User talk:Graeme Bartlett/archive 24

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Graeme_Bartlett/archive_24.

~

	Older talk is in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 archives. Please add your talk at the bottom of the page:

Hi Graeme,

You deleted a page for Sydney Cordle before the last general election in May 2010. He is now the party leader of the Christian Peoples Alliance and I would like to create a new page for him!

Feedback and objections, please?

Aernout Fabius aka AFabius7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by AFabius7 (talk • contribs) 21:53, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk

Dear Graeme, may we please get (will you help promote) a revision added to the diagram under "Production of Acetaldehyde" on the page of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury%28II%29_sulfate that includes the product of methyl mercury and/or all other side products? this will be highly helpfull to know what to expect from that reaction, having learned from the past, (ie: the digram shows the catalyst and acetaldehyde as resultants leaving out the methyl mercury found to be produced as a byproduct {molar by percent compared to expected non production will show how what the plant engineers in japan expected to what is actual, showing the experimental/applied and theoretical relations}). thank you ryan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.123.122.58 (talk) 12:38, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

69 You are going to have to give me a reference to base any side reactions on. A catalyst means that it is not consumed. But if say 0.1% turned into methyl mercury, it may still be a functional reaction. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:22, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

Arvind asia asked another question answer one and clear my doubt In science reference desk.

a doubt on balloon

Hi Graeme, Thought I had taken the balloon into deep sea in Pacific Ocean what will happen to it ? If you find the answer talk in my talk page. Arvind asia (talk) 12:10, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salt surface structures

Hi Graeme, I was wondering when the course related editing of articles such as salt surface structures would be completed, as I'm holding off from making any significant changes until then - thanks. Mikenorton (talk) 08:11, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As soon as it is in article space it is a free for all. Students were asked to keep the work in sandboxes till last Friday. So you are welcome to start changing it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:35, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Graeme. I've raised concerns about possibly copyrighted images on the article talk page and on A.A.Hoffmann's own talk page as he probably hasn't seen the requests for more information on his commons talk page. Mikenorton (talk) 21:16, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

El Clasico

Hi Graeme. Requesting long term (ie. indefinite) protection of El Clasico article. Reason is simple; having an article of one of the fiercest and most contentious rivalries in world sport unprotected has led to the page being one of the most vandalised on this site, As a fan of neither team I have tried to maintain neutrality but have ended up reverting constant vandalism. I had assumed the page was locked permanently but alas it became unlocked and as usual had to revert more vandalism. Last weeks unofficial referendum in Catalonia that voted for independence is indicative of how contentious this rivalry is thus the repeated vandalism is par for the course in such an article.Carlos Rojas77 (talk) 21:53, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protected one year. The best place to ask for this is at WP:RFPP. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:25, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Main Central Thrust at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 03:51, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up on El Clasico

Graeme...issue on the article with an editor, Cid Campeador3, ignoring previous messages sent to him by other users on the issue of content disputes. He was told to request for comment on the dubious sources he continues to add into the article without gaining any consensus on talk. He hasn't asked for any assistance on the issue and ploughs on ahead. I'm neutral on this subject and have removed biased material from the two sets of fans; in this case, Cid Campeador3, a Madrid fan, is giving a Madrid slanted viewpoint on a contentious game (11-1 match in 1943). I'm doing my best to keep the article from being skewed toward either club, and have messaged him that he needs to follow the advice he was given by other editors to gain consensus on talk, go to arbcom if need be, rather than fragrantly ignore other editors and inserting his own viewpoint. Not just that but his English is weak, uses bare URL (and the same one several times over). I dont care what happened just that it is recorded accurately. Trying to maintain the quality of an article is not easy when someone repeatedly ignores standard practice. Your input would be welcomed.Carlos Rojas77 (talk) 02:53, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tectonics of the South China Sea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moho. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Something you mentioned in the Persondata RfC

Hi, back ages ago in this RfC, you mentioned the "AFC reviewer tool". I'm looking to notify them that Persondata is now deprecated (as per this conversation), Could you direct me where I could do that? Or where to start looking? Thanks —Msmarmalade (talk) 00:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Open your discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:14, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wanniassa, Australian Capital Territory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Binary compounds of hydrogen

Are you happy with the changes made to Binary compounds of hydrogen between 24 June 2014 and 5 December 2014? Biscuittin (talk) 17:05, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How it is now, there is a lack of references. Some sentences are incomplete or misleading. Some substances mentioned are not binary compounds of hydrogen. There are some contradictions. But that is not the changes. When I check the changes they are mostly colour scheme(s). But I will check more. The colour scheme used in the first two periodic tables does not match, this just makes things less clear. What assessed or not-assessed is unexplained on the page. Also there is a lack of units for the enthalpies.

For the changes, which are mainly the intro to the molecular hydrides, there is an improvement, but still a lack of references. The monomeric hydrides have a wrong emphasis now on the most obscure and hard to make ones, whereas the common ones like methane, water and hydrogen chloride are not mentioned. Plasmic has not followed the requirement to include references. THough the material is not controversial, just seriously inbalanced. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:17, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vegas logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vegas logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:15, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Salt surface structures

Hello! Your submission of Salt surface structures at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 21:30, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Titanium in zircon geothermometry

On 10 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Titanium in zircon geothermometry, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the titanium in zircon geothermometer measures the temperature at which zircon crystals form? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:22, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2969 views

Hi Graeme

Hi Graeme, how are you doing? Wanted a clarification. Why did you remove content in this diff and later in fact the article itself as a copyright violation? The author has applied for the auto patrolled status and generally, he looks a brilliant author. Thanks (and good to see you around). Wifione ^Message 01:47, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Demiurge1000 had nominated it for speedy deletion as copyright infringement, then I thought that most of the article was good and that the copyright infringing text could be rewritten or chopped. But on checking further the rest of the text was also a copyright violation. The copied text was from http://books.google.ca/books?id=mCHPARZQ0KsC&pg=PA30&lpg=PA30 Industrial Microbiology: An Introduction By Michael J. Waites, Neil L. Morgan, John S. Rockey, Gary Higton. So I cut my effort to rewrite the lot to delete the whole thing. Since this was recent you should check other work if the user appears to be productive. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:32, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your briliant comment! Those deleted articles (including the one you deleted) wasn't my recently created articles. It was one of the articles I created at my earliest time on wikipedia when I was not in any way familiar with policies. There were about 4 or 5 of them then that was blatant word-for-word copyvio, and 3 were deleted at AfD on the basis of notability. In fact I even had a competency issues then at ANI and a very big thanks to User:DGG and others who saved me from being blocked then. Over the time I had grown to be a competent wikipedian, who have a core understanding of wikipedia policies with over 50 undeleted articles (not even with any maintenance tag). See them here in order of their creation and you will see that those deleted articles wasn't my recently created articles, over 50 undeleted articles was created thereafter. I had explained this to Wifione. Thanks! Wikicology (talk) 07:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It does look as though a big improvement has happened in the last few months, so it is back to Wifione to conclude on autopatrolled. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:32, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Graeme, the article you deleted was created by Wikicology in September 2014. I've declined his auto patrolled request as of right now. Will advice Wikicology to wait at least six months before considering applying again. Wifione ^Message 07:37, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Salt surface structures

On 20 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Salt surface structures, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that salt surface structures include the extrusive advance structure where salt flows under gravitational pressure? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Salt surface structures. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 12:02, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2595 page views

Seasonal Greets!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello Graeme Bartlett, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. Happy editing, JudeccaXIII (talk) 18:06, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

DYK for Strain partitioning

On 24 December 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Strain partitioning, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that strain partitioning results in rocks being deformed in different ways when exposed to stress? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Strain partitioning. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1370 page views

DYK nomination of Tectonics of the South China Sea

Hello! Your submission of Tectonics of the South China Sea at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:01, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove this page or at least my personal information

Hello Graeme, I was googling my legal name last night and the first result pops up with an unpublished article from a Japanese search engine. This article contained personal details of mine which the initial contributor did not seek permission from me to post. No wonder I can't get a job. As a fellow Australian, I would really appreciate it if you could permanently delete the sections which state my name and birthdate, or delete the page altogether. The initial contributor has not been active since 2012, doesn't seem like he's coming back anytime soon. The page is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:LukeAnthonyBurger/Stylistics and my latest revision includes all the changes I would like to be permanent (removal of all my personal details). I look forward to your response, Merry Christmas! 01:40, 25 December 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by U3083960 (talk • contribs)

Merry Chrismas U3083960. I doubt that will affect your job prospects, but it has been removed from public view on Wikipedia now by using revison deletion on the text. You can also ask oversight to delete if you need further hiding on Wikipedia. Search engine caches may take a lot longer to update though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:07, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal Greets!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello Graeme Bartlett, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. Happy editing,  !dea4u  11:04, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

DYK nomination of Continental arc

Hello! Your submission of Continental arc at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Brianhe (talk) 22:22, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 17:59, 30 December 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--Mdann52talk to me! 17:59, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2015 already

Hi Graeme. No frills - just a quiet ‘’all the best’’ to you for 2015 and I hope you’ll continue to be around on Wikipedia for a long time to come. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:03, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for the new years wish! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:59, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen

On 3 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen contains over 250,000 km^3 (60,000 cu mi) of igneous rock, including a multitude of gabbros? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 12:02, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2147 page views

Orphaned non-free image File:Terrible's Hotel and Casino logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Terrible's Hotel and Casino logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Elsevier access

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Chris Troutman (talk) 21:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion

First, thank you for restoring Cannabis Science Inc.. Would you also restore the company logo [1] which was deleted after the article as orphaned fair use? The original admin who deleted it seems to have been inactive for a few months. Kindzmarauli (talk) 16:23, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:56, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

depreciated cite parameters

It looks like you are not aware that |coauthors= is depreciated in {{cite journal}}. I started removing them in Magnesium monohydride.

