accusing other users, and giving false impressions. I have to clarify issues every time, he does that. --Sarandioti (talk) 20:42, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
@ J. Delanoy, to me here it seems that Athenean is not voicing concerns but making false accusations and assuming bad faith when he can't back up his claims or get his way, by complaining to admins and stirring up trouble for no good reason. --I Pakapshem (talk) 20:54, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Care to semi while you're there? (Requested at RfPP.) Thanks, 76.230.10.71 (talk) 18:15, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
that page on christian violence is racist, I agree that should be deleted, plz dont delete my coment I could not create an account —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.140.178.26 (talk) 20:26, 15 July 2009 (UTC) Thank you, SirI hope I am not interrupting some very productive Huggling by posting this. I appreciate your reversion (diff} of my User page. Thank you. Newportm (talk) 00:20, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Inapropriate reversalHi, this is actually an inappropriate edit - the external link referred to was published this week by an independent magazine and gives additional information on the site. Please review, and undo your "undo" for Suite101.com -- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:199.60.221.253&redirect=no —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.60.221.253 (talk) 01:20, 16 July 2009 (UTC) Advice on how to handle suspected vandalism.I've been a newbie vandalism for a few days now and would like you opinion on how to handle a case like Tamil people. I originally reverted because the same IP kept removing large sections and making potentially contentious changes with no references and no edit summary. The changes s/he is making could very well be good faith by someone not familiar with Wikipedia policies. Am I justified in continuing to revert s/his reverts (which sounds perverted) and then report s/him when he reaches stage 4? Or should I ask for semi-protection for the page? Or just let them stand until for now? The main contentious claim s/he is inserting is referring to Tamils as terrorists without any references which if I understand the policy correctly is a POV no-no. Thanks for any help you can give. --Sophitessa (talk) 02:10, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
IP disruption in EpirotesSorry to bother you again, but the IP disruption in that article shows no signs of stopping [16]. --Athenean (talk) 21:55, 15 July 2009 (UTC) I don't usually agree with ip editors, but this time athenean is the one responsible. What Athenean refers to as disruption, is the following: He added that all Epirotes are greeks, when he saw that he had no reliable sources for the removal of famous Albanian Epirotes. Athenean continues his edit-warring, AND has made 3 reverts, and numerous edits that contain edit-warring. Check it here. [17] --Sarandioti (talk) 22:02, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
So you have NOT edit-warred or reverted? Let's see [18], [19], [20], [21], [22] . And no I am not wikiharrassing you.--Sarandioti (talk) 22:17, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
How exactly did I revert? I have ADDED text(which was accepted by Facturious eventually as I accepted part of his additions)It is called CONSENSUS. The rest is the usual conspiracy theories. I am getting used to checkuser, so feel free to ask for checkuser AGAIN. --Sarandioti (talk) 22:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC) I will stop commenting here, ask checkuser again if you want Athenean or anything else. AGAIN and AGAIN you will be proved WRONG. --Sarandioti (talk) 22:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey J., I created the above titled page today in my sandbox and moved it to the current page. Problem is, it took the entire history (with all my sandbox messing around) with it. Is there some way to delete the history of my messing around and have just the history from today that really makes a difference? - NeutralHomer • Talk • 14:26, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Expiries on semi-protectionsPlease don't forget to set an expiry when semi-protecting user talk pages. Some of these folks may not notice you've protected their page and then they remain protected long after the disruption has ended. –xenotalk 15:07, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism & HarrasingAn IP editor[45] is removing our previous consensus on the terms and the merge tag by Andreas. I suspect he is this Spis Ikke Gul Snø. Could you run a checkuser?--Sarandioti (talk) 16:53, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
At last that user is gone(for good). I just hope he does not return.--Sarandioti (talk) 22:06, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for help on Czech wikiThank you for your editations on Czech wikipedia. The cs administrator --Misbeliever (talk) 00:55, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Education Centre of Australia returns from the deadThe article reappeared five minutes after you deleted it for copyvio. What's the correct and polite way of telling the author to cease and desist? Favonian (talk) 01:24, 17 July 2009 (UTC) We seem to be stepping on each others toes.See [48]. It looks like we both just issued a range block for different ranges and times over the same issue. For the record, it looks like he's exclusively editing from the 165.154.46.0/24 range, but if you have evidence of the /16 also being a problem, then perhaps we should leave yours and get rid of mine. What's your feeling? --Jayron32.talk.say no to drama 01:40, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
