User talk:I'llbeyourbeach

Welcome!

Hello, I'llbeyourbeach! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Katietalk 16:36, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Umm, hey, I wanted to have 2fa on my account—just for security. I'm not anyone important but H:2FA said that anyone could have it unless there is "no reason not to grant one", and so I go to that other page to request 2 Factor Auth tester permissions on wikimedia to realise I don't have a userpage made there... I thought that might be grounds for rejection? I was under the impression that my English wiki userpage showed up by default if I didn't have a userpage, I think it might've said something like that when I created my en.wiki userpage... Umm so anyway, I thought I would just copy the source code from my en.wiki userpage and make my wikimedia userpage from that... and that triggered an anti-spam filter which asked me contact an administrator to explain what I was trying to do. I hope this is how you're supposed to do that. Uhmm, yea so I just wanted to enable 2fa on my account. Do I even need a talkpage on metawiki to get approved? Should I try to see if there's some option to set my en.wiki userpage as a global default on all other wikis? Make a new userpage on wikimedia? Sorry to bother you this sounds stupid and I should probably look around myself but I'm new and this is all pretty confusing and complicated looking. I'llbeyourbeach (talk) 10:47, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi there. To my knowledge, you don't have to have a Meta user page in order to receive 2FA. Don't worry about it, and just follow the instructions in the template. The stewards will find you – they can see your global contributions (your contributions across all MediaWiki projects). And welcome! Katietalk 16:34, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi I'llbeyourbeach! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, [undefined] Error: {{Lang}}: no text (help) inside a Wiktionary link?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion [[Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 1070#[undefined] Error: {{Lang}}: no text (help)_inside_a_Wiktionary_link?|here]]. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

Hi. FYI, your username is not showing up in your signature (here). No worries if that is by design. --RegentsPark (comment) 19:17, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh... thank you for telling me, but I’ve no clue why that is. I did sign with four tildes after the comment. There’s no way I accidentally deleted a part of it.
It might be a bug hehe? Idk but I did mean to sign my name there. —I'llbeyourbeach (talk) 01:12, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah. Probably a bug. BTW, your comment made a lot of sense, so thanks! --RegentsPark (comment) 01:23, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
That's very kind hehe. I was a bit nervous commenting because everybody was in the midst of a serious and thorough conversation about nationalities across the subcontinent through independence but I couldn't... see the point of adding sumn like that in the first place lol. Looking back it, I have a concern about unambiguity, I think I should've mentioned that I only support excluding nationality, citizenship, etc. if it can be correctly inferred from birthplace. —I'llbeyourbeach (talk) 15:28, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Resubmission

Hi there, re: this, if content you've previously submitted has disappeared from an article, please check the article's edit history to find out why. In this case, Fylindfotberserk removed the the |alma_mater= content here, explaining pretty clearly, "Not for non-graduates as per template documentation". If we look at Template:Infobox person, we can read the |alma_mater= parameter instructions and find out why. In this case: "It is usually not relevant to include either parameter for non-graduates". Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I’m so sorry. I read it off the top and didn’t notice that it said ‘either’ shouldn’t usually be included for non-graduates.
I’d seen |education= be used for non-graduates (though in fairness dropping out of Harvard was more relevant to the Mark Zuckerberg or the Bill Gates articles, than Rajput's and DTU) and thought the parameter would be appropriate use here. Part of me was thinking it was relevant (at least loosely) because his college was already there in the infobox since earlier edirs. I’ll discuss future edits and changes to this on the talkpage before doing them. Adding his college to the infobox (under |alma_mater= at least) wasn’t really my edit—I wanted to set it straight that he didn’t graduate.
Sorry again, resubmitting it under |education= was lowkey disruptive; I need to read these things more carefully. I'll exercise more caution moving onwards. —I'llbeyourbeach (talk) 18:31, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


European beewolf

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please respect the spelling conventions, where an article is written in UK English use those spellings. So no “ize” instead of “ise” or dropping the u in behaviour. As the article about the European Beewolf is about an European species written in UK English that’s how it should be edited. Otherwise thanks for your constructive edits. Quetzal1964 (talk) 22:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did respect the dominant convention, which was American English when I copy-edited the article; the article was not written in British English, @Quetzal1964. '-yze' and dropping the 'u' in behaviour were the dominant spelling used and I changed the one '-yse' I saw to make it consistent with the rest of them. I only edited §Biology, and didn't pay much attention to the British connections in the article; I presumed someone else would figure out MOS:TIES if that was something that needed to be figured out. Thank you for doing that. —I'llbeyourbeach (talk) 05:10, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree the article was mixed in its spelling style but I would say that British English was the predominant variant used and that I was as guilty as any other editor of mixing this up (e.g. "mold" rather than "mould"). I see that you have decided to use "Commonwealth English" in your edits for the article. Quetzal1964 (talk) 07:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Checking the edit history, I believe that one 'paralysed' was the only instance of Commonwealth spelling in that entire article, @Quetzal1964, I don't see how it was predominantly British in spelling. I neither have much experience applying MOS:TIES nor do I see a strong national tie to Britain—it just has a range there—but what slight connection there is, there is, and so I don't oppose your decision. But then the same connection should also apply to the southern African British colonies as this wasp has a range up till there. I thought Commonwealth English would be unproblematic—it's pretty much British English. —I'llbeyourbeach (talk) 08:02, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Morning, you misunderstand me "Commonwealth English" is fine, I was just noting that you had used that variant which as you say, is almost identical to British English. Thanks. Quetzal1964 (talk) 08:12, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, hehe~ I thought you wanted me to explain myself or my rationale. No problem! —I'llbeyourbeach (talk) 08:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lehran logo.xcf listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lehran logo.xcf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edit request


Thank you so much, @SpringProof and other copyeditors ^^ It reads so much better now.

That final paragraph in the lead sounds WP:EDITORIAL and MOS:FLOWERY. I fixed up some other small things I saw; maybe I'll fact check that paragraph later and phrase it better. —I'llbeyourbeach (talk) 15:24, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Babylon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Babalu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ismat Chughtai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United Provinces.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]