Some cs1 errors are visible, but other are not. If you add .citation-comment { display: inline !important; } to your vector.css file, all errors show up in their bright red glory.

Also, there is a PUA in the article... a unicode character that displays a box. It's in the citation with the title of "Subvalent Compounds Featuring Direct Metal-Metal Bonds". It was in between the two ZNs. I removed it, but I'm not sure what was supposed to be there. Bgwhite (talk) 08:51, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am using a Wikipedia standard gadget to add references, the "cite" button from the Wikipedia:RefToolbar. I suggest that you fix the built in scripts first! Because there will be more and more references being produced that way. People that decide to change the way a template works really need to fix everything that produces that template. That strange unicode character should look like a hyphen, but it appears it is from a "private use area". This can be fixed! Also I will add that style sheet element. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:24, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The strange unicode would have come via https://tools.wmflabs.org/reftoolbar/lookup.php, but I don't know whether to blame that as it also has trouble with German umlauts as well. It could well be the data store behind DOI. The script putting out the coauthor is at MediaWiki:RefToolbarLegacy.js. I would appreciate if it just had an authors box and that I don't have to split up between author and coauthor any way. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:35, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know you were using RefToolbar and I don't use it. So, I guess we are crossing wires in this case. The people who work on CS1 related templates are usually very good at informing others. RefToolbar was made aware of the depreciated parameters and was supposedly fixed. RefToolbarLegacy.js is no longer maintained.

As for the PUA, no need to worry about it. PUAs and invisible Unicode characters are added all the time, usually from copy/paste. The vast majority of the time, I know how to fix the PUA, but I was unsure in this case, thus my note. Bgwhite (talk) 22:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Repeat AfD nominee

You previously voiced an opinion on an AfD discussion on an article. It was subsequently moved to user space and made it to main space. It has been nominated for deletion again: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cantata++ (3rd nomination). If you are interested in weighing-in, it would be helpful to know if you see any improvement in the article and it currently meets WP:GNG. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:03, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Magnesium monohydride, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dipole moment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Continental arc

On 10 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Continental arc, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that continental arc volcanoes have magma formed from a mixture of melted asthenosphere and crustal rocks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Continental arc. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 12:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1201 views

DYK nomination of Metamorphic facies of subduction zones

Hello! Your submission of Metamorphic facies of subduction zones at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Chris Troutman (talk) 23:55, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting page protection on FC Barcelona

Hi Graeme. FC Barcelona's page has been subjected to repeated vandalism. The page itself only became unlocked when the higher level Admin lock expired (one of the flaws that occurs when really the page should return to being locked). Requesting page protection as its prone to vandalism, especially from ip users. Cheers--Carlos Rojas77 (talk) 17:59, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Protected a week, vandalism is really quite moderate for such a prominent article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/CheckPage

Please approve or deny access, but please do something. I can't wait to try that Tetra quark ^(don't be shy) 19:00, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sultan-ul-Faqr Monthly Magazine

Hi, I saw you declined speedy delete of Sultan-ul-Faqr Monthly Magazine. The article is part of a large promo effort by some Sultan-ul-Faqr Publications Regd., a group of socks creating and defending their promotional articles that fail any notability guidelines.

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sultan-ul-Faqr Publications Regd.
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faqr-e-Iqbal
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tehreek Dawat-e-Faqr
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sultan Bahoo: The Life and Teachings
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarwari Qadiri
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sultan-ul-Arifeen

For SPI, see here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mrashid364.

Of note, Google does not return a single hit of "Sultan-ul-Faqr Monthly Magazine" apart from Wikipedia and the company's own Facebook/blog pages.

Declining speedy and forcing the article to go through XfD is an open invitation for more socks/SPAs, and will require others to spend time tracing and blocking them. This could have been avoided by speedy. Regards, kashmiri ^TALK 10:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the investigation results in a ban then we can speedy delete, or if it is too promotional then speedy delete can happen. But a large proportion of stuff here is written by someone with an interest in the subject, and if it is not too bad then a consensus can decide its outcome. Perhaps some of these AFDs could be combined if the topics are connected. Secondly if speedy delete happens there is nothing to stop another attempt to create a similar thing, but once AFD decides to delete it is very easy to delete again. So AFD is good for finality. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:56, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Valid points, thanks. kashmiri ^TALK 11:39, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

e-mail for you

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 12:52, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Graeme name

Hi, I was just trying to look up "Graeme" as a name, and I see your name around -- the only usage of Graeme I recall anywhere--and I figure you must be an expert! I see Graeme goes to a dab page Graham (disambiguation) which doesn't explain much. The dab wording is a bit confusing, implying at top that Graeme can be a given name, but below sort of seeming to imply that it is only a surname. I wonder if it could be added that it is a given name of some nationality or another, at the top? I am mildly curious. It came up for me because there is a Graeme name used by me in a reference at Le Courrier de Floride, where I am worried that I might have misunderstood something (are they the author or not?), but that person has surname Hamilton. Anyhow, cheers, have a nice day. --doncram 20:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixIndex&from=Graeme%2F&namespace=2 you can see quite a few users, or lost of articles at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3APrefixIndex&prefix=Graeme&namespace=0. There is also Graeme (surname). Anyway it can be a given name or a surname. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wilfred de Souza

Just curious as to why you deleted the PROD notice at the above article. The two references provided do nothing to establish notability. The first gives no reference to de Souza at all and the second is a memorial notice for his son, which only establishes that de Souza exists. I would ask that you go back and have a thorough look at the references cited and explain how they establish any notability whatsoever. Dan arndt (talk) 23:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you are thinking of another article, as I did nothing to this one. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:35, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your edit? is it not? Wilfred de Souza Dan arndt (talk) 05:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, the missing bit of the edit summary should say that prod is still possible, it was the prod blp that was declined. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:13, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kaijuland Battles

I noticed that you declined my speedy tag as spam for this article on the basis that it could be made neutral in tone. Since it's a recent release of a non-notable game by a non-notable company, and has no claim of notability (just describes the game), I've gone to AFD. I hope you don't see this as wheeling—I decided against SD tagging for notability for that reason Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:22, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For the issues you raise that is the correct forum. It's not wheeling! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AWB Violation/ Capitalize the "U" in "universe" or not?

== Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in. ==

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Arianewiki1 (talk) 14:51, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Spear point

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Spear point, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Deunanknute (talk) 03:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alternaria black spot of canola

added links pointing to Petiole, Inoculum and Stubble

Aztec body modification

added links pointing to Maya and Branding

ECMA-407

added links pointing to Ambiance and Multichannel audio

Trade during the Viking Age

added links pointing to Bagdad and Conquest

Boats burials in Asia

added a link pointing to Kita Ward

Jacob Alexander Figueroa

added a link pointing to Topless

Rafflesia verrucosa

added a link pointing to Perigone

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 10:39:21, 21 January 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Daytodayebay

• Daytodayebay (talk · contribs)
  • User:Daytodayebay (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

My article has been flagged as copyright material. Would you please mention which area?

Daytodayebay (talk) 10:39, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10:43:18, 21 January 2015 review of submission by Daytodayebay

• Daytodayebay (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:BRYNCYN (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Graeme

I just saw the reason of copyright. I will work on the article and resubmit.

Thanks Prabhat Daytodayebay (talk) 10:43, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Magnesium monohydride

On 22 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Magnesium monohydride, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that magnesium monohydride is a molecule known only as a gas and is found on the sun and other stars? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Magnesium monohydride. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:44, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

4904 page views.

