User talk:Interlude65

Your rollback request

Hi Interlude65, I have granted rollback rights to your account in accordance with your request. Please be aware that rollback should be used to revert vandalism/spam/blatantly unconstructive edits, and that using it to revert any other type of edit - such as by revert-warring or reverting edits you disagree with - can lead to it being removed from your account...sometimes without any warning depending on the admin who becomes aware of any misuse. If you think an edit should require a reason for reverting, use a manual edit summary instead of using the rollback tool. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 18:12, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 18:54, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No brainer

Is not an attack in any country I've lived in. I would appreciate you not editing my comments without my permission. Thank you.--Milowent • hasspoken 02:59, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Interlude65. You have new messages at AxG's talk page.
Message added 17:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

 [[ axg ◉ talk ]] 17:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk (Yes album)

Taking a short paragraph and moving it a little below is vandalism? I tried to present things differently. So if you think it was better before it's fine, but I don't "like to experiment". --Hyliad (d), 07 January 2013, 23:56 (CEST)

Whoops! Sorry, I didn't know that wasn't vandalism, because it looked like it to me at first. Thanks for your good-faith contributions, but the reason why I reverted your edit is because it did not present very well. Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 00:55, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spyro: Enter the Dragonfly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indonesian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Star

Hi, I just noticed you gave me a barnstar the other day and I didn't see it until now; I much prefer to have them posted on my talk page so I get pinged, but thanks all the same. Rcsprinter (message) @ 17:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Interlude65 I'm Greg davidson I wanted to let you know it was a mistake hope you be a Wikipedian!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greg Davidson (talk • contribs) 16:10, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Jeoff G Davidson 14:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Citation Barnstar
Queens! G Davidson 17:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

The Macintosh startup sound

Thanks for corrections. I was making edits three times in a row, and they all have been undone, hopefully it now stays for posterity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.255.45.246 (talk) 18:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Information icon Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Meghan Trainor, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. There is currently a consensus. Thanks. Amccann421 (talk) 05:23, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oops! I warned the wrong user. My sincere apologies. Amccann421 (talk) 05:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. ;) Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 05:28, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

I saw you reverted my edit here. Perhaps you would benefit from some explanation. The parameter "icon_nr" is not in use any more, but "sortkey" now does the same thing. So if you want the templates to function as you initially intended, you should implement my edit. Also note that your userpage is added to a tracking category, Category:Fix, because of this issue. I have edited hundreds of pages like yours, and all are very happy... Debresser (talk) 18:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit because it broke the syntax, making it show on the the userpage. I'll fix everything to the new syntax whenever I can. Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 20:16, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I see nothing in the diff that could explain that. In any case, thanks for taking care of it. Debresser (talk) 20:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Information icon Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lips Are Movin, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhDv2.0 21:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About My Post on Meghan Trainor's Me Too Talk Page

Maybe I worded it wrong but I feel that what I said on the talk page was relevant to the actual article, as the article itself refers to the song in the manner I considered erroneous. If my post did violate wikipedia guidelines, I'm sorry. If not, I intend to re-post it, as I think it is relevant to the article. Thank you KatarnLabs (talk)

I amended my admittedly poor post on the Me Too talk page when I re-posted it. I stated my complaint clearly and explained why it DID relate to improving the article, and yet I get this bit of extraordinary rudeness from you "Sorry, but no one cares what YOU think. Your opinion is not relevant here and it contributes nothing regarding making improvements to the article, especially now that the Critical reception section is not in the article anymore. Please do NOT revert my edit again.". I admit the first time my post was mainly opinion driven, but I explained myself much better when I re-posted it. Please respond to this post on my talk page, thank you. KatarnLabs (talk)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Interlude65. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Interlude65. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Meghan Trainor discography

Thanks for your revert of Patricia CV on Meghan Trainor discography. Changing information to their idea of what it is and disregarding convention/what source say (or even using unreliable sources to back up their ideas) is a habit of this user. Ss112 06:46, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ss112: You're very welcome! Sounds like she's just another one of "those" users who base every single one of their actions here on Wikipedia on subjective emotion instead of objective logic! ;) Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 06:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Interlude, do you think there should be a consensus on whether "Better When I'm Dancin'", "Better" and "I'm a Lady" were full or only promotional singles or not? It seems editors disagree (especially this Hurricanebasketball7 editor), and the individual pages for the songs and the discography say different things. For the record, what do you think they are: Promotional or full commercial releases? Ss112 12:40, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ss112: Well actually, the question we should really be asking here is this: where is he (Hurricanebasketball7) getting this information that he keeps belligerently adding to the article? If we could get him to maybe answer that question, then we could see whether it is a reliable source of info or not; that will help us in determining a consensus here. Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 06:37, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioning my account name unnecessarily by interlude65

