|
User talk:Goodnightmush/Archive 3
Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC) California Musical Theatre edit warTwo editors on California Musical Theatre refuse to edit in good faith and one is becoming harassing. The consensus (so far the only other two are myself and DionysosProteus)is that the spelling for theatre on the article should be theatRE. However User:Bhuck refuse to stop making reverts to his decided spelling. On the article Proposition 8 the member left a hidden message next to the text for California Musical Theatre; !--sic -- in California they are using the non-US spelling for the proper noun--. Also User:DionysosProteus refuses to stop adding information in the lead that goes against consensus and editing in good faith. Even after I added the exact wording to the "History" section as a compromise. He continues to accuse me falsely of vandalism. It is clearly an edit war. I know placing "Protection" on an article is a last ditch effort and is not something you do lightly.....but this may just need it now.-- This is clearly attempts by both members to push an agenda and their own POV. Amadscientist (talk) 00:53, 11 January 2009 (UTC) Crap! If you get a sec could you also take a look at the Roman forum article. It appears to be under attack be random vandals.....I mean REAL vandals. Constant reverts seem to be going on now for just over a month.--Amadscientist (talk) 01:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC) I have made formal requestsSorry for taking up space on your talk page for these situations. I discovered the proper page to request protection. I've never had to actualy request a page be protected so I didn't know thare was a place for that, but thanks!--Amadscientist (talk) 03:34, 11 January 2009 (UTC) I need a favorIf you have time and could look into this situation with the California Musical Theatre article and then get back to me with what you percieve was the actual problem. I have been spoken to in ways that would blow your hair back in other discussion previuose to this, and yet when I simply ask someone not to be an ass that is held against me as incivil when I am being accused of being a vandal. I have not been blocked but have been told i did make 4 reverts. 3 on the 11th of January and one that they say is the fourth revert on the 9th of January. No explanation has been made other than to say that was the fourth revert. I do not undertand this at all. I am not asking for you to step in just view the discussion page, the edits and reverts and the 3rr violation complaint and if you undertand what is going on......could you explain it to me? There was no discussion at all about my being accused of vandalism, there was an actual accusation that there was no consensus for me to revert to begin with when the Wikipedia policy states silence is consensus and I was not silent. So there was no consensus for Dionysis to make his change. Wiki policy also states that continuing to place information back over and over again without consensus is vandalism which is what Dionysis was doing along with calling me a vandal over and over. Even if you agree with the others I am hoping you will at least take the time to leave me a message on my talk page....which I have blanked along with my User page. My not understanding doesn't make me right, but it does cause me a great deal of stress and makes me percieve a manipulation of the system against the wikipedia policy.--Amadscientist (talk) 07:18, 12 January 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 19:26, 13 January 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:37, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC) Delivered at 04:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable) Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 21:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009From the editor — A new leaf
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 06:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC) First Edit Day
Versus22 talk 07:13, 22 February 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week. Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:11, 2 March 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:32, 9 March 2009 (UTC) Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009 — 16 March 2009
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:48, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