If you wouldn't mind....could you please delete Metal messiah and/or block me for violating 3RR? Thanks, Javért | Talk 05:33, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Rollback rightsHi, I would like to know if you could grant me rollback rights? I'd like to help out in the fight against vandalism, I just realized by coming accross these 2 valdalisms(1) (2), this feature would be useful. Thanks. --TitanOne (talk) 07:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Just so you know...I stole your chessboard, and converted it into a checkers game :) UntilItSleeps Public PC 16:18, 17 July 2009 (UTC) This made me smile :)Gold. :D javért | talk 18:15, 17 July 2009 (UTC) History of terrorismI reverted your recent edit edit, haberstr is a known pov pusher over this project, and if you read the talk page archive you'd be aware of this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.239.38.135 (talk) 18:45, 17 July 2009 (UTC) how do i delete a pagei have a plan to delete the page Godzilla vs. Frankenstein but how do i do it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloverbeatme!! (talk • contribs) 03:38, 19 July 2009 (UTC) ServersDo you know if you can host a website from a Dial-Up connection on a server? Also how does the chess thing on your page work? 66.202.88.214 (talk) 08:44, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you very much! :-)). - Jeffrey Mall | Talk2Me | BNosey - 16:01, 18 July 2009 (UTC) Your 2 revertsHello! I am curious as to two quick reverts you did, the second one here. The first action you took was great and restored the article as factual and relevant. Why did you revert yourself a minute later? Cordially, SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:31, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Cuisine of the Republic of MacedoniaQuestion about the results of the naming policy. This article was originally named Macedonian cuisine (currently a dab page) and was paired with Macedonian cuisine (Greek). Should it be returned to the original name, its second name Macedonian cuisine (Slavic) or left alone? Food and Drink guidelines state it should be named Macedonian cuisine, but I am having trouble understanding the result of the discussion. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 20:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC) WikiLove
I thank you for unblocking me. I promise to make improvements to this project to the best of my ability. Happy editing! Accuweather123 (talk) 22:51, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
ThanksThanks for catching the vandals at my user page twice in the past couple of days. Cheers! Geoff T C 23:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
bad username?Is this username in violation of policy? Griffinofwales (talk) 04:06, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Removal of merge discussion tagCan I remove it in Chameria article [49]? His proposal wasn't supported by anyone. Also users he invited to the discussion remained neutral and did not take part. So, can I remove it? --Sarandioti (talk) 10:03, 19 July 2009 (UTC) Unblock IDCan you get me an unblock id because when i logged on my LexusIS300, MC10 pushed me away and he started vandalising my account. He also is going to start vandalis the account he created yesterday so when every time i log on i get blocked on the other computer. He made his account ULKFKINPEPL (You love ****** people). I need a Unblock id. Thanks for your cooperation! Please report as soon as possible! When ULKFKINPEPL logs on on this computer, he vandalises and then when i log on, i get blocked and when MC10 logs on, he doesn't get blocked. Alasto Light (talk) 12:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
You liar! AlastoLight —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alasto Light (talk • contribs) 20:43, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey J.delanoy! I've read the instructions of how to have a block id but i don't know how to do it? Can you show me the steps? Sorry about it. I feel ashamed. i just want my brother blocked because my parents said not to go on to wikipedia so i started vandalising so he couldn't go on anymore but my parents said i was okay if i go on. Alasto Light
Is this vandalism?Engology (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is adding [[Engineer]] to multiple BLPs, mainly Astronauts and US military figures. Is this good faith editing or is he just vandalising, I cannot tell myself. Martin451 (talk) 22:16, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
I'm reverting the article since the information added appears to be rather racial, "Half Bavarian/Half French", and states the Bourbon/Borbon dynasty as "so called". So you might take a look at that information and see what you think. Thanks. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:58, 20 July 2009 (UTC) SarandiotiHe has started edit-warring again [50] [51] [52], in conjunction with his teammate I pakapshem: [53] [54] [55]. Rather than discussing, he is resorting to taunts on the relevant article talkpage: [56], which he has left on my talkpage previously: [57]. --Athenean (talk) 23:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks...for your quick handling of both the vandalism on my page, and the vandal. I'm always willing to give 'em one hit for free, but your summary judgement of "vandalism only" seems 100% accurate. Thanks again, Doc Tropics 23:14, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Yikes. Semi-protect? Vicenarian (T · C) 02:19, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
