User talk:Haljackey

Wikipedia:ACCESS#Resolution, while I agree that conforming to something used by less than a percentage of a our readers, when doing so is detrimental at times to the other 99% is ludicrous, we are required to make things compatible with 800x600. Wikipedia:WikiProject_Usability/Sizing_examples#Screen_width_test specifies that 592 pixels works best under that resolution. I'm going to try and find a way of making it scale to the screen size. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 16:21, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on it... you might like the finished product! Haljackey (talk) 16:24, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I got it down to 662 pixels. Resizing it to 592 looks ok. I put it in the sandbox here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ontario_Highway_401/sandbox#Collector-Express_System


this is what it looks like, which is kind of weird. When its below the TOC, it makes a constant left margin. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 17:03, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, never mind with that then :P. Haljackey (talk) 17:07, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Given the limited amount of information that could ever be available for a specific city, I don't think it's necessary to have headers beyond South-western / Eastern Ontario and the GTA. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 20:07, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:43, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Sinise FPC

I am wondering if you are still on the fence on this FPC having watched recent responses.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:16, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure at this point. Still on the fence I guess. Haljackey (talk) 23:49, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Gary Sinise on stage

Since you voiced an opinion at the unsuccessful WP:FPC nomination, I thought you might consider the Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Gary Sinise on stage nomination.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:Greg L, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. From thanks, Thesmatestguy 04:04, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I fixed the problem. I was adding a new section to an existing section. I see the possible confusion that may have made. I have since fixed that by leaving him a new message. Haljackey (talk) 04:10, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Evacuated Highway
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Evacuated Highway 401 Color.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Jujutacular T · C 13:45, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, saw your note on the nomination page. Unfortunately, August 10 is already reserved: Template:POTD/2010-08-10. Maybe the day before would work. Like Nautica said, inquire with Howcheng. Thanks again for your contributions to FPC! Jujutacular T · C 20:06, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

VPC

— raekyT 11:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The 401 photo you uploaded

I'm not going to get into details, but I think you know that uploading it on flickr doesn't make it yours, unfortunately. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 05:50, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've got the ok from the creator of the image, but he doesn't know how to get it on here. I was thinking that was the best way to get it on for now. I'll edit the details as I get more info. Guess I'll revert the image until I have it. Haljackey (talk) 14:58, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Send them the fill out form available here, and email it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, preferably from an email address on the same domain as the image is hosted. Let me know if you need a hand with it or anything, I'd really love to see that image used. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 15:42, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Will do. Oh and by the way, he also has it up on Flickr (but in a different shade) but its under all rights reserved (link: http://www.flickr.com/photos/redroom_studios/1440036557/). If that was changed to some rights reserved would it be ok to use or does he still have to go and fill out that form? Haljackey (talk) 17:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If he changes it to attributed and/or share-alike, then you could upload it and link the flikr url as the source. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 22:44, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, I'll see what I can do. Haljackey (talk) 02:22, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
lol, turns out the photo isn't his either. Any ideas from here? Haljackey (talk) 00:12, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I figured that would be the case. I'm pretty sure it was taken by the MTO for one of their many reports (I have seen the picture on one of the older reports. 2007 SHP if I remember correctly). So really it's a case of trying some more to get a better picture and replacing the current photo once that is found, or giving up and only mentioning it in text. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 00:51, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'll keep trying lol. It's the widest stretch of the 401, and one of the widest in the world, so it's a powerful photo to use.
  • Speaking of photos, I'll have access to a good Digital SLR camera over the next little bit. Any photos you want from the London area? I'm willing to go as far as the 401/403 split in Woodstock. I could also retake some shots I took with my camera for better quality. Haljackey (talk) 02:55, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, some shots of Highway 4 and 402 would be really useful (and 3 if you're willing to go south that far). If you can get the 401/402 split or the 401/403 split, they'd be useful as well. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 05:38, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Highway 4 is just a regular road around here, not much to set itself apart. I already got the 401-402 split in one of my shots. There is an overpass closer to the split, but it doesn't have sidewalks so it would be really difficult to do. As for the 401/403, not sure if there is a good place to get a shot of it. I got a great place where I can get a shot of Highway 3 in St. Thomas (the expressway part). I'll be heading there anyway on Sunday so it should be easy to get, but I won't have access to a digital SLR then. Haljackey (talk) 13:07, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Any shot is good. Even a nice shot of 4 disappearing into the rural horizon would be ok. As it is though, there's no photo for it at all. Doesn't matter if you don't have the DSLR, it's not like your normal camera takes crappy pictures :p A picture from one of the overpasses showing the width of the trench vs. the two lane "expressway" would be awesome. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 15:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't get a chance to take a photo of the Saint Thomas Expressway (it was raining) but I did manage to get two half-decent pictures of Highway 4. They're in the article now: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontario_Highway_4 Haljackey (talk) 00:36, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Took a DSLR for a spin yesterday. Got 6 good pictures of the 401 in London. They'll be up on the commons page later today. Haljackey (talk) 01:41, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An Invite to join the Highways WikiProject