G. Flint Taylor

Another editor asked about the neutrality tag that you applied to G. Flint Taylor three months ago. Can you please go to the talk page, Talk: G. Flint Taylor, and explain what your neutrality concerns are? Robert McClenon (talk) 21:48, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Graeme - I'm the author of the article on G. Flint Taylor and am reaching out again to see if we can please resolve the concern you raised about NPOV. If you go to the talk page, another reader has weighed in. I'm not opposed to revising the article to address specific problems, but also don't think it is fair for this tag to linger indefinitely. Please help! Carolfowler1 (talk) 14:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)Carolfowler1[reply]

Is there an adjustment necessary?

Hi, and thank you again for adding my user name to the AWB CheckPage. Hopefully you can help me, as I've had problems logging in from the AWB program. Per this discussion, another editor says that there is some character in my entry that causes AWB to not recognize my name when I try to log in. Is there any way you can get me on my way? – Paine Ellsworth^CLIMAX! 21:49, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! and see my response at the AWB talk page. I am now able to login. – Paine  22:27, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help

I want to work with files on Wikipedia. Can you provide me some links as work fields and guide pages which help me in this field. Thanks. Owais Khursheed (Talk to me) 16:11, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Elsevier

Hi. I wanted to update you on the status of your Elsevier account. I sent the first list to Elsevier on 12 January. Elsevier reports that they will be e-mailing applicants next week with an access code, which will start your use of the resource. I appreciate your patience with this process. Feel free to contact me with any feedback or questions you have about Elsevier access. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:59, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block request

I'm requesting a 72 hr block to help enforce a Wikibreak. My rationale is very complicated, but I want to make sure I don't come back on, as, aside from complications from an extremely rare genetic disorder I have, as mentioned here, I will be having much extra time in the next few days whereas I will be tempted to come back on Wikipedia. I hope this break will help restore my AGF.Qxukhgiels (talk) 22:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring deleted article?

Hello Graham -- Vrac advised me to ask whether you could restore this article to my user space:

"17:04, 15 January 2015 Graeme Bartlett (talk | contribs) deleted page Lisandro Aristimuño (Expired BLPPROD, concern was: Unsourced BLP)"

I didn't see the note about its having no references until long after it had been deleted (it was a translation of the article on the Spanish Wiki and I didn't realize it needed references). Thanks. MagistraMundi (talk) 10:31, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for restoring. MagistraMundi (talk) 10:38, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Tectonics of the South China Sea

On 24 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tectonics of the South China Sea, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the continental crust below the South China Sea is theorized to have begun splitting apart from the Eurasian Plate around 55 million years ago? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tectonics of the South China Sea. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 13:44, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1727 views

DYK nomination of Eastern Pilbara Craton

Hello! Your submission of Eastern Pilbara Craton at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:41, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you done? The way you phrased your most recent comment on the nomination gave the impression that you had more to do before the nomination could proceed. Please stop back when you have finished your work on it. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:43, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Whether 'Norman Copeland' is not adequately supported by reliable sources?

Hi, Graeme! You have declined my submission as it 'is not adequately supported by reliable sources.' But there are references to the London Gazette, archives, books of the Reverend Norman Copeland - aren't its reliable sources and why not if so? Suggest, please. How should I make them reliable? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taraslgr (talk • contribs) 15:14, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Deicke and Millbrig Bentonite Layers

Hello! Your submission of Deicke and Millbrig Bentonite Layers at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:00, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

adding the references as you type this! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protect Existing Article?

Graeme,

Thank you for publishing my article. Unfortunately there are some wikipedia users trying to have it deleted, as I notice they deleted another article I had contributed a good deal to with the band of musicians, artists and developers, of which Jacob Alexander Figueroa / Zander is a key contributing member. There was an article previously on the band, which I'm not sure if you were able to view before it was taken down, but it had several independent and verifiable sources yet it was taken down for having a lack thereof. It seems the same situation is now happening with the article Jacob Alexander Figueroa. As you are well aware, since you published the article initially, this article does in fact have international press and independent, verifiable sources, such as NY Arts Magazine, MPR News, and the Minneapolis St. Paul International Film Festival. I was wondering if you would be able to provide neutrality and mediation in this matter and protect the article from being removed? It seems that it is now to the point of editing for improvements, but not to be dismissed by way of deletion. Thank you for your time and help! WeAreAllStars (talk) 08:13, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AE

Please read my post just above yours. Andy (PotW) is restricted from adding or removing infoboxes from articles (because some article owners don't like them). Suggesting to generally replace a template by a better one, or to merge two, has nothing to do with it. Unless the present restriction is changed (something some people want), we have to go by it, not by wishes for a future one. I wrote this three times today, it's tiring. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:55, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed my comment, as I am not involved with this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:12, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seen, thank you, - wish others were as decent, - those who don't know the background dominate the foreground, unfortunately ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Infoboxes

You have posted a comment saying "Pigsonthewing is banned from infobox work". That is false. Please remove or strike it. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The text includes "discussing the addition or removal of, infoboxes" which I generalised to "work". I will ammend my reason. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:04, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(watching) no, it is not "work", it's about individual articles, - there have been several "clarifications" of it, archived on the case page. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• looking again: please read what you quoted, "discussing the addition OR removal of, infoboxes", OR highlighted, because that is the crucial point, Yes or No to a specific infobox, - a merge or replacement is "removal AND addition" and doesn't fall under the present restriction. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:13, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• supported by an arb, one example of many possible, "there has been so much subsequent discussion about it that the intent to restrict it to articles is abundantly clear." - wish it were so clear, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:19, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes, I am pretty sure that it is talking about articles. I think the issue really is add or remove vs (add and remove) that you might be disagreeing with my interpretation. The comment you point me to considers that the template discussion is out of scope. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:35, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure that I understand completely but quite willing to learn. Do you mean that template discussion is not under the scope of the restriction? Then we agree. - I participate in one of them. I wanted to use {{infobox hymn}} and found that it is very limited in parameters. Therefore I looked around what else to use and found {{infobox musical composition}}. You can compare in the same article because there was a little edit war: Vom Himmel hoch, da komm ich her vs. the same with "hymn" (try to find it, - we have to deal with a user who doesn't believe an image should be in an infobox because a certain pdf-writer doesn't print an image from the infobox, but that's a different story). Consensus was for "composition". When I mentioned the problems of "hymn" to Andy he researched and made the formal request, still found on top of the pages. If you look at the discussion: some users seem to believe the article would no longer be in category hymn if the infobox name was "musical composition" (or - as I later suggested - "composition"). However: our readers don't see that difference, only editors. I fail to understand the amount of resistance. The template documentation has an example "hymn" that can be copied, if there is fear of wading through too many parameters. - Now I compare, my style of simply using "composition", and Andy's open official way, inviting discussion from everybody involved. I couldn't take what he has to take, day by day. Back to simply using "composition". --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:26, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

16:16:50, 26 January 2015 review of submission by Silverspoon83

• Silverspoon83 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Frankie Monkhouse (Boxing) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Graeme. I have submitted a further reference to support the boxer's win/lose record. I hope this is now satisfactory. With thanks. Silverspoon83 (talk) 16:16, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17:42:07, 26 January 2015 review of submission by Armageddon's Song

• Armageddon's Song (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Armageddon’s Song (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I was not aware that Amazon.com was an unreliable source, nor was I aware that the the independent reviewer at arrse.co.uk was a shady character and not to be trusted, which is exactly what you have said, is it not? 

Armageddon's Song (talk) 17:42, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:04:43, 26 January 2015 review of submission by Armageddon's Song

• Armageddon's Song (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Armageddon’s Song (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

2nd review. The first review related to volume one and this later review is of volumes two and three. Does that suffice?

[1]

Andy Farman Armageddon's Song (talk) 18:04, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:15:23, 26 January 2015 review of submission by Armageddon's Song

• Armageddon's Song (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Armageddon’s Song (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Apparently a second review is required and I have therefore attached the review of the second and third volumes of the series. [2]

Andy Farman

Armageddon's Song (talk) 18:15, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:41:01, 26 January 2015 review of submission by Armageddon's Song

• Armageddon's Song (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Armageddon’s Song (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Third review [3] Fourth review [4] Fifth review [5] Sixth review [6] Seventh review [7] Eighth review [8]

Do these now require their edition to the draft?

