User talk:Graeme Bartlett/archive 12

Older talk is in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 archives.

If I deleted your article, it may be possible for me to restore it. Please post a message for reconsideration of the deletion. and you can read Why was my page deleted?

please add your talk at the bottom of the page:



Maximus Carontus Page Deleted

I have no idea how Wikipedia works. Jsu now trying to figure it out. But Maximus Carontus gets googled. It has had thousands of marketing dollars spent on just the logo, so people will google the logo to find out what it is and wind up back to the marketing site that created it. I figured it would be a good idea to post a wiki article on actual person behind logo. I am new to Wiki and trying to figure out how it works as I go along. Was going to continue to update and elaborate the article. Please reconsider the "A7" deletion. Thanks! maxcarpro@gmail.com (Sorry if I just hi-jacked someone elses post. Wasn't sure how to write my own.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxcarpro (talk • contribs) 16:47, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Vanatoru tennis hoax

All articles on Wikipedia regarding Sebastian Gabriel Vanatoru/Vînătoru are blatant hoaxes and the articles are created by a sock puppeteer. He is a vandal too modifying many tennis articles and replacing players name with his own in competitions like the 4 Grand Slams. You can see here some archived deleted articles with this hoax: User_talk:NawlinWiki#Vanatoru_vandal and here: User_talk:NawlinWiki/Archive_41#Tennis_hoaxes_by_Sebiku_and_socks. Thank you. Please block this user. (Tennis Helper (talk) 14:01, 6 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

re:hoax tagging.

I tagged Route 46 (MTA Maryland) and Route 47 (MTA Maryland) as hoaxes because the article summary summarizes them as quickbus routes currently operating in the MTA Maryland bus network. These routes don't exist.--ETLamborghini (talk) 23:42, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

You have new messages
You have new messages
Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at 1234r00t's talk page.
Message added 22:17, 7 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I made two userbox and the template above! How do they look? Mr. R00t Talk 22:19, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't finished my page, I have a lot more to add on it and I am still learning how this works. I don't know where to store it until I finish. Please reconsider and give me another chance to finish the Hazy Malaze page. Hazy abi 12:50, 8 July 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hazy abi (talk • contribs)

FYI

Just FYI Portal:Telehealth looks like the same guy that tried to make Portal:HealthLink BC ...hope i am not bugging you :) Moxy (talk) 01:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The Barnstar of Integrity
Thank you for doing right by new editors Moxy (talk) 02:06, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Please delete Oluf III of Denmark too. Thanks. --Againme (talk) 15:19, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Highlight films

Please reconsider the speedy on this one. The article claims that the founder/owner has won awards, not that the company has. Also note that the sole contributor appears to be the same person, introducing a massive COI and spam concerns. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 01:40, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy on Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (United Arab Emirates)

You declined the speedy deletion at Telecommunications Regulatory Authority (United Arab Emirates). The entire text of the article is an obvious copyvio. See [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Is there a reason for the declined speedy? SnottyWong chatter 03:52, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lazkao Txiki

Hi Graeme. Can you please take another look at this speedy? From what I remember it seemed to assert notability fairly strongly. Googling his name gives 160,000 results, and he has an article on a couple of foreing-language Wikis ([7] and [8]), so I'm thinking A7 may not apply here. Whether he's notable or not I'm not sure, but some of those Google hits look quite promising. Alzarian16 (talk) 10:24, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll try to improve it some time over the weekend. I think there's enough material out there, although it's mostly in foreign languages so I may take some time to sort through it. Alzarian16 (talk) 13:27, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Sean Meenan Page

Hi why was this page deleted? There are a lot of pages dedicated to people on Wikipedia and Sean Meenan is actually mentioned is a couple of them. He's an american businessman who's pushing the environmental movement forward in each of his businesses. He's an initial investor of etsy, which is noted on their wikipedia page, and currently co-owns the newest Cafe Habana with Rande Gerber, who also has a Wikipedia page. Please reconsider the deletion. Thanks Ecoeatery (talk) 18:25, 9 July 2010 (UTC) Jeff[reply]

hi ok so i want to know why did my page get deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shaquille "Shaqcago" Smith (talk • contribs) 07:04, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why was page deleted

