User talk:Henk Poley

Welcome!

Hello, Henk Poley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  —Recurring dreams 02:22, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

article mess

as a somebody, so am I. Sandpiper (talk) 10:50, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see you added a ref from tepco to the start of the artcle with regard to radiation leaked from fukushima daini. I was reading those press releases also and could not make up my mind whether they meant they had made preparations to vent gases, or they had made preparations and then done it? Do you understand them to mean they definitely did release gases (which would be radioactive) Sandpiper (talk) 22:43, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The later press releases, or maybe even that one somewhere, deny that any release of radiation has occurred from daini. I cant remember exactly now what I thought yesterday but the whole thing is official speak and thus does not necessarily say the exact truth. No doubt there is a definition of a radiation release which ignores small amounts. It is difficult to argue radiation at daini might not be from daiichi. In any event, the specific sentence about daini has now been deleted in a rearrangement. I think the article 10 notification made at daiichi was when the reactor first became too hot and departed from normal operating parameters, something like that. Article 15 notification was when it became more serious. UK reactors vent mildly radioative gases from time to time without much fuss (that is, they dont bother mentioning it to the public). Tends to be more fuss when people find out. The impression now being made on wiki is that there was not much of a problem at daini, see its article. It would not amaze me if it is now closed down for quite a long time for examination and repairs, but it would also not amaze me if it is rushed back into operation in a month because of power shortages. I dont know what really happened there. I have not seen any official statement about flooding at daiichi, but this is blamed for the failures, so I have even less idea if flooding caused problems at daini. Sandpiper (talk) 08:56, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:33, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1150 ?

I take the liberty to ask you whence you found the number "1150" in this edit.

As far as I understand watching at this source : [1] (as translated by some editor on the TAlk Page, I don't speak Japanese), the capacity of pool 4 is 1590, and the pool presently contains 1331 rods of used fuel, and 204 of fresh fuel, which is a bit more than the 1500 that I had copied from this source : [2] where it is given with a footnote stating "We have revaluated upwards the number of rods in this pool following a communication from IAIA".

So as you can see, I am far from sure for my data but thought it was better to check whether you are for your "1150" since nothing approaching is to be found on either of these documents. French Tourist (talk) 23:07, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Asiana Airlines Flight 214

Hey Henk. Thanks for pitching in with the article, but please don't use sources like Twitter. They are far from always reliable. For instance, one Twitter eyewitness said things like the plane had flipped over, when it clearly did not. Steven Walling • talk 20:22, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Henk Poley. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]