User talk:Info por favor

File:World marriage-equality laws.svg

Hi. I understand that why you marked Illinois as green, but the thicker national borders don't help anything and look really ugly. Regards. Ron 1987 (talk) 01:49, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a link to the map you are talking about.
In File:World marriage-equality laws.svg, Illinois is not marked green. The colour can be named beige, or in other words, pale brown. On the talkpage for this file, many wikipedians name the colour “yellow”. A white border between home nations of the United Kingdom is very difficult to see when both nations are beige. Mann, for example, has the black border of the circle.
I do not observe in what way my edits make thicker national borders. I make a black border between England & Wales and the nation of Scotland, because Scotland’s parliament will decide equal marriage separately from the United Kingdom parliament.
Please describe how the borders I make are thicker. Thank you.
Info por favor (talk) 02:41, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I meant yellow colour, not green. All borders on the map are thicker after your edit. See this and this. Ron 1987 (talk) 03:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see you are correct. I now remember that this is a bug when I import the SVG from wikipedia into the editor on my computer. I will repair borders on File:World marriage-equality laws.svg. ― Info por favor (talk) 04:20, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have now made the borders less thick. ― Info por favor (talk) 05:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Info por favor! Thank you for your contributions. I am Teammm and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Teammm talk
email 03:20, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar

I appreciate it, and I'm logging in to say I'm doing alright. I'm still backing off of Wikipedia for a while, but I figured it wasn't wise to leave on a silent note. Dralwik|Have a Chat 23:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Statewide Democratic primaries - Number of States

Why did you change Hillary's number of states to 27 states? Shouldn't it be 29 states? Here they are: AL,AZ,AR,CA,CO,CT,FL,GA,ID,IL,KY,LA,MD,MA,MI,MN,MO,NV,NJ,NY,NC,OH,OK,PA,SC,TN,TX,VA,WV?

Thanks. All4peace (talk) 15:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I made a counting error: it’s 28 states. Arkansas has no polling within the preceding 6 months. Info por favor (talk) 17:08, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I missed Arkansas, thanks.All4peace (talk) 17:15, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Turner (actor) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tom Turner (actor), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 02:17, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tom Turner (actor) (December 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Mirror Cracked was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
You need further reliable sources to make this draft ready.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Mirror Cracked (talk) 02:47, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Info por favor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Mirror Cracked (talk) 02:47, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tom Turner (actor) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tom Turner (actor), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tom Turner (actor)

Hello, Info por favor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tom Turner".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 20:41, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]