Shortcuts
- - - - - - - - - - - - WikiProject Highways - - - - - - - - - - - -
Hi, Haljackey, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the International Highways WikiProject and its new regional taskforces! The Highways WikiProject is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects, or anything related to International Roads. This includes supporting existing regional road WikiProjects and fostering the development of new international highway WikiProjects. We have recently created five regional task forces focused on Europe, Asia, Africa, Oceania and Latin America.

To improve road and highway articles, here are guidelines for B class criteria. Please add any higher GA, FA quality articles to the international roads portal. Also, please help out by inviting new or unfamiliar editors with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/New articles/Invite template.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

JCbot (talk) 01:51, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CRWP/RC

I reverted your addition to the page. If I didn't, the bot would on its next update anyway. The only way to get something listed on the RC page is to tag that article/file/etc as part of the project, which I have done as well. Now the bot will add the photo it its standard formatting, and the manual addition won't be reverted. (The caption is not part of that format, btw.) Imzadi 1979 → 07:13, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All right, it's no big deal. I saw pictures in the US section, so I thought I may as well add one for Canada. If you don't want it it's fine. Haljackey (talk) 15:55, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think you can add the caption since its automated. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 16:10, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) NO! I do want it. I just know that any manual editing of that page will be reverted by the bot the next time it edits. I copied the template from the USRD page for the CRWP, UKRD and HWY pages to set them up. They will all have any featured photos inserted in the pages by the bot. The problem is that the bot uses the banner template transclusions to determine what to include. File talk:Evacuated Highway 401 Color.jpg wasn't created with the {{CRWP}} tag, so the bot didn't know to include it. The bot made an update which not only added the photo, but added the newest GA New Brunswick Route 95 and added the DYK dates. (Since that's a relatively new option to display and even sort DYKs by the Main Page date that I added to the template.) In short, just like the Article Alerts page, the Recognized content page can't be manually edited, or the appropriate bot will overwrite your changes every time it updates. Imzadi 1979 → 16:17, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

London Roads

Hey don't know if you've noticed the stub removal drive I've had at WP:ONRD. I was wondering if you'd be ok with, or interested in merging the multiple stub articles on the arterials in London into a list format similar to List of Ontario Tourist Routes or the sandbox version of List of roads in Toronto that I'm working on? It would help cut down the amount of work that needs to be done and any of the more substantial articles can always be left separate. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 02:24, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm ok with it. The road articles for London are incomplete to say the least. Feel free to remove any stubs you see fit. Haljackey (talk) 02:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

I have tried to state this as simply as possible. Use WP:BRD cycle, now you are edit warring, have violated WP:3RR, and risk being blocked from editing. UrbanNerd (talk) 05:07, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How have I done this? Aren't you the one who's changing the edits? I took action and followed this WP:BRD thing you later brought up by discussing it on your talk page. Should this have been done on the article's talk page instead? If yes then my bad. I have never had a problem on this site and I would prefer to work together on this issue rather than bicker at this. I have helped make both the London and 401 articles GAs (good articles) and work with others to make the articles better. If you are going to constantly swap my photo without giving reason (which you did until earlier today) then I felt the only option left to me was to delete my photo. Haljackey (talk) 05:19, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The "screw you guys, I'm goin' home" approach isn't the friendliest option to choose from. WP:BRD is not a binding policy at all, and it itself says not to use it as an excuse for edit warring. - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 05:38, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I modified your comment on a Talk page

