User talk:Invasive Spices/Archive 2

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Maple Syrup Article

Hi Invasive Species,

You said 'Hello @Absolutely Certainly: The duplicate <ref>s do need to be merged the way @Nikkimaria did or in some similar way. I don't know about the other changes. Invasive Spices (talk) 17 September 2022 (UTC)' To which duplicate references are you referring? Citations 5, 7, 9, and 14 are about 4 different species of maple trees, as are citations 6, 8, 10, and 15 (with pictures). Absolutely Certainly (talk) 21:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. You provided an explanation backed with a reference that confirms your explanation. I will pass on trying to improve this article as their is too much opposition. But if I did, an example of a major change I would do is change the first paragraph of the lead from:
Maple syrup is a syrup made from the xylem sap of sugar maple, black maple or red maple trees, although it can also be made from other maple species. In cold climates, these trees store starch in their trunks and roots before winter; the starch is then converted to sugar that rises in the sap in late winter and early spring. Maple trees are tapped by drilling holes into their trunks and collecting the sap, which is processed by heating to evaporate much of the water, leaving the concentrated syrup.
To:
Maple syrup is made from the sap of maple trees. The sap is collected by drilling small holes into the trunks of a maple trees. inserting small pipes in the holes, which allow the sap to flow into containers placed below the pipes. The collected sap is then boiled down to produce maple syrup. Mainly produced in Eastern Canada and Northern New England, Quebec is notable as it produces 70% of the total worldwide supply.
Short, sweet. Avoids all the specific information that is explained in the body of the article. Absolutely Certainly (talk) 22:25, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
I have replied Talk:Maple syrup#Merge dupe refs. — Invasive Spices (talk) 18 September 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fresno County, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bale.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agriculture in California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Population structure.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

"2G discontinuation in Maryland" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 2G discontinuation in Maryland and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 1#2G discontinuation in Maryland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:31, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

"2G phase-out in Maryland" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 2G phase-out in Maryland and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 1#2G phase-out in Maryland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:33, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Noble immigration to the United States

Notice

The article Noble immigration to the United States has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:SYNTH. Just like other people, nobility migrates as well. Some even to the US. A random selection of some examples (including an ambassador, hardly a relevant inclusion) doesn't an article make.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 15:19, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

  • including an ambassador, hardly a relevant inclusion I suggest reading the article before PRODing it. The text already explains why an ambassador (Prince Bandar) is counted as an immigrant in addition to being an ambassador: He bought large amounts of real estate not related to his ambassadorial duties, and became so connected with the Cowboys that he bought a seat next to the owner. You could have also read Bandar bin Sultan Al Saud which shows that he continued to serve as unofficial ambassador even after being removed from his post, and has spent a large amount of his life every year in the country since. I will add that to the article. Invasive Spices (talk) 7 November 2022 (UTC)
  • Those objections might necessitate moving it over the List of upper class immigrants to the United States redirect but that won't be necessary. The idea that only this category of immigration can't have an article is strange. Invasive Spices (talk) 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Noble immigration to the United States for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noble immigration to the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noble immigration to the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 16:00, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of US immigration to the United States for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article US immigration to the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/US immigration to the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 14:43, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Technological change in Maryland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Technological change in Maryland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technological change in Maryland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Waddles 🗩 🖉 19:40, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Environmental conservation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

Cylindrosporium rubi

I was wandering through the backlog of articles that are tagged with merge proposals, and stumbled into this one. It looks like you proposed it for a merge with Raspberry leaf spot back in July of this year. You might consider starting a discussion about that idea at Talk:Raspberry leaf spot, maybe even pinging some of the major contributors to that article to get their thoughts. Joyous! | Talk 00:44, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

  • Thank you. I should have done that by now. This is probably the source I read [1]. — Invasive Spices (talk) 21 November 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Agriculture in California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AXR.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Coconut oil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Garnish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

"Template:R to publisher" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:R to publisher and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 5#Template:R to publisher until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 05:29, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Babuyan Claro

This is evidently the name of both a volcanic island (Babuyan Claro Volcano ) and a Barangay (administrative district) in the extreme north of the Philippines. Rogermccart (talk) 01:47, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Convert: precision too large at Oat