Regards

Andy Farman

Armageddon's Song (talk) 18:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1. http://www.arrse.co.uk/reviews/armageddons-song-andy-farman/
2. http://www.arrse.co.uk/reviews/armageddons-song-andy-farman/
3. http://www.survivalistboards.com/showthread.php?t=358122
4. http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R3ON5MR2HY5V37/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B00DDYOV14
5. http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R3IJBSD262B5T1/ref=cm_cr_dp_title?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B00D8QHZYC&channel=detail-glance&nodeID=266239&store=books
6. http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R38AN2LXWTE8WB/ref=cm_cr_pr_perm?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B00FBEP2OE
7. http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R15J43CHMSOFNN/ref=cm_cr_pr_perm?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B00KEZUO8E
8. http://www.amazon.co.uk/review/R339M5KE9J9A2T/ref=cm_cr_pr_perm?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B00KEVU1CM

DYK

Hi Graeme: The DYK queue is down to a single entry, which is due to swap in to the main page in 3 hours. Could you move things from the prep area into the queue so the entry after that goes as scheduled? There are only a few of you DYK admins that are active these days... Thanks! MeegsC (talk) 22:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And I am not all that active with this anymore either! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:09, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Later Sui Empire (dominating usurp during 1418-1644)

Do you mind if I revert you and re-delete it? When I originally declined the deletion, the tagger came to my talk page and gave a detailed and convincing rationale for why it was a hoax; as well, the requester's talk page is full of warnings for hoax creation, and some hours ago I blocked him for hoax creation, specifically on this article. I suppose your screen reader takes quite a while to read through long pages, so I'll be happy to provide quotations if you don't want to wade through everything. Nyttend (talk) 00:53, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted it myself as a re-creation, it was similar enough. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:11, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Screen reader — I had confused you with User:Graham87. Nyttend (talk) 03:45, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10:00:24, 27 January 2015 review of submission by Armageddon's Song

• Armageddon's Song (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Armageddon’s Song (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

All the books exist and that is verifiable. There is no stipulated requirement for reviews, or did I miss that? Armageddon's Song (talk) 10:00, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

10:32:33, 27 January 2015 review of submission by Armageddon's Song

• Armageddon's Song (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Armageddon’s Song (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User name change requested. http://www.arrse.co.uk/community/threads/review-armageddons-song-vols-2-3-by-andy-farman.214661/ the second review. Please inform Mr Thompson that the Amazon reviewer is Anthony Riches, author, (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AnthonyRiches) and the arrse.co.uk reviewer is a decorated veteran, neither man is a 'monkey'. Armageddon's Song (talk) 10:32, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hykmete Bajrami

added a link pointing to University of Prishtina

Ian Thomson (writer)

added a link pointing to Pembroke College

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Main Central Thrust

On 29 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Main Central Thrust, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Main Central Thrust extends 2,200 kilometres (1,400 mi) along the Himalaya mountain belt? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Main Central Thrust. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 12:01, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3619 page views

SafetyNet

Could indulge me by elaborating upon or double checking this CSD decline? It's a tag that I've noticed is handled inconsistently, which is to be expected to some extent because it requires interpretation of what "unambiguous advertising or promotion" means as it applies to a variety of cases, but this one strikes me as a particularly clear example. The entire article comprises a short definition of what kind of software it is, a website link, a line of platforms it's compatible with, and then a comparatively long list of "features". That the features list appear to be copied directly from the developer's website seems to support their promotional nature -- not necessarily in the sense of commercial advertising, of course, but in the sense that its only purpose a "feature" list serves is to promote rather than to give an encyclopedic treatment. I didn't notice it was a copy/paste job when I tagged it initially, but still don't think it requires copyvio grounds to qualify for csd. To me, if it looks like a spec sheet or marketing brochure that would be just as at home on the developer's website, it's likely it qualifies for G11. That itself is an oversimplification since there's still subjectivity involved, but that's why I'm curious how other people interpret it. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 06:53, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A definition, and a list of features could easily be in an encyclopedic article. I would delete if the article was entirely promotional language, or full of hype. Theis often happens when it is written by PR people. But in this case there are encyclopedic contents. The tone is advertisement, but it can be edited to remove the tone (eg get rid of "your"). Speedy delete should only apply if there is nothing at all that could be saved if we deleted each promotional sentence. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:53, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To me it seems at odds with NOT/NPOV for a bulletpointed list of software features (an unsourced list which it turns out was copied from the company website) combined with a very brief definition (that doesn't make any claim to notability), to be considered non-promotional and/or an acceptable encyclopedia article (regardless of COPYVIO issues). That said, I don't really want to argue with you on this; I just disagree with the call and am feeling a little frustrated that G11 seems like kind of a crapshoot depending on who sees the tag. On the other end of the spectrum I've seen long, multi-section, multi-sourced articles deleted for G11 as well. Ultimately I'd just be happier if it were more consistent one way or the other so I know which road to take. (FYI I've nominated this one for deletion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SafetyNet). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 02:22, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you see long articles get deleted for G11 that should not have done, I am quite willing to give them a review, restore, and cleanup if needed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:44, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

re Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion#https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Clinicallytested/sandbox

YOu wrote: "Not done Basically you want Targeted Individual back, but there were two AFDs Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Targeted Individual and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Targeted Individual (2nd nomination) which decided to delete. There does not seem to be any prospect that this content would be come acceptable as an article."

Please notice there is an abandoned draft User:Yambaram/Targeted Individuals. As I understand, it must be deleted as well, by the same reasoning. What do you think? Staszek Lem (talk) 23:06, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is not abandoned, as edited in the last few months. There is a comment at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive870#WP:BLP violations etc at Targeted Individual. This draft does not suffer from the BLP problems found in the original article, so I think it looks to be an attempt to address the problems, so we can let it develop. But keep an eye on it to see if it mentions real people. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:11, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Deicke and Millbrig bentonite layers

On 31 January 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Deicke and Millbrig bentonite layers, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Deicke and Millbrig bentonite layers in eastern United States were formed by huge volcanic eruptions? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RfC: AfC Helper Script access

An RfC has been opened at RfC to physically restrict access to the Helper Script. You are invited to comment. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Outbreak Customz page deletion

Please restore the page for Outbreak Customz. It has been temporarily deleted and should remain on your site. It is a licensed manufacturer and repair facility. The information on the page is correct and verifiable. Thank you in advance for your time. AJWrayIII (talk) 01:54, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

18:28:22, 5 February 2015 review of submission by Kjross

• Kjross (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Loss function surrogates for classification (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am not sure if you were looking for anything other than a title change with the article originally titled "Loss function surrogates for classification" (it should now be "Loss functions for classification"). I have attempted to remove the word "surrogates" from the title (but as an amateur wikipedia user may have been unsuccessful). Please feel free to remove the word "surrogates" from the title if I was unsuccessful. I have no particular attachment to it and follow your reasoning for why its inclusion would be misleading. Based on your comments and those of Mark Viking, I have made no further edits. Please let me know if you were looking for further edits before accepting the article. Thanks!

Kjross (talk) 18:28, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now accepted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:31, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Subduction zone metamorphism

On 6 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Subduction zone metamorphism, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that as rocks are compressed, sinking down into an oceanic trench, they release water that causes volcanoes to form above? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Palace Station.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Palace Station.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Sunset Station logo.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sunset Station logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Texas Station logo.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Texas Station logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:13, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bleu horses

Can you explain the proper fair use rationale for using the photo of the sculptures at Bleu Horses? I can live without them in the DYK hook, but would be nice to preserve them in the article itself. I've done a lot of Fair Use rationales, but usually for deceased individuals, haven't had one work for art. Montanabw^(talk) 18:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:41:36, 12 February 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Tbergquist

• Tbergquist (talk · contribs)
  • User:Tbergquist (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

You reviewed the Victor P. Morris page on February 6. The permissions for the photo were sent in to Wikimedia on January 7. Hopefully the photo will be approved soon! Thanks. Tbergquist (talk) 22:41, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tbergquist (talk) 22:41, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Eastern Pilbara Craton

Hello! Your submission of Eastern Pilbara Craton at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Lemuellio (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on WP:AN#Closure review: Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC to physically restrict access to the Helper Script

Hello! You have been selected to receive an invitation to participate in the closure review for the recent RfC regarding the AfC Helper script. You've been chosen because you participated in the original RfC. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. This message is automated. Replies will not be noticed. --QEDK ♠ T ♥ C 14:22, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello, Your Honorable Graeme Bartlett!

I am here to pledge to you for User:Tetra quark. He is my close friend. He is now doing worse. He removed some warnings posted on him. He became so mean. I don't know what happened to him. But what he is doing now is very damaging.

I come here to appeal to you. Please give him another chance. I know there is still some good remaining in him. Please don't block him indefinitely. He is a good person. I am so ashamed of myself, to you, and to all his victims, but I will talk to him. Please, Your Honorable, he is the leader of WP:COSMOS. Losing him would be tragic. Anyway, I will respect your decision, Your Honorable. Allow me to post a message to him. If he deletes it or responds very badly, then I will hand him over to you.

