User talk:Gonzo fan2007/Archive 2010

Proposed deletion of Ust-Shchugor

The article Ust-Shchugor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to verify the existence of this place. The registries of the inhabited localities of Krasnoyarsk Krai contain no entry for "Ust-Shchugor"

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 17:46, January 4, 2010 (UTC)

Addressed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 03:40, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, sorry about that prod; I should have been more thorough and careful. Anyways, I've addressed your spelling concern on the article's talk page; if you have anything to add, please do so. Thanks much!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:06, January 6, 2010 (UTC)
Don't worry about it. Just wanted to make sure the spelling was correct! Thanks. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 18:11, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article titles

I dont have a discussion link, but I know that this is how it has been done for a while now. Just ask User:Chrisjnelson or User:Pats1, I believe they are the ones who first did it this way.--Yankees10 23:19, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Brown (running back b. 1981), Chris Brown (running back b. 1987), Greg Jones (linebacker b. 1988), Greg Jones (linebacker b. 1974) are some examples of this way. But now I see that there is also Steve Smith (American football, born 1979) and Steve Smith (American football, born 1985). So maybe a new discussion should be started.--Yankees10 23:30, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Robert J. Parins

I've always seen that if someone is living, then the opening sentence says that ____ is ____. I can't find it in the official WP:MOS. Looking at Bill Clinton and George W. Bush supports your position. So I'll leave it alone. Wow, you caught the article right after I started it!

It's good to see you around here! No matter how little you are around. I hope that you are doing good. I noticed the prod on your page and saw it was clearly notable and important to the encyclopedia, so I took care of it. The state/province/region might have been wrong, which is what may have caused the confusion. Royalbroil 01:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aww, man - Packers playoff tickets! I'm sure you'll have a great time. I hope that you're able to get some great pics if you try! I got a new Canon EOS 1000D in June and it's been extraordinary! I earned some pit passes at the NASCAR Nationwide Series race at Milwaukee. It took AWESOME pictures of the cars on pit lane, especially considering I was looking toward the sunlight. I just got done adding them to articles.
I know what you mean about not letting all your hard work here go. I have to check my watchlist almost every day to make sure all of the articles that I worked on stay in decent shape. Royalbroil 03:12, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assorted Howdies

Glad to see you back, amigo, hope things are going well for you. Dayewalker (talk) 03:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks bud. Things are going well. I wouldn't say I'm "back" necessarily, but I also will probably never actually "leave"! Hope all is going well with you. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 03:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Thanks for listing my peer review nom Saw on the VG template. I was wondering if you wouldnt mind reviewing it? My first peer review way back when only got a single, vague comment and didnt help much. GroundZ3R0 002 01:14, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to when you listed my peer review nom on the VG template. And that would be great if you have the time, what background info do you need? GroundZ3R0 002 23:38, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm I just checked the edit history for the page I was referring to and it turns out it was another editor. I am not sure how I left this message to you then. I apologize for the confusion and happy edits, GroundZ3R0 002 23:58, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autoreviewer

Just so you know, I gave you the Wikipedia:Autoreviewer permission back since you resigned your adminship under no controversy. There's no reason for new page patroller to have to review any new articles that you create. Royalbroil 00:09, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I didn't even think of that. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 05:03, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship day

Happy Adminship from the Birthday Committee

Wishing Gonzo fan2007/Archive 2010 a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!

-- Vatsan34 (talk) 16:33, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:08, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]