HI interlude 65. May I know the reason why you mentioned my account name unnecessarily even though I didn't edit something for the past few days. It's OK if it was accidental John singh (talk) 08:13, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My question is, specifically when did I do this to you? Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 19:51, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You mentioned my name at September,09,2018 at 23.57 even though I didn't do those edits bro...
OK, I honestly have no words at all for just how unbelievably ridiculous and downright false your statement is. I think it is a glimpse into just how incompetent/ignorant of a Wikipedian you might be, considering that you can't even properly sign your own name using four tildes (~~~~) and then you get on with your seemingly delusional mistaking of my revert of an IPv6 user's edit over at List of sex symbols for an edit that you made, when it was actually me reverting those edits by said IPv6 back to a revision of the article that had been made by you. Did you happen to somehow misread anything along the way? 'Cause it sure seems like that's the case, or maybe you're just being an outright diva here. The bottom line is, be competent, or be blocked; that's just the "lay of the land" over here at Wikipedia. I cannot, and will not, put up with any problematic/potentially problematic users over here at this site. Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 21:36, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If I'm wrong, can you tell me what were those wrong edits I've done which you are accusing me off falsely. And this wikipedia community is to influence other people to spread knowledge so don't act like a diva bro — Preceding unsigned comment added by John singh (talk • contribs) 18:49, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please stay away from Winkelvi's user pages. Cullen328 Let's discuss it`

  • Sorry, my mistake. I didn't know that you're apparently not supposed to put notices like that when there was no preconceived obligation to do so, and thought that I was being courteous and helpful to those who agreed upon his indefinite block and clarified about how he's basically banned indefinitely from Wikipedia over at the administrator's noticeboard. My bad! Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 06:25, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Interlude65. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DRN case reminder

Hello, from a DR/N volunteer

This is a friendly reminder to involved parties that there is a current Dispute Resolution Noticeboard case still awaiting comments and replies. If this dispute has been resolved to the satisfaction of the filing editor and all involved parties, please take a moment to add a note about this at the discussion so that a volunteer may close the case as "Resolved". If the dispute is still ongoing, please add your input. ElectricBurst(Electron firings)(Zaps) 01:16, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Editing while tired

Thank you for striking the incivility from your comment at AN when ​ asked you to. I regretfully admit that, when I thanked you for the parts of your candid comments on Aspergers and history (which I appreciated), I was viewing in the diff view and I didn't actually notice the bit where you crossed the line into incivility. My mistake. I agree with NinjaRobotPirate that you went too far at that point and it was best for you to strike that (thanks NRP). Had I been more alert I should have caught that and said something about it myself, instead of liking the comment. Sorry to both of you for having been confusing. Best, - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 18:17, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • I agree that the comment was in poor taste--which is especially galling when it occurs in a discussion where a user, who has dedicated a lot of time to the project, is denied permission to come back. Drmies (talk) 21:12, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Drmies: The quantity of his contributions really doesn't matter when most of them have been incredibly detrimental to the overall culture of Wikipedia. And if my comments greatly helped keep him nipped in the bud, like he totally deserves to be, then that's fantastic. I'm glad that I was able to ironically contribute significantly to better reaching a consensus, if that is the case! Interlude 65 (Push to talk) 06:17, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Boys Like You"

Hi, can I know where you got the studio information for "Boys Like You"? The credits are on Tidal but studio information is usually only in CD booklets, and I can't seem to find one for this song.--NØ 08:00, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Outfield edits

Hey, no problem. I figured my little grammar edit got caught up in the reverting of that inaccurate info someone else put in there.

At first I thought all you'd reverted was my edit but then I saw you'd removed the stuff about that guy who wasn't in the band, so I just wanted to make sure that one tiny comma I'd changed weeks ago was changed again. I'm OCD like that. ;)

Frankly, the entire sentence I was editing made me want to redo it, but I'm mostly a minor edit wikipedia editor dude. Cheers.

gfoxcook (talk) 00:15, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]