Your Honorable, you may post a message on my talk page if you have any comments for me. Regards? SkyFlubbler ^(talk) 08:26, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@SkyFlubbler: Uh... thanks for your sacrifice, but what are you talking about? I'm not going to get blocked. My 1 week block has ended. Also, stop talking as if I'm about to go to the electric chair (irl) or something Tetra quark ^(talk) 15:33, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Helium dimer

On 23 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Helium dimer, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the helium dimer is the largest molecule in the ground state made from two atoms? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Helium dimer. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:01, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• 5108 views

DYK for Eastern Pilbara Craton

On 25 February 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eastern Pilbara Craton, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Eastern Pilbara Craton contains pieces of Earth crust that are 3.6 billion years old? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eastern Pilbara Craton. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• 3689 views

Victor P Morris article

Permission for the image was received on February 22, 2015 from Ron Jones, ticket # 2015010710020391. Can you please publish this page now? Thanks. Tbergquist (talk) 22:38, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot tell who Ron Jones is or see the confirmation myself, hopefully Ron Jones will contact me or add a note to the draft to say that it is approved. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:57, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Self blocks

As your name appears on Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to consider placing self-requested blocks, you may sign at the newly revamped Wikipedia:Block on demand page, along with comment and a link to your requirements page, if any. Thanks, SD0001 (talk) 15:55, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Main Page/CSS

Thanks for the help. I've temporarily resigned adminship due to off-wiki issues (planning to request them back before long), and it's slightly weird having to make all these requests for things I'd normally do myself. Nyttend (talk) 16:26, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nitesh Estates Limited

Sir, please allow me to create this page as I am intend to work on it. I found it notable enough to be present on Wikipedia and hence requesting you to do so. Please allow me to create the page and once it is being made then please make the desired changes that you want to do on it. You are an expert and definitely I need your help in the creation and stability of this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.64.198.37 (talk) 12:40, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This page cannot be created. I am sure you know the story. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:51, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mr. Graeme: does it mean that this page can never be created in future? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.68.77.212 (talk) 12:10, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It cannot be created by banned people. If circumstances change and there are many appearances of independent writings in newspapers, or major TV stations have a program about the company then it can be created. But if people are paid to make the article then it is a bad idea, and it will probably be unsuitable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:35, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I have found various media links online that proves the existence of this company. I am just asking for one single chance as I have the complete evidence of the existence of this company and using that only I will create this page. And yes I am eager to work on this page but not for money. Although I did a complete research on this page and company and hence decided to work on this complicated page. Please give me one single chance atleast. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.68.77.212 (talk) 08:00, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Existence is not an issue here, but instead we need substantial writings, that means of a large size about the topic. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:36, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, I will do that but at least let me try. I will definitely give my 100% in creating this article. This way I will learn a lot on Wikipedia that I am eager to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.69.40.191 (talk) 11:31, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment the article cannot be created. You can write a draft on your own computer. But don't expect the notability to change over a few hours. It will probably take years to achieve the independent coverage required. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:34, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Start class

Hi Graeme: My article was just approved by you, thank you, as "Start Class" I am not sure what this REALLY means? Will this mean that it will be published in Wikipedia? Thank you. Tim Edborg Timedborg 15:36, 8 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timedborg (talk • contribs)

Brielle Daniel Edborg

Dear Graeme: You just recently approved my article as a "Start Class". Can you please explain what this fully means? Thanks! Tim Edborg Timedborg 15:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timedborg (talk • contribs)

Centre for Study of Insurance Operations

Graeme, that's fantastic! Thank you for accepting my article on Centre for Study of Insurance Operations. How long do you think it will take before the article starts showing up in Google searches? thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.52.243.152 (talk) 00:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

William R. Spencer

added links pointing to Huntington Station, Cold Spring Harbor, Centerport and Greenlawn

Coaxen Indian Village

added a link pointing to Bast

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Gilbert

Hi Graeme,

I came across your user page through the questions and answers for drafts on Wikipedia! I am looking for an experienced editor to please have a look at this Draft- Draft:Alex Gilbert. Please give me advice on how I can improve this article? Does it need more reliable sources? There is a few secondary sources on this page that I am sure are reliable! Just need your advice!

Thanks! --DmitryPopovRU (talk) 09:33, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response! Will develop try develop the article a little more! --DmitryPopovRU (talk) 18:35, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11:03:47, 9 March 2015 review of submission by MarkfromPoole

• MarkfromPoole (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Poole People (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I do not understand why the sources that I have quoted are considered unreliable. The source used for evidence of electoral results was the Borough of Poole. The Borough of Poole is the local authority to which Poole People councillors are elected, and its employees the Returning Officer who is responsible for the administration of local elections. The only other source quoted was the Daily Echo which is the long established local paper in this area. Having read the guidelines for reliable sources, newspapers of this nature should be acceptable where they are setting out facts. MarkfromPoole (talk) 11:03, 9 March 2015 (UTC) MarkfromPoole (talk) 11:03, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

23:28:39, 9 March 2015 review of submission by JAHendler

• JAHendler (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Daniel Weitzner (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

JAHendler (talk) 23:28, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am having trouble figuring out what needs to be done to have Daniel Weitzner added to wikipedia. The page I created originally was based on his bio at his MIT web page (https://www.csail.mit.edu/user/1283) which, although it has a cc-0 tag was autodeleted. So I created a new page with none of the same wording as that to avoid the autodelete. The notability, however, seems to be being questioned as I am citing the notable things he has done (like created the White House's privacy policy) and the like. I realize I should include his awards and such - but when I included the following paragraph (from his page) or anything like it, it gets autodeleted (again, despite being public domain).

(quoted from MIT page) Weitzner is a founder of the Center for Democracy and Technology, led the World Wide Wed Consortium’s public policy activities, and was Deputy Policy Director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation. In 2012 he was named to the Newsweek/Daily Beast Digital Power Index as a top ‘Navigator’ of global Internet public policy and in 2013 he received the International Association of Privacy Professional’s Leadership Award. (end quote)

note that the above does indeed include major awards, his role as the head of Internet policy for the Obama administration would seem to qualify as notable by itself, even without these, and he is constantly being quoted in the news and such (for example a Google news search today on "Daniel Weitzner" finds about 50 articles).

I've been a wikipedia entry for a long time, and I'd certainly say Danny is better known than I am, especially after his White House stint - so it seems to me he fits the Golden rule, meets the notability rule for academics, and that the problem is that I'm just not a very good wikipedia author. So I'm seeking more specific advice about what I might do... I've been a fan of his for many years, have coauthored articles with him in major publications, and feel that his omission from Wikipedia is ironic, given he is one of the people who helped create the very policies on which the web was created as open and free (he headed the World Wide Web Consortium's Technology and Society Domain and was instrumental in the ruling against Eolas in a patent-case that literally could have shut down wikipedia, among many other pages, due to its cost - http://www.w3.org/2003/10/27-rogan.html)

I could go on (he's keynoted Usenix, appeared on dozens of panels with Berners-Lee and other clear notables

I'm happy to put some of the above in more formal form into the article if it would make a difference, the problem is since I'm clearly missing why he isn't notable, it's hard to know what of the above might change your mind.

thanks much for any advice you could give

---

thanks for your reply, I just don't know what a reference "about" someone is in this sort of case? For example, would http://gov20.govfresh.com/daniel-weitzner-is-the-new-white-house-deputy-cto-for-internet-policy/ count? I realize I'm being obtuse, but I guess I'm not sure what is being looked for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JAHendler (talk • contribs) 23:54, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate article title

In every instance I've ever seen of someone moving a newbie's article into the user space, where the title was in some obvious way inappropriate, the person moving the article left the obviously inappropriate title intact. You continue that perfect record with this edit, where you left "Kirkwood-Buff" (with a hyphen) intact instead of changing it to "Kirkwood–Buff" (with an en-dash). Why do people who do this never look at the title? Michael Hardy (talk) 17:43, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I consider there is no difference between hyphen, n-dash and minus symbols. It is only a minor decorative improvement to change it. But if someone else changes those I won't change it back. So I won't consider the proposed title inappropriate. Particularly since I have only "-" on a keyboard that is what you get. In addition a typable title must be available as a redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:38, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question Regarding Former Article That Was Up

There was a wikipedia page on the Band Famous that was approved back in December 2014 and it was almost up for good. I was one of at least a few Wikipedia users trying to help improve the article but some of the people that were trying to take down the Jacob Alexander Figueroa article successfully had the Band Famous wikipedia page deleted after a short discussion. I was curious if that article could be undeleted now that Jacob Alexander Figueroa is up for good and all the citations are good, that the article could then link to the Band Famous page, as he is an active member, and that would help serve to have the article stay up for improvements? I think the article just needed to be cited properly with the authors, publications, radio... The Band Famous wikipedia page didn't have the proper format in the citations, which harmed the article. I would be happy (if the article were put back up) to fix the citations so that everything is properly formatted. Maybe you or another administrator / editor who has the power to do so could take another look at the Band Famous Wikipedia page and perhaps it can be undeleted so that further improvements can be made? I would be happy to hear your input! Thank you for any guidance or insight with this matter, WeAreAllStars (talk) 21:20, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Thank you for the redirect from "Band Famous" to Jacob Alexander Figueroa. Is the article for "Band Famous" able to go back up? There is more press on the band that needs to be properly formatted in the citations of the Band Famous wikipedia page... Or do you propose these articles be added as citations under Jacob Alexander Figueroa? Specifically I'm wondering if you or anyone you know would consider an undeletion of the "Band Famous" page so that editors like myself can improve upon it. ~~ WeAreAllStars (talk) 22:17, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Prod bomber" on Curtin Student Guild

