User talk:Igorp lj/Archive 1

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Igorp lj, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Monroe Fein. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! brewcrewer (yada, yada) 04:17, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

talk page etiquette

Please do not split another persons comment, add your comment after theirs. Thanks, Nableezy (talk) 23:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll try - in current Wiki format sometimes It's hard to find whom one replies. - Igorp lj (talk) 23:41, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki help

{{adminhelp}} As I remember I'd registrated with ' igorp_lj' login name. Why is it really converted to ' Igorp lj ' one consisting of two parts an who may help me to rerun to my choice?
Thank you. - Igorp lj (talk)

You'll notice in your address bar that this page is shown as "User_talk:Igorp_lj" - when you registered your account, Mediawiki interpreted the underscore as a space, because that's how it handles them from URLs. When you log in, it shouldn't make any difference if you add the underscore or not. Hersfold (t/a/c) 22:06, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{adminhelp}} What one can do to let my name be seen according to my choice - 'igorp_lj' in all Wiki's places ? - Igorp lj (talk) 23:00, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not an admin, but what you can do is change your signature so that it shows up as you want it. Click on the "my preferences" link at the top right of the screen and in the user profile tab write igorp_lj in the text box for Signature. Do not check the box below. Click save and from now on whenever you sign it will show igorp_lj as your name. It wont change the address though. nableezy - 23:56, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you!!! It appears that good news just from you were waiting me while I spent time at ru.wiki. Thanks again and I'll be glad to discuss any topic with you besides of possible difference in our points. - Igorp_lj (talk) 22:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

revert

Please note this purely technical revert, I hope it's ok. --ElComandanteChe (talk) 17:31, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I do not see it as tech. one. Please either explain your change or revert it back.
Any way, I do not know about any Martians living near Itamar. What about you? --Igorp_lj (talk) 17:37, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Take a look at this diff - you've removed the opening brackets "{{" of "Otheruses" template. --ElComandanteChe (talk) 17:44, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oops & sorry, --Igorp_lj (talk) 17:56, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Alexsmail (talk) 23:42, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks & the same for you too ! (not only here) --Igorp_lj (talk) 00:03, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with Wikipedia:Emailing users

In Wikipedia:Help desk/Archives/2014 April 11#Problem with Wikipedia:Emailing users you didn't mention you mail provder but if it's Yahoo then you are probably hit by the problem at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 125#Wikipedia email not working when I send but works when others send to me. It's also mentioned at DMARC#History. We may have to update our email help pages. Some mail providers still allow Yahoo mail from other servers than Yahoo's own. My Danish mail provider may be one of them. My advice is still to try another mail provider, especially if you have Yahoo. PrimeHunter (talk) 10:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I do, I use Yahoo. I have to think how to arrange this passing. May be I'll try to make test pass to other email provider before.
Thank you for this info. --Igorp_lj (talk) 13:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(at the moment) - Problems with Wikipedia email? answers.yahoo.com (Nihiltres) --Igorp_lj (talk) 22:09, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rabin Pre-Military Academy

In Rabin Pre-Military Academy#References, I'm removing your remark embedded in the citation of a Jerusalem Post article of March 19, 2009:

That was what Zamir wrote in 1990, reprinted in 2004. The testimonies of the soldiers that he brought to the public's attention seem to corroborate - what a coincidence - his thesis.

This sort of personal commentary doesn't belong on the mainspace page. You might consider adding it to the article's Talk page; I leave that to you. -- Deborahjay (talk) 10:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notification. I do think that article author's opinion should be in the article, and there is no place here for your "This sort of personal commentary", but let's continue at the article's Talk page. --Igorp_lj (talk) 13:19, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AE misrepresentation/exaggeration on Hebrew/Israeli quotes and comparison between Arab-Israeli matters and the holocaust

Igorp lj, I promised to notify you. Though there was no direct reply on my querry,[1] two AE executives is enough input for me. See block-log update. According to this, it is appears preferable that future allusions should be ignored. MarciulionisHOF (talk) 06:08, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RfC United States same-sex marriage map

I opened up an RfC for the U.S. same-sex marriage map due to the complicated situation of Kansas: RfC: How should we color Kansas? Prcc27 (talk) 12:14, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contact

Hello, Igorp lj. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

I can use a good word...

