User talk:Ian Strachan

Welcome!

Hello, Ian Strachan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  --rogerd 21:50, 30 March 2007 (UTC) Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Amos Han Talk 20:51, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additions in GNSS Augmentation

Thanks for your work in GNSS. I'm going to partially revert some of your additions, but I'd like you to understand why.

  • A ground station actually does a lot more than "compare its position" and truly takes measurements of the signal characteristics to generate correcting information
  • The ICAO specification came after the WAAS specification, so the original text is more accurate regarding the association between SBAS and WAAS.
  • We already had a list of SBAS implementations, so I'm going to remove your redundant info.

One final suggestion; your history shows a frequent claim of "I work as an XXXXXX." While personal experience is definitely helpful, remember that personal thoughts are original research, and therefore not appropriate for use in the articles nor usable to verify your additions. Additions should be cited from verifiable and acceptable sources. But you can use your experience to track down articles and published information to help reputably improve the whole wiki.

Thanks again - Davandron | Talk 01:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aew nimrod

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Aew nimrod, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MilborneOne 11:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry a bit of explanation, a cross reference would be ok and after your last comment on the Aew nimrod page I have created AEW Nimrod as re-direct page to the main Nimrod article. It was the upper/lower case Aew nimrod that I didnt like!, still suggest that you allow it to be deleted. The redirects allow other common variants of article subjects to be found in the search. You may also like to visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft where most of new ideas, new articles and other aviation contributions can be found. MilborneOne 19:17, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Foot-lambert

Thanks for your recent edits to Foot-lambert. Can you explain why you capitalized the Lambert? I believe in general it's not correct to do so for units. See Template:SI_unit_lowercase and its talk page, though of course the foot-lambert is not an SI unit. Also, please try to use a more descriptive edit summary...flight simulation just isn't so clear... thanks. jhawkinson 20:14, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear JH, I used initial capitals for Lambert because it is a guy's name. Similarly with Ampere, Volta, Gauss etc. Is that not common usage where a family name is involved? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ian Strachan (talk • contribs) 05:20, 7 June 2007
Hi, Ian! (By the way, you can sign your post by typing ~~~~ at the end). take a look at the reference I mentioned above. It says:
As for all SI units whose names are derived from the proper name of a person, the first letter of its symbol is uppercase. But when an SI unit is spelled out, it should always be written in lowercase, unless it begins a sentence or is the name "degree Celsius"
Now, since the footlambert is not an SI unit, SI's rules don't apply (formally speaking), but in practice, I think indeed we should hew to them. So generally the ampere and volt are not capitalized, even though we talk about 120V and 20A, and when referring to the people we do capitalize. Subsequent to my comment, someone else reverted your change, and I think they were probably right... All the best. jhawkinson 19:55, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New item

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article New item, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 06:29, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:CAE_4_sims.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CAE_4_sims.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 22:52, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CAE 4 sims.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CAE 4 sims.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:19, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Link B2 simulator.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.78.53 (talk) 01:26, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ownship

The article Ownship has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

An unsourced stub of questionable notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:52, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:CAE sim at roll angle.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CAE sim at roll angle.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:42, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source information needed for File:Bentworth Old Manor1890.jpg

Hello, Ian Strachan!

It was really helpful of you to upload File:Bentworth Old Manor1890.jpg. However, in order to keep and use new images, we need to know their original source.

If you can edit the description page and add this information, that would be great. If you're not sure how or need help, please ask at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Transport delay listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Transport delay. Since you had some involvement with the Transport delay redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Gorthian (talk) 05:43, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]