Information on "Peter Facione" page you delted is 100% true and verifiable. No copyright violations were involved. If it is not appropriate to post page about self, then that is a different matter. It is easy enough to have someone else post it. Please advise. Am new to Wikipedia's policies, quiks, norms, and customs. Thanks for your help. P Facione. pfacione@measuredreasons.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pfacione (talk • contribs) 20:13, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Again, thank you. The bio I am trying to put in Wiki is same as the one in Leading Authorities, is same as one on my business website, is same as one in my last book by Pearson Education - more or less with minor changes. Why? Same person wrote them. Leading Authorities does not have copyright, even if they try to assert it. I have copyright on that bio. So the question is whether to simply reinstate it, or to take the time to rewrite it. It would be easiest all around if you reinstate it. There was nothing plagerized or false in the bio. Please advise. Thanks. Pfacione (talk) 21:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC) --Pfacione (talk) 21:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Communiqué "Geochange"

You edited this article Communiqué "Geochange" and remove hangon as infringing text removed. But now article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. And some admins want to delete this article. Please help me to keep my article. Explain me what i must edit. Thanks.Ismail Valiyev (talk) 07:59, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Celtic Heartbeat Records

Why not merge this subject instead of speedy deleting [9]? A lot of damage has been done to the encyclopedia because of these improper speedy deletions. Please exercise greater consideration in the future and consider using AfD instead, so other editors will have an opportunity to weigh in. Also, can you please restore the article so it can be merged? Here's a source [10] took a single google books search to find. The backlinks also need restoration.Freakshownerd (talk) 17:28, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:TeleComNasSprVen

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at TeleComNasSprVen's talk page.
Message added 00:43, 17 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 00:43, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You learn something new everyday. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 16:31, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aß listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aß. Since you had some involvement with the Aß redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 01:12, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Time

WRT RfD#Aß, there is a back-story here.

I hate to waste even more time over this, but I feel it only reasonable to fill you in on the background here, which really, really is a waste of time.

User talk:Chzz/Archive 24#Crint Eastwood and D77t and D78t

Which was archived to preserve sanity, but continues, User talk:Chzz#Crint Eastwood and D77t and D78t.

I am sorry; I know this is whole thing is pointless.  Chzz  ►  09:22, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Typhronemon5...

...is apparently a sock of the banned user Brucejenner. It's up to you, but indeffing him would normally be called for. Also, I have asked for semi-protection of the "Marriage" page that he keeps attacking under various guises. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 21:57, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes if he is a sock, is there any evidence of this? Semi protect will just stop the band new sock though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:15, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the SPI: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brucejenner The latest filer has asked for a CU "sweep" to see if there are other sleeper accounts lurking. It wouldn't surprise me, since BJ has been a recurring abuser for about the past year. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 22:27, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This user had been blocked indefinitely. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:28, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Changes Camp Canberra Aug 11, 2010

I saw you're listed in the ACT Wikipedian page and thought, by chance, you might like to come to this:

RecentChangesCamp, Canberra is being held at the University of Canberra, Building 7, Room 7XC37 on 11 August 2010.
ABOUT | REGISTRATION | SCHEDULE

Hope we'll see you and friends there, but please register so we can prepare lunch. Leighblackall (talk) 07:19, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

/* Global Network for the Forecasting of Earthquakes */

Dear Mr.Graeme Bartlett

Please join debate. And tell your opinion. Thanks in advance

Best regards

--Shahin Khalilov (talk) 06:39, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfair Deletion

The deletion of Gofnet.com by you is very unfair. The article was an essential ingredient for Wikipedia and should not be deleted. It describes Gofnet.com, which is a song search engine, a different concept in itself. Its deletion should be re-considered. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajit garga (talk • contribs) 13:42, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore Gofnet.com

Dear Sir,
Kindly restore the article for Gofnet.com --Ajit garga (talk) 13:53, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kig (Slur)

I really think Kig (Slur) is an attack page on somebody named Kig. Everard Proudfoot (talk) 00:18, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Band of the hand poster.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Band of the hand poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:28, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Please can you block me until 2 august 2010 Because of my very important exams

Thanks RahulChoudhary 13:59, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Irish Go Association

Can I ask you the rational behind the declining of the CSD on the above, as even the refs supplied are not about the organisation and the page makes no claim to significance as I can tell. Codf1977 (talk) 12:39, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just felt like this was a page worth keeping. But no reason solid enough to put on a edit summary. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:58, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough - I have opened an AfD on it. Codf1977 (talk) 13:25, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No big deal but