The table of oat production you modified at Oat to use {{convert}} now displays the message "convert: precision too large" for each of the entries in the table. — Archer1234 (talk) 00:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oat, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages AFZ and INRA.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Redirects from subspecies (to species)

There is a template, {{R from subspecies to species}} that redirects to {{R from subtopic}} that has been around since 2015. I just came across your recent creation, {{R from subspecies}} that redirects to {{R taxon with possibilities}}. I don't think two redirect templates for subspecies are necessary, and even if they are, they shouldn't redirect to different places. Plantdrew (talk) 21:31, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Certainly they should not redirect to different places. I think mine is the more specific target. Invasive Spices (talk) 14 December 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Leishmania tropica
added a link pointing to Life cycle
Trypanosomatida
added a link pointing to Morphology

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Isogenic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

"Anti-Latter Day Saint sentiment in the United States" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anti-Latter Day Saint sentiment in the United States and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 28 § Anti-Latter Day Saint sentiment in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 19:51, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

That is much better Invasive Spices (talk) 28 December 2022 (UTC)

Noticeboard

Hi Invasive Spice sorry I can't reply to on Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard due to the reply option being missing. Not sure what has happened 1keyhole (talk) 21:12, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Hi @1keyhole: You can use {{ping|Invasive Spices}} the way I did here with you. Invasive Spices (talk) 30 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Invasive Spices!

Happy New Year!

Invasive Spices,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 03:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 03:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gibberella baccata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Morus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sorghum bicolor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages National Research Council and Awn.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

get off my talk page.....

....and stay off it. Don't blame me because you came you with a malformed RFC. You've had several editors (aside from me) tell you the RFC is screwed up. Learn the rules here.Rja13ww33 (talk) 17:51, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

The technicalities of RFC submission syntax do not justify the large volume of personal insults you have generated. I corrected the format and everyone other than yourself has moved on with the RFC. No one other than yourself has posted personal insults in response to my lack of understanding of RFC syntax.
You have a history of several years[2] of WP:SPA editing for one WP:POV. That is against the rules here. My need to correct the RFC format was not. Invasive Spices (talk) 17 January 2023 (UTC)
The RFC was malformed....it STILL is malformed. On top of that, it is misleading. (As it doesn't take on what the point of dispute was.) My edits are not POV.....you simply don't know what you are doing. As demonstrated here [3] and in this RFC. How many people is it going to take (telling you) before you realize this?Rja13ww33 (talk) 19:12, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
That is classic WP:IDHT. Stop spamming repetitious comments on multiple pages.
You have been reminded by editors other than myself that your conduct is not WP:CIVIL. — Invasive Spices (talk) 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Only one other editor....and you can't blame me for getting exasperated with how hard-headed you are. You've now had three editors (aside from me) tell you your RFC is malformed....and one of them now backs my statement on how the issue should be stated. Either you have a learning disability or there is some language issue....but I would advise you to stop talking and listen.Rja13ww33 (talk) 16:17, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Certainly there are continued complaints that the RFC is malformed. Certainly everyone should be concerned about that.
Certainly you should WP:TALKOFFTOPIC stop posting in the wrong section to mislead others about where the RFC is located. Invasive Spices (talk) 18 January 2023 (UTC)
In a discussion with you, it's hard to tell what is on or off-topic considering how screwed up it typically is. Blaming me for somehow misleading people as to where the RFC is (when it is a RFC you started) is kind of funny.Rja13ww33 (talk) 18:09, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Meat ant
added a link pointing to Ecosphere
Soybean
added a link pointing to INRA

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Your signature and its timestamp

Please fix your signature. As used several times recently (example), it has an invalid timestamp: there is no time, only a date plus the timezone "(UTC)" - the latter requires a time in order to be meaningful. There are a number of bots and scripts that require a valid timestamp in order to operate correctly.

