|
User talk:Helper201/Archive 5
Conservative Party spectrum positionHeya, there’s been some dispute on the talk page for Conservative Party (UK) between another editor and I regarding the correct order and predominant description of the Conservative Party (extending to disagreement about the applicability of some of the sources). I, for one, agree with your edit putting ‘centre-right’ first as the predominant descriptor. I wonder if you would wish to include your opinion on the talk page discussion. Cheers, Will Thorpe (talk) 00:04, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add Introduction to contentious topics You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Sweet6970 (talk) 22:32, 24 November 2024 (UTC) SorryYou are right, I made a mistake at Template:Discrimination. My apologies. Rsk6400 (talk) 08:02, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Discussion on European political alliancesHi, since you had contributed to similar discussions in the past, I just wanted to flag a new discusion on Talk:European political party on how to categorise entities that are not European political parties. Happy to get your input! Julius Schwarz (talk) 09:32, 20 December 2024 (UTC) |