Would you rather substantiate or retract your accusation that I am "a prod bomber who is part of a vandalism team"? And did you have a directly relevant rationale for removing the PROD tag or did you just reflexively remove it as part of some mission that you're on? —Largo Plazo (talk) 11:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And can I remind you of WP:NPA and that you shouldn't use edit summaries in this way, Graeme? If you think you have a valid case to call Largo Plazo part of a vandalism team, then go to ANI. I also would like you to explain your accusation. Dougweller (talk) 15:48, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Doug, I was not personally calling Largoplazo anything. Largoplazo's edit was removed with that edit summary because I removed it with the edits of four other users who were working as a team adding many prods and then confirming them is a disruptive way. I should not have removed his edit with that edit summary, but what happened was that 1 edit looked to be part of the same disruptive editing pattern of the other tag bombers. However Largoplazo's edit history later proved to me that there was no problem with disruptive editing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

F1 financial Crisis

I thank you for accepting the draft article through the AFC, but I'm confused as to why you moved it back. You mentioned the AFD that the article went through, and although there were problems in the article that was previously deleted, the issues have since been resolved. For instance, there are reliable sources which properly cite the crisis of Formula One. There is no original research because the article mentions only sources that the news sources have done. Of course, I can't copy straight from the articles, so I had to paraphrase them so that I can properly site the article. Besides, it had to look like an article and not a news report.

Another issue raised was that the crisis isn't a crisis, but something else. The original title of the article was 2014-15 F1 Financial Crisis, but editors noticed that the topic had to be time specific. So I removed the "2014-15" bit from the title. Still, I'm not sure if "crisis" is an appropriate word. What do you think would be an appropriate title for this article? Please let me know what you think. Once again, thanks for accepting my article through the AFC. FordDixon (talk) 15:00, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rash move?

I don't know what the conventional standards are for moving pages from the draft space to the article space, but I have qualms about your move of Eternal dominating set on 8 March. The mathematical notation looked as if it was copied and pasted when copying and pasting non-standard formatting or characters had the effect of changing their appearance and making them illegible or at least far below usual standards. Thus we saw this line:

γ(G) ≤ m-γ∞(G) ≤ α(G)≤ γ∞(G) ≤ θ(G)

which I have changed to this:

γ(G) ≤ m − γ_∞(G) ≤ α(G) ≤ γ_∞(G) ≤ θ(G)

and this line:

γ∞(G ◻ H) ≥ γ∞(G) γ∞(H)

which I have changed to this:

${\displaystyle \gamma _{\infty }(G\,\Box \,H)\geq \gamma _{\infty }(G)\gamma _{\infty }(H)\,}$

This second one was completely illegible. In the first, the subscripts did not appear as subscripts, the minus sign looked like a hyphen and lacked proper spacing, binary operators lacked spacing in some instances, and things that should be italicized were not.

You could have posted a link to the draft at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics. Many people read that page frequently, and some could have cleaned up the artricle. Michael Hardy (talk) 20:49, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the cleanup. I will notify Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics for mathematics drafts, so that the experts can assist. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:59, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 04:13:38, 12 March 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Steven Paul Fisher

• Steven Paul Fisher (talk · contribs)
  • User:Steven Paul Fisher (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

My article was declined and I have no idea why! Steven Paul Fisher Steven Paul Fisher (talk) 04:13, 12 March 2015 (UTC) Steven Paul Fisher (talk) 04:13, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Grounds for Coffee article was denied - help needed now

Hi Graeme and thank you for reviewing the Draft:Grounds for Coffee article. I haven't submitted drafts before so newbie here. I want to make sure though that it doesn't get deleted so that I can keep working on it and hopefully submit it again in the future. Is it good where it's at now, or do I need to move it to my userspace/sandbox? Also, are you able to in any way quantify how many more articles it would need to reference before it will become notable? Three more? Five more? I was going along the same lines of those articles which are within List of coffeehouse chains specifically if you took a quick look at Caffe Luxxe or Caffè Umbria they have very little notability, but still passed the test somehow and didn't get the speedy deletion. Your help in explaining to me the difference between those and this would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Zul32 (talk) 13:18, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Graeme... I read your comment on my talk page, and yes I believe that there been newspaper or magazine articles on the chain, but I have to contact the owner of the chain directly because they have probably archived it for their own records. Once I have those references then I'll be able to update the article! Thanks for letting me know that I need two good leads on this. Oh and you didn't answer the question of it staying there so it won't get deleted.... is that OK? Zul32 (talk) 20:56, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17:26:36, 12 March 2015 review of submission by GABO:mi

• GABO:mi (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:ESGI – European Sequencing and Genotyping Infrastructure (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear Graeme,

thanks for reviewing my Wikipedia article on the ESGI consortium. I am new here but very excited to contribute. Currently I am working my way through the different steps.

To improve this article, I was planning the following steps and I wanted to check with you beforehand whether this would be appropriate.

For one, I would add a reference link for the project to the corresponding website of the European Commission, which I would assume is a reliable source. This link is currently listed as an “External Link” (ESGI on CORDIS) but I would move it to the “Reference” section by including it right after the first paragraph (“…started its operation on 1. February 2011.”).

Furthermore, I do understand your comment that the ESGI project is not mentioned in the title or abstract of the referenced articles. The work that went into those articles was funded through the ESGI consortium and therefore, ESGI is acknowledged in those publications in their respective “Acknowledgement” sections. Unfortunately, the publications listed are not open-access and thus it is hard for an outsider to confirm this.

My idea here would be, for one, to include another sentence at the end of the current article:

“The efforts of the involved scientists led to several peer-reviewed publications, all of which acknowledge the funding through the ESGI consortium.” (or something like this)

Here, I would then reference the articles already there (as those are high-impact publications) but would also include additional open-access articles that can be checked for the mentioned acknowledgement.

Please let me know what you think. Thanks so much!

Andre

GABO:mi (talk) 17:26, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert Durham

Graeme, Many thanks for accepting my article on Herbert Durham.

I see you are Australian and you may be interested in two other pages I created while doing my research. I am British and live in the UK and while researching one of my ancestors I found a portraitin his photograph album taken by photographers 'Johnstone, O'Shannessy and Co' in Melbourne. I created a page on the photographers Johnstone, O'Shannessy and Co, and also one on the individual Henry James Johnstone

In doing so, I found the Wikipedia page on Clement Hodgkinson very interesting. I have visited Australia many times but was unaware of his activities.

MrArmstrong2 (talk) 09:24, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well Mr Armstrong 2, I read your two articles. It would be good to see many photographer articles in here as an aid to genealogists who have mystery photos. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:25, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jayantilal Gada

user name: Yatin Rewale article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jayantilal_Gada Hello - I've just seen that My article I submitted for review Draft:Jayantilal Gada has been rejected after review, with the feedback that This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. The feedback seems very general and I would like to amend and resubmit, but would like more specifics in order to do so.Please tell me what changes i have to do to get this article accepted.Now I added more references to show subject notibility.If any new references in article are reliable or not pls tell me .thank you Yatin Rewale (talk) 07:29, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Boost Software License for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boost Software License is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boost Software License until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Be..anyone (talk) 15:34, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anna Gili, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cassina and Alessi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aware IM

Hello Graeme,

Thank you for reviewing my article about Aware IM.

This article is about a software system that has been around for more than 12 years and is used by people in more than 30 countries around the world. Not only that, but they also formed a development community that maintains its own resources to help others learn and use Aware IM.

The review comment says "references are either connected with the authors of the software, or are passing mentions". I can assure you that all the references I included into the article (except for one that is clearly marked as such) are from genuine independent Aware IM developers. They are either from people describing their own experience working with Aware IM, or their actual applications built with Aware IM, or both. They are not passing mentions. What can I do to prove the credibility of the references?

Surely Aware IM deserves no less attention than similar tools such as Filemaker, Alpha Five (database) or AppFlower, each of which has its own Wikipedia page even though their history and widespread are apparently different.

