User talk:Interstellarity/Archives/2019/April
I have reverted your move of this article. If you wish to proceed with it please follow the required procedure. I believe (but am not certain) I've identified the procedure you need to follow if you wish to proceed on the article talk page but you should follow this through yourself or request help from other parties if necessary. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk)
Huggle
Can you please delete this page User:Mstrojny/huggle.yaml.js? I tried adding a speedy deletion tag, but was unable to do so. Mstrojny (talk) 00:16, 23 March 2019 (UTC) Your thread has been archived
Hi! I noticed that you have been using Twinkle to revert vandalism! That's awesome! Huggle is another great option that I recommend it's fast and quick, it reverts vandalism and warns the user for you in one click of a button! It can also do a lot of other things! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 21:50, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Proposed change
I am proposing a new change to WP:TUTORIAL. See here. Also see my sandbox. DannyS712 wanted the second layer of headings to be equal length. Can you please edit the sandbox so that the headings are of equal length? Thank you. Mstrojny (talk) 10:31, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
TheWikiWizard - April 2019Hello, Mstrojny! Here is the April 2019 issue of TheWikiWizard.
Hope you like this month's issue! If you'd like to discuss this issue, please go to this issue's talk page. Happy Reading! --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 03:06, 16 April 2019 (UTC) Pending changes reviewer grantedHello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages. Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. See also:
-- ferret (talk) 11:37, 18 April 2019 (UTC) Your thread has been archived
Cannon content removed wrongfullyGood day Interstellarity, I received a message stating that you removed one of my edits. The information I added was made cannon in the Marvel Universe story-line through the movie Deadpool 2. I do acknowledge that the content may seem vulgar, but it is factual and should remain on record. I understand that you might have removed it in misconception that it was an attempt of vandalism, but I assure you I was merely adding new content that was cannoned by Marvel. Please help resolve this issue, Best regards, JP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.113.214.43 (talk) 13:25, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
IRC nickIt appears that you asked at #wikipedia-en-help about how to delete your account. Normally, you just stop using the nickname and, in the fullness of time, your registration will expire and someone else can potentially register it. You could ask a channel op to drop your old nick, which would cancel your registration immediately without waiting for it to expire. But the easiest thing to do is to simply stop using it, since it could be confusing if someone else started using the nick so soon after you stopped. (If you had obtained a cloak on IRC, the process would likely be more complicated, but it doesn't appear that you did that.) Happy editing and the IRC channels are still there if you want to use it, perhaps under a new nickname. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 21:58, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
Your thread has been archived
Checkuser usageHi! In regards to the SPI you filed, the checkuser tool (which is used to compare IP addresses of users) is not allowed to be used to publicly disclose IPs as per the Wikimedia Foundation Privacy Policy. (You can see some guidance here.) In general, you should only request checkuser evidence when either (1) there is evidence to suspect two or more user accounts, not IPs, of being operated abusively and the evidence is not so blatant as to warrant immediately blocking them, or (2) there is a blatant sockpuppet of a user known to make multiple abusive sockpuppets at the same time. In this case, the checkuser would be used to look for the undiscovered accounts. Bear in mind, however, that checkuser is not for fishing, and checkusers will not check users for sockpuppets merely on suspicions or hunches that user may have an unknown sockpuppet account. Let me know if you have any more questions! Cheers! Reaper Eternal (talk) 23:40, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
|