Here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashtul (talk • contribs) 00:04, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ARBPIA alert

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

— MShabazz Talk/Stalk 01:59, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

=> User talk:Malik Shabazz/Archive 51#Sovereignty

I'd ask you to withdraw these your WP:ARBPIA alerts. --Igorp_lj (talk) 10:48, 8 March 2015

--Igorp_lj (talk) 10:53, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

With respect to the ARBPIA alert, as the template says, it "is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date." — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 16:50, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

+ not short discussion in subtopic at User talk:Malik Shabazz/Archive 51#WP:ARBPIA alerts ?
+ continued in Talk:Palestine#Definition of the term "sovereign state" (moved to Archive_13) by Laurel Lodged, 9 March 2015
--Igorp_lj (talk) 18:02, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Hi Igorp, thanks for your message. I have moved it to Talk:Palestine so that others can contribute. Oncenawhile (talk) 07:42, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback Malik Shabazz, 29 April 2015

{{talkback|Malik Shabazz|Your revert (Gaza strip)|ts=02:30, 29 April 2015 (UTC)}}

See == revert (Gaza strip)

I wasn't talking about any consensus for Nishidani's "nonsense" (in your words). So I'd suggest you to read a Talk:Gaza Strip#Seib topic before your so fast revert. --Igorp_lj (talk) 21:52, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Your classification of people into two camps—those who compare the Gaza Strip to a concentration camp and therefore must be pathological "critics of Israel and left-wing / pro-Palestinian activists" and those who reject the comparison and can be left undescribed—violates both WP:NPOV and WP:BLP. I did read that section of the Talk page and, as I wrote, there was no consensus for your nonsense. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:28, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Are you meaning that Lauren Booth, Giorgio Agamben aren't "critics of Israel and left-wing / pro-Palestinian activists"? IMHO, if someone may find an information about activism of "those who reject the comparison" it may be added as well.
Any way, there is no consensus for your edition as well, it isn't attributed, their RS are grouped confusedly, etc. So I'd invited you to take a part at the Talk page to discuss the arguments against it. --Igorp_lj (talk) 07:13, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 2 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Igorp. Could you look into the Binjamin Infantry Brigade? I can't see it listed in Israeli brigades but it is called thus on Haaretz's report concerning the al-Kasbah incident today. If it's a bother, forget it. Thanks Nishidani (talk) 17:30, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It should be named either Binyamin Region Brigade as at Arutz 7, or Binyamin (Regional) Brigade as at JPost. I have no idea why Haaretz has called it just as Binyamin infantry brigade. I'll check Hebrew sources later. --Igorp_lj (talk) 20:40, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Another var: Binyamin Territorial Brigade (Judea and Samaria Division)
see אוגדת אזור יהודה ושומרון / חטיבת בנימין - באזור רמאללה ויריחו - מח"ט: אל"מ ישראל שומר
--Igorp_lj (talk) 20:52, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Sabra & Shatilla survey

Thanks for adding your view there- You should add your signature to the comments you provided. All Rows4 (talk) 18:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks &  Done --Igorp_lj (talk) 19:59, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FAQ

(reply to my "Talk:Mandatory Palestine/FAQ: Transjordan": I've returned "Response by DaoXan" & Zero's reply to the page to let know to a reader about other POV. Can you please explain your "moving to main talk page - this is an FAQ, and should be discussed on the main talk page" deletion's description  ? Regards, --Igorp_lj (talk) 22:04, 6 July 2015")

...Sure, his comments were almost impossible to understand, poorly structured and poorly sourced. The FAQ should not be a discussion, but a consensual position reflecting the views of the editors who are discussing at the talk page. See the banner I added, which explains it. Oncenawhile (talk) 22:11, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And as it turns out, when his response was pasted into the main talk page, it was disagreed with universally. Oncenawhile (talk) 22:12, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The template banner says "These FAQ answers reflect the decisions found in the talk page archives. Please feel free to change them in light of new discussion."
Which means that the discussion should be had at the main talk page itself.
Oncenawhile (talk) 22:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • "his response was pasted into the main talk page"; "decisions found in the talk page archives"...{{where}} - ??
P.S. Let's continue at one - either my or your User_talk, where I've already written my questions along with leaving FYI at DaoXan page. --Igorp_lj (talk) 22:32, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removed your precious ITIC garbage addition (@The kyle 3)

Considering that the article in question is about Israeli strikes and Palestinian casualties during last year's attack on the Gaza Strip by Israel, and not about the whiny piddling and excuse-making of pro-Israel and IDF-apologist "think tanks" trying to defend a 65-70% civilian death rate through lying.