Sincerely yours, Pen93 (talk) 23:09, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 21:27:45, 22 March 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by HoneybearUSA

• HoneybearUSA (talk · contribs)
  • User:HoneybearUSA (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Could you please let know what to fix so could approve my article Hi Graeme, I'd like to get this article up and running. Please let me know if there is anything to add or delete for approval. As instructed by the previous reviewer I added more reliable sources including articles from the Washington Post and KQED. I also deleted the SF Classical Voice links as requested. Thank you for your help. HoneybearUSA (talk) 21:27, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HoneybearUSA (talk) 21:27, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Great War Display Team

added a link pointing to Cosford

T. B. Narasimhachar

added a link pointing to Sabha

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

19:40:57, 23 March 2015 review of submission by 165.91.178.45

• 165.91.178.45 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Vladimir I. Bakhmutov (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

165.91.178.45 (talk) 19:40, 23 March 2015 (UTC) Dear Editor: I know well this person (that’s why I am writing) and I have used the references that are reliable and can be verified . I do not understand why you do not like these references taken from the journals and official websites. Would you so kind and explain me what you want.[reply]

18:44:36, 26 March 2015 review of submission by ProfessorMilo

• ProfessorMilo (talk · contribs)
  • User:ProfessorMilo/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for reviewing my first article. I’ve edited it to try to make his notability more obvious. I’m trying to keep it neutral as well though. If you have time, can you review it again and let me know how I did? Thanks. ProfessorMilo (talk) 18:44, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

moving page Draft:Dodecaborane to Dodecaborate

Why did you accept this draft? First, discussion was ongoing. Second, nobody said it was acceptable. Now we have to merge it with Caesium dodecaborate which is where the redirect went, and decide which of the two is the best title. --Bduke (Discussion) 03:30, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is about to get a big cleanup. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:33, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am finding much that is irrelvant or is not correct. Eg synthesis is not by the way suggested. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:51, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why on earth did you make that decision, I thought we worked with consensus around here? BDuke and I had started to hatch a plan, we already have a superior article on a very similar material and now we have to deal with this complicated mess. Jeesh. --Smokefoot (talk) 03:53, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relax. Nothing I have done is irreversible. Your plan can still be implemented. Do you still want to go for moving the cesium compound to the Dodecaborate page? DO you think it is better than this one? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:33, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Right.--Smokefoot (talk) 13:26, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mine G. Kırıkkanat Page submission

Hi Graeme,

What is an independent source? why was this refused, the page exists in French, Turkish and Arabic wikipedia. So I don't understand the reason you did not accept the submission. Can you please help me finding what you call an independent source or fill the blanks.

Kind Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gasova (talk • contribs) 05:14, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can I have a concrete example of Independent references not directly connected with their business. Newspapers and books. As this concerns a Writer, novelist and columnist whose first translated book was published in the USA in 2012.

Thanks a lot.

Kind Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gasova (talk • contribs) 08:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jayantilal Gada

Draft:Jayantilal Gada article:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jayantilal_Gada I waiting for your help.I got your feedback that submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability.I remove old references which are not reliable.Now I added more references about person Jayantilal gada from news papers and other.If any new references in article are reliable or not pls tell me. Thanks youYatin Rewale (talk) 06:43, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Frostburg State University seal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Frostburg State University seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:20, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nominations

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Tessera (Venus) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:52, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Lada Terra at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:52, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Ovda Regio at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:52, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Henshaw? Deleted? Why??

I don't understand why the page - Matt Henshaw - was deleted, the page was new, with new links and information from Europe and the UK? This was my first attempt at a wikipedia page, I spent a whole evening on it, and now I don't even know where or why it has gone?! I don't want to be disillusioned with editing wikipedia this quickly. Thank you for approving it first off, from what I gather. 707 Music (talk) 01:55, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored it G4 is inappropriate in this case, a real new AFD is needed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, what is an AFD? 707 Music (talk) 17:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An AFD is a deletion debate where a consensus is determined whether to delete or keep an article. Read about it at WP:AFD. The Matt Henshaw page was deleted before after such a debate. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Henshaw and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Censored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:40, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK Noms

LINKS!!!! Johnbod (talk) 22:40, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bai Chunli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese Chemical Society. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Graeme,

In the log on wiki/infobeans I see that it was restored by you in March 2014. However in March 2015 it was deleted by another user. I'm Avinash Sethi co-founder of InfoBeans and would like to own and restore the page. I seek your advise on guidelines for setting up the page. InfoBeans is in existence since year 2000 and has several government and industry affiliations and mentions which will make it eligible to be part of wikipedia. We have 400 people working across 3 cities including Bay Area. Kindly help me in restoring the page.

Avinash VirtualAvi (talk) 10:45, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Henshaw

I understand why you restored Matt Henshaw. What I don't understand why you restored an old version. Why did you dump all changes after your edit? duffbeerforme (talk) 11:25, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I only restored a range out of the history that was related to the current draft article, and not the earlier versions. If you want I can restore the versions deleted in the prior AFD and the associated G4 and decline. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm talking about edits more recent than Cleaning up accepted Articles for creation submission. Such as removal of bad charts. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You badcharts edits are now reinstated. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:48, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Graeme - appreciate your feedback and pointers. I will prepare a draft page referring to coverage by reputed newspapers and other institutions to prove notability. It can be on sandbox and then with approval from veterans like yourself can move to main site. It will take 2 weeks for me to put together inputs from independent sources. Thanks very much. VirtualAvi (talk) 12:17, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--requesting self block== I had also requested this at User talk:JamesBWatsonbut i thought that he might have been inactive. I want a self block for 4 years

DYK for Zamama (volcano)

On 19 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Zamama (volcano), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Zamama volcanic center on Io had an average output power of 139.6 gigawatts between 1996 and 1999? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zamama (volcano). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:22, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2998 page views

DYK for Lada Terra

On 21 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lada Terra, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that shield volcano outflows cover 48% of Lada Terra on Venus (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lada Terra. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 21:16, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3049 views

DYK for Tessera (Venus)

On 22 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tessera (Venus), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that tesserae on Venus are areas of high radar reflectivity? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tessera (Venus). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:32, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2912 views

Praveen Kumar Nagercoil

I just wanted to point out that this person's userpage was twice speedy deleted with those grounds before(as well as regular articles with that content, deleted several times). The person seems to have no interest in contributing to Wikipedia other than to advertise themselves or treating Wikipedia like social media. 331dot (talk) 10:09, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did not make the rules for U5, but I read it especially for this (non)delete. You might have more luck with db-spam, or an MFD to get a final decision. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not suggesting you made the rules, just that others had a different interpretation. I see that resumes are not included in U5, though the page seemed to go beyond a resume to advertising themselves(or at least their presence on social media). Just a different opinion, no big deal- though could you not have simply used a more proper rationale to delete it yourself? (maybe you can't, I'm not sure). 331dot (talk) 10:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was not so bad that I would have deleted it as an advert, but close. I did delete another u5 this way in the last hour. But if you tag it that way I will leave it for someone else to consider. Our userpages can advertise us and our outside world to some extent. So there is a grey area. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:24, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Someone else seems to have just blanked the page for now citing WP:UPNO as a reason so it probably doesn't need to be worried about unless the person restores the content. Thank you for your comments 331dot (talk) 10:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_History_Troupe

I'm a bit concerned that the outcome of the above case is something that you should maybe take on board. It is important to really get familiar with the guidelines on notability if you are reviewing new articles. I don't think that article should ever have been accepted. --_nonsense ferret 01:46, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are taking this too seriously. The writer had a chance to comment, but did not do so. But I do not know if you informed them about the AFD. A certain percentage of AFCs will be nominated for deletion by people like you and get deleted. But a fair number also survive AFD. The alternative if you think non acceptance is better than deletion after it has been accepted is to propose returning to a draft state. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My comment is not intended to cause you offence, I know you do a lot of great work here, I'm simply raising a concern. Your view that this had any chance of being deemed notable seemed to me so far out of step the practices at AfD discussions as to make me raise an eyebrow. Let's be clear, it wasn't a close call or 50/50 chance of success. --_nonsense ferret 12:10, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ovda Regio

On 27 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ovda Regio, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Ovda Regio (pictured), Venus' largest crustal plateau, covers an area of about 15,000,000 km^2 (5,800,000 sq mi)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ovda Regio. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2808 page views. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:50, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Angela Hutchinson

Could you please restore Angela Hutchinson as a draft page for me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashleydotson286 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ganiki Chasma

On 1 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ganiki Chasma, which you recently nominated. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ganiki Chasma. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Allen3 ^talk 00:11, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3237 page views.

An old thesis is reliable?

