User talk:Harpick

Welcome!

Hi Harpick! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! GoldRomean (talk) 21:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Still interested in knowing your answer to Bbb23's question... it's not like your vandalizing or anything thou so thanks for your RCP work! GoldRomean (talk) 21:07, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No I haven't, I'm just happy to be here assisting where I can. -- Harpick (talk) 21:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As long as you're happy, that's all that matters. Don't forget to archive this as quickly as possible. Archiving makes you happy.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:34, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not in any rush to archive, but once a discussion is finished its best to archive and not clutter up this page. -- Harpick (talk) 21:39, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Somehow I think there's little chance of this page becoming cluttered.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I hope so, but whatever happens happens. -- Harpick (talk) 21:41, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, @Bbb23, looks like you were right... user indef blocked for sockpuppetry. GoldRomean (talk) 02:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Spicy (talk) 22:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Harpick (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet this is my only account Harpick (talk) 22:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 23:56, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.