I first noticed this happening at Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment#Staying on thread topic, where none of your posts has a time - compare yours with the posts made by Rja13ww33, Giraffedata, WhatamIdoing or myself, all of which have valid timestamps of the form hh:mm, dd Mmmmm ccyy (UTC). The only way that I can imagine this happening is that you are signing with three tildes followed by a manually-constructed datestamp, and not the four tildes that is recommended. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:00, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Why did you feel the need to ping those editors? Invasive Spices (talk) 22 January 2023 (UTC)
So that they are aware that I named them. This is a common courtesy, in order that there be no impression that I am talking behind their backs. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
I can see you are very sincerely concerned about something. Redrose64, I appreciate your attempt at improving what ever it is you are improving. I appreciate that I am receiving the help of an admin for this I suppose pressing and urgent matter. I have a question for you now Redrose64: Why did you ping anyone? Invasive Spices (talk) 22 January 2023 (UTC)
(What do I do with something like this. What kind of response would work here. This is the kind of thing that doesn't need a response. As the history of the last few weeks shows, if I point out the obvious problem, then suddenly they…even more… On the one hand there is the topic of conversation, on the other hand there are all the other things in the world that are not the topic of conversation…but if I say that then they…
For those of you sincerely wondering what on earth is going on here: I don't normally edit anything with the slightest political relevance. Then I tried adding text to Allegations of CIA drug trafficking based upon a very good source and the rest is history. Let this be a lesson to the rest of you: DO IT. Certainly do what I did but be prepared for faeces. Large quantities of faeces. New loads of faeces, delivery, when you thought you had seen all the faeces there were to see.)
And when I say faeces I mean FERTILIZER because obviously that is something I do know a great deal about. Yes. That is it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Invasive Spices (talk • contribs) 22:53, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
@Redrose64, https://signatures.toolforge.org/check/en.wikipedia.org/Invasive%20Spices says that his signature is okay. So the question then is: How is he getting a bad date to appear? Your suggestion of three tildes followed by a manually typed (or copy/pasted) date is possible. Invasive, is that what you're doing?
If there is some reason that you're not using the Reply button (e.g., you have Javascript disabled, you don't like it), then I would love to hear about that, too. You can reply here (I'll subscribe to this section), or you can post at Wikipedia talk:Talk pages project, where the devs will be more likely to see it directly. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 17:56, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
@Whatamidoing (WMF) If you and Redrose64 have time to do things like this you have sufficient time to respond to the derailing spam at Talk:Allegations of CIA drug trafficking#RFC on geography. Your use of your WMF account for this is interesting. Invasive Spices (talk) 18:55, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
I use my work account, because WP:Talk pages project, and therefore understanding how editors post comments onto the talk page, is actually my job.  :-)
Work-me has no views at all on the content of any Wikipedia article. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 23:15, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

"Israeli immigration to South Florida" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Israeli immigration to South Florida and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 27 § Israeli immigration to South Florida until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Fram (talk) 09:08, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murine respirovirus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burlington.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Warning

Stop collapsing a discussion that you're involved in over the objections of other editors as you did here or you will be blocked from that page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:25, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