Why on earth add so much (or any really) info from an old PhD thesis that was not even vetted by publication? It doesnt even count as a primary ref? Can you imagine if we started transferring information from PhD and MS theses into Wikipedia? --Smokefoot (talk) 22:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am using this as a secondary source, including only what it reports from other sources. I am not adding any more of the research in this thesis. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:24, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well in any case, the article is pretty self-respecting now. --Smokefoot (talk) 01:37, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stellar Spectral Types by NOAO.jpg

FYI, I have nominated File:Stellar Spectral Types by NOAO.jpg for deletion rather than making a unilateral decision on the {{di-replacable fair use}} tag. Please see Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 May 4 for the discussion if interested. --B (talk) 00:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Still no answer from Shirt58

Hi Graeme Bartlett, as you told me I've tried to contact Shirt58 in order to understand which were the part to modify. I had no answers. Now, can i ask you if i can do some modification to the main article you moved as a draft in order to be reintroduced as an article? Let me know, so I can procede to edit on the draft. Thank you for your time! I look forward to hearing from you --RedBud (talk) 07:34, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Federal Police

I'm watching Australian Federal Police because an LTA has used it for various campaigns, so I noticed the strange IP edit summary that you have now removed. Special:Contributions/202.61.5.22 shows that he's been doing that for a few months, and Google shows he spams it elsewhere. However, the few edits I checked were quite reasonable, so I left it. However, you might want to let him know that an edit summary like that is not suitable here. If wanted, I'll post a message, if I can follow up with you if I notice it repeated. Johnuniq (talk) 09:22, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are more observant than me. I saw the text spammed over other places on the internet. I will issue a notice about edit summaries. Is there an edit summary search tool that can look across all edits? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:35, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This tool searches for text in edit summaries, but only for one user. I doubt there are any tools which search edit summaries for all users, so a search of a database dump would be needed—overkill. Johnuniq (talk) 11:44, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I need the overkill option! I suppose it could have been on the toolserver if that was still live. Our user here has a small enough number of edits to see them all easily. But if another IP was used it would be obscure. Even though the IP was previously warned, I think it a bit excessive to block at this point. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:21, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was not thinking clearly when I wrote my last comment—the most commonly used database dumps are a snapshot of current pages only, and they do not contain history or edit summaries. A dump including edit summaries would be massively large, and searching it would require a server-level computer. It's possible to do a full-text search of articles because a large index has been built to support such searches. However, there is no index of edit summaries, so a search would require examining every edit by every user, checking the edit summary, and accumulating the results—an operation that would probably take several days on a big computer. There is a tool for searching the database, but quite a lot of SQL knowledge and an understanding of the database organization would be needed. Also, I suspect they must have some method of monitoring long-runnning queries, and the run would be stopped somehow. In short, I don't know how to search edit summaries, but someone at WP:VPT would know if it is feasible. Johnuniq (talk) 01:06, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My need is not significant however, it would be mainly to find more spammers and socks and their earlier work after they were discovered. Afterwards an edit filter can notice. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:57, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chaac-Camaxtli Region

On 4 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chaac-Camaxtli Region, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Chaac-Camaxtli Region of Io contains a variety of different surfaces, including bright floor material (pictured) probably made of solid sulfur dioxide? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chaac-Camaxtli Region. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Panyd^The muffin is not subtle 19:34, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

4255 page views

Persondata RfC

Hi, You participated in the previous Persondata RfC. I just wanted to notify you that a new RfC regarding the methodical removal of Persondata is taking place at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Thanks, —Msmarmalade (talk) 07:53, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Surface features of Venus

On 12 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Surface features of Venus, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the surface features of Venus include volcanoes, impact craters and aeolian landforms? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Surface features of Venus. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 06:25, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EGS-zs8-1 has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. EGS-zs8-1, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated  to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 04:05, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Secondary crater

On 18 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Secondary crater, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that secondary crater formation requires a primary crater, sufficient gravity, and enough velocity in the ejected material? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Secondary crater. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Thanks for your article Victuallers (talk) 00:03, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• 2591 page views

DYK for EGS-zs8-1

On 19 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article EGS-zs8-1, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that EGS-zs8-1 is the oldest and most distant galaxy ever observed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/EGS-zs8-1. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 12:03, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• 6847 page views (this had over 3000 views in the first 3 days anyway)

No reply for RedBud - for AdvaCare Draft modifications

Hi Graeme Bartlett, We still haven't heard back from you with regards to my AdvaCare page. I last wrote to you on the 11th asking if the changes were okay. Could you please let me know asap so we can move forward with it. Thank you! --RedBud (talk) 01:29, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did reply on 4 May saying this: Some wording still gives it a promotional sounding tone: dedicated, demands of the market, highlighted, focused and trademarked. The references need to include much more independent writings for this to be able to be an article though. What references there all look to be written by the company. The WHO content is just one line. Are there any newspaper stories, or journal articles? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:55, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know, but I've made modifications on the draft, changing the words you suggested me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:AdvaCare_Pharma Try to look at it.--RedBud (talk) 06:15, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

no comment

re your declining, in AGF you or them...User:JarrahTree 15:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to comment on VP proposal: Establish WT:MoS as the official site for style Q&A on Wikipedia

You are being contacted because of your participation in the proposal to create a style noticeboard. An alternate solution, the full or partial endorsement of the style Q&A currently performed at WT:MoS, is now under discussion at the Village Pump. Darkfrog24 (talk) 21:29, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you restore a few histories + talk page history

• Archie Karas
• Vajazzling (is it possible to combine histories) not the article but the redirect + talk page
• Jim's Steaks + talk page

Valoem ^talk ^contrib 13:14, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• @Valoem: all 5 restored. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:10, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Is their anyway to combine history with Vajazzling and Vajazzle? If not can you restore history for Vajazzle? Valoem ^talk ^contrib 23:40, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really want to do that as all the editions look to be independent, and overlap in time, however I can do Vajazzle, leaving out something that should not be there. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 01:15, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, history restore of Vajazzle works as well, just to show evolution of article. Thanks! Valoem ^talk ^contrib 01:18, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done history is back. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:49, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Few more requests please userfy both article plus talk for Organizations in A Song of Ice and Fire and Wars in A Song of Ice and Fire, and this Talk:Yo Sé Que Mentía overturned at DRV. Also I do mind if I restore this article it passes GNG very clearly person is also notable for more than one event. Based on this DRV the close was determined to be in administrator discretion, however this administrator has since been permanently banned, so discretion should fall on active editors. Since you were kind enough to restore this for me I thought it would be prudent to ask. I found these two sources as well Telegraph, Inquisitr. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 09:39, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One more Brian G. Gilmartin. Is this just a redirect Brian Gilmartin or is there more? Sorry it so difficult I can't see delete material. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 10:10, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirming Brian Gilmartin was just a redirect as you can tell from the deletion reason. For ‎Diana Napolis, the DRV statement about administrator discretion, means that the administrator Secret had the discretion to select this kind of closure. Not that anyone has authorisation to restore. However on that topic you should address the issues raised in the AFD. Are there BLP violations? Is it a BLP1E? (or can you show notability based on more than the one event, ie coverage in publications at other times?) Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:18, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I trust my judgment here. I've added three additional sources just in case. I believe arguments from some editors in the AfD favor keeping to be compelling enough. An extensive investigation was taking place for multiple cases of stalking over an extended period of time. I'll restore it with the additional sources and no prejudiced against renomination. Valoem ^talk ^contrib 12:36, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wars in A Song of Ice and Fire was already moved to User:Jclemens/Wars in A Song of Ice and Fire so you can just go here and improve it. In your userspace you now have User:Valoem/Brian G. Gilmartin and its talk. For the now userfied User:Valoem/Organizations in A Song of Ice and Fire you will have to find extra sourcing that shows notability of the topic. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:49, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Molybdenum ditelluride

On 27 May 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Molybdenum ditelluride, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that molybdenum ditelluride has potential for use as an infrared detector? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Molybdenum ditelluride. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Harrias ^talk 07:32, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2286 page views

SCWISTlogo.gif deleted in 2010

Should I update this image again under different name? The page using this logo was deleted. I am working on releasing it again and will need this image. Gpeja (talk) 22:13, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the article is recreated then it would be worth having a logo for the organisation. If you actually hold the copyright on the logo, then you can make it free and release it to commons. But it was used under fair use and so cannot hang around if it is not used on an actual article. Once the User:Gpeja/Society for Canadian Women in Science and Technology page is moved back to an article, I can restore the logo for you. I don't think the logo needs a different name though. Does the organisation have a new logo? If so then it can be update when there is an actual article to put it on. (In userspace we cannot use fair use images). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:45, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it now to Draft:Society for Canadian Women in Science and Technology. Gpeja (talk) 18:00, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Reference errors on 7 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Eta Carinae page, your edit caused an ISSN error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted article

Hi Graeme,

You deleted a page for "Pan European ICT & eBusiness Network for SME". Why did you delete this page? The organisation operates european wide and is the official representation for all SME companies in Europa. They are instructed from the EU (projects: http://www.it-sme.eu/projects/). They have the same importance than UEAPME (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UEAPME). You wrote " No evidence of awards, charting or in depth coverage in independent reliable sources" as reason, but what kind of sources should I add? UEAPME for example doesn't have better sources in my eyes.

I am sorry for my late answer. In the last 2 weeks I had been on vacation.

Looking forward to reading your answer.

BEst, Andreas