User talk:Griot-deWelcome!
Disambiguation link notification for October 9Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alice Dalgliesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Woodbury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 9 October 2012 (UTC) Disambiguation link notification for November 4Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Nevinson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lancaster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 4 November 2012 (UTC) Effect of your edit 'Authority control moved from invalid place'?Hello Griot-de. You made a minor edit to the 'Craig Charles' page on 9 December 2012 (15:26 GMT) stating 'Authority control moved from invalid place'. Can you please tell me what you changed? A recent edit to the page by INeverCry states 'Removing "Craig_Charles_at_Birmingham_NEC_Nov_12.jpg", it has been deleted from Commons by INeverCry because: missing permission as of 9 December 2012'. I would like to get this photo correctly restored. Thanks, Clare ClareGC (talk) 21:49, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Your request to usurp User:GriotHi. Your understandable request to usurp the name "Griot" is causing some scratching of heads at WP:BN. The simplest option is simply to ask you if you'd consider renaming all your accounts to a name that is not taken anywhere. If you're not happy to do this, I'd understand. --Dweller (talk) 10:54, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
That's very helpful, thank you. If you ever change your mind about changing all of the accounts, a Steward can help you rename all your various accounts simultaneously to something that's free. --Dweller (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC) Removing PRODHey, just wanted to let you know that I'd removed the PROD for MarlÃn, Ãvila. I do think it's a typo or some other type of error, but redirects can't be deleted with a PROD. They have to go through WP:MfD. It might be speedyable via R3, but you'd have to prove that it's an invalid typo. I'll give it a whirl though. I think what happened is that someone was trying to put an "í" in the title but accidentally put another "Ã". I can't see where there the misspelling is commonly used, so I'll try speedying it. If all else fails then it'll have to go through MfD.Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 23:31, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Re: Little bot problem with more than 1 redirect on a pageHello. I use the standard
Why do this?I'm puzzled why you exert so much unproductive energy adding and removing spaces to articles. What improvements do you imagine these result in? For example, in a flurry of edits here you have removed the trailing spaces in the citation labels, replacing for example, <ref name="title" /> with <ref name="title"/>. In fact, the first version is the syntactically correct one which the HTML parser expects to see. Since you are misformatting the code, the parser then has to backtrack to correct your mistakes, so it takes longer to parse the code. Then in a following flurry of edits here, you have added spaces to all the section headers, replacing , for example, "==Subheader== with "== Subheader ==". This achieves precisely nothing apart from adding superfluous spaces, and annoying the article authors by imposing your own preference over the top of their preference, even though you have contributed nothing of substance to the article. This fixation on spaces is continued in a following flurry of edits here, where you similarly imposed your own preference on bullet points to an article you have made no substantial contributions to. Well, its a very minor point, and I suppose it's petty bringing it up. Still, I wonder why you bother wasting computer resources and your own time like this, and go out of your way to mildly irritate other editors by riding roughshod over their own preferences. --Epipelagic (talk) 08:25, 21 March 2013 (UTC) Noni Ιoannidou listed at Redirects for discussionAn editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Noni Ιoannidou. Since you had some involvement with the Noni Ιoannidou redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 06:41, 5 August 2014 (UTC) Hi, |