I see that you exhibit a lot of the worst traits of the obnoxiously pro-Israel Wikipedia editor-- for example your wailing over the single Israeli child killed last summer while shamelessly ignoring the 400-500 children killed by Israel. Even more rationale for me to revert your "additions". The kyle 3 (talk) 17:37, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@The kyle 3: explain what are you talking about in the message. Maybe it'll be news to you, but the pro-Israeli (as well as pro-Arab, etc,) editor - isn't a curse word. IMHO, much more important is to bring and to use correct & reliable information. That's what I haven't found in this your "whiny piddling" message.
So when you'll be able to formulate your charges specifically, basing on relevant RS & diffs - wellcome. But not before :) --Igorp_lj (talk) 18:19, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

East Talpiot
added a link pointing to Lehi
Yahya Ayyash
added a link pointing to Lehi

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --Igorp_lj (talk) 10:54, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Skunk discussion

You are discussing in the wrong place. You want Skunk_(weapon), not Skunk. Kingsindian ♝♚ 14:50, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks (!) &  Done --Igorp_lj (talk) 14:59, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Regavim (NGO), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Baker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 28 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks &  Done --Igorp_lj (talk) 20:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Poll on Peace Now article

The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived.

You reverted my edit on Peace Now. A poll is a primary source. Wikipedia is based on secondary sources. Do you have any media articles that report on this poll? Otherwise it's not a valid source... --Perplexed566 (talk) 21:52, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll check.
At the moment: it seems to me that this poll is more RS and closely concerns to "Peace Now and the Second Intifada (2000–2005)" section than the following PR about its own success from Peace Now itself & its allies:

Despite the arguable decline in the Israeli public's support for the Oslo Peace Process, Peace Now succeeded in leading a demonstration of 100,000 people (in May, 2002) for the purposes of pressuring the government to withdraw from all Palestinian territories.[23] (According to "Peace Now" itself) Shortly after the outbreak of the Second Intifada, Peace Now was instrumental in creating the Israeli Peace Coalition, which later evolved into the Israeli-Palestine Peace Coalition.[1] Its main objective is to end the Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands, and to achieve a just, lasting and comprehensive peace based on a two-state solution.[24]

Let's clarify & continue at Talk:Peace Now. --Igorp_lj (talk) 23:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

WP:ARBPIA3 is now open and evidence can be submitted until September 8. 62.90.5.221 (talk) 09:09, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, --Igorp_lj (talk) 23:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BBC or MFA

It seems to have been discussed years ago so there was a consensus.

If you actually want to make a change, you should focus on the new case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Palestine-Israel articles 3/Evidence. Settleman (talk) 18:31, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm still trying to understand what are the changed 'Scope of evidence'.
As I see it's worth to read already moved numerous 'Preliminary statements' too. --Igorp_lj (talk) 22:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Palestine-Israel articles 3/Evidence

Please rewrite your evidence so that it is more general and not focussed on any specific editor. I've already made it clear to another editor that they need to do this and if they don't it will be done by someone else. There are no parties to this case. We are interested in the general issues and although hopefully we can revise the existing remedies to improve the area, we won't be sanctioning any editors. Thanks. Doug Weller (talk) 17:54, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: I am not sure that other evidences do prove that "there are no parties to this case", but I'll try to correct my text, so it'll describe a situation without specifying therein the names of specific editors.
Do I understand right that your ask doesn't mean removing the links to examples themselves, or ..? --Igorp_lj (talk) 21:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(before receiving your answer)  Done [2] --Igorp_lj (talk) 23:34, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding..