  • @ScottishFinnishRadish: I came to an agreement with Firefangledfeathers on that user's Talk:. I gave notice[4] 7 days ago that I would make that edit. I did so specifically to avoid the kind of nonsense you are engaged in here and now.
You were involved in that discussion. Your involvement culminated in literal WP:IDHT.[5] Neither you nor FFF objected in 7 days and so I proceeded.
Lastly what on earth does "you're involved in" mean in this context? Are you attempting to deploy WP:INVOLVED against me? I'm not an admin and that is not what WP:INVOLVED is about. You on the other hand are an admin, you are involved[6] in a revert war to maintain an inaccurate section header on behalf of a long term abusive WP:SPA (Rja13ww33) and therefore I must imagine the community will frown upon your warning me as a tactic to get your own way in something in which you are WP:INVOLVED. — Invasive Spices (talk) 21:47, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
FFF simply said they were done reverting, which is more of a "it's not worth it" than a "you are correct." As far as involvement, as I explained to you on my talk page, WP:TPG clearly says Involved parties must not use these templates to end a discussion over the objections of other editors. That is a discussion you are involved in, as in actively taken part of. Lastly, my revert of your out of process closure on violation of WP:TPG does not make me WP:INVOLVED. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
@ScottishFinnishRadish: Please provide the diff which you claim is my out of process closure of the RFC. Invasive Spices (talk) 16:15, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Where did I say you closed the RFC? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:37, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
In that case this isn't relevant to anything and you are – again – staging a distraction. In the interest of clarifying how obviously inappropriate this is, @ScottishFinnishRadish:
Please provide a diff showing that I closed anything.
Invasive Spices (talk) 18:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
[7][8][9][10] are all examples of you closing a discussion that you were involved in in violation of WP:COLLAPSENO which, again, states Involved parties must not use these templates to end a discussion over the objections of other editors. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:38, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
So – to repeat – that is obviously not a closure neither appropriate or inappropriate. I was – unfortunately – not ending Rja13ww33's personally abusive spam or RFC derailing by doing so. My edit left Rja13ww33 and cohort free to continue spamming the RFC – and indeed they did so.
The RFC section fell victim to several editors cooperating to derail the RFC. They then began posting the same derailing spam[11] in a section which is obviously not the RFC. Per WP:NPA and WP:TALKNO and WP:RFC this is not permitted in the RFC. Certainly it is bizarre for them to takeover a different section for the same spam. At least one editor[12] was unable to find the RFC because of that.
@ScottishFinnishRadish: Why are you edit warring and "warning" me in support of Rja13ww33 a long time WP:SPA whose "contributions" to this RFC[13] are solely WP:Personal attacks? — Invasive Spices (talk) 18:58, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
I guess we'll have to agree to disagree on the content of that discussion. The warning remains, however. If you disrupt a discussion like that again you will be blocked to end that disruption. I also encourage you to avoid referring to editors who disagree with you as a cohort, as that is a personal attack. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
Calling attention to the anomalous conduct of a large number of editors strenuously working together to derail an RFC on a politically fraught subject is a personal attack? No of course it is not. Attacking the firebrigade is ominous. ScottishFinnishRadish the place to voice your disagreement with WP:TALK is Wikipedia talk:TALK. Raising concerns about the conduct of editors is normal and one of the primary purposes of Talk:s. As you are well aware that has never been prohibited and doing so would bring Wikipedia to a halt. Invasive Spices (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Invasive Spices, this was a post, a reply, or a comment; but one thing that it certainly wasn't is spam. Please do not describe legitimate posts as "spam" unless that person has been posting identical text to many different pages. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:31, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
I don't think this editor understands what "spam" actually is. Just like they don't understand what a SPA is. Anyone can look at my editing history and see I am not a SPA.Rja13ww33 (talk) 22:45, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
Redrose64: Very interesting to see you misrepresent that edit. That has been one of my primary evidences and for good reason – it is an attempt by Rja13ww33 to mislead other editors as to where the RFC is located. Rja13ww33 inappropriately replied in a different section to make it appear as if that was the RFC question. At least one editor sincerely mistook where the RFC was located due to the volume of such distractions which followed that one.
On the subject of redefining "spam" I will not follow your redefinition. You're free to read spam if you sincerely don't know what that means. "Repetitious posting of any kind" is the most common definition and that is the definition I employ here. No one uses the definition you give here – no one defines it as byte for byte the same strings posted to multiple different locations. That is a proper subset of spam. If that were the only problem that would make Rja13ww33's comments disruptive but of course it is worse than that.
That is volumous repetition to derail an RFC because it is a politically fraught subject. Invasive Spices (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
Rja13ww33: Your edit history is the most obvious WP:SPA thing I have ever seen. The number of edits outside of your obsession area in the 8 years you have been here are very few. The number of edits I am able to find from any other than your obsession WP:POV is 0.
The tremendous effort by the above 2 admins – and a great many others in your 8 years here – to avoid handling your SPA problem is concerning. If I do that I have a problem. If they do that…I have a problem. Nonetheless some time your invisibility will fail you. Perhaps this is that time. Invasive Spices (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
You must have a different definition of "zero" than most people. (Of course, your definition of a lot of things is different than most.) My last 500 edits include everything from the 1992 Dallas Cowboys to Jimmy Carter to Rocky III. If there is some sort of connection between those subjects (that is POV)....let me know.Rja13ww33 (talk) 02:22, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
This technique again. (For the stalkers, very few is the phrase.) Invasive Spices (talk)
Yes, the technique as in: "Invasion Species is wrong (as usual)." Perhaps you should have stuck with "very few" instead of the ridiculous "The number of edits I am able to find from any other than your obsession WP:POV is 0." Of course, anyone can look at my history and see that your "very few"/"zero" claim is nonsense anyway you cut it.Rja13ww33 (talk) 01:49, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pectobacterium carotovorum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BMC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cassava diseases

