An article you recently created, Beet sugar factory, is not suitable as written to remain published. It is too closely worded and structured to another article, Sugar beet. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 16:42, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, the article intentionally consists of sections from the sugar beet page with updates and fixes on the references. The idea is to remove the sections about sugar processing and the history of the sugar beet industry to a separate page called beet sugar factory. (Just like there are separate pages for sugar cane and the cane sugar processing.) As soon as the review is complete, I will replace these sections on the sugar beet page with small paragraphs and a link to the beet sugar factory page, fixing this issue. Grieg2 (talk) 17:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Beet sugar factory. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 12:44, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!
Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!
Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!
Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!
Thank you for the useful articles on different guns. Useful for me who does not know much about old or new gun machines.
The reason for contacting you is to have some help identifying some old field guns in my town.
For example this gun or this one or this one or this one. There are some more which I try to identify and would like your help if you can and know.
The color postcard is a bit vague. On the other three images, the upper part of the carriage, i.e. the vertical part below the trunnions, shows that these all depict a gun on what is roughly the same type of carriage. One can count the number of rivets on the muzzle side. There are 11 in the first column which does not reach the bottom, and 11 in the second column which does not reach to the top. This applies to all three of the carriages.
I identify the carriage as a German 21 cm RK coastal gun carriage. We can deduce this from an image of the 1873 Vienna exhibition, shown on the 21 cm RK L/22 page. The pattern of the rivets of the 21 cm RK L/22 Vienna photograph matches that of your three images. Based on the overall appearance of the guns and carriage, and an image supplied by the Dutch captain Mazel, I say that the three images depict a Krupp 21 cm Ring Kanone.
However, the unclear number of rivets on the Vienna photograph does not seem to match the number of rivets on your three images. The explanation for this would be that as the Dutch captain Mazel mentioned, the 21 cm RK L/22 at the Vienna exhibition was on a carriage which had the trunnions at a height of 2.015 m. This identifies the Vienna carriage as the early c/69 carriage. So, the images you linked are probably on a different coastal carriage. This could be the even somewhat lower c/70 carriage, or the higher c/73 carriage. It anyway explains the likely difference in the number of rivets.
I will first update the carriage identification on the 21 cm RK L/22, and upload or link Mazel's picture of the 21 cm RK L/22 on that carriage, with proper references. I will then proceed with the identification. Grieg2 (talk) 18:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I finished the identification of the gun as a 21 cm RK L/22 by doing some calculations to check whether it all makes sense. These are in the image I added to this discussion. Grieg2 (talk) 11:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Grieg2,
Could you help me identify the gun on the right of this photo?
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Hi Grieg2. Thank you for your work on 26 cm RK L/20. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