...my welcome of Settleman: yes, I would say that was absolutely correct in this case. Have you looked at his first edits? His *very* first edit was the creation of a new article! ..In a very controversial area, no less. Now, how many new editors do that?

And I´m answering your question here, as I don´t want to "clutter" arb.com evidence page, with things that *really* don´t belong there, Cheers, Huldra (talk) 00:05, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Huldra, sorry, I'll reply you later, afer my return to Internet. --Igorp_lj (talk) 14:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
See my As I know it wasn't your 1st such "greeting". The rest - see my opinion above. --Igorp_lj (talk) 23:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

messages to other users

You are not entitled to continually return material to another user's personal pages. On the contrary, he is entitled to remove them, see WP:REMOVED. Even more, continually returning deleted messages is harrassment, see WP:HUSH. Zerotalk 01:00, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, it appears that there is only "although archiving is preferred" recommendation in e-Wiki. In ru-wiki such demand is tougher.
If so - ok. I'll move my message from his Talk to my one. --Igorp_lj (talk) 14:03, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(moved from Pluto2012/archive1)

== Caution: AGF & EQ ==

Hi, you seem to have broke wp:AGF & wp:EQ here: "Paid editing ; former editing on wp". I'd suggest you apologize to S. and disavow your provocative questions. --Igorp_lj (talk) 09:58, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Returned after removing by Pluto2012. --Igorp_lj (talk) 10:24, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Sorry, but I have to return it again. See also: AGF, EQ, removing a Caution from a Talk page --Igorp_lj (talk) 23:58, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

--Igorp_lj (talk) 14:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removing material from own talk page

Re this: per the guidelines, one is fully entitled to remove most kinds of material from their own talk page. You certainly do not "have" to restore a comment once it has been removed by the owner, they certainly have read it and apparently decided not to reply. Do feel free to remove this comment :) “WarKosign” 10:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WarKosign, thank you & see topic above. --Igorp_lj (talk) 14:07, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
У каждего монастыря свой устав. Я бы на вашем месте извинился, что-бы это недоразумение не раздули. “WarKosign” 17:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DRN for Duma

Here . Settleman (talk) 06:37, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(=> Archive #124: Duma arson attack#Ya'alon on Jewish extremists --Igorp_lj (talk))

Ok. Rather after Hatima tova (!)
Btw: it's worth while to move the same message from there to here (pls wiki-mail me to let me sent you such minor notes). --Igorp_lj (talk) 09:52, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: Please go to the link above and provide a concise, specific summary of the dispute. --JustBerry (talk) 03:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@JustBerry: Thank you for reminder. I've already began to prepare it, hoping to leave my summary either today or tomorrow. --Igorp_lj (talk) 21:15, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like a plan. --JustBerry (talk) 21:17, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
:) => [3]. Sorry, I'll have only mobile phone in a next 4 days. --Igorp_lj (talk) 09:34, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hi there. Just wanted to drop you a line and say good work on the list of violent incidents page. I know from personal experience how hard it is with all the incessant harassment and subtle source falsification. If you happen to see obvious distortion of sources, please let me know on my talk page (I mean really obvious stuff, like turning "some" into "most" or "black" into "white", stuff that can't be argued about). No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 22:01, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@No More Mr Nice Guy: Hi here too. 1. Ok.
2. Regardinhg to these Lists: I have another proposal:)
--Igorp_lj (talk) 23:51, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that article is completely ridiculous and useless. But I'm glad to see someone has the patience to look after it. Nishidani couldn't write an NPOV article if his life depended on it. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 00:22, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
here's a source with video of a Palestinian man deliberately driving over some Israeli civilians, then getting out of his car and chopping people up with a cleaver. Might be useful for that ridiculous list. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 15:02, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks + צפו: הפיגוע הבוקר במלכי ישראל מתחילתו ועל חיסול המחבל (זווית שלא פורסמה, ממצלמת האבטחה) enlarged, + here: Security footage of Malchei Yisrael attack --Igorp_lj (talk) 19:44, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think the ynet one can actually be used in articles since it comes from a reliable source. You know what the BBC headline would be for this incident? "Palestinian man wounded by Israelis during car attack and stabbing". No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 19:51, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes: :( Why the BBC is biased against Israel --Igorp_lj (talk) 23:40, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that's the one I was thinking of. There have been more over the last few days. Interesting stuff, I don't know if I agree with this guy's reasoning, though. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 00:34, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you see the one with the 13 year old who's father said he was out to buy CDs (or wood for his steam engine?). Apparently to get a CD you must stab some Jews. See here. Also good for the ridiculous list. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 20:27, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@No More Mr Nice Guy: Thank you, I've seen it and I'm going to check how it is presented in the List.
I was out of wiki a ~couple of weeks, and currently I can visit wiki only sporadically, but I've already tried to add a bit of common sense in what some editors do, e.g., in the same List. Nevertheless, if you see something interesting, pls send me a mail and I'll try to find a time to do something. --Igorp_lj (talk) 10:31, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Will do. No More Mr Nice Guy (talk) 17:05, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JSTOR cleanup drive