A tag has been placed on Category:Cassava diseases indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:07, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

"Epidemiology of IKBKAP in the United States" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Epidemiology of IKBKAP in the United States and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 7 § Epidemiology of IKBKAP in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Fram (talk) 16:19, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ANSI X6.1

Notice

The article ANSI X6.1 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 16:37, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Martin Greenfield
added a link pointing to Vanity Fair
Salmon louse
added a link pointing to Smolt

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

ANSI X6.1 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, ANSI X6.1, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 14:15, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello @Onel5969: Why 3? Your page says 1. Invasive Spices (talk) 16:47, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Hi. No it doesn't. It says that sometimes 1 is acceptable if the subject clearly meets an SNG (Specific notability guideline, e.g. populated places with a single source to an official census). This does not meet the standard. Onel5969 TT me 16:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
Neither your own page nor WP:GNG agrees with you.
User:Onel5969 I also don’t have problems with either stub articles, or articles with a single source. As long as the source is good enough to pass WP:VERIFY, and as long as the article subject either pass WP:GNG or one of the SNG’s.
WP:GNG We require the existence of at least one secondary source so that the article can comply with Wikipedia:No original research's requirement that all articles be based on secondary sources.
Where did 3 come from? Invasive Spices (talk) 21:53, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

"Euphytica" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Euphytica has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 3 § Euphytica until a consensus is reached. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:47, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

"Evolutionary Applications" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Evolutionary Applications has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7 § Evolutionary Applications until a consensus is reached. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

"Pesticide Science (journal)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Pesticide Science (journal) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7 § Pesticide Science (journal) until a consensus is reached. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

"Weed Research (journal)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Weed Research (journal) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7 § Weed Research (journal) until a consensus is reached. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:45, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

"Biological Control (journal)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Biological Control (journal) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7 § Biological Control (journal) until a consensus is reached. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:49, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

"Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7 § Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology until a consensus is reached. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 05:50, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

"Journal of General Plant Pathology" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Journal of General Plant Pathology has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7 § Journal of General Plant Pathology until a consensus is reached. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 06:30, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

"European Journal of Plant Pathology" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect European Journal of Plant Pathology has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 7 § European Journal of Plant Pathology until a consensus is reached. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 06:30, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ismar Schorsch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jewish Theological Seminary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

"Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 9 § Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences until a consensus is reached. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:04, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

"The Pacific Review" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Pacific Review has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 9 § The Pacific Review until a consensus is reached. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:05, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Then why was I told in the past to avoid them at all costs? Rontrigger (talk) 22:50, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

@Rontrigger: I don't know. Wikipedia has a lot of people saying a lot of things of which not 100% will be true. Good redlinks are desirable. Invasive Spices (talk) 22:55, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ruth Minsky Sender, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grafenort.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aerobic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shai Halevi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Research paper.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phakopsora pachyrhizi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Effector.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Endowment.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Phyllocnistis citrella

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Phyllocnistis citrella, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Phytosanitary certification
added links pointing to Certificate and Phytosanitary
Murder of Catherine Cesnik
added a link pointing to Vanity Fair

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:29, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:00, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Rye

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rye, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:13, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Ascochyta hordei
added a link pointing to Byelorussia
Cassava
added a link pointing to Farinha

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Construction in California

Information icon Hello, Invasive Spices. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Construction in California, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:40, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Jason Miller (communications strategist)
added a link pointing to Axios
Rathayibacter toxicus
added a link pointing to Anguina

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

"1/6 rioters climb stairways with ropes" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 1/6 rioters climb stairways with ropes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 9 § 1/6 rioters climb stairways with ropes until a consensus is reached. Estar8806 (talk) 20:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

"1/6 rioters climb stairways with makeshift ladders" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 1/6 rioters climb stairways with makeshift ladders has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 9 § 1/6 rioters climb stairways with makeshift ladders until a consensus is reached. Estar8806 (talk) 20:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Construction in California

Hello, Invasive Spices. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Construction in California".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:38, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Magnaporthe grisea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Susceptibility.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Wheat

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Wheat, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:00, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International
added a link pointing to CABI
Potato
added a link pointing to Solanum goniocalyx

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Theanine".

