Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RachelTensions was:
Good artice, almost there - declining for now because of slight WP:NPOV issues: seems to be slanted towards Ramgarhia, especially the "early skirmishes" section. It reads as if Ramgarhia was the good guy, aghast and apologetic about the incident, and his men saved Ahluwalia's life by putting him in a palanquin and taking him for treatment after he fell of his horse. But even after all that, Ahluwalia was out for revenge. Can this be expanded to present the background a little more neturally?
Statements like "Jassa Singh Ramgarhia bravely resisted" and "Due to his many cruel and immoral actions" sound like opinions and should be attributed to someone rather than let them sound like the opinions of Wikipedia. (WP:WIKIVOICE).
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahluwalia–Ramgarhia War and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Thanks for reading my article about the Ahluwalia–Ramgarhia War. And thanks for the constructive input on increasing neutrality and avoiding bias. I realize that you’re worried about the tone, primarily in the “early skirmishes” section, and I’ll try to adopt a more measured voice with better attribution. I’ll revise, eliminating subjective language, and resubmit. Your counsel is invaluable, and I am grateful for your input. Indo-Greek21:43, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, HerakliosJulianus!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! RachelTensions (talk) 21:22, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@RachelTensions I have made the needed changes to fix the neutrality issues, especially in the "early skirmishes" part. I rewrote some parts that had biased language and made sure that all viewpoints are represented fairly. I also worked on linking opinions and statements more clearly to trustworthy sources. I think these changes make the article's overall tone and presentation better. Indo-Greek23:00, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey sorry to interrupt you but I eagerly need kind of assistive enforcement to tactically remove an sock evasion
got something to say about an malicious user which rapidly got confined around the subject contain Sikh and their related prophetic topic if you not able to guesstimate i am talking about this dude [1], who abnormally changing the leading verse on the starting preface over Ranjit Singh along with shadowing the multiple aspect consolidated at Sikh Empire allegiance which utterly triggering the sanctioned guidelines of WP:PRIMARYnorms126.74.136.245 (talk) 07:16, 27 November 2024 (UTC):[reply]
without any further delay I want to conclude can you please try to revert some of his his latest edition over Ranjit Singh which he quoted as
Ranjit Singh (13 November 1780 – 27 June 1839) was the founder and first maharaja of the Sikh Empire, serving on the throne of Punjab from 1801; of Jammu from 1808; and of Kashmirfrom 1819, until his death in 1839
without any admissible placement. Thats it i just want to confiscate related to his WP:COI which is more than enough for me
Thanks for pointing this out. I'm not an admin on Wikipedia, so I couldn't edit the Ranjit Singh article myself. I'd recommed you to bring it to the administrators' or experienced editors' attention through the relevant noticeboards, such as Sockpuppet Investigations (SPI) or Administrators' Noticeboard. They would be in a better position to investigate and take any required actions against the possible sockpuppetry or COI acts. Indo-Greek14:10, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please add page numbers, links, online citation to help with verification.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Batte of Jammu (1774) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Thank you for taking time to review my draft on the Battle of Jammu (1774) in such detail. I will now go through the points you have made and explain how I will strengthen the submission accordingly:
To address the points raised and provide a detailed explanation, here's how you can structure your response to effectively engage with the reviewer's feedback:
In-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject):
Hari Ram Gupta provides a comprehensive analysis of this event in two of his works: History of the Sikhs: The Sikh Commonwealth or Rise and Fall of Sikh Misls, Vol. IV and History of the Sikhs: Trans-Sutlej Sikhs, 1769–1799. These sources delve deeply into the Battle of Jammu within the broader context of Sikh and Hill States history. Additionally, other historians have also provided substantial coverage of the event.
Reliability:
The sources used are authored by acknowledged historians who specialize in this field. Most are secondary sources, which meet Wikipedia's standards for reliability. While Dalbir Singh's work is a thesis, it is thoroughly cited and draws upon reputable primary and secondary sources, further enhancing its credibility.
Secondary:
As mentioned, the authors referenced in the draft are secondary sources, as they analyze and interpret primary data and other scholarly works about the subject.
Independent:
All the authors referenced are independent scholars who have studied the history of the Sikh Confederacy and the Hill States without affiliation or bias related to the subject of the Battle of Jammu.
Verification (page numbers, links, and citations):
The page numbers are already included in the "Notes" section of the article. However, I understand that adding links and more accessible online references in the "Works Cited" section will enhance verifiability. I will update the draft accordingly.
I will be glad to revise the article by due consideration of the above-mentioned concerns and will resubmit after such improvement. Any further suggestions or recommendations which you could bring to my knowledge, I will appreciate so much.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maratha–Sikh clashes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Shahdara and Ghulam Qadir. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