Hello TWL users! We hope JSTOR has been a useful resource for your work. We're organizing a cleanup drive to correct dead links to JSTOR articles – these require JSTOR access and cannot easily be corrected by bot. We'd love for you to jump in and help out!



Sent of behalf of Nikkimaria for The Wikipedia Library's JSTOR using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Igorp lj. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Igorp lj. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Arson Attacks from Gaza

Can you please add in 2018_Gaza_border_protests some of the arson attacks since the 25'th June until today ?159.253.248.234 (talk) 15:58, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could you request to add the 28'th and 29'th of May events please  ?

May 28:

https://www.jpost.com/Arab-Israeli-Conflict/Report-One-wounded-one-killed-in-IDF-artillery-fire-toward-Gaza-Strip-558562

May 29:

https://www.kan.org.il/item/?itemId=31819 https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/29/world/middleeast/gaza-israel-mortars.html

Request to edit by IPs are removed and ignored.5.144.49.8 (talk) 12:43, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Terrorism-info.org.il

Hello Igorp lj,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Terrorism-info.org.il for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

AmericanAir88 (talk) 13:50, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Here is my reply there "because... it simply points to the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center page" --Igorp_lj (talk) 14:41, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You cannot have Urls as redirects. AmericanAir88 (talk) 15:13, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If Rules do not allow such title even as reDirect, so ... as I see, Dlohcierekim has already erased it. --Igorp_lj (talk) 15:39, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Igorp lj. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. Sent at 08:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Committee for a Workers' International (1974) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Imelda Marcos on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of Asian Americans and Pacific Islands Americans in the United States Congress on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 14:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:2020 Ganja missile attacks on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:COVID-19 misinformation on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:30, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Red Party (Norway) on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Fidesz on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:30, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas I'm researching Wikipedia Questions? 15:49, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Clywedog Reservoir on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Eritrea on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:30, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:AUKUS on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Julian Assange on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've been unsubscribed from the Feedback Request Service

Hi Igorp_lj! You're receiving this notification because you were previously subscribed to the Feedback Request Service, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over six months.

In order to declutter the Feedback Request Service list, and to produce a greater chance of active users being randomly selected to receive invitations to contribute, you've been unsubscribed, along with all other users who have made no edits in six months.

You do not need to do anything about this - if you are happy to not receive Feedback Request Service messages, thank you very much for your contributions in the past, and this will be the last you hear from the service. If, however, you would like to resubscribe yourself, you can follow the below instructions to do so:

  1. Go to the Feedback Request Service page.
  2. Decide which categories are of interest to you, under the RfC and/or GA headings.
  3. Paste {{Frs user|Igorp_lj|limit}} underneath the relevant heading(s), where limit is the maximum number of requests you wish to receive for that category per month.
  4. Publish the page.

If you've just come back after a wikibreak and are seeing this message, welcome back! You can follow the above instructions to re-activate your subscription. Likewise, if this is an alternate account, please consider subscribing your main account in much the same way.

Note that if you had a rename and left your old name subscribed to the FRS, you may be receiving this message on your new username's talk page still. If so, make sure your new account name is subscribed to the FRS, using the same procedure mentioned above.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask on the Feedback Request Service talk page, or on the Feedback Request Service bot's operator's talk page. Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]