User talk:Hz.tiang

Click here to leave me a message!


Hanna Zayachkivska

Hi!

I know Anna personally and I have seen her passport. There is two Ukrainian names, Hanna and Anna, and she is Anna (Анна). In her social pages she insisted that she is Anna, not Hanna. Her surname is Zaiachkivska, not Zayachkivska. She is not a model, she consider herself a painter and a singer. http://www.missworld.com/Contestants/Ukraine/

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:36, Wednesday, January 8, 2025 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together


ChineseSkill

Hi Hz.tiang, could you make an article for ChineseSkill, a Chinese-learning app? Miaosi51 (talk) 05:45, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I can make an article on ChineseSkill, but may I suggest that you create the article yourself. Wikipedia encourages users like you to be bold and do stuff yourself. If after reading this you want to create the article, I recommend that you read Wikipedia:Your first article.
If you would still prefer that I create the article instead, I'm fine with that. Just reply me your decision here. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page or you can ask at the teahouse. Cheers, heyzec! 08:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hz.tiang, I would love for you to do it. I'm not familiar with Wiki's editing procedure. It took me a while to figure out how to send you messages (and still don't know if i'm doing it right...) Please help!!Miaosi51 (talk) 09:36, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There was a disscussion here and we felt that ChineseSkill might not be notable enough to have its own article. I was also unable to find reliable sources for the article. I'm afraid I will not be able to create the article on ChineseSkill. Sorry about that, heyzec! 12:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I have a problem with you undoing my post. For what do people come here to add truthful good facts to a wiki page if people like you are just going to delete all there hard work and time in one go BAM! People stay away from my edits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.38.234.39 (talk) 11:31, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing on Felpham Page.

Hi Hz.tiang, The edit I made to the Felpham page is factually correct and your undoing was incorrect. Best wishes, SSX TRICKZY — Preceding unsigned comment added by SSX TRICKZY (talk • contribs) 11:35, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

T-34

Hello,

Can you explain me the recent revert in the T-34 article? Thank you Homenagen (talk) 12:00, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you removed: However, a Military Commissariat Report of the 10th Tank Division, dated 2 August 1941 reporting that the frontal armor could be effectively defeated within 300-400m by the 37mm Pak 36's armour-piercing shot. without explaining why you did it. In the future, do leave an edit summary when large chunks of an article is removed to prevent misunderstanding. Thank you. Cheers, heyzec! 12:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't removed anything, I did add the those wordings with a proper WP:RS and you did the revert. Please adjust your glasses! ;-) Homenagen (talk) 12:24, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Btw. what as that on the Golden Gate Bridge? You tried to revert the obvious of an IP Vandale, but revert it again? Anyhow, I fixed it for you. Homenagen (talk) 12:29, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops, my mistake. I accidentally reverted your edit and then mistook my revert as your edit. :P Sorry about that!
About that edit I think I reverted the wrong article. I'm currently using Huggle to revert vandalism, which is something new to me. Looks like I have to be more careful in the future! Cheers, heyzec! 12:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, no sweat! Could happen to everyone :-) Happy editing! Homenagen (talk) 12:40, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

copy right ??????? Hawayo Hiroumi Takata

I am sorry BUT 

 I fail to see how you have come to this copy right decision ?????.

Please high light what you feel or see as a copy right violation exactly ??? elilat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elilat54 (talk • contribs) 09:59, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please review

Hi,

I have added inline citations in the article. Can you please review it again? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:StrollUp

Abhishekgoel22 (talk) 10:38, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Western non-interpolations

If you are going to revert something, please leave an edit summary. The anon I reverted has been removing text on a number of articles w/o explanation. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 08:25, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What was the reasoning behind you reverting my reverting the anon? Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 08:32, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jim1138: I kind of got mixed up while reverting vandalism and saw your edit as vandalism probably because of the unusual words within the wiki markup. Anyways, you have already reverted my revert so I see that everything is okay now already. Cheers, heyzec! 17:04, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prejudice against Polish people is present!

Hello. I'm writing in accordance to your revert of my change to the Anti-Polish sentiment article. The statement that nowadays there is no discrimination of Poles is a LIE! It is highly biased and should not be present of Wikipedia. The sources do not say nothing about this statement as such, only examplify the stereotypes but dont clearly say that there is no racial prejudice. Havent you heard about the attacks on Polish people in the Netherlands? Havent you heard about the total ban of using Polish language in Lithuanian school and public places? Haven't you heard about Poles being unable to find a job in Germany because of their Polish-sounding surnames on a CV? Haven't you heard about Polish people being stabbed in Ireland only for being of Polish ethnicity? Haven't you heard about the Dutch website, approved by the Dutch government, where people were able to spit venom and hate towards Polish people and Gypsies?!! I'm ready to discuss. 192.162.150.105 (talk) 13:39, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 January 18

I assume this edit was in error. Please be careful not to delete others' legitimate comments at ongoing discussions. Regards, 58.176.246.42 (talk) 13:44, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@58.176.246.42:Oops, sorry about that. As you have already reverted my revert, I believe everything is okay now. Cheers, heyzec! 13:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pending review

Hello, my edits in Kuwait have been pending review for many hours. Can you please review them? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.27.220.77 (talk) 15:28, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ham Rove

Oh and did the good lord say that you should go dance to the traffic come on your right. 9/11 was an insid job and your face tingles. )_) ====D07:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)07:40, 9 July 2016 (UTC)~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:44:C700:D13E:7924:F22B:3BD8:693F (talk)

Could you teach me how to "Revert good faith" edits, etc.

Hi, I've been a long-time Wikipedian editor and never really looked into formatting edit comments into Vandalism/Good-Faith template messages.

Ex: In the "View History" page, this comes out to: "[insert your user name here:] (Reverted good faith edits by 66.143.156.40 (talk). (TW))"

Only if you have time, can you show me how to format edit comments? Or show me a link to how it's done? Thank you very much. Have a wonderful day. :) WinterSpw (talk) 12:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@WinterSpw: Hi there! Firstly, it looks like you have been helping to remove vandalism from articles, so thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Currently, I use a tool called Twinkle to revert vandalism. If you are an autoconfirmed user, which you are, you can enable Twinkle for your account by clicking on the Twinkle checkbox on your user preference page here.

Twinkle allows you to revert the most recent edits on articles. On an edit page such as this one, you will see two new clickable links: [rollback (AGF)] and [rollback (VANDAL)]. The first one is for edits that were made in good faith, while the second is for edits that are blatant vandalism. The edit summary will be automatically generated depending on which link you click, and after the revert Twinkle will redirect you to that editor's talk page where you can give them warnings. If you have more questions regarding Twinkle or other Wikipedia stuff, feel free to ask me here or at the help desk! heyzec! 12:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Never had a chance to thank you, so, here it is, a BIG thank you for your assistance and insight. :D Happy day to you! :) WinterSpw (talk) 08:49, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline Amsterdam Metalfest

Hello Hz.tiang,

I was wondering why you declined the draft for Amsterdam Metalfest.

Cheers,

Nieke. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.144.161.238 (talk) 12:11, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@85.144.161.238: Hi there, your draft Amsterdam Metalfest was rejected because there is insufficient context. Currently, there is only one sentence in the draft that describes about this festival. As a result, the notability of the subject is not shown. Articles in Wikipedia have to be sufficiently notable. I suggest that you can start working on you draft by add more details such the number of attendees for previous events and perhaps the public opinions/reception towards this festival. heyzec! 15:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hz.tiang. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hz.tiang. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]