A projector is likely, at least.--Pharos (talk) 02:32, 21 July 2009 (UTC) WhoopsI think that edit was before I restored it because of Vandalism, well, thanks for letting me know, and I'll be more careful. Darren23 (Contribs) 21:49, 21 July 2009 (UTC) A note on your revert on JapanThere must have been some confusion as you reverted this edit by Darren23 which was reverting vandalism. When you reverted it, you restored the vandalism by Ibugcutie (talk · contribs). ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 22:10, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Sorry, had to use RollbackHello. It looks like you were beat by a couple of seconds on this revert. I'm not trying to rub it in, I know it happens, but I had to use rollback to revert it, and I hate to rollback an admin without explaining :) When I tried to use undo, it said that I triggered the spam filter. The link was to moneyweek and was a source. I didn't feel right removing a source to please the filter, so I used rollback. Cheers! Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 22:07, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Alasto LightI have no idea what the conversation above means but, given that MC10 HA (talk · contribs) triggered an autoblock on Alasto Light (talk · contribs), I blocked him indef for sockpuppetry. Given your recent interactions I thought you should know. Regards, Woody (talk) 22:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
copy of a deleted (A7) page please?Hi, could you do me a favor, and get me a copy of the recently deleted page Gitorious? I don't know enough to know if it should be un-deleted in place, so unless you feel like looking into that, I'd appreciate a copy of it in my userspace. Thanks! - JasonWoof (talk) 21:36, 11 July 2009 (UTC) P.S. My intention is to add notability info as I find it, and as it becomes available, and eventually get this article back into WP. I will ask for help in deciding if/when it's ready. - JasonWoof (talk) 21:59, 11 July 2009 (UTC) Awesome. Thank you! - JasonWoof (talk) 22:09, 11 July 2009 (UTC) Hi, since JasonWoof has apparently not done much with his page, may I ask that my revised version at User:Tuxcantfly/Gitorious (I also copied it to User:JasonWoof/Gitorious), emphasizing more on the notability of the open-source server-side software and external deployments (Sugar), be reviewed for re-inclusion? —Preceding undated comment added 16:55, 12 July 2009 (UTC). Texcantfly: Great work! And thanks for integrating your changes into User:JasonWoof/Gitorious. What is the reason for having User:Tuxcantfly/Gitorious also? Please feel free to edit User:JasonWoof/Gitorious - JasonWoof (talk) 05:45, 18 July 2009 (UTC) J.delanoy and Texcantfly: I think we'd better shoot for having User:JasonWoof/Gitorious be reinstated, since it has the full history (including before the deletion). What is the procedure for getting reinstated? J.delanoy: can you offer an opinion of whether the page is ready? - JasonWoof (talk) 05:45, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Deleted pagehi you recently deleted my article M.T.E before it was finished and now i have to start all over again. could you please check before you delte peoples articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdotk (talk • contribs) 16:32, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
My apologiesI understand you are just trying to help. I apologize for getting upset when you reverted my user page, even though I tried to explain to you, and the several editors before you, that I was indeed the user eganjt. One of your editors has threated to contact my ISP because he so adamantly belives I should sign in to edit my own page, even though that is not required. I don't wish to take it this far, I don't need the drama. I'm sorry I didn't AGF with you.Eganjt (talk) 18:56, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
A message of a radio station manager in Mexico"Mexico Top 100"article was a very really important tool in our station, and in some more here in our country, in that, we can check what was the top since 2002 to 2009, why did you delete that article, the people here are angry but why did you delete that? jus tell me mjmonge@live.com.mx please, are you the boss in wikipedia to delete usuable articles na-ah! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.174.185.211 (talk) 06:55, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Is this a bit POV?Hi, Would you please take a look at this article. Over the past two days a single editor has more or less re-written the article, dumping some of the text and all of the images, (including, it has to be said, one of my own) without any reference or explanation and replacing them with their own. While accepting the fact that there is a lot of good new material the new text contains sentences (and headings) such as :'Our Company and brands', 'This pioneering spirit had led us to look always further', 'And, most of all, New Holland is the innovative, dynamic and smart partner, people who cultivate a new idea of agriculture can always rely on.' Isn't all this a bit POV? ♦ Jongleur100 ♦ talk 16:02, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank youSomeone vandalized my Userspace! Thanks.Thanks for the revert on my user page. - Zhang He (talk) 23:43, 23 July 2009 (UTC) A Bad AccidentHey. I manually copy and paste usernames all the time and I think I accidently copied and pasted yours thinking I had copied and pasted my own. If you get an email about a password change, I went to "Log In" and pasted "my" username and then my password and accidently hit "E-mail new password" instead of "Log In". If no harm was done, thank goodness. If inconvenience has been caused, I didn't mean for it to happen. Silly accident. Thank you.--The LegendarySky Attacker 09:45, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Swamilive IPWould you care to block 72.35.4.220 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)? Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 02:43, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