[11]. Note in the future the advice here that bans apply regardless of 'good faith'. By declining to speedy delete the article started by the banned user, it's turned the AfD discussion into a battleground with his sockpuppets and an ANI report. Banned users are disruptive to the entire project as a whole and that is why they are banned. Giving an inch of help has been more disruptive and time wasting than just deleting their contributions entirely would have been. It's not a huge complaint, but something to consider next time you run into the situation. Thanks. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

Speedy deletes need some evidence, so for banned user or socks there should be a link to SPI or ban notice (could be on user page). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:20, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Johann Schmid

Sinatra Saga Vol.2

Just to let you know that the above page which you deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement has been recreated with the same content - I have tagged it for speedy deletion. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 18:21, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PS the tag should not have been G4 as there was no deletion discussion, but it was a G12 copyright infringement. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:16, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, I have noted that for future reference. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 22:34, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you declined the speedy for File:CBF logo.svg. However, it violates two conditions of free-use: it's an svg and thus not low-resolution and it doesn't have a rationale for every use. Also, a number of the rationales given contradict each other in their usage. As no svg version would be suitable, this file should be deleted, as uploading a "smaller" version would have no effect.

Additional discussion is at WP:VPM#CBF Logo. OrangeDog (τ • ε) 22:35, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Please see User talk:LessHeard vanU. If you follow the same terms, by all means, block me. Please follow the terms carefully as far as block duration, reason, and page protecting my user talk page so that I don't have to police it (which defeats the purpose of being blocked). MVOO (talk) 23:56, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just came across UKAIS and thought you should know: the appropriate process for dealing with articles where the content has been copied but permission is asserted is (in addition to declining the speedy deletion as you did) to blank the article using {{subst:copyvio|url=insert URL here}}, as many OTRS releases never come through or are inadequate. Wikipedia:Copyright violations has more details if you feel like wading through it. Cheers! VernoWhitney (talk) 00:27, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding to this so quickly! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:42, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zenage Studios

Kindly restore Zenage Studios article page. This company has been creating several apps that are available on Apple Store and Android Market. You can find its references in Apple itunes and Android market. Zenage Studios has also produced iphone apps for "The Marathi Abhimaangeet" or " The Marathi Abhimaan Geet" - the song with 112 established singers and a chorus line of 356 singers from all over India. You will find references for this also.

Kbhardwaj (talk) 03:57, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy blanking

Hi, Graeme. I'm in the process of courtesy blanking some content for a vanished user. I hope you don't mind. He is very adamant about it, and I would hope to accommodate him in this if we can. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK I will let you get away with it! (and check if you are nominating deletions also). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:28, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. :) The only content he created seems to be Johann Schmid. I've removed his username from the log, but didn't feel comfortable deleting it. You and I are the only editors of consequence, other than him. I don't mind if you don't. When working on new content, I tried researching the guy at google books but did not find any other sources; he may be of borderline notability anyway. Of course, I don't mind retaining it, either, if you prefer. I really don't know what constitutes notability for WWII pilots. :/ I've removed his contributions from every talk page where I found it. That only leaves this change, which is not even creative enough to require attribution. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:59, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My contribution to Johann Schmid was deleting some text and leaving the original writings of the user, and sticking on a reference section. So essentially nothing. I know nothing about the topic either! I think the article claims enough importance to not be a speedy candidate, but leave it to others to AFD if they want. However I would not be surprised if the vanished user comes back in the future! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:26, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Trunki

Hi

I was wondering if you could take another look at User:Trunki which you speedy declined. The main reason i speedied was the "article" is because it is on the users page and not a wiki article page, with the username being the name of the product. The content itself appears ok, and should possibly be moved to its own article page? Also, the username appears to be a violation of the Username policy, specifically WP:USERNAME#Company/group names.

Thanks CalumH93|talk 22:26, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your points are correct, I will move it and block user! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:27, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Rogers (writer)

My intent originally was to complete a nomination at the request of an IP editor but noticed that it had previously been deleted at AFD so I decided to give G4 a shot first. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:29, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is OK, but article now has much more content, so I think it does need a proper AFD, with no speedy delete shortcut. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:31, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Rogers (writer) (2nd nomination). --Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:34, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be able to expedite a page protection request at WP:RPP for me?