Hi Haljackey

A courtesy note to let you know that I moved your photo on the Motorway Talk Page to the top of your article. I beleive that it is better ther as it lines up with your text. (Mine follows). Martinvl (talk) 21:09, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not-so-controlled-access highways

Hello Haljackey,

Thanks for writing Good work. I support this. at 05:44, 17 June 2011 (UTC) on Floydian's talk page, in relation to a merger proposal. Would you be so kind to add your supporting message in the merger discussion on the talk page of the article in question? Here: Talk:Limited-access road#Merger proposal. Thanks. Nankai (talk) 04:40, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Consider it done. Haljackey (talk) 00:41, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Expressway redirect

please pop in to Talk:Limited-access road to discuss the redirect for Expressway Nankai (talk) 21:36, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Simcity 4 Interchange.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Simcity 4 Interchange.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

London Ontario Sister City

Hi Haljackey - I note you reversed this edit by an IP editor who wiped out the sister city listed in London, Ontario. I saw that person's edit as well, but I left it because I can't find evidence that London and Nanjing are still sister cities. Have you been able to find a reference for this? PKT(alk) 16:45, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The London to China website states that we have a sister city, and do did a recent article in the London Free Press. I'll try to source those to back it up. Haljackey (talk) 18:05, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Member assessment at the Canadian Roads Wikiproject

-- ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 23:41, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lane count

Traffic volumes
Location Windsor London Woodstock Cambridge Mississauga Toronto Oshawa Belleville Kingston Brockville Cornwall
Section Dougall Parkway –
Essex County Road 46 		Highbury Avenue –
Veterans Memorial Parkway 		Oxford County Road 59 –
Highway 403 		Highway 8 –
Highway 24 		Mississauga Road –
Hurontario Street 		Weston Road –
Highway 400 		Park Road –
Simcoe Street 		Highway 62 –
Highway 37 		Frontenac County Road 38 –
Sydenham Road 		Highway 29 –
North Augusta Road 		Highway 138 –
McConnell Avenue
Traffic volume (AADT) 1969 9,550 17,450 16,700 19,900 28,450 106,850 29,000 13,750 12,000 10,050 10,300
1988 13,200 33,800 35,100 50,400 97,100 319,600 79,000 22,500 20,700 15,300 12,900
2008 16,700 64,500 67,100 125,600 177,300 442,900 120,700 43,500 45,400 29,100 18,400
Average annual daily traffic counts of selected sections of Highway 401 over 40 years
Lane count
Location Highway 3 to Dougall Parkway Dougall Parkway to Essex County Road 42 Essex County Road 42 to Highway 402 Highway 402 to Highway 403/410 Highway 403/410 to Highway 427 Highway 427 to Highway 27 Highway 27 to Highway 409 Highway 409 to Brock Road Brock Road to Salem Road Salem Road to Burnham Street Burnham Street to Frontenac County Road 38 Frontenac County Road 38 to Montreal Street Montreal Street to Quebec Border
Lane Count 4 Lanes 6 Lanes 4 Lanes 6 Lanes 18 Lane collector-express system 8 Lanes 10 Lanes 12-16 Lane collector-express system 10 Lanes 6 Lanes 4 Lanes 6 Lanes 4 Lanes
Distance 2.5 km 43.1 km 127.5 km 161.3 km 5.8 km 0.8 km 3.9 km 43.3 km 6.0 km 68.3 km 138.2 km 8.2 km 209.0 km
Number of through lanes on Highway 401 (excludes ongoing or planned widening projects)

Main page appearance: Ontario Highway 401

This is a note to let the main editors of Ontario Highway 401 know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on April 14, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 14, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director Raul654 (talk · contribs) or his delegate Dabomb87 (talk · contribs), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Highway 401 uses a collector-express roadway configuration to manage high traffic volumes. Highway 401's widest segment has 18 through lanes