The film was brought to my attention, but was gone before I could look in. However, I was informed that the entire deleted article consisted of just one sentence: "Black Noon is an American television movie directed by Bernard L. Kowalski and broadcast in 1971 by ABC as a segment of its Movie of the Week series." I thought it best to contact you and invite you to visit User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox/Black_Noon. The new version is in its formative stages. I already sourced that it was a CBS product, and not one from ABC... and can show it being commercally aired over an 8-year period. More is in the works. With my own attempt being something different from the one deleted, I wish to ask is it prefered procedure to request undelete of the former and then overwrite with my content (when ready), or if it would serve to simply move mine to article space when ready. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 03:01, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Long time, no speakI have gone without hassling you for far too long. :) Any chance you can tell me what I'm doing wrong at User:Moonriddengirl/SCV to keep the signature from automatically expanding? I'd like it to. Instead, I get (from {{User:Moonriddengirl/SCV|d}}):
I'm getting ready to create a template for SCV and CP work. It's not very elegant at this point. Can you help, or is this out of your neighborhood? Since you did so much with me with templates before, you were the first to come to mind. :D --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:27, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
^Just wanted to make sure you were aware of the above page. :-) Tiptoety talk 02:33, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Hope you don't mindI've replaced the warning with a censorship template here. ZooFari 02:09, 27 July 2009 (UTC) A little help?Hey there. Kafziel here. When I log into my account, it's saying I'm on a forced Wikibreak. My account still appears to be secure - nobody is using my account for vandalism or anything - but I can't get in. I didn't do that to myself, so I'm wondering if you know how to bypass it (or if you can point me in the right direction). Do you know what might have happened? Thanks in advance! 76.172.118.225 (talk) 02:25, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
instant deleteHello, I recently submitted an extremely helpful external link to two pages on wiki and had them instantly deleted with a nondescript warning message. The two pages I posted the external link to were for the Salton Sea and the Algodones Dunes. No content was changed, only an external link was added and based on the sparseness of the Salton Sea and the Algodones Dunes pages the link is extremely helpful. The link is http://www.bigboytravel.com/northamerica/usa/california/saltonsea What would need to be changed in how it was posted in order to share this helpful external link with wiki readers? Thanks JonJonathanleighmiller (talk) 22:41, 27 July 2009 (UTC) Your newpage patrol scriptHello J.delanoy, I'm Airplaneman. I'm here to ask you if I could use your newpage control script or something similar. Patrolling new pages is quite tedious, although I know it needs to be done. May you please tell me how it works or tell me where to read up on it? Thanks! Airplaneman talk 03:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
CKCW-FM ArticleI warned this IP for the same edit, however the edit is legit this edit shows that the Infobox displays the format as in fact hot adult contemporary. - Jeffrey Mall | Talk2Me | BNosey - 00:50, 28 July 2009 (UTC) Some confusionHi J.delanoy, I wonder if I could ask you to cast your eyes over a confused situation. I've received Speedy deletion notifications about three articles, which I didn't create. However, before they were deleted, the edit history showed me as the only author(?) Marek.69 talk 01:32, 28 July 2009 (UTC) Thanks for your help. Cheers. Marek.69 talk Seeking help on ISV articleMr. Delanoy, I found you on the discussion page about paid editors because we seek help from/for a skeptic like me :) ... your comment about notabilty suggests you're the best person to ask! I've worked for ~20 years at what has /got to be/ a notable software company in the US (founded in 1978), with infrastructural (data processing) software used by the world's largest companies in conjunction with databases, data warehousing, mainframe and COBOL migrations, flat files, etc. IRI released the first commercial sorting software off the mainframe, and is the only company with flat-file and data-model based test data generation, handling bulk XML and LDIF file conversions, encrypting files at the field level, and so on. There are plenty of third-party product reviews and industry references, but I'm getting speedy deletions despite neutral tone and content, while competitors and lesser-known ISVs with weaker postings remain. Bottom line is that we believe it's past time a Wikipedia article was done on CoSort and/or the company behind it, and thus the desire for Wikipedia insider help. We would like to hire someone like you (or someone you'd refer) who will comply with Wikipedia policies and carry the clout that seems to be needed. Apologies if what I've said comes across the wrong way, but I've gotten a bit frustrated and need help. We're not looking for a puff piece, just an appropriately encyclopedic entry in Wikipedia for a notable software company. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtree09 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
