User talk:Guninvalid


Welcome

Hello, Guninvalid, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your submission at Articles for creation: Veo (company) (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 12:11, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Guninvalid! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 12:11, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help desk

Thanks for trying to help, but you lack the knowledge and experience needed there and are misinforming people. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:47, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Veo (company)

Information icon Hello, Guninvalid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Veo (company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Veo (company)

Hello, Guninvalid. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Veo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:39, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Second Gilded Age has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Second Gilded Age. Thanks! Tavantius (talk) 15:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Vox article cites a handful of books. I could cite the books themselves, but I haven't read them. In hindsight maybe I should, but I'm not sure what counts as a "secondary" source in this context. guninvalid (talk) 22:26, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Second Gilded Age has been accepted

Second Gilded Age, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:00, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Encouraging sockpuppetry

Don't suggest to any editor that they use sockpuppets, either to evade blocks or for any other purpose. If you do so again you are likely to be blocked from editing by an administrator. JBW (talk) 11:18, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's why I said "if you can". I wasn't sure the total extent of Tiamat's block. I'll refrain from saying stuff like that for indef blocks in the future. guninvalid (talk) 21:00, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Throning (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Neologisms require multiple sources not just using, but discussing, the term. Each of the sources cited here is, in one way or another, borderline at best. I don't think this draft is a million miles from acceptable, but it's not quite there yet IMO.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:03, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my 400th edit!

Only 100 more before EC. guninvalid (talk) 09:30, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And this is my 500th edit! 8 days later, almost to the minute. Yet another edit at 1:30am. guninvalid (talk) 09:31, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hello Guninvalid! The thread you created at the Teahouse, How do I welcome a new user?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:19, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


For your great work on the AfD!

The Original Barnstar
for your great work in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Thompson (businessman), especially your very well-reasoned summary of the arguments of both sides, which was cited by the closing administrator. Coretheapple (talk) 22:12, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Though I won't be doing that again per Liz. guninvalid (talk) 22:28, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh! I see what you mean. Hadn't noticed that, only Sandstein's invoking your analysis. So I imagine there's a conflict of views among admins on this. I see her point. That said, I must say I was pleasantly surprised with the close. A very good one, though of course I'm prejudiced. Coretheapple (talk) 23:34, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Throning (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Lemonaka were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
"While throning can be seen as a negative, many negative outcomes can be avoided when both persons are aware of and okay with it..." This looks like something original research.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
-Lemonaka 02:29, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sayfo on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: Economy, trade, and companies request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not on a "Economy, trade, and companies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]