On the article Holidayz. At least two IPs have been removing the Afd template from it repeatedly all night (or day, depending) and I'm requesting semiprotection at least until the discussion is over in 4 days. WP:RPP has a considerable backlog at the moment, given that my other protection request, which was considerably less urgent and needs a little more thought and discussion, hasn't been touched for almost two hours. But the above one aside, semiprotection of Holidayz needs expediting. Thanks. elektrikSHOOS 09:43, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, someone else got it, thanks anyway. elektrikSHOOS 09:45, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah Finlay McWalter got to it 8 minutes back! There seems to be few admins active at the moment. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:47, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yep. As soon as all the sysops go offline, it's when all the edit warring, page blanking and moving about of pages starts, I tell you. :D elektrikSHOOS 09:56, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moves over redirects?

Hi,

Thanks for taking care of moving the articles on characters from Twelft Night. I note in your edit summary that you wrote “but requestor could have done this themselves”. Last I tried moving an article over a redirect I was unable to do so. Was there something special about just Maria (Twelfth Night), or should I in general be able to do this (and if so, could you point me at the relevant documentation)? --Xover (talk) 11:25, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks. I'd tried it before, but the crucial bit I was missing was probably “and no edits to the redirect”. Anyways, thanks for the help, and the explanation. --Xover (talk) 11:31, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Your speedy action and civility concerning the overly-hasty speedy deletion of Selden Long is much appreciated.

Georgejdorner (talk) 17:38, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much

What would I need to make it better? --Philyboy2012 (talk) 19:40, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete of Houston two step

Hi there. You declined the speedy deletion for Houston two step, saying it wasn't an advert. I was wondering what your reasoning was for declining. Also, do you think prodding the article would be appropriate, or should I go to AfD? Thanks. —Torchiest talk/contribs 03:37, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information and tips! —Torchiest talk/contribs 04:10, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nishan (actor)

Hi. I see that you have deleted the article Nishan (actor). Can you please restore the page as it is or as a subpage of my talk page so that I can expand it? Thanks in advance. --Sreejith K (talk) 07:18, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thats for restoring the article to User:Sreejithk2000/Nishan (actor). I was not aware that the article had hardly anything in it before I requested restoration. I have added more links to the article now, but I am not getting anything from the web to be added on to this page. Can you check whether this subpage can be restored to the original article space now or should I wait to expand the article further. Thanks. --Sreejith K (talk) 07:45, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Speedy

You declined my speedy tagging of User:Many_A_Flower since the original MFD just decided to move the article to a subpage rather than the users userpage. The outcome of your speedy decline ultimately ends up with the consensus of the MFD not being honoured.

However please take a look:

The original article Jason Steed, Fledgling Jason Steed were deleted via AFD, the latter twice. The author decided to keep it on their userpage User:Beehold where the MFD determined to move it to the subpage. Since then we have a user (not sure which) try to recreate the article at Fledgling Jason Steed this was deleted as a G4. To circumvent that it was then recreated as Jason Steed (Book series) by User:Onthemap and again redeleted as G4. User:Onthemap also pasted a copy as their userpage. Looking a bit closer we also have User:BonfireCharlie which is a copy of the article.

Now either all these users User:BonfireCharlie, User:Onthemap and User:Many_A_Flower are all the same as User:Beehold determined to show contempt for the consensus to delete this stuff by the multiple recreations, or they are different users, in which case the copies other than User:Beehold/Fledgling Jason Steed are all unattributed copvios. Either way I can't see how it can be legitimate to retain all these copies despite the various deletions and debates.

Please advise. --82.7.40.7 (talk) 12:53, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mahane Israel (Chabad)

Hi, you declined a speedy on this article because of lots of refs - however none of them actual mention the organisation - although some of them mention an organisation with a slightly different name - but I see no claim to notability only to existence. noq (talk) 23:39, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let the AFD determine the consensus. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:48, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Helium hydride ion

Hi there

The consensus which has emerged from WP:CHEMICALS is that chemboxes are for compounds not for ions, of which this is one. If you disagree with that, you can bring it up there. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 05:12, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for Deletion

I am writing to inquire why the page "WQAT" was removed. Everything on the page is legitimate and verifiable. Can you elaborate please. Also were you the one who noticed and flagged the page or did someone else flag it for deletion? Thanks!

