Hello, Hakikatco, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Said Nursî does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.
There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:
One or two? And adding a little context to the quotes, for example when he mentioned it, and why the quote is significant for his followers would be helpful. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 04:03, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
citation needed templates
Hi there why did you remove these templates? Instead, you may add sources if you don't want to see them in the page? Otherwise your edits would be reverted. Egeymi (talk) 05:45, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Hakikatco, I see you have some interest on the Said Nursi article on wikipedia. But your additions are stray, unsuffienctly sourced and the Said Nursi article disrupting quotes. I don't know much about Said Nursi but I am sure there is more info on him and not only about what he said, but his biography. If there is a well known quote of Said Nursi you can create its own article for it, but then with context on why it is important, to his followers, in his biography. See I am a Berliner from Kennedy, or Civis Romanus sum, Peace at Home, Peace in the World or Biji Serok Apo for examples. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:48, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear, I really believe you are concerned for Said Nursi, but is he the inventor of a sun cream that also works as mosquito repellent? Or was a he an abstract comedian? Just to show you, that without context, the Said Nursi quotes can be understood anyhow. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 05:23, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The context is there in the edit:
Risale-i Nur is the collection of 14+ books he wrote. In these books he states that all living and non living creatures in the universe are connected and created by a single Artist or Engineer :
"He who created the eye of the mosquito is the one who created the sun. "
..
Nursi repeatedly stated that all the persecutions and hardships inflicted on him by the secularist regime were God's blessings and that having destroyed the formal religious establishment, they had unwittingly left popular Islam as the only authentic faith of the Turks. He stated that:
"In my 80+ years of life, there has been no persecution I have not tasted, no oppression I have not suffered. I neither care for Paradise nor fear Hell. If I see my nation's belief secured, I will not even care about burning in Hell, for while my body is burning, my heart will be as if in a rose garden." Hakikatco (talk) 21:37, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In my personal opinion it would make sense to explain why this phrase is the one chosen of a collection of 14 books. But I will not revert you anymore if you add that phrase. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:06, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
June 2023
Your recent editing history at Gülen movement shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Diannaa (talk) 12:49, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Hello Hakikatco! Your additions to Said Nursî have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 11:25, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have the permission from the copyright holder to use the content on Wikipedia
Your message says I need to use one of the below licenses:
CC BY, all versions and ports, up to and including 4.0
CC BY-SA 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0
CC0
GFDL and CC BY or CC BY-SA (not including CC-BY-SA 1.0)
I have reverted your edit to the article on Aisha. The edit you made was much the same as the one you made at 05:11 on 20 January 2024 and it got reverted because the source you cited was not considered reliable.
If you think that the edit should go in the article, please could you discuss it at Talk:Aisha. It would help if you read through some of the previous discussions about this issue in the talk page archives - it is likely that your questions have already been answered.
Have you also considered adding how oppressed Aisha was because she did not have a smartphone and an Instagram account? These things are normal in 2024, but apparently what was normal in 620 A.D. in Arabia and what is normal today are different. That probably explains why she got married at a normal age in 620 A.D. even though it is not a normal age today.-- Toddy1(talk)07:01, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You said at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents that according to Muslim community Islamicity is high quality website and active for 29 years. If that is true, there must be reliable third-party published sources on it. See if you can write an article at Draft:IslamiCity that other people think is worth moving to mainspace. I did a search on Google News to see if it might be possible to write such an article. The search produced 22 potentially usable sources. I had to exclude www.islamicity.org and www.prnewswire.com as sources - we want to know what other people write about Islamicity - we do not care what they say about themselves. If you click on the "books" tab, it produces some more potentially useful sources.-- Toddy1(talk)06:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
I didnt do disruptive editing, the other editors deleted my content with no valid reasons and I restored 1 of these disruptive edits after the incident was created on the incident dashboard, none of my content violated any of the Wikipedia policies, and the other editors were not able to prove that they did Hakikatco (talk) 14:38, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
