This is an archive of past discussions with User:Isochrone. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hi, I'm not sure the source you added for Arundel's claim to be founder of the Alexandria Times is adequate? It's very primary (being a US trademark publication), and, at least in the form it opens in my browser, it merely shows me that someone of Arundel's name who lived in Alexandria applied for something; the reference as it currently appears doesn't actually show the Alexandria Times' trademark (though it must surely be there). Is there any way this can at least be formatted in such a way that it demonstrates to the reader that the fact is actually true? Also I think we should be very cautious about such heavily conflict-of-interest editing. When someone identifies themselves as the very person they are writing about, it's a bit problematic that they charge in and edit the article. Thank you for not reinstating the rather promotional material he wrote about himself; I would very much prefer to see that discussed at the talk-page than simply accepted. Thanks! Elemimele (talk) 20:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi Elemimele, apologies for the source being a bit weird. The relevant page is 459, you can ctrl f for "Alexandria Times". If you feel the source is unreliable due to its primary status, I'm happy for you to go ahead and remove it. As another editor already informed the user on COI disclosures, I thought that was sufficient. Of course, the content they added was just promo garbage and has no place in that article. — Berrely • Talk∕Contribs07:14, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thanks for the reply. I never know what to think about sources like that. Technically they're primary, but I can't see the US trademark system as unreliable. I'm inclined to leave it the way you put it - it's probably accurate and the best we can do. I was just a bit cheesed-off with the flurry of stuff going on yesterday, particularly as the CoI editing was very promotional. You left the article in a much better state. Elemimele (talk) 10:22, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello
I am new to Wikipedia, and wish to create a page for one of the public figures. How should I go about it?
Thank you! --Deepa254 (talk) 14:15, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi, Berrely! Here is the December 2021 issue of TheWikiWizard!
Humour
Christmas is here again, time to bug people to get you the stuff you really, really want! (Anyone going to get me some butter cookies, or that giant Costco teddy bear?)
If you don't like turkey, there's always the rotisserie chicken!
If you ate too much turkey and regret it, then you should have read the above message ;)
Wikipedia News
We don't have much to report this month, but we do have the following...
Wikipedia Asian Month which took place in November, has finished. Now, all the articles are judged and then it is determined who gets the postcards, even if you don't get one, or didn't participate, there is always next year, and we thank you for everything you have done!
Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021 took place earlier this month, for elegible editors. (At the time of this writing it was still taking place, but I assumed by the time this issue was sent, it would have been finished - It is set to finish at December 6 2021 at 23:59 UTC )
Editor's Notes
I haven't forgotten about TWW ;) Don't worry.
TWW is in the process of getting a new main page, if you have any ideas, or would like to help, please shoot a message on the TWW talk page.
That's it for this issue! This is the last issue for 2021. See you all in 2022! Have a safe and happy holiday season!
Like this Issue? Got Feedback? Spot a mistake? Discuss this issue here
To change your subscription, or to subscribe click Here.
Thanks for uploading File:Private Eye logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Please email donate@wikimedia.org including what type of change you would like to make and as much information as you can about the original gift such as:
Email that was used for the donation receipt
Full name used
You will receive an email confirmation when the change is completed.
Please do not include your credit card number or other financial information when contacting us.
As a volunteer editor I cannot assist you with payment enquires, and to rectify the card details, you should contact the email above. Feel free to ask any further questions you may have :) — Berrely • Talk∕Contribs11:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Please stop vandalizing the Hunter Wise Financial Group page
Please stop vandalizing the Hunter Wise Financial Group page. Futures Magazine did not do any research. If you bothered to check the original GOVERNMENT PRESS RELEASE (yes, believe it or not, the CFTC is a U.S. GOVERNMENT organisation), you would have noticed that Futures Magazine simply copied from the CFTF press release. Futures magazine has no copyright on U.S. government issued press releases. Duh. Thank you for your cooperation, and I hope you research your edits in future before making them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EricSavage (talk • contribs) 22:18, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
There isn't much use in saying this to a user who is sock-blocked, but in the future (if there is one) you should add {{pd-notice}} when copying from public domain sources; your edits showed up in copyright systems four times. I didn't know it was copied from the CFTC article because you only sourced the magazine in your edit. — Berrely • Talk∕Contribs11:30, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Berrely hi I want a ad that says Do you watch College football? and then Are you interested in helping Wikipedia in its College Football pages? and after that say If any of these questions are yes then join WikiProject College football! with college football teams logo in the background and when you click it it leads you to the wikiproject with Click her for details at the bottom thanks Hamadi31 (talk) 17:19, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
Vitaium unreviewed articles are not indexed as to prevent spam being indexed by search engines. I'm not aware of noindex tags by default for any other namespace (other than draft) — Berrely • Talk∕Contribs11:42, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 22
Hello everyone, and welcome to the 22nd issue of the Wikipedia Scripts++ Newsletter. This issue will be covering new and updated user scripts from the past seven months (June through December 2021).
