en User talk:Gr8white

Welcome!

Hello, Gr8white, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Just H 19:42, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moscow

You are a member of WikiProject Russia. I wanted to let you know the article Moscow is in Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Moscow list now. --Hirakawacho 10:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move of man-powered flight

Yes. I object. The official (Fédération Aéronautique Internationale) description of this subject is manpowered flight. See [1] JMcC 17:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your reference refers to manpowered aircraft but I can't find any reference to man-powered flight, which is the title of this article. In fact, ALL the external references in this article refer to human-powered flight, not man-powered. So I don't see that as a valid reason. Gr8white 19:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:1961 alye parusa.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:1961 alye parusa.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:28, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Gr8white,

Thank you very much for correcting my grammar in White Nights Festival. Also thank you for the right image. This image is a VHS and DVD cover in Russia, and also a book cover and a promotional poster in Russia. This image has been distributed in millions of flyers and promo posters given to school graduates in Leningrad, and other parts of Russia over decades. I remember having it given to me and to others by our teachers at the end of every school year. It's meaning was similar to "School's out for Summer!" and "Your dreams are coming true!" This promo image is now part of the Soviet history, it should qualify under fair use. Steve shelok honov 07:44, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Who Put the Bomp (song). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Make sure if you are going to talk about angels' rectums, you get a solid reference for this. Tanthalas39 (talk) 02:11, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. I still think that really needs to be referenced, but I'll leave it up to you. Tanthalas39 (talk) 02:30, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Piekha

Hi, Gr8white,

You are right. There was no written biography of Piekha until 2007. The only one titled "Edita" was written and published in 2007 upon her request.[2] This article illustrates problems with any written/published biographical material about Edita Piekha.[3] A musicologist from the St. Petersburg Conservatory, named Aleksey Lopatin, was chosen by Piekha to write her biography, because she read and liked his publications. However, when the book was published and presented to Piekha on her 70th anniversary, she became very, very upset while reading her own biography, and threatened with legal action. Her lawyer, Irina Tulubyeva, insists that Lopatin did not have approval from Piekha, but the publisher, "Eksmo," has a record that Piekha recommended him. The book was recalled from book stores, but many copies were already sold, making Piekha even more upset. She was displeased with some parts of her biography having allusions to such popular characters as Cinderella, Galatea, and Penelope. Her lawyer mentioned that she is on the hunt buying the book trying to destroy all copies out there, but its too late. As for her studies at the Leningrad Conservatory, was it a transfer, or something different; she took singing classes there in 1956/57 while still a university student, so formally she was taking classes at both schools for about a year. However, she continued sporadic studies at Conservatory after she formally dropped out of the Leningrad University Dept. of Philosophy on her 3rd year. Not sure if she ever graduated from conservatory, but her 1st ex, Aleksandr Bronevitsky, graduated in 1955, (During the 80s I played piano for his band (Ensemble) "Druzhba" at nights and on several tours, when I took vacations from my day job, medical) Piekha joined the band in 1955, when Aleksandr Bronevitsky together with his brother, Eugeny Bronevisky, and their classmates formed the "Ensemble Druzhba" (aka... "Friendship") where Piekha was invited to sing some songs in French and Polish. She became and instant celebrity in the USSR after her 1955/56 New Year's Eve TV performance, then she was made the leading star of the 1957 Festival in Moscow. Her career file was kept separately from all other files on actors at the State Concert Company "Lenkonzert" in Leningrad/St. Petersburg, because she was a foreign-born suspect. Her 2nd husband, Gennady Shestakov, was a KGB colonel. Her 3rd husband, was Vladimir Polyakov (b. 1938), a political analyst who worked for president Yeltsin's administration; they met in 1992 at a private function party where she was invited to sing, they married in 1994 and divorced in 2006. She never really moved to his house in Moscow, but he visited her in St. Petersburg.[4] The last time I saw her in person was at the 1988 funeral of her 1st husband, Bronevitsky, in Leningrad. Her Russian article has a list of her best hits, mostly imitations of the 50s American twist, rock'n roll, and ballads, but softened and adapted to pass the Soviet censorship. You can use this to edit the article the way you like. Regards, Steve shelok honov 04:45, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message and corrections. This is only a tip of the hidden blpd personality[5] otherwise just an older version of P. Hltn in a different cultural setting. Steve shelok honov 07:25, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edita Pyekha

I created a redirect page Edita Pyekha erroneously. It showed up as a regular page with "1. REDIRECT Edita Piekha". I corrected the error (someone else apparently did so also) and when I save the page it shows correctly as a redirect. But following the link takes me to the original erroneous page. Please help (I have some ideas but don't want to muck things up further). Gr8white (talk) 00:16, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, it's working now - if someone fixed this, thanks. Gr8white (talk) 00:28, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Movable/Moveable

