User talk:Himbeerbläuling

Welcome!

Hi Himbeerbläuling! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) Please notify me after replying off my talk page. Thank you. 20:02, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Kurt Gödel, and list of german mathematicians

Thanks for your enquiry: I had noted that you had not made many edits to Wikipedia yet and thought I should perhaps explain my revert - I am sorry that laziness won out in this case.

My reasons for not wanting Gödel simply described as Austrian is that the matter has been a matter of controversy on the talk pages. At the time of Gödel's birth, the term 'Austria' was ambiguous, meaning either the Austrian Empire, or the whole of Austro-Hungary; using the term still is yet more unclear because first, current Austria is less that the Austrian Empire, significantly losing Gödel's birthplace to Czechia, and second, Gödel held four different nationalities over his lifetime. There's no problem with how the facts are handled in the body of the article, but the lead should be economical and clear.

With respect to lists, ideally each list should have its own determinate criterion for inclusion. It's not a real problem for people to belong to no lists or more than one list: if we want unambiguous Wikimedia-wide answers to the question of what the Patria of a person is, the place to hash this out is on Wikidata. — Charles Stewart (talk) 09:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Althea Violet Alexis-Windsor has been accepted

Althea Violet Alexis-Windsor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 21:21, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Non-diffusing categories

When an article is in a non-diffusing subcategory of another category, it should not be removed from the parent category. See WP:ALLINCLUDED. I have reverted your bad category edits to Ina Koch. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:34, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Himbeerbläuling! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, A question to someone who also knows about de (German) Wikipedia policies, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My edit in "Don't shoot yourself in the foot"

Dear User:EEng, i came to the opinion piece "Wikipedia:Don't shoot yourself in the foot" from reading a discussion about users' behaviour on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. In the talks, WP:BOOMERANG was linked several times and mentioned even more. The edits in question were on Islamic subjects. I am not sure whether all muslim editors understand that the quotation is not as a whole from the bible. Yours, --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 17:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Behind the scenes, here in project space, we credit our fellow editors with some common sense. Most will be clued in by the shift in register, but if a few aren't -- so what? EEng 01:24, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lyme Regis Branch Line

Hi! I reverted two edits you made to this article. There was nothing wrong with your edits. On the contrary they correctly fixed a couple of wiki-syntax errors. The problem was that the edit before yours had replaced the entire article with text from a completely different article. (Chertsey branch line) That, of course, destroyed the Lyme Regis branch line article. In order to restore that article, I had to undo the last three edits. Alas two of them were yours. Best Wishes OrewaTel (talk) 06:57, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 07:00, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello OrewaTel, did you see this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chertsey_branch_line&diff=1133327172&oldid=1128888114 ? How do you think about it? --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 15:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is the edit that AfterBrunel was making when he accidentality pasted into Lyme Regis branch line. It is, as you expect from this editor, an accurate description. There are a couple of points that I must check. I think the line to Richmond described in History/Surrounding Railways is very interesting. If it is the line that I think it is then it should have (at least) a section on another page. I'll add a link. OrewaTel (talk) 21:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am gathering the background to write further articles; probably 1) LSWR Windsor Lines (Waterloo - Richmond - Windsor emphasising history); 2) Kensington and Richmond line of the LSWR; via Hammersmith, Turnham Green and Gunnersbury; and 3) Staines - Reading, including the narrow gauge connection through Reading station; and 4) Ascot to Aldershot. Because the background source books are very complex, this work is taking a considerable time. Himbeerbläuling: bei dieser Arbeit geht es immer leider langsam vor. Nicht wie ein Schmetterling, sondern wie ein Elefant. Afterbrunel (talk) 07:41, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

;-) Danke. (=Thank you) --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 07:47, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ja! Das Schreiben in einer anderen Sprache ist immer schwierig. Da merkst du, dass du nicht fließend bist. Danke - Ihr Englisch ist ausgezeichnet. (Yes! Writing in a second language is always difficult. That's when you discover you aren't actually fluent. Thank you - Your English is excellent) OrewaTel (talk) 21:32, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Euer beider Deutsch ist auch sehr gut. --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 10:05, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Elizabeth Miller

I saw you suggested Elizabeth Miller for an article at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Medicine. I have started one at Elizabeth Miller (epidemiologist) and wondered if you might be interested to contribute to it. Mgp28 (talk) 23:49, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the good article. I have been of-wikipedia for roundabout one year, and just now i am back here. --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 13:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]