User talk:Isaacsorry

You said that heavy metal wasn’t done developed in the US, but it was, as the Wikipedia page points out. Blue Cheer, Blue Oyster Cult, Jimi Hendrix, Iron Butterfly, Sammy Hagar, and hundreds of proto-metal bands that stemmed from the American Acid Rock genre birthed and innovated the genre - It’s culturally appropriative nonsense to suggest that three British blues rock bands were alone responsible for creating a genre that already stemmed from American rock music innovation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gingeraleking (talk • contribs) 23:04, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Stevie Wonder's "classic period", from its old location at User:Isaacsorry/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - RichT|C|E-Mail 15:06, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stevie Wonder's "classic period" (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Stevie Wonder. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 11:54, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Isaacsorry! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 11:54, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lede section in articles

Making extensive changes to the lede of an article requires a consensus. Rarely does an article need to be fundamentally transformed, especially one that is a GA. Always use the talk page rather than make such unilateral edits. H Havens (talk) 16:05, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You seem highly subjective. Please don't try to behave like an administrator, considering that you have a few warnings on your talk page. Isaacsorry (talk) 16:19, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Isaacsorry, they have a point though. Whether they are an administrator or not does not matter. Substantial changes to well-established articles should be discussed. And H Havens is not the first editor to make this point to you: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Please listen. Robby.is.on (talk) 20:14, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Similarly this edit in Paul McCartney. TJRC (talk) 17:33, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trade GANs?

If I review your GAN will you review mine? For starters, yours needs to have ref 27 filled out, the BPI citation. My GAN is at Talk:John Robinson (drummer). Binksternet (talk) 22:59, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Beatles album articles

It would be much appreciated if you could actually read GAs and FAs before making changes to lead sections, instead of zeroing in on certain areas and missing the wider context or earlier, relevant points. I'm not just talking about Revolver but other Beatles album articles too. Thanks, JG66 (talk) 18:22, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kamala Harris

Various sources cited within the article describe her as African American. Don't remove sourced content especially without gaining consensus first. See Talk:Kamala Harris/FAQ. Thank you, —MelbourneStar☆talk 11:57, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

- MrX 🖋 11:59, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Kamala Harris. Your edit at Kamala Harris introduced error into the lead. —valereee (talk) 16:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Purple Rain (album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Purple Rain (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 04:20, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Purple Rain (album)

The article Purple Rain (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Purple Rain (album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 05:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stevie Wonder's "classic period" (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zppix was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Stevie Wonder. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 18:52, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Copyeditor's Barnstar
For your recent work related to The Rolling Stones articles. Your copy edits are must appreciated. TheSandDoctor Talk 23:51, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring on Bob Dylan

Please read WP:BRD. After someone disagrees with your edit, instead of repeatedly reverting you are required to discuss on the talk page. Sundayclose (talk) 16:25, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Styles

Hey there. Rather than get into an edit war, I opened an RfC to determine which version of the lead is more appropriate. Feel free to respond here. Thanks. KyleJoantalk 19:16, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One Direction

Interesting you’ve been notified previously about disrupting the lead section in articles. The lead is meant to be a brief summation of the subject, which means not flooding it with excessive detail. To make substantial changes to the lead section it has to gain a consensus, otherwise anyone can do what they like regardless. In addition to the changes, you often leave grammatical errors, which leaves others having to clean up the mess. Try to be more collaborative and less singular in your approach. Cranberry Wood (talk) 21:15, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jimi Hendrix

Lead sections should provide a summary or overview of an article and not be overly detailed. Additionally, they should not contain material that is not discussed nor referenced in the main body of the article (see MOS:LEAD). Also, articles should not be edited merely to reflect a different stylistic preference. FAs and GAs have already gone through a review process; it is better to discuss proposed changes first and avoid edit warring. —Ojorojo (talk) 14:10, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Cure