Mogwog (talk) 02:13, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Action is Requested

In discussions registered editors such as Onef9day, ActiveBanana, Sodabottle have recommended to retain (or opposed deletion) the RS based Kannada script in the Periyar E. V. Ramasamy article. I also support it them. Please add Kannada script in the lead. Thanks Appagaru (talk) 07:00, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot see that there is a consensus yet. For my own opinion is that GA does not mean the article is frozen. "senior editor" means nothing in this debate. I prefer more rather than less, but to meet verifiability there has to be a sourse that gives the Kannada script name, and it actually has to be useful in someway to have it. You don't actually need an admin to make the change as it is only semiprotected. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:24, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Administrator: Thanks for your response. It is very helpful. The article already has a RS (23) that states "He has declared himself as a Kannadiga in many of his meetings. An excerpt from one of his meetings: "Many people say I am not a Tamilian myself. They are saying this because my mother tongue is Kannada. Many think that I am a Telugu Nayudu.The truth is that I am a Kannadiga from the Balija Nayudu caste. 'Periyar E.V.R's speeches, Dravidar Kazhakam publication, 1990, Chennai'[12]". Hope I can correct the article to its original status that had Kannada script. Appagaru (talk) 15:22, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to intrude here. My opinion as an involved editor: I thought removing kannada script would reduce the endless edit wars/discussions instead of starting a new one. In summary : the subject's mother tongue was Kannada but he himself is only notable for his activities among Tamils. For transliteration/transcription purposes Tamil script is enough (both phonetically and as a native language search string). The Kannada script is useless as a search string because there is minuscule coverage of the subject in Kannada sources (as the subject is/was not notable in Kannada speaking areas and is/was not widely covered there). So the case for including Kannada script boils down to ethnic/linguistic pride and claim "he is one of ours".--Sodabottle (talk) 16:08, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately Appagaru's argument does not justify the use of the script. You will have to find that others have written about the person in the script, and supply a reference. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:33, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for Deletion of Miracle Bell

Hi Graeme, I was just wondering why my page on the band Miracel Bell was deleted? Miracle Bell are a local Co. Kildare band from Ireland, and they have entered the Official Irish music charts (IRMA) on a couple of occasions. Do i need to provide citations to have them included, or is it simply that they are not a big enough topic for an Encyclopedia? Thanks, Conor —Preceding unsigned comment added by Conorm4 (talk • contribs) 15:33, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:JenniferPearce

Please note that this is a user page, not an article, and thus any text not about the editor but rather designed to promote a company or location is pretty much by definition "spam." It's not even a subpage, so it's can't realistically be considered a userspace draft either. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 18:23, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Same with User:Dan yesu. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 18:25, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Talk page stalker here, I'm letting both of them know that their userpages may be against policy. elektrikSHOOS 18:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am treating them as article drafts, more suitable as a subpage, but as new users they probably don't know that. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:14, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So I would suggest that you move the user pages like this to a subpage and let the user know. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:16, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you do that since, as an IP editor, I am unable to do so. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 20:37, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Good point I confused you with User:elektrikSHOOS. I note that MFDs have voted to move them. However I am hoping that the user gets the page ready for mainspace and can move it. I will move them at 69's req. 21:07, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Black Moss Reservoirs

Thanks for deleting the page. You said that A3 isn't quite valid for talk pages. Which CSD catagory should I have used instead? — Fly by Night (talk) 22:37, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Southeast mediterranean annotated geography.jpg

Hi Graeme. You seem to forgot to G8 the above file. Just to point out. Thanks and regards. Rehman(+) 13:19, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated the above file with a bunch of other files that I F2'd. While doing that, I came across this file; does it fall in F2 as well (looking at the FP status)? Thanks for your time. Rehman(+) 13:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
For File talk:Southeast mediterranean annotated geography.jpg it had project tags, I leave these on even if the page moved to commons as otherwise that project info would be lost. The other talk comments may have been moved to commons, but I did not check this out, it would be a bit of an attribution checking problem. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:04, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the tip here and on my talkpage. Best regards. Rehman(+) 00:39, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daurte Design Page Deleted

I was trying to create a page for Duarte Design, because for some reason the previous one (which I never saw) was deleted. It said the page was deleted because it replicated one that was already deleted. I'm confused as to how that could be (due to the fact that I didn't make the previous one) and what was wrong with it? Thanks. Jecwick (talk) 17:27, 5 August 2010 (UTC)Jecwick[reply]

Nagapattnam Refinery

Good work. I'm impressed. And a good lesson, as well. 98.82.0.102 (talk) 23:32, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User:The Obento Musubi/Secret page/Signatures and User:The Obento Musubi/Secret page/Barnstar icon

The MfD can be found here, hosted by yours truly. Just a friendly observation: I'm surprised that you deleted the latter but kept the former. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 04:30, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

thanks for your help with User:J8079s/Rotary direct lift devices/workpage its a project I hope to get back to when I have some time. J8079s (talk) 15:36, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]