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:52, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

You commented. Your involvement in this dispute is not required but would be welcome. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:57, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
I did intend to participate but then forgot. will do so in the next few hours. Good reminder. Invasive Spices (talk) 21:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
It's bad you tagged me in with some "tangential" off-topic snarky comments. Using DR as cover for this is inappropriate in my view. Bon courage (talk) 02:28, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
I didn't tag you and that wasn't snark. I phrased that as gently as I could. The creator has a long history of this sort of thing and both editors required a warning by the moderator for continued EW during DR.
You obviously didn't write that essay for Reflecktor. I wasn't refering to Reflecktor. Invasive Spices (talk) 18:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
So what are you doing? Why am I mentioned? Why is my essay mentioned? And why is Reflektor mentioned in relation to to it? Could you say simply what you mean because this all looks like some kind of veiled attack. Bon courage (talk) 19:08, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Pat Robertson is a global businessman

Hello, Invasive Spices

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username AngusWOOF and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Pat Robertson is a global businessman, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 21 § Pat Robertson is a global businessman.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:59, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Slow down

Hello. I'd suggest that you slow down on creating redirects. While some of them seem helpful, others are very implausive and framed like sentences, for example American films are extremely popular around the world, Discussion of whether to release Kim Kardashian, Superstar, and Madeleine Albright surprised to learn of her parents Jewish ancestry. These redirects unnecessarily add to the backlog at RfD when they will understandably brought to discussion and likely deleted.

Please read Wikipedia:Redirect, especially its section #Purposes of redirects which lists the most common types of redirect. WP:RFD#DELETE and WP:RF#KEEP may also be helpful. Finally, there exist the essays "Redirects are cheap" and "Redirects are costly", which you may want to read. Thanks, Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 14:46, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lone Star Lake (disambiguation)

Notice

The article Lone Star Lake (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary disambiguation page per WP:ONEOTHER.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix (talk) 01:14, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

"Lone Star Lake (Texas)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Lone Star Lake (Texas) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 27 § Lone Star Lake (Texas) until a consensus is reached. -- Tavix (talk) 01:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Buchwald v. Paramount
added a link pointing to Paramount
Maize
added a link pointing to B73
Morphology of Diptera
added a link pointing to Tegula

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:37, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Measure beta diveesity

A tag has been placed on Measure beta diveesity requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 15:46, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Animal trypanosomiasis
added a link pointing to Steer
Mexican free-tailed bat
added a link pointing to Desert Museum
Rapeseed
added a link pointing to Resistance gene

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Immigration to Maryland

Information icon Hello, Invasive Spices. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Immigration to Maryland, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:09, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Global business interests of Pat Robertson

A tag has been placed on Global business interests of Pat Robertson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:32, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

"Global business interests of Pat Robertson" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Global business interests of Pat Robertson has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 9 § Global business interests of Pat Robertson until a consensus is reached. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:40, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Madeleine Albright surprised by her parents' Jewish ancestry

A tag has been placed on Madeleine Albright surprised by her parents' Jewish ancestry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. voorts (talk/contributions) 13:08, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Madeleine Albright surprised to learn of her parents Jewish ancestry

A tag has been placed on Madeleine Albright surprised to learn of her parents Jewish ancestry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. voorts (talk/contributions) 13:09, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

"1/6 rioters climb stairways with ropes and makeshift ladders" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 1/6 rioters climb stairways with ropes and makeshift ladders has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 10 § 1/6 rioters climb stairways with ropes and makeshift ladders until a consensus is reached. Randi🦋TalkContribs 15:02, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

"Zsuzsanna Budapest immigrates to the United States of America" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Zsuzsanna Budapest immigrates to the United States of America has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 13 § Zsuzsanna Budapest immigrates to the United States of America until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 08:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Film director responsibility for rehearsal in USA industry

A tag has been placed on Film director responsibility for rehearsal in USA industry requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 10:36, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Survey sociolinguistics at the University of Delhi

