User talk:HerkusMonte/Archive 3

scotty

why did you dillited my edit? The accident was in did in Kaliningrad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScottyNolan (talk • contribs) 10:38, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copernicus article

Hello Herkus Monte,

could you have an eye on the Copernicus page. Copernicus birthday seems to have brought out Polish nationalists. I don't like to get in an edit war, so having a second pair of eyes looking at the article is a good thing. I ask you this because I noticed that you have a strong interest in Prussian history are involved in these matters for a long time.

Cheers, Larkusix — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larkusix (talk • contribs) 21:00, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Where is consensus about Czesław Miłosz as expert of history and Italian lang. as important for Kopernik page? [1] --Piotr967 (talk) 14:28, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Royal Prussia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marienburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nicolaus Copernicus

It is disturbing to see what appears to be a nationalist edit war starting up again at Nicolaus Copernicus. If you believe you have obtained a talk page consensus for your changes at the Copernicus article, please link to it. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:16, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Baysen/Bazynski

Herkus, please see my comments here. Can you provide ANY English language sources to support the name to which you keep moving the article? I'm getting a little tired of raising this point on discussion, only to be ignored for months and years, yet, when I actually make a change it is swiftly reverted within the same day. If you have time to revert and move-war, you should have time to look for sources which actually support the name. And provide them. Thanks. Volunteer Marek 20:36, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Erich Weise

We'had disagreements in the past and all, but I've always had respect for you. But seriously, trying to defend a Nazi archivist who was involved in plunder and war crimes? This is not a fight worth fighting.Volunteer Marek 05:03, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts in Konigsberg

Hi Herkus, could you please explain what was the reason for the revert? I thought the lead in the previous version talked twice about the same moment, i.e. late WW3 events. What was the issue with the new version? Thanks, FeelSunny (talk) 10:31, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, never mind, actually. Now that I noticed Marek and Piotrus frequently messaging you, I see no reasons for any further contacts. Bye. FeelSunny (talk) 10:35, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
???HerkusMonte (talk) 15:15, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, HerkusMonte. You have new messages at Yopie's talk page.
Message added 22:57, 20 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Yopie (talk) 22:57, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For you

The Civility Barnstar
When dealing with 'The Gang'

Rsloch (talk) 08:58, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Miacek and his crime-fighting dog (woof!) 09:32, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zaremba book

Ich werde überprüfen, [2] am Dienstag in der Bibliothek.--Woogie10w (talk) 18:27, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Featuring your work on Wikipedia's front page: DYKs

Thank you for your recent articles, including Rominten Hunting Lodge, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:49, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Rominten Hunting Lodge

Please see the discussion there. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:52, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Rominten Hunting Lodge

Hello! Your submission of Rominten Hunting Lodge at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:02, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New page

Hi, I was involved in reviewing your DYK nomination for Rominten Hunting Lodge. I just noticed your new page, Reichsjägerhof Rominten. I believe that in this case, too, you should be using an English-language title and providing the German and other-languages translation in the lead, per WP:TITLE#English-language titles. Best, Yoninah (talk) 18:13, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Map

The map you're restoring, even the slightly different version is obviously based on this map: [3] (scroll to the middle). As is clearly indicated that map is a publication of Konrad Henlein's Nazi party. Volunteer Marek  18:57, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The actual 1930 Census map can be here: [4]. Like I said, whoever, made some interpretations of their own here. Volunteer Marek  19:16, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it's a little hard to compare because lack of markers but this map that you replaced the original with [5] seems much better. Volunteer Marek  19:19, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kalkstein/Kalckstein

Any idea if Ludwik Kalkstein was from the same family? I read somewhere (can't find the source now) that he wrote the screen play for the Polish TV serial "Czarne Chmury" which was based on Christian Ludwig von Kalckstein.  Volunteer Marek  20:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hans-Jürgen Heise (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Focus and Province of Pomerania
Paul Kleinschmidt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Province of Pomerania

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Gabriel Fahrenheit

In 1686 GDAŃSK belonged to Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, now is polish and is called GDAŃSK, name Danzig exists only in german workbooks - and here we dont use it. Please not use misrepresentation. Andrzej19 (talk)

Yes, and the option Danzig had 47 votes in this period, Gdańsk 48 votes. ([[6]]) Andrzej19 (talk) 12:16, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]