CheckUserAs an admin, shouldn't you have access to that anyway? Thank you for the assistance. --Drr-darkomen (talk) 01:34, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Latin King pageI have a message that I did a unconstructive edit to the Latin Kings page, how so? It is obvious that New York based Latin Kings are writing lies all over that page. Latin King started in Chicago and they're the ones with the say so not New York. Please explain how it was unconstructive when I have the source of most of the history from chicagogangs.org a website ran by an ex-gang member who then became a gang unit officer and is now running the website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.44.91.74 (talk) 06:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC) HeyHmm. Well, from one of the answers to the questions: "In that case, I think that quietly running a checkuser and/or contacting the user privately if necessary would be the best way to handle it. " Under what circumstances would you quietly run a checkuser without letting the sockpuppet user know? It is my bad for not asking this before voting... I shall consider changing my vote after you reply. BrianY (talk) 05:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
CAN or COULDHi. I guess it is very important to write the exact speech MJ daugther did in the Service. WIKIPEDIA is considered the most accurate source all over the world. So, I do insist: Paris Jackson said: The Best father you CAN ever imagine. It will remain for the history.
Yours JC. jcgr@live.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.186.23.163 (talk) 00:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC) Bannedumm i'm confused why did i get banned?
RequestIf you don't mind, could you please delete Thundergroup? I've reverted the removal of the speedy template at least 6 times. Thanks. :) --javért stargaze 18:39, 30 July 2009 (UTC) Can you take a look at this page? One user was blocked for continuously adding junk (pictures of a chimp etc) and being reverted by a few of us. Now another with a very similar name is making some possible BLP vios and adding possibly copyrighted images. -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 18:41, 30 July 2009 (UTC) HelpI noticed that you reverted a vandalism edit on the Brimstone page. I have been trying to keep up with these constant vandals but can not be watching at all times. They seem to be having a field day writing blatant vandalism, I correct one and then there are three more. I'm not sure how exactly to do warnings, although I am not an admin either and have no power. Is there any way you could help out in protecting this page? If you look through the edit history you will see what I mean. Here's hoping you can help out. RingWars2007 (talk) 00:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Please take a look at User:MichaelQSchmidt/sandbox/Black Noon. The original unsourced one-sentence stub that was prodded and deleted has gone through some major changes... including showing it being commercially aired over at least an eleven-year period and the film now being properly attributed to CBS... not ABC. Because of the errors and lack of sourcing in the original article, I have no disagreement with the original prod nor with the deletion, but I'd like to return it to main space and wanted your input. Thank you, MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 00:41, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
FYITwilight sucks (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and The-turd-monster (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) are accounts of the same person. Fred Talk 01:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Possible Range Block?WP:TVS has been having ALOT of vandalism from sockpuppets of indef blocked User:Dingbat2007. Luna Santin did a checkuser and found several other socks (all blocked by Enigmaman), but also found the range the socks and IP edits are coming from....65.49.128.0/17. With edits like these that are coming fresh off a 31 hour block, would it be possible to do a range block? It would help out alot and probably wouldn't cause much collateral damage. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 02:10, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks!Thanks for the revert on my talk page just now! I was going to award you this months ago, but forgot.
How did he sneak that one in?i though the filter wouldn't allow swear words in names. HalfShadow 18:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey I was not vandilizing the Tuke Rule Page I was just correcting the name.24.250.26.95 (talk) 21:44, 31 July 2009 (UTC) User rightSince I voluntarily gave up my account creator flag due to the increasing amount of drama IRL and thus my decreased time to work with ACC, and since I am now getting re involved in the account creation process (logs here), I would like to request my flag back. :) Thanks either way, →javért stargaze 23:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
#File:ChinaTJC.jpg){kind=link}