A tag has been placed on Survey sociolinguistics at the University of Delhi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 10:40, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Perform survey at Taim Ecological Station

A tag has been placed on Perform survey at Taim Ecological Station requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 10:42, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kathleen Kennedy Townsend heading the Department of Juvenile Services

A tag has been placed on Kathleen Kennedy Townsend heading the Department of Juvenile Services requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 10:44, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Verify species loss

A tag has been placed on Verify species loss requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 10:48, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ethnologue 27th edition

A tag has been placed on Ethnologue 27th edition requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 10:49, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

"Ethnologue 27th edition" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Ethnologue 27th edition has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 13 § Ethnologue 27th edition until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 12:03, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Survey condition of United States of America's indigenous people

A tag has been placed on Survey condition of United States of America's indigenous people requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 14:09, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

"More research is required in social immunity" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect More research is required in social immunity has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 13 § More research is required in social immunity until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 14:12, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

"Community Cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Microbial Ecology Research and Analysis amassing bioinformatics data" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Community Cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Microbial Ecology Research and Analysis amassing bioinformatics data has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 13 § Community Cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Microbial Ecology Research and Analysis amassing bioinformatics data until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 14:13, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

"Roberta Marinelli examines seafloor biota" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Roberta Marinelli examines seafloor biota has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 13 § Roberta Marinelli examines seafloor biota until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 14:15, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of FCC assigns spectrum

A tag has been placed on FCC assigns spectrum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 14:18, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Audio engineer rehearses in the United States

A tag has been placed on Audio engineer rehearses in the United States requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 14:19, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of United States cast rehearsal

A tag has been placed on United States cast rehearsal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 14:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Illegally retaliation against Bassem Youssef

A tag has been placed on Illegally retaliation against Bassem Youssef requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 14:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

"Keren Everett studying Amazon languages" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Keren Everett studying Amazon languages has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 13 § Keren Everett studying Amazon languages until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 14:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

"Keren Everett's continuing missionary work" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Keren Everett's continuing missionary work has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 13 § Keren Everett's continuing missionary work until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 14:25, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Laura Nader studying in Mexico

A tag has been placed on Laura Nader studying in Mexico requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 14:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

"Jewish passing as indigenous American" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Jewish passing as indigenous American has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 13 § Jewish passing as indigenous American until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 14:27, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

"Negotiating free trade agreements between the US and other nations involves screen quotas" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Negotiating free trade agreements between the US and other nations involves screen quotas has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 13 § Negotiating free trade agreements between the US and other nations involves screen quotas until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 14:28, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

"Two separate Asian giant hornet introductions in North America" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Two separate Asian giant hornet introductions in North America has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 13 § Two separate Asian giant hornet introductions in North America until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 14:30, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Batteries purchased in the United States

A tag has been placed on Batteries purchased in the United States requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 14:31, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

The redirect Geographic influence of dietary trends on epidemiology of Hashimoto's thyroiditis disorder in US has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 13 § Geographic influence of dietary trends on epidemiology of Hashimoto's thyroiditis disorder in US until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 14:37, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

"Sharia courts can be integrated into the American religious arbitration system" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Sharia courts can be integrated into the American religious arbitration system has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 14 § Sharia courts can be integrated into the American religious arbitration system until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 15:24, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

"Generation of hypotheses about possible ecological relations that are not yet known or well understood" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Generation of hypotheses about possible ecological relations that are not yet known or well understood has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 14 § Generation of hypotheses about possible ecological relations that are not yet known or well understood until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 15:27, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of United States of America 5G NR dynamic spectrum sharing frequencies

A tag has been placed on United States of America 5G NR dynamic spectrum sharing frequencies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 15:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

"Regulation of transvaginal mesh in the United States of America" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Regulation of transvaginal mesh in the United States of America has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 14 § Regulation of transvaginal mesh in the United States of America until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 15:40, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

"Community Cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Microbial Ecology Research and Analysis offering computing infrastructure" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Community Cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Microbial Ecology Research and Analysis offering computing infrastructure has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 14 § Community Cyberinfrastructure for Advanced Microbial Ecology Research and Analysis offering computing infrastructure until a consensus is reached. Fram (talk) 15:44, 14 June 2023 (UTC)