User talk:Heds

This user may have left Wikipedia. Heds has not edited Wikipedia since 3 June 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Re: Glyptapanteles

Oh, swell. Thanks! Any info, advice, or hands-on editing you wanna do is entirely welcome! - Vianello (talk) 04:56, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Input requested at WP:FPC

Hi Heds,

Having made a quick check on the history of Insect mouthparts I noticed you created the article. I recently nominated an image I added to this article, Image:Australian painted lady feeding closeup.jpg at FPC. One recurring argument, and one which I disagree, is that the image in question has no encyclopaedic value in this article. I was wondering if you, as an editor of the article in question, could help resolve this issue? Thanks, --Fir0002 01:06, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fir002,

I've read through the debate. First, you should know I'm not into featured pictures, articles etc, although the criteria that underpin them do, I guess, help improve the quality of articles for those trying to acheive them. Second, I'm not sufficiently experienced with WP:WPC to have an opinion on whther your image meets the guidelines. What I can say, though, is that as an entomologist I can see value in your shot, although it does contain unfortunate ambiguity for the novice viewer, such as the right forleg apparently appearing from the the head; the black background is unfortunate too. To be frank, I think the other painted lady shot shows a better profile of a butterfly proboscis in use, but it's not a good enough close up to use in the mouthparts article. Heds (talk) 03:14, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - thanks a lot for your reply anyway! --Fir0002 05:32, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Bostrichoidea Blattidae Zootomy Hemolymph Zyras Chrysomeloidea Bostrichiformia Harpalinae Harmonia (genus) Cicada Unicorn beetle Woodworm Staphyliniformia Amphibian Japanese rhinoceros beetle Dytiscus marginalis Bashkirian Leptinotarsa Ocellus

Cleanup Neoptera Lampyris Exopterygota Merge Etiquette Mouth Urinary system Add Sources Wasp Death watch beetle False potato beetle Wikify Tarictic Hornbill Pesticide toxicity to bees Double rifle Expand Venture capital Panthalassa Bilateria

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:34, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Pterocerina colorata

Seems to be a mistake, thing like this happen when you use a bot. Bugboy52.4 | =-= 03:02, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: Polypedilum

Thank you for pointing out my error. now rectified

Jim Neversink

Hello - I saw you did something on Jim Neversink, but I am new here and am not sure what it means. It seems like you removed a tag saying it needs person data, but you left the one that says it needs an infobox. Were you just interested in the persondata, and left the rest of the data as they are, or do you think an infobox is missing? Many thanks --SkaraB 08:33, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, and welcome! I made changes as requested here by PC78. Your observation suggests the request could have included removal of infobox tag too, which makes sense - I just performed the operation requested. You might have a chat with PC78 and let me know if further work is required.Heds (talk) 05:38, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here they are...

These are the stubs I've created, which were listed tasks at the stub sorting project.

• {{Belidae-stub}}* Dec 2008  Done upmerged with beetle stubs
• {{Buprestidae-stub}}* Dec 2008  Done upmerged with beetle stubs
• {{Cantharidae-stub}}* Dec 2008  Done upmerged with beetle stubs; also available as {{Soldier-beetle-stub}}
• {{Cerambycidae-stub}}* Dec 2008  Done upmerged with beetle stubs; also available as {{Longhorn-beetle-stub}}
• {{Chrysomelidae-stub}}* Dec 2008  Done upmerged with Category:Beetle stubs; also available as {{Leaf-beetle-stub}}.
• {{Coccinellidae-stub}}* Dec 2008  Done upmerged with Category:Beetle stubs
• {{Elateridae-stub}}* Dec 2008 Done also available as {{Click-beetle-stub}}; upmerged with Category:Beetle stubs
• {{Histeridae-stub}}* Dec 2008  Done upmerged with Category:Beetle stubs
• {{Lampyridae-stub}}* Dec 2008  Done also available as {{firefly-stub}}; upmerged with Category:Beetle stubs
• {{Leiodidae-stub}}* Dec 2008  Done though it was not necessary (only 2 articles are stubs).
• {{Lucanidae-stub}}* Dec 2008  Done also available as {{Stag-beetle-stub}}; upmerged with Category:Beetle stubs.
• {{Passalidae-stub}}* Dec 2008  Done upmerged with Category:Beetle stubs.

Here are two more that I found done by another user: {{Tephritidae-stub}} {{Tachinidae-stub}}

ZooFari 00:41, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done added to WP Arthropods project page. Heds (talk) 04:15, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on achieving italicised article names

As mentioned here, I propose that project arthropods members discuss and settle on a single approach to achieving italicised article names (where relevant). The options appear to be: 1 delete "name=" from taxoboxes; and 2 include {{italictitle}} at the head of those articles that need it. Please add your support and arguments below. Depending on the result, I may use AWB to make bulk changes. Heds (talk) 02:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Option 1 (taxobox option)

Option 2 (tag option)

Support - it doesn't interfere with taxobox design and uses a fix that is desinged for the purpose. Heds (talk) 02:05, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support I agree with Heds. -Megan McCarty talk|Sign here! 16:25, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support If it can be automated, as Heds implies, then this would be very convenient. Assuming, of course, that it doesn't *create* any problems when implemented. Can anyone anticipate any? Dyanega (talk) 20:43, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other options

1. A bot. Bugboy52.4 | =-= 00:26, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
2. Include the {{italtitle}} template within {{Taxobox}} Tim1357 (talk) 04:59, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No opinion

I have no opinion on this issue! I'll go along with the majority but wont spend wikitime to italise. IMHO much more urgent things such as adding missing articles still persist. AshLin (talk) 11:34, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Xeris spectrum

Thanks for fixing it. I know little to nothing about bugs and biology. Dincher (talk) 13:55, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anatomy?