English spelling is full of irrationalities, and one of the worst (and worst explained to learners) is the spelling of "long" and "short" vowels. In our sister languages Dutch and German, the rule is quite regular: divide syllables after a vowel and before a single consonant, or between two consonants; then the vowel in a closed syllable is short, while the vowel in an open syllable is long. The "silent e" at the end of many English words therefore serves only to create a "virtual" (but before the year 1400, real) syllable; e.g., <rate> comprises two syllables <ra> and <te>, and so the <a> is "long", while <rat> is a single syllable and the <a> is "short". Therefore, rationally if not historically, all final "silent e"'s must be dropped when a suffix is added, if they neither make a syllable nor are needed to "soften" a preceding consonant. (Example of the latter is <change> + <able> yields <changeable>, but <change> + <ing> yields <changing>.) Hence, the spelling <moveable> (as well as a host of others, such as <mileage> and <microwaveable>) should be spelled without the intrusive letter <e>.

Emmylou Harris

Thanks for your work on the Emmylou Harris article. I did an extensive copyedit and rewrite several months ago, but there have been a number of large, sloppy additions since then, and I just couldn't seem to get around to going over it again. Nice job. I think there are still some problems with the Grammy years. Elite Hotel was definitely '76, not '77, for example. Unless you get to it first, I will check these one by one, but it's slow going for me since I'm on dial-up. Rivertorch (talk) 04:48, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:RentonHSLogo.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:RentonHSLogo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 21:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RUSSIA roll call and your input required

Privet. You are receiving this message as you were listed on the membership list of WP:RUSSIA at Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia/Members. Recent times has seen minimal activity within WikiProject Russia, and there is an attempt to re-invigorate the project and have it become more organised into a fully-fledge functioning project, with the aim of increasing the quality of Russia-related articles across English wikipedia.

As we don't know which listed members are active within the project and Russia-related article, all listed members are receiving this message, and are requested to re-affirm their active status on Russia-related article by re-adding their username to Wikipedia:WikiProject Russia/Members by adding:

# {{User|YOURUSERNAME}}

to the membership list. You may also like to place {{User Russian Project}} on your userpage, as this will also place you in Category:WikiProject Russia members.

There is also an active proposal on the creation of a single WP:RUSSIA project. The proposal can be viewed at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Russia#Proposal_for_overhaul_and_creation_of_a_single_WP:RUSSIA_project, and your comments and suggestions are welcomed and encouraged at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Russia/Proposal.

We all look forward to your continued support of WP:RUSSIA and any comments you may have on the proposal. --Russavia ^{Dialogue Stalk me} 04:37, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Korsakov

Hi there! So you prefer Semen over Semyon? Why is that? You should really distinguish Russian letters Е and Ё. KNewman (talk) 19:46, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see you refer to WP:RUS... Well, it contradicts itself. It says Khrushchyov should redirect to Khrushchev, but at the same time the table suggests writing Ё as YO. KNewman (talk) 19:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi again! I see your point. Well, then the problem lies in the word Semen itself :). You don't really want people to associate this gentleman's name with sperm, so maybe in this case (and in case of all Semyons for that matter) we can make an exception and write it as Semyon? What do you think? KNewman (talk) 05:50, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duwamish (tribe)

A while back (about 18 months ago) you requested a rewrite of Duwamish (tribe). It was a misery, but I think I've done a pretty fair job. I'd be very interested to know what you think of the result. - Jmabel | Talk 01:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ludmila vs. Lyudmila

I replied to your comment at Talk:Ruslan and Ludmila. — AjaxSmack 20:00, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Easter. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. I am leaving this message on the talk page of the other two participants. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 07:15, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I placed the above warning, not because you have reverted multiple times in a 24-hour period, but more to point out the danger in which you were heading. I happen to agree that in this particular context (relationship rather than title) "son" is the correct orthography, however, I don't think it's worth the energies that were being put in to it. I will have a go at re-writing the paragraph in the next few days to neutralise the POV to some degree. I know you've de-listed the page from your watchlist, would you like me to let you know so that you can review it (or even see a draft before it's posted)? Cheers, Beeswaxcandle (talk) 08:42, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Princess Oona.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Princess Oona.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:27, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Princess Oona.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Princess Oona.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 16:12, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Preciosa.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Preciosa.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:53, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Honey badger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polecat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 08:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Scarlet Sails DVD Cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scarlet Sails DVD Cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Starfire sign.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Starfire sign.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]