Echoing Cranberry Wood and Ojorojo here. Your edits to ledes can be seen as disruptive, particularly on GA and FA pages. The wording, phrasing and what information is and is not included in a lede for those articles has long been set. Hard to quantify wording and statements such as "The Cure were one of the first alternative bands to have critical and commercial success in an era before alternative rock had broken into the mainstream" should be avoided; Were they really "one of the first"? What does "an era before alternative rock had broken into the mainstream" mean exactly? Do you have a source for that statement? The Cure had success with new wave and goth rock styled songs in the United Kingdom and other countries in the early and mid 1980s, so that phrasing may seem Americancentric as well. Please be a little more careful with these edits. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 15:05, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Isaacsorry, this is not a new issue for you. Please see the multiple warnings you received several weeks ago, under "Lede section in articles", above, and you still continue. You really need to stop this. It's clear that you know better by now and yet you persist. TJRC (talk) 02:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Doc Strange, you're also echoing what H Havens, Sundayclose and I have said above, I believe. A couple of other editors too, at various album articles ...
Isaacsorry, what you seem incapable of doing is a) seeing that some of your additions to lead sections partly repeat what's already there; and b) go into excessive detail, which might be fine in the main body but not in the lead, which is a summary or overview. I don't know how many editors you're trying to annoy before you're willing to adapt this behaviour. All I've seen you do on Wikipedia is expand lead sections – not too successfully. You cut some unsupported or rather exaggerated statements in the lead at the Beach Boys, I remember; that was good ... JG66 (talk) 14:34, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I edited the Beatles For Sale album because it's not at a "good article" status; is there really anything wrong with editing the lead? Also, telling me that I'm "not all there" is ridiculously rude and uncalled for. Do not throw insults to get your point across. You also did not remove some piece of edits I added to the article, clearly showing that I'm not exactly contributing to "nothing". Isaacsorry (talk) 15:36, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your response here does not address any of the other concerns and posts that other editors have had with your editing. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 16:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Purple Rain (album)

The article Purple Rain (album) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Purple Rain (album) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 12:42, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to John Womack does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Tick Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 18:50, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.-- Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 18:33, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm AussieWikiDan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Edinson Cavani, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AussieWikiDan (talk) 12:22, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there

File:Vijay-best-international-actor-iara-award-function-united-kingdom-london-2018.jpg

Its Thomas hankins george from UK I have photographed the above image please add the image to Vijay (actor) article. regards 123.215.16.234 (talk) 04:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Styles again

Hi there Isaacsorry! I reverted your revisions to the lede for reasons that I explained in my edit summary. I'd like to add that the article makes no mention of Billboard Music Awards (for his solo work) or a BMI London Award, so please also mind the weight of the content you'd like to include. Cheers! KyleJoantalk 11:59, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Harry Styles, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. KyleJoantalk 14:56, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

could you add the below thumb image to Vijay article

remove the Nanban three person sitting image and replace it with below image

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vijay_Thalapathy_Sarkar_Limo1_Caesars_Palace_Las_Vegas_Joseph_Vijay_Chandrasekhar_Thierry_Brouard_@premiumparis.jpg

most tweeted

https://www.indiaglitz.com/thalapathy-vijay-selfie-the-most-retweeted-tweet-in-2020-master-shooting-it-raid-tamil-news-275664

https://www.thehindu.com/entertainment/movies/actor-vijays-selfie-with-fans-most-retweeted-on-twitter-in-2020/article33273273.ece

Concern regarding Draft:Stevie Wonder's "classic period"

Information icon Hello, Isaacsorry. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stevie Wonder's "classic period", a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 23:37, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stevie Wonder's "classic period"

Hello, Isaacsorry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stevie Wonder's "classic period"".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! S0091 (talk) 18:52, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from reviews/websites that are not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. If your intention is to add quotations from reviews, you need to use quotation marks. Please let me know if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 15:02, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Call Me If You Get Lost has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your final warning. Further violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 14:36, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Diannaa (talk) 20:28, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked your account, because in spite of repeated warnings, you continued to add copyright material to Wikipedia in violation of our copyright policy. You cannot resume editing until you provide a statement describing how copyright applies to Wikipedia, show that you understand our copyright policy, and make a commitment to follow it in the future.— Diannaa (talk) 20:28, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stevie Wonder's "classic period"

Hello, Isaacsorry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stevie Wonder's "classic period"".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 20:45, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Coat of Arms of the University of Hertfordshire.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of Arms of the University of Hertfordshire.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:15, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]