You say you do anatomy? Maybe you can add info about the anatomy to the insect orders. I made the WP:INS mostly to collaborate with other editors and bring the insect orders to GA. Currently I am doing Earwig, and it needs to be expanded on basic anatomy (maybe also differences with it's anatomy and other insects), can you help? Bugboy52.4 | =-= 03:28, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Will have a go (I'm a slow editor with 4 kids, though!). Have thought about the need for this project. Do you intent to go as far as transferring all the insect articles currently tagged with {{ArthropodTalk}} to {{WikiProject Insects}}? Have previously taken other subordinate projects out of WP:ARTHA (eg WP Spiders, WP Lepidoptera) so that articles are tagged by only the most subordinate projects. This would take WP Lepidoptera out of WP Insects, which seems to conflict with your aim to have ordinal articles up to GA by this project. Nice work on earwigs, by the way. Heds (talk) 01:34, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers

There were two progress boxes, now merged, the numbers in the categories may not add up exactly, as someone may have put them in explicitly. However the difference you obtained would suggest another problem, I cut and pasted the progress box into open office, and the figures add up. Did you keep your working? Rich Farmbrough, 23:22, 1 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Reply is here. Heds (talk) 02:24, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I had hoped that was what happened, December 2008 seemed the only candidate. Rich Farmbrough, 02:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Space

Hi. Could you modify your AWB edits so that they do not add an extra space after the italictitle template? It pushes the entire article down and creates unnecessary white space. mgiganteus1 (talk) 02:49, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing.Heds (talk) 02:54, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thrypticomyia

Odd - I don't know how that happened. Anyhow, it's fixed; thanks for catching it! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^Che dicono a Signa?_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the way - I note you're doing some AWB work adding italicized titles to articles. Would you like a hand? Just point me in the direction of some that need doing; I'd be happy to help. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^Che dicono a Signa?_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 06:16, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing. Taking quite a while, as you might imagine! Wrapping up for now to take kids places, but will post setting details to you later today or tomorrow. Thanks! Heds (talk) 06:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, Christmas, I completely forgot. Sorry - please feel free to smack me. I've got taxes to do this weekend, but we'll see afterwards. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^Che dicono a Signa?_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:37, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A well-deserved barnstar!

		The Wikiproject Lepidoptera Barnstar
		For User:Heds who has contributed greatly to Wikiproject Lepidoptera by his untiring cleanup and improvements.

"Italicization"

Heds, do you speak spanish? I have seen that you, like me, are very interested in writing the titles of the articles in italics, when they correspond to binomial nomenclature. In the spanish Wikipedia, I started a very very long discussion (more than 250 paragraphs) to implement italics too. Just for using the template DISPLAYTITLE!! I couldn't imagine the strong opposition that some users were gonna do to use italics in the titles.

For the english Wikipedia, I have seen that you use AWB, but I didn't get to install it. Do you know some program like that to work faster?

I saw your bot request Wikipedia:Bot_requests#Italicising_article_names_for_species_and_genera. Have a good luck with that. I'm not sure if I could only imagine to do that in a future. Flakinho (talk) 02:49, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there Flakinho. No, I don't speak Spanish. Strange that there should be disagreement re italicising articles, as it's about a scientific standard, not preference, and certainly not peculiar to particular languages. You might want to point your discussion of the issue to the en debate, which ended ages ago. I'll try later to find it for you. But see below.

Thanks re the bot request. ?You might note that I'm taking the matter back to the highest order project to see a resoluton on mechanism can be found. I'll try to keep you informed as it goes.

If you can't access AWB, I don't know what to suggest. But it was even the slowness of doing it by AWB that suggested a need for a bot. Heds (talk) 11:13, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please confirm your membership

This is an important message from WikiProject Wikify. You are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Wikify. As agreed upon by the project, all members will be required to confirm their membership by February 1, 2010. If you are still interested in assisting with the project, please add yourself to the list at this page—this will renew your membership of WikiProject Wikify. Thank you for your support, WikiProject Wikify

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 19:45, 22 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

You've been Invited!

You have been invited to join and help WikiProject Insects in its most recent collaboration, Lepidoptera, which has finally been nominated for Good article, soon a reviewer will review and you are welcomed to help before and during the reviewing process as a member of the project. Your also welcomed to nominate yourself as an unbiased, reviewer for the article.

When you wish to help (which is greatly welcomed) you can get briefed and ask questions on my talk page or the WikiProject insects' talk page when you're ready!! Thank you for your cooperation.Bugboy52.4 | =-= 14:21, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request for comment

As a member of Wikiproject insects you maybe want to voice your opinion this discussion on the use of vernacular or scientific names in higher ranking taxa. Bugboy52.4 ¦ =-= 12:54, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted!

Science lovers wanted!

Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 18:25, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Italics of Lepidoptera

Hi Heds, I saw the link to User:Heds/Italic title project on your user page and wanted to let you know that I'm working on Lepidoptera. My main target is capitalization fixes, but I'm also italicizing the scientific names. My To do: and Done: list is at User:SchreiberBike/Lepidoptera caps. If you want to do things other than Lepidoptera, I'm working on that at least. Keep up the good work.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  01:01, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SchreiberBike . It's been a while since I"ve attended to this task, so I'm glad that you're onto it. Keep it up!Heds (talk)

Thanks!  SchreiberBike | ⌨  16:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Heds. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Heds. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Heds! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 22:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]