User talk:Harborsparrow

Hello! Drop me a line here and I'll try to listen.

Archives

1 2 3

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Onion powder Object-Z Category of small categories Loglan 88 MSDN Academic Alliance Microsoft Developer Network White Mustard Microsoft Campus Agreement Eletriptan Savory (herb) Microsoft Money Effect system Interface inheritance Seasoning Association (object-oriented programming) Tarragon Microsoft Dynamics Invariant (computer science) Superclass (computer science)

Cleanup Identity (philosophy) Aspect (computer science) Deliriant Merge Method overriding (programming) Impedance mismatch Microsoft Intermediate Language Add Sources Module (programming) Systems design MSN TV Wikify List of open problems in computer science Object-Relational impedance mismatch Manna Dey Expand Sun Certified Professional Mentha Brescia

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 04:10, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History

Hi Harborsparrow! On Talk:Design_Patterns I just added my reasoning for removing the link to the online copy of the GoF book. --213.209.110.130 09:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes! I see now that it is from Romania. Thanks for the clarification; I have removed the link again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harborsparrow (talk • contribs) 14:48, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Scheldt2.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Scheldt2.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• • After further checking, I found that permission cannot be granted to use this file. Thus I have removed the links to it. It can be deleted. I would delete it myself but do not know how.Harborsparrow 14:08, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:JavaPlatform1.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:JavaPlatform1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem

Copyright problems with Image:Kohnstein.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Kohnstein.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Pascal.Tesson 15:04, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Book designpatterns.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Book designpatterns.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:10, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Harborsparrow! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Nelson and Neal - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:38, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in complementary and alternative medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Bon courage (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

If you make further personal attacks like you did at Talk:Macrobiotic diet, I shall report you to WP:ANI and request that the community sanction you. Bon courage (talk) 16:25, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My language may have seemed a bit hot to you, but I don't think that I wrote anything false. You *did* dismiss my complaint two years ago just as quickly as you did this time, and further, you looked through my history and reverted another edit of mine, which was on an ESSAY, that perfectly describes what you have been doing with regard to Macrobiotic diet, calling my description "silly" and "revenge". Who is making a personal attack here?Harborsparrow (talk) 18:41, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You were. The word "revenge" was not used that I can see. Bon courage (talk) 19:13, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Criticism of Wikipedia, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, now I see that that article is really intended to be just a series of sources from outside media that criticize Wikipedia. That was not clear to me upon my first view of the article. Got it. Harborsparrow (talk) 17:45, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Basically anything in an article should be verifiable by sources meeting WP:RS. Doug Weller talk 21:40, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A Dobos torte for you!

7&6=thirteen (☎) has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it. To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Signing posts

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Talk:President of the United States, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. - wolf 20:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added note

I noticed a few issues, that even though they were from some time ago, were still issues. It appears you started an archiving effort, and at the same time, left several lines of whitespace. We try to avoid that as it causes issues with WP:ACCESSIBILITY. Also, the extra space appearred to invite an out-of-order post. (To which in your reply you appear to have forgetten to sign.) I addressed these issues for you, but going forward, you should know that there are bots that will archive your talk page for you. The bots are simply a few lines of wikitext that you would add to the top of your talk page (they wouldn't beed seen on the actual page, just in the edit window). To add a bot, you would simply add some wikitext to the top of your talk page, such as;

{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
|maxarchivesize = 100K
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 4
|algo = old(90d)
|archive = Talk:Harborsparrow/Archive %(counter)d
}}

Anyway, I will leave that up to you. Have a nice day - wolf 21:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Wolf. I usually do sign posts; probably I was upset and forgot. I appreciate the fix and the civil response and coaching. Harborsparrow (talk) 21:22, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tennessee edits

Please gain consensus on the talk page before making these edits. In order to ensure that this article maintains it's good article status, it is best to get the input of multiple editors before making changes like this. If you haven't done so, please also read my response to your post on my talk page explaining why I undid your edits. Bneu2013 (talk) 15:31, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Prestopino moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Paul Prestopino. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude (talk) 20:17, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paul Prestopino has been accepted

Paul Prestopino, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 16:56, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you S0091. I appreciate the work you are doing. Harborsparrow (talk) 16:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He was a tough one. Clearly influential but sources were tough to find, I think he meets WP:BASIC though. I did not go through other articles to wikilink him so please do that if you have the time. S0091 (talk) 17:43, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Outside the Magic Circle (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Outside the Magic Circle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Harborsparrow! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Outside the Magic Circle (November 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Outside the Magic Circle and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 04:39, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Outside the Magic Circle has been accepted

Outside the Magic Circle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 14:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Harborsparrow. Thank you for your work on Paul Prestopino. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Thank you. Much appreciated. Harborsparrow (talk) 16:04, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theodor Fontane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Realism. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whole Earth Center moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Whole Earth Center. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Willa Cather, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benjamin Taylor.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bartlett Tree Experts

Hi there, what source are you intending to cite in this edit? If I follow the link I get a four-page newsletter PDF that doesn't mention Wistman's Wood. Belbury (talk) 16:54, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Belbury Sorry, I had referenced the wrong edition of the newsletter. I think it is fixed now. Thank you for finding this.Harborsparrow (talk) 01:44, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that matches up! Reading that newsletter, though, your text is a very close copy of that source, with some sentences taken word for word. Per WP:PARAPHRASE there are potential copyright issues with this, so I'm afraid I've had to revert your edit. It just needs to be rewritten in your own words.

From the kind of text you're adding, it looks like no additional source is required - the information is already present and sourced later in the article. The lead section of an article doesn't need to be footnoted with sources where it's summarising sourced content from later in the article. Belbury (talk) 08:11, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Whole Earth Center (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Whole Earth Center and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^Edits! Talk! 10:33, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]