Ontario Highway 401 is a 400-series highway in the Canadian province of Ontario stretching from Windsor to the Quebec border. The segment of Highway 401 passing through Toronto is the busiest highway in North America, and one of the widest and busiest in the world. Together with Quebec Autoroute 20, it forms the transportation backbone of the Quebec City–Windsor Corridor, along which over half of Canada's population resides. The entire route is maintained by the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario and patrolled by the Ontario Provincial Police. The posted speed limit is 100 km/h (62 mph) throughout its length. In 2011 construction began on a westward extension of Highway 401. This new route will generally follow, but not replace, former Highway 3 between the current end of the freeway and the E. C. Row Expressway, at which point it will turn and follow that route to a new border crossing. (more...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:ZelAlpha.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ZelAlpha.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:56, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hwy 401 video

Very nice... if the file size isn't too large, and you can convert it to the Ogg format, you could upload it to enwp/commons and put it directly in the article in place of a photo. The only thing is that you would need freely licensed music (or no soundtrack). Imzadi 1979 → 20:06, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting... I'll consider it. My video program cannot make Ogg format, guess I'll need to find a program and a tutorial for it. I'll see what I can do to get free music, if not I'll leave it blank. Haljackey (talk) 20:33, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RfC:Infobox Road proposal

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:HWY

Nbound (talk) 22:55, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Permission for Photos?

Hi there. I Saw a picture of your London Ontario Morning Building Raise photo. Is it okay that I use this photo for our website's banner? We are building a non-profit website for London Ontario. - Thank you for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FireTricker (talk • contribs) 18:13, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Haljackey, I have not seen your feedback yet? I was hoping it would be okay.

--- Haljackey is there any other way I can contact you more privately? My email is philip20000 at gmail .com. I have wrote on the photo by Mathew Campbell (wikipedia) on the photo and hope this will be enough. Thanks really appreciate your time and effort.

Sure, send me an email at haljackey@gmail.com Haljackey (talk) 14:51, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

uploading image: http://i.imgur.com/GSJj1cb.jpg

Upload it (http://i.imgur.com/GSJj1cb.jpg) and I will crop it, thanks.--Jd.101 (talk) 22:29, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Pictures

Those are some sexy new images you uploaded before the weekend! Some are definitely jumping out at me as considerations for another featured picture. Namely, File:Highway_403_End.jpg and File:Highway_410_Start.jpg. Nice work! - Floydian τ ¢ 17:05, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Don Valley Parkway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Riverdale Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Transport Newsletter September 2013

The Transport WikiProject Newsletter
September 2013

In brief (please click):

To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove yourself here. Delivered by Rcsprinter (natter) @ 16:29, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Simcity 4 Interchange.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Simcity 4 Interchange.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:35, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree files

Some of your files may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 November 1#OTRS pending since June. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:05, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Transport Newsletter September 2013

The Transport WikiProject Newsletter
November 2013

In brief (please click):

To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove yourself here. Delivered by Rcsprinter (chatter) @ 14:32, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Transport Newsletter September 2013

The Transport WikiProject Newsletter
November 2013

To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove yourself here. Delivered by Rcsprinter (message) @ 15:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ACR supports

Normally we don't count support declarations if they aren't accompanied by a review of some kind. You may want to take that into account at Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways/Assessment/A-Class Review/Ontario Highway 402. Imzadi 1979 → 04:16, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Transport Newsletter May 2014

The Transport WikiProject Newsletter
May 2014

In brief (please click):

To stop receiving this newsletter, please remove yourself here. Delivered by Rcsprinter123 (push) @ 19:16, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Ontario QEW ALT.svg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ontario QEW ALT.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Haljackey. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Haljackey. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ontario Highway 401

Hi there. With this edit you wrote "The Highway 401 extension in Windsor opened in 2015. It is a modern 6 lane below-grade freeway with tunnels that contain greenspace above the road. It will connect to the planned Gordie Howe International Bridge." I made a few changes to the caption, but I'm not sure what you mean when you say it is a "freeway with tunnels that contain greenspace above the road." Did they built the tunnels just to avoid disrupting the greenspace above? Could you please also add a source to support this. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:15, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Haljackey. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ontario Highway 401, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Autoroute 20. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Center Line: Fall 2023

The Center Line
Volume 10, Issue 1 • Fall 2023 • About the Newsletter

Features

• A New Future for Road Articles Online

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi 1979 → on 19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]