Got anything good? Tell us about your new, improved, old, or messed-up script here!
Featured script
LuckyRename, by Alexis Jazz, is this month's featured script. LuckyRename makes requesting file moves easier, and automates the many steps in file moving (including automatic replacement of existing usage). Give it a shot!
Updated scripts
SD0001: hide-reverted-edits has been updated to take into account changes in reversion tools like Twinkle and RedWarn.
ClaudineChionh: SkinSwitcher (a fork and update of Eizen's script) provides an options menu/toolbox/toolbar allowing users to view a given page in MediaWiki's default skins.
Wikipedia:User scripts/Ranking is a sortable table of Wikipedia's thousand-or-so most commonly used scripts; it includes their author, last modification date, installation count, and sometimes a short description.
Toolhub is a community managed catalog of software tools used in the Wikimedia movement. Technical volunteers can use Toolhub to document the tools that they create or maintain. All Wikimedians can use Toolhub to search for tools to help with their workflows and to create lists of useful tools to share with others.
draft-sorter sorts AfC drafts by adding WikiProject banners to their talk pages. It supersedes User:Enterprisey/draft-sorter, adding a few features and fixing some bugs.
BooksToSfn adds a portlet link in Visual Editor's source mode editing, in main namespace articles or in the user's Sandbox. When clicked, it converts one {{cite book}} inside a <ref>...</ref> tag block into an {{Sfn}}.
diffedit enables editing directly from viewing a diff "when, for instance, you notice a tiny mistake deep into an article, and don't want to edit the entire article and re-find that one line to fix that tiny mistake".
warnOnLargeFile warns you if you're about to open a very large file (width/height >10,000px or file size >100 MB) from a file page.
QuickDiff (by OneTwoThreeFall at Fandom) lets you quickly view any diff link on a wiki, whether on Recent Changes, contribs pages, history pages, the diff view itself, or elsewhere. For more information, view its page on Fandom.
talkback creates links after user talk page links like this: |C|TB (with the first linking to the user's contributions, and the latter giving the option of sending a {{talkback}} notice). It also adds a [copy] link next to section headers.
diff-link shows "copy" links on history and contributions pages that copy an internal link to the diff (e.g., Special:Diff/1026402230) to your clipboard when clicked.
auto-watchlist-expiry automatically watchlists every page you edit for a user-definable duration (you can still pick a different time using the dropdown, though).
generate pings generates the wikitext needed to ping all members of a category, up to 50 editors (the limit defined by MediaWiki).
share ExpandTemplates url allows for easy sharing of your inputs to Special:ExpandTemplates. It adds a button that, when clicked, copies a shareable URL to your exact invocation of the page, like this. Other editors do not need to have this script installed in order to access the URL generated.
show tag names shows the real names of tags next to their display names in places such as page revision histories or the watchlist.
ColourContrib color-codes the user contributions page so that pages you've edited last are sharply distinguished from pages where another editor was the last to edit the page.
All in all, some very neat scripts were written in these last few months. Hoping to see many more in the next issue -- drop us a line on the talk page if you've been writing (or seeing) anything cool and good. Filling in for DannyS712, this has been jp×g. Take care, and merry Christmas! jp×g07:30, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello Berrely! Why edit warring is fully protected, not semi-protection or extended confirmed protection although some edit warring is not performed by extended confirmed accounts (e.g. IP, newcomers, or autoconfirmed users)? --Vitaium (talk) 15:09, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
@Vitaium in rare cases, edit warring may be between multiple extended confirmed users. In these cases, pages are fully protected. However generally the most an admin will protect an article is extended confirmed. — Berrely • Talk∕Contribs15:17, 29 December 2021 (UTC)