en User talk:Isochrone Archives 2020 September

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Isochrone. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).

Administrator changes

Eddie891

Angela • Jcw69 • Just Chilling • Philg88 • Viajero

CheckUser changes

SQL

Guideline and policy news

Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors must or should use the articles for creation process.
A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.

Arbitration

A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2020 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
An open request for comment asks whether active Arbitrators may serve on the Trust and Safety Case Review Committee or Ombudsman commission.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:55, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia style and naming request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Category talk:Roman Catholic prayers on a "Wikipedia style and naming" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Extremely Sorry! need Help!

I am really sorry about the previous edits I made. I was making edits from my POV and I know that Bajrang dal is a disputed area here on wikipedia. I really am sorry and as I am new to the platform could you please tell me how to find relevant sources regarding the article Bajrang Dal as we do not believe it to be a "militant organization" whereas it COULD be represented as a "paramilitary organization". please help thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superbsic (talk • contribs) 05:16, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Air India Kolkata London Flight

I know that Kolkata-London is under Vande Bharat Mission but if you see the Heathrow Page then you will find Vistara and Air India from Kochi and Amritsar which are also under Vande Bharat. In Amritsar Airport’s Page you can find London Flight. Then what is the problem in adding it in Kolkata Airport Page? Also it can be booked by anyone who have a UK Visa valid for more than 6 months...If you agree with me please add it in the airport’s page NilInfinite (talk) 09:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

NilInfinite, LHR - ATQ is a scheduled flight. It used to operate before COVID. If it's mentioned in Kochi, it's wrong. Kolkata Airport is a good article (an ideal article), so follow its format to edit other Indian airport articles and not vice-versa. I hope you understand. ❯❯❯ S A H A 09:56, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

A baklava for you!

Hi,

Thank you for helping me at CivicActions page! I am glad for that. --Comrade-yutyo (talk) 16:03, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

No problem! — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 16:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Please read this article that confirms the closure of the magazine

https://www.peterboroughmatters.co.uk/local-news/peterborough-bauer-magazines-closing-due-to-coronavirus-11553 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.253.66.146 (talk)

The article already says the closure, and those are cited by reliable source. Please provide inline citations to reliable source. — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 09:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rustam School

The article Rustam School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:12, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Template:User is blocked

Hi, just as a heads up, there’s community consensus against using a similar template at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 17, so I’ve deleted the user page you tagged with this and nominated the main template for speedy deletion via G4. If Anomie objects, I can send it to TfD, but there’s a pretty clear consensus against tagging people as just blocked, and if a CU doesn’t tag someone as a sock, there’s generally no reason for anyone else to unless asked. We know how the templates work :) TonyBallioni (talk) 18:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

TonyBallioni, sorry was unaware of this. Assumed as the template existed it should've been placed on pages. Apologies for the inconvenience. — Yours, Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 18